EXCLUSIVE Anything but Maggie! Private emails reveal how Starmer ordered removal of Thatcher's portrait from No10 study - as Reeves set all-woman rule for art in No11 snubbing Gladstone and Disraeli
The PM previously said the image of the Tory doyenne was taken down because he does not like 'pictures of people staring down at me'.
But correspondence with the Government Art Collection, obtained by MailOnline under freedom of information rules, suggest he less worried about what went in place of the painting than it being moved 'as soon as possible'.
Meanwhile, separate exchanges with Rachel Reeves ' team have revealed her determination that all the art in the Treasury would be either of women or created by women.
Incoming ministers are entitled to use any of the 15,000 art works that make up the Government Art Collection to decorate their offices in any way they see fit.
Priority on choices is given based on seniority, with the displays regarded as a way to project British soft power during official visits.
The painting of Baroness Thatcher, by Richard Stone, was originally installed by Gordon Brown despite complaints from left-wingers.
GAC officials offered to come to see the PM and 'present some options and talk through the artwork'
Depicting Lady Thatcher just after the Falklands War in 1982, the reputed £100,000 cost was covered by an anonymous donor. The work was placed in her former No10 study, unofficially tagged the Thatcher Room.
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport initially rejected the FOI request as 'vexatious' before relenting and supplying emails covering two months after the general election. However, personal details of junior staff and material 'out of scope' has been redacted.
A message from the facilities manager at No10 to the GAC on August 5 - as the country was being wracked by summer riots - said: 'I've been asked to have the Thatcher painting in the Study swapped out for anything else! Any suggestions as to what we could replace it with and how soon?!?!'
Red Ellen: The flame-haired Communist who became a Labour minister
Ellen Wilkinson, whose picture Rachel Reeves requested for the wall of her office, was a founder member of the Communist Party of Great Britain who went on to become a minister under Winston Churchill and Clement Attlee.
Born in Manchester in 1891 to a working class family she went to university and became a suffragist and socialist activist at a young age, travelling to Russia after the resolution and meeting Leon Trotsky and Lenin's wife.
She became known as 'Red Ellen', a nod to both her hair and her socialist politics.
She went on to have a leading role in the Jarrow Crusade, the 1936 march from Tyne and Wear to London to protest against high unemployment.
She served as MP for Middlesbrough East from 1924 to 1931, as one of the first female members of parliament. During this time she supported the 1926 General Strike.
She was elected MP for Jarrow in 1937 and held the seat until her death in 1947, aged 55.
Despite her socialist politics she served in the wartime coalition government at the Ministry of Home security.
After the war, despite being involved in attempts to remove Clement Attlee as Labour leader, she was made education secretary.
Wilkinson featured in Reeves' 2019 book, Women of Westminster: The MPs Who Changed Politics.
The now Chancellor wrote: 'When Ellen Wilkinson was elected, she decided to defy convention by entering the Smoking Room. She was stopped at the door by a policeman who informed her that ladies did not usually enter.
'''I am not a lady,'' she responded curtly. ''I am a Member of Parliament,'' as she pushed the door open. These acts of defiance, determination and courage brought about a sea change in the cosy male club that had previously existed.'
The official followed up the message the next morning, saying they had received an out of office response and is there 'someone else that can help'.
'It is a PM request and he is keen to get something else in to replace that painting sooner rather than later,' they added.
A GAC staffer replied asking for a 'steer on the PM's art preference'.
After one of their colleagues weighed in to point out that the Thatcher portrait was not a GAC piece, the No10 aide wrote back: 'Exactly. Not sure where we will place the Thatcher painting. I just know we need to replace it with another piece and preferably a GAC piece as soon as possible.'
Last September, Sir Keir told the BBC his decision to take down the picture was 'not actually about Margaret Thatcher at all'.
'I use the study for quietly reading most afternoons... where there is a difficult paper,' he said.
'This is not actually about Margaret Thatcher at all. I don't like images and pictures of people staring down at me.
