Puppy Discovered After Months of Heartbreaking Abuse Finally Safe
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
An 11-month-old puppy who suffered brutal abuse at the hands of his owner has made a remarkable recovery after being rescued.
The dog, named Bernie, was seized by authorities after a member of the public reported seeing him being beaten "for several minutes." When the U.K.-based animal welfare charity Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) received the call, staff rushed to the scene and found the young British bulldog limping and visibly distressed.
Bernie's eyes were bloodshot, his skin was in poor condition, and a full veterinary examination revealed a shocking catalog of injuries.
"We were disgusted to see the extent of his injuries. Bernie had facial fractures, cuts and bruises around his face, and very painful muscle injuries. The police seized Bernie, and his owner signed him over to us," the RSPCA shared online.
Bernie's bloodshot eyes can be seen.
Bernie's bloodshot eyes can be seen.
RSPCA
Today, Bernie is thriving in a loving home, but his journey to recovery was long and difficult.
When he first arrived at the shelter, staff described him as "shut down" and wary of every new experience—a heartbreaking reflection of his traumatic start in life. Over time, however, he began to trust his carers and showed glimpses of the playful puppy he should have always been. Eventually, Bernie found his forever home, where he claimed a favorite spot on the sofa and rediscovered how to just be a puppy.
Sadly, Bernie's story is far from unique.
The nonprofit organization Shelter Animals Count says that about 10 million animals die from abuse each year in the United States alone, including pets, farm animals, wildlife, and animals used in testing. Around 250,000 animals annually are victims of hoarding, often kept in unsafe and unsanitary conditions. Shockingly, less than 0.01 percent of animal abuse cases are reported, making it difficult to fully understand the scale of the problem.
RSPCA Chief Inspector Ian Briggs, an expert in cruelty cases, said in a statement: "We are seeing a shocking rise in the number of seasonal calls reporting animal cruelty to our emergency line. Sadly, the summer months tend to be when these reports peak, which is leading to a welfare crisis.
"We don't know for sure why cruelty peaks at this time of year, but the surge in pet ownership during the pandemic has played a role, while the longer days mean more people may witness and report such violence," Briggs said.
From left: Bernie had bloodshot eyes and injuries; and plays now in his new home.
From left: Bernie had bloodshot eyes and injuries; and plays now in his new home.
RSPCA
A Facebook post about Bernie's rescue received over 4,000 likes and many heartfelt comments.
One user wrote: "Poor baby. The sadness in his eyes. I will never know or understand how anyone can be so cruel. Thank RSPCA for rescuing him."
Another added: "I hope his scars heal. He is at least safe and being loved right now, bless him."
Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@newsweek.com with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Posts AI Video of Obama's Arrest: 'No One Is Above Law'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated video showing former President Barack Obama's arrest on his social media platform on Sunday. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment via an email sent outside regular business hours and Obama's office via a contact form on its website. Why It Matters Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, released a report on Friday alleging that Obama and his national security Cabinet members manufactured intelligence regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election to "lay the groundwork for what was essentially a yearslong coup against President Trump." She said she would refer the officials to the Justice Department for prosecution. The announcement comes as Trump seeks to move on from the backlash he has received from his supporters over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. President-elect Donald Trump, right, speaking with former President Barack Obama at the state funeral service for former President Jimmy Carter at the Washington National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., on January 9. President-elect Donald Trump, right, speaking with former President Barack Obama at the state funeral service for former President Jimmy Carter at the Washington National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., on January 9. Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images What To Know The video, which Trump posted on Truth Social, begins with Obama saying in a campaign speech that "no one, especially the president, is above the law." The clip them shows other Democrats—including former President Joe Biden and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi—saying, "No one is above the law." Later in the video, Trump and Obama are seen sitting in the Oval Office together when FBI agents handcuff Obama as the AI-generated Trump smiles widely, with the montage set to "YMCA" by the Village People. The video ends with Obama dressed in an orange jumpsuit in a jail cell. While some Trump supporters cheered the video and called for Obama's arrest, others questioned whether it was an attempt to deflect from the Epstein case. Social media users also said the Supreme Court's 2024 ruling that former presidents had broad immunity from criminal prosecutions for official acts would protect Obama. What People Are Saying Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures: "Creating this piece of manufactured intelligence that claims that Russia had helped Donald Trump get elected contradicted every other assessment that had been made previously in the months leading up to the election that said exactly the opposite, that Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to try to 'hack the United States election for the presidency of the United States.' "So the effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people, undermining our democratic republic and enacting what would be essentially a yearslong coup against President Trump, who was duly elected by the American people." Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, dismissed Gabbard's claims, telling The New York Times: "This is one more example of the director of national intelligence trying to cook the books. We're talking about apples and oranges. The Russians were not successful at manipulating our election infrastructure, nor did we say they were." Conservative journalist Nick Sortor wrote on X: "President Trump posted an AI video of Barack Obama being ARRESTED by FBI and rotting in a prison cell. MAKE THIS A REALITY, @AGPamBondi!" MAGA influencer Gunther Eagleman wrote on X: "Don't give Obama the chance to flee to Kenya... Revoke his passport ASAP!" Political commentator Majid M. Padellan wrote on X: "SCOTUS made it impossible to arrest [Obama] when their dumb ruling gave trump immunity." What Happens Next On Sunday Morning Futures, Gabbard said it would be up to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel to "gather all of the evidence—both that we have released, the facts that have already been known previously, the information that will continue to come out—and move forward with this prosecution and these indictments."
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Your Smartwatch Could Carry a Hidden Health Risk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Smartwatch bands have been found to contain high levels of a potentially harmful chemical that researchers believe can be absorbed through the skin, raising the question of whether the popular accessory could pose a hidden public health risk. A University of Notre Dame study published the American Chemical Society at the end of 2024, found the wearable tech contained significant amounts of "forever chemicals," per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—specifically perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA). The author of the study, Graham Peaslee, a professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame, Indiana, told Newsweek that "we found that it was almost entirely PFHxA leaching out of the wristbands." "I believe the plastics industry has been using this particular PFAS in consumer products, which helps explain why it is so prevalent in the samples from this study," he added. Peaslee also indicated that a significant proportion of these chemicals in wristbands could pass through human skin under normal conditions. While traditional watch bands are made from a wide range of materials, from stainless steel to leather, smartwatch bands are typically made from more synthetic materials. Smartwatch bands have been found to contain high levels of a potentially harmful chemical, raising the question of whether the popular accessory could pose a hidden public health risk. Smartwatch bands have been found to contain high levels of a potentially harmful chemical, raising the question of whether the popular accessory could pose a hidden public health risk. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva What Is PFHxA? PFHxA, one of the thousands of compounds belonging to the PFAS family, is used widely in consumer products as well as for paper food packaging and carpets, but can be harmful to humans. It has been found to have an impact on thyroid and liver function and, given it is part of the PFAS family, is by default associated with certain cancers as PFAS chemicals are classed a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). There is, as yet, limited research directly connecting PFHxA to cancers. Despite it's possible health impacts, it is not one of the PFAS molecules currently regulated by the EPA. "Like most PFAS, the potential public health effects are still under investigation, but PFHxA is likely among the PFAS species that can accumulate in biological and environmental systems, including the human body," Christy Haynes, a professor of chemistry at the University of Minnesota, told Newsweek. Compared with other PFAS chemicals, it is thought to have a smaller impact on the human body, because it is a shorter-chain chemical that was initially planned to be used as a replacement for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), Jennifer Freeman, a professor of toxicology at Purdue University, Indiana, told Newsweek. "Shorter chain PFAS usually have less concern for bioaccumulation in the body compared to their longer chain counterparts," she said. Research is still ongoing, however, and studies have indicated PFHxA may cause similar adverse health effects to other PFAS chemicals, Freeman added. PFHxA "has been largely unstudied because it only shows up in whole blood samples for humans" unlike other PFAS chemicals, which "show up in blood sera samples," Peaslee told Newsweek. This is because it "is much harder to measure whole blood," he said. But, as a result of its "hazardous properties," the European Commission is looking to restrict the use of the chemical because of the risk to health it poses, requiring certain industries to scale back their use of PFHxA over the next five years. In the U.S. only Michigan has a maximum contaminant level for PFHxA, specific to drinking water contamination, while several other states "have advisory or notification levels, or cleanup levels in groundwater, soil or fish tissue," Phil Brown, the director of the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute at Northeastern University, told Newsweek. "We should be concerned because this is a common replacement for PFOA which has many documented health effects," Brown said. "The general scientific consensus is that PFAS chemicals share many types of biological activity and many similar health effects." What Smartwatch Producers Have Said Smartwatches are a widely worn accessory in the U.S.—with around one in five Americans wearing either a smartwatch or wearable fitness tracker, according to a Pew Research survey from 2020. Some of the major producers of smartwatches include Apple, Samsung and Google. In light of the University of Notre Dame study published last year, a Google spokesperson told Newsweek: "Pixel Watch bands meet industry standards with regard to PFAS." The spokesperson added that Google "proactively restricts" the chemicals in its products and is "committed to minimizing PFAS beyond what is required by law." Google imposes limits on a long list of different chemicals, PFHxA being one of them. "We are proactively developing long-term alternatives to eliminate PFAS where possible," the spokesperson added. Apple and Samsung have previously faced lawsuits concerned with this issue. A lawsuit was raised in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California in January against Apple, with the claimant stating Apple "misleadingly and materially omits, on all relevant marketing and advertising, that the products contain toxic PFAS." "Instead, [Apple] falsely and misleadingly markets and advertises its products" as "the ultimate device for a healthy life," the lawsuit added. At the end of 2024, a lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in the Central District of California against Samsung, with claimants, represented by the same law firm, making similar accusations—that Samsung had "misleadingly" not disclosed that its products contained PFAS, despite its advertising its product would help consumers "start your wellness journey." Both lawsuits point to the study released by the University of Notre Dame as proof the products "are toxic to consumers due to the presence of PFAS," adding that the "public was reasonably outraged, as widely reported in the press, when it was revealed that Defendant's products instead contain toxic PFAS chemicals that harm humans and the environment, and at excessive levels." A Samsung spokesperson told Newsweek: "Customer safety and satisfaction are our top priorities. We remain committed to using safe and sustainable materials, while maintaining high-quality products." Meanwhile, all materials used in Apple products, including materials with prolonged skin contact, must comply with the Apple Regulated Substances Specification—an additional specification created by the tech company that restricts certain hazardous substances in wearable devices, where consumer exposure is higher. The company adheres to this specification when "regulatory limits are in general not available or may not be sufficiently protective for prolonged skin contact." "Apple Watch bands are safe for users to wear," an Apple spokesperson told Newsweek. "In addition to our own testing, we also work with independent laboratories to conduct rigorous testing and analysis of the materials used in our products, including Apple Watch bands," they said. Newsweek also contacted Huawei, another global producer of smartwatches, via email for comment. A file photo shows various models of the Apple Watch Series 10 on display at the Apple Store on 5th Avenue in Manhattan. A file photo shows various models of the Apple Watch Series 10 on display at the Apple Store on 5th Avenue in Manhattan. Sven Hoppe/dpa via AP Are Experts Concerned? Although there are concerns over whether PFHxA can be absorbed through the skin there is currently limited research to determine whether this is the case, and, if so, how much of the chemical can be absorbed via this route. "The skin provides a great barrier for chemical absorption but is also recognized as one of the major routes of absorption," Freeman said. "Some chemicals, depending on their chemical properties, can permeate the skin with the potential to enter the bloodstream and be distributed throughout the body." "There are a small number of studies suggesting uptake of PFAS through skin is possible and the concentrations of PFHxA reported in the study are quite high," Christina Remucal, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, told Newsweek. "It's also important to take into account that when people wear a watch, it's for most of their waking hours, so that is a lot of exposure," Brown said, advising consumers to opt for silicone-based bands instead. However, Remucal added that "there is still a lot we don't know about uptake through skin compared to other pathways like drinking contaminated water." Additionally, the way these samples were extracted "may not translate directly into human exposure," she said. "More work needs to be done to better understand how PFAS in watch bands ultimately end up in our bodies," she said. "This study suggests looking at this potential pathway is important." While data is "insufficient to conclude