'I've found it all my life. When I was a lawyer I used to have pictures of judges. I don't like it. I like landscapes.
'This is my study, it is my private place where I got to work. I didn't want a picture of anyone.'
The Thatcher portrait has reportedly since been hung in a first-floor meeting room.
Downing Street sources denied that Sir Keir's words clashed with the content of the emails.
Tory MP Stuart Andrew, the shadow culture secretary, told MailOnline: 'Instead of focusing on the real issues that affect the lives of the British people, Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves wasted precious time in office on petty, divisive actions like tearing down portraits of Conservative women who made Britain better.
'Starmer's leadership is unravelling before our eyes, and if he doesn't get a grip soon, the damage to Britain will be irreversible.
'This Government needs to stop playing politics with history and start delivering real results for British people.'
Fellow Tory MP Mark Francois, a shadow defence minister, said: 'Given all his travails over winter fuel payments and then benefit cuts, you might think having a portrait of a strong and decisive PM, like Mrs Thatcher, in his office would be a good omen - but apparently not.
'Unlike her, it seems Sir Keir was for turning, over his choice of art - along with just about everything else.'
At the end of July GAC officials proposed a rehang of 11 Downing Street that included 'an emphasis' on 'notable women artists and sitters'.
But it did propose hanging some works by and of men, including King James II.
An aide to Ms Reeves replied: 'On No11 as a whole, and feeding into the proposed rehang of the State Room, Rachel would like the paintings all to be of women or by women.
'That would reinforce Rachel's message to the Treasury as the first female Chancellor, it would be significant (has it been done before in Downing Street or an equivalent Government building?) and it could amplify GAC's work celebrating the Representation of the People Act Centenary.
'This would be difference to the proposed rehang, although clearly some elements could still work.
'On portraits, it would point to having female portraits.'
The message added: 'On the Chancellor's study, there is quite a lot of interest in Rachel's choice of the person to put behind the desk.
'Please treat in confidence and not yet final, but Rachel would like a picture of Ellen Wilkinson here.... Elsewhere in the room, she would also like a picture of Emeline Pankhurst if possible.'
'More generally, Rachel welcomed Eliza's suggestion that it would be possible to lift the feel of the room and (would) welcome suggestions on abstracts, landscape or still life paintings by women.
'In line with the theme above, this would mean moving the picture of Gladstone and the busts of Gladstone and Disraeli.'
Jewish Conservative peer Disraeli served as Chancellor several times and headed British imperial policy as Prime Minister twice.
There have long been attacks on Liberal PM Gladstone over his family's involvement in slavery - with calls for statues to be removed and civic buildings renamed.
The emails also laid out what Ms Reeves wanted in her No10 flat, requesting pictures that would link to her Leeds constituency.
However, the Chancellor seemed less keen on an unspecified work by Anthony Gormley and Double Deathshead by the Chapman brothers.
In September last year, Ms Reeves told an all-female reception at No 11: 'This is King James behind me, but next week the artwork in this room is going to change.