if wearing a smartwatch band containing PFHxA will be a significant concern as a PFHxA exposure source," Freeman recommended consumers err on the side of caution, and consider using a PFAS-free or silicone band in the meantime. While caution and alternatives are advised, Haynes also told Newsweek there was no need for consumers to panic about the study. "I am not worried about PFHxA exposure from the wristband of a smartwatch," she said. She said that the chemical was likely incorporated "within a polymerized matrix and, thus, quite unlikely to leach from the band unless it is severely degraded by harsh conditions." While there is some evidence that liberated PFHxA can be absorbed through skin, she said, "ingestion and inhalation of PFHxA are more significant routes for exposure and accumulation." "If I had this smartwatch and the wristband was damaged, I would replace it, but I wouldn't think about it much beyond that," Haynes said. That said, "In a world where I think we should only use PFAS in critical applications where there aren't other options, such as medical devices, I think companies should be working on an alternate formulation for the wristband," she added. Reference Alyssa Wicks, Heather D. Whitehead, Graham F. Peaslee (2024) Presence of Perfluorohexanoic Acid in Fluoroelastomer Watch Bands, American Chemical Society Environmental Science & Technology Letters Vol 12/Issue 1.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Calls for Senator To Be Jailed: 'Big Trouble'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has escalated his attacks on Senator Adam Schiff, calling for the Democrat to go to prison for alleged mortgage fraud. In a Truth Social post on Sunday night, the president accused Schiff of falsifying loan documents, saying the senator was in "BIG TROUBLE" and should "pay the price of prison." Newsweek contacted Schiff for comment via contact form on his website on Monday. Why It Matters Trump and Schiff have had an adversarial relationship since the former's first presidency, and Schiff has remained a fierce critic of the president. While serving in the House of Representatives, Schiff took a leading role in inquiries into Russian interference in the 2016 election. He also played a key role in the president's first impeachment in 2019. Trump's call for Schiff to be imprisoned reflects a broader pattern of the president using his power and influence to target his political opponents, particularly those involved in past investigations against him. A composite image of President Donald Trump, left, departing the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 15 and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff of California at the U.S. Capitol on December 10, 2024. A composite image of President Donald Trump, left, departing the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 15 and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff of California at the U.S. Capitol on December 10, 2024. Anna Moneymaker/What To Know Trump ramped up his attacks on Schiff last week, alleging in a Truth Social post on July 15 that the Democrat had engaged in a "sustained pattern of possible Mortgage Fraud," which the president said had been uncovered by the Financial Crimes Division of the Federal National Mortgage Association, also known as Fannie Mae. The president accused Schiff of improperly declaring a house he owned in Maryland as his primary residence to get a lower mortgage rate. A spokesperson for Schiff told the Los Angeles Times that the senator followed legal advice and was transparent about living between his two homes, one in his home state of California and the other near where he works in Washington, D.C. A Fannie Mae memo reviewed by the outlet did not accuse Schiff of mortgage fraud or of any crimes, but it noted "a sustained pattern of possible occupancy misrepresentation" regarding which home he and his wife listed as their primary residence on mortgage documents. In a post on X, Schiff described Trump's accusations as a "baseless attempt at political retribution." He added in another post, "And much as Trump may hope, this smear will not distract from his Epstein files problem." The president has faced mounting criticism over his administration's failure to release records about child sex abuse linked to the late financier and former Trump acquaintance Jeffrey Epstein. In his Sunday Truth Social post, Trump also said Schiff had falsely accused his son Donald Trump Jr. of criminal activity during the Russia investigation, adding that Schiff should "pay the price of prison for a real crime, not one made up by the corrupt accusers." What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday: "Adam 'Shifty' Schiff is in BIG TROUBLE! He falsified Loan Documents. He once said my son would go to prison on a SCAM that Schiff, along with other Crooked Dems, illegally 'manufactured' in order to stage an actual coup. My son did nothing wrong, knew nothing about the fictional story. It was an American Tragedy! Now Shifty should pay the price of prison for a real crime, not one made up by the corrupt accusers!" Senator Adam Schiff wrote on X on July 15: "Since I led his first impeachment, Trump has repeatedly called for me to be arrested for treason. So in a way, I guess this is a bit of a letdown. And this baseless attempt at political retribution won't stop me from holding him accountable." What Happens Next Schiff has not been formally charged with any wrongdoing, and experts say it seems unlikely that Trump's calls for prosecution will lead to formal legal action.