'Every picture in this room is either going to be of a woman or by a woman - and we're also going to have a statue in this room of (suffragist) Millicent Fawcett, who did so much for the rights of women.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Dame Stella Rimington obituary
Stella Rimington, who has died aged 90, was the first head of the Security Service, commonly known as MI5, to be officially identified. She was also the first woman to head the agency, one that had been deeply infused with male culture. Asked what attracted her to MI5, she told me: 'Even though there were all of these tweedy guys with pipes, I still thought the essence of the cold war and spies and stuff was fun. You know, going around listening to people's telephones and opening their mail and stuff.' Rising to the top of MI5 after heading the agency's counter-subversion, counter-espionage, and counter-terrorism divisions was an achievement consolidating her reputation as a formidable Whitehall streetfighter, manifested not least by her success in wrenching from the police Special Branch its historical lead role countering Irish Republican terrorism in mainland Britain. Soon after she retired, she was embroiled in a furious row with her former Whitehall colleagues over her decision to write her memoirs. 'It was quite upsetting,' she said, 'because suddenly you go from being an insider to being an outsider and that's quite a shock.' But, she added: 'I've never been one to retreat at the first whiff of gunshot.' Her most controversial role as she rose up the ranks of MI5 was responsibility for countering 'subversion'. She was active during the miners' strike during the mid-1980s, and justified spying on the leadership of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) on the grounds that Margaret Thatcher regarded it as 'the enemy within'. She said: 'If the strike is led by people who say they are trying to bring down the government, our role [is] to assess [them].' She chose her words carefully in an interview with the Guardian, denying that MI5 itself ran agents in the NUM, adding: 'That's not to say the police or police Special Branch … might have been doing some of those things …' The Special Branch reported to MI5 while GCHQ was providing MI5 and the police with technical help for bugging operations. Rimington also justified targeting and keeping files on civil liberty campaigners, protest groups and MPs, on the grounds that while not all their members were regarded as subversives, some of their contacts, colleagues, and friends were. Targets included the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament – one of its organisers had been a member of the Communist party – the National Council for Civil Liberties (now Liberty) and two of its senior officials, Patricia Hewitt and Harriet Harman, and Jack Straw, former president of the National Union of Students. All became Labour cabinet ministers. Rimington admitted MI5 checked files on prospective MPs to see if 'there is anything in there of importance ... so the prime minister can take it into account when he forms his government'. She insisted that individuals on whom MI5 had files should not be allowed to see them. She later acknowledged that during the cold war MI5 was 'overenthusiastic', opening files on people who were not 'actively threatening the state'. She also went as far as to accuse successive governments of wanting to 'live in a police state', introducing more and more anti-terrorism laws, including plans to hold terror suspects for 42 hours without charge. Such laws, she said, combined with 'war on terror' rhetoric, played into the hands of those they intended to deter. She described the response to the 9/11 attacks on the US in 2001 as a 'huge overreaction'. Looking back, she said: 'I suppose I'd lived with terrorist events for a good part of my working life and this was, as far as I was concerned, another one.' Asked what impact the 2003 invasion of Iraq had on the terrorist threat, she replied: 'Well, I think all one can do is look at what those people who've been arrested or have left suicide videos say about their motivation. And most of them, as far as I'm aware, say that the war in Iraq played a significant part in persuading them that this is the right course of action to take.' She was born Stella Whitehouse in south London; her father was a draughtsman, her mother a midwife and nurse. Her father had fought at Passchendaele in the first world war. 'He was never able to relax after that, a very uneasy soul, difficult to get close to,' she recalled. He worked in the steel industry in Barrow and then in the Derbyshire-Nottinghamshire borders. 'Unfortunately, when we moved out of London, we always seemed to move to places that were priorities for German bombing,' she said, describing her childhood as 'disturbed and frightening … I was four when we left London as the second world war broke out … as the Barrow blitz commenced: hiding under the stairs, windows were blown out and ceilings fell down … Claustrophobia plagued me into adulthood. I struggled to sit in the middle of rows and always stood by the door on the underground. At all times I needed an exit route.' Educated at Nottingham high school, Stella studied English at Edinburgh University, then archive administration at Liverpool University. Her first job was as an assistant archivist in Worcestershire county council's record office. In 1963 she married John Rimington, her childhood boyfriend, who became a high-flying civil servant, and was posted to the British high commission in Delhi responsible for economic and trade relations with India. It was there that, in 1965, she 'fell into intelligence', as she later put it. She was approached by the resident MI5 officer who offered her a job as a typist. 'I was holding coffee mornings and the like … I was grateful for an end to the boredom,' she said. She joined the staff of MI5 in 1969 after the couple returned to Britain. In a colourful passage in her autobiography, to which she gave the provocative title Open Secret, she recounts how she came up against what she described as a 'strict sex-discrimination policy' in MI5. She wrote: 'It did not matter that I had a degree, that I had already worked for several years in the public service, at a higher grade than it was offering, or that I was 34 years old. The policy was that men were recruited as what were called 'officers' and women had their own career structure, a second-class career, as 'assistant officers'. 'They did all sorts of support work, but not the sharp-end intelligence gathering operations.' She vigorously challenged MI5's prevailing culture so successfully that John Major, the then prime minister, approved her appointment as director general – head of the agency – in 1992. After she retired in 1996, she became the target of bitter attacks by Whitehall mandarins and the SAS for daring to write her autobiography. In a ferocious diatribe, David Lyon, colonel commandant of the SAS, wrote in a letter to the Times: 'All members of the country's security forces should keep silent about their work, for life. When there is a requirement to publish, it is the government alone who should do so.' Rimington, he added, could expect 'a long period of being persona non grata, both to many she has worked with and many she has yet to meet among the general public'. She said she received a 'bollocking' from the cabinet secretary, Richard Wilson, and was told to remove any reference to the SAS despite widespread media coverage of their operations, including the well-documented killing of three unarmed members of the IRA in Gibraltar. In an attempt to sabotage her memoir, a copy of the manuscript was leaked to the Sun newspaper. The woman who had spent years deploying the secret state described the process of vetting her memoir as 'Kafkaesque', an experience that, she said, led her to understand 'how persecuted you can feel when things are going on that you don't actually have any control over'. Rimington said she decided to write her memoir to explain to her daughters, Sophie and Harriet, why she was never around as a mother. She separated from her husband when the children were young, but divorce 'seemed a faff' as she put it. They became friendly in old age and lived together during lockdown. 'It's a good recipe for marriage,' she said looking back. 'Split up, live separately, and return to it later.' After completing her memoir she turned to fiction, writing thrillers starring Liz Carlyle, a female agent sometimes referred to as her alter ego, and later Manon Tyler, a CIA agent. In 2011 she chaired the Booker prize panel, when she provoked a controversy by saying 'readability' and an ability to 'zip along' were important criteria for judging books. Literary critics suggested other things such as quality might be taken into account, adding that the shortlist was the worst in decades. Rimington responded by comparing the publishing world with the KGB and its use of 'black propaganda, destabilisation operations, plots and double agents'. Rimington was made Dame Commander of the Order of the Bath in 1996. After she retired she held a number of corporate posts including a directorship of Marks & Spencer, and was chair of the Institute of Cancer Research. She was widely credited as the inspiration for Dame Judi Dench's M in the James Bond films. She is survived by her husband and two daughters. Stella Rimington, intelligence officer, born 13 May 1935; died 3 August 2025
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Farage calls on police to share immigration status of charged suspects
Nigel Farage has called on the police to release the immigration status of suspects charged with crimes following the arrest of two men in connection with the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Reform UK party leader said he "absolutely" thinks such details should be released when asked about the matter at a news conference on has been reported that the two men charged in connection with the alleged rape in Nuneaton last month are Afghan nationals but the police have not confirmed this. Warwickshire Police said once someone is charged with an offence, the force follows national guidance that does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status. The authorised professional practice followed by forces across the country, and cited by the College of Policing, says the told the BBC there was some concern among police that disclosing the immigration status could lead to disorder in the area but that officers "went by the book" when releasing by a reporter at the news conference in Westminster whether police should release the names, addresses and immigration statuses of suspects after they have been charged with a crime, Farage said: "What caused unrest on our streets after Southport last year was us not being told the status of the attacker."That led to crazy conspiracy theories spreading online."Last year's deadly attack in Southport, in which three young girls were murdered, led to the spreading of a false claim online that the attacker was a Muslim asylum a perceived lack of information from police about Nuneaton to what happened in Southport last July, Farage continued: "To have masses of speculation as to what might have happened makes things I think far worse than they otherwise would be".Asked to clarify his thoughts further on whether he thought police forces should be obliged to publish such details, he said: "Yes, I absolutely think that they should."Later in the news conference, Farage called the police's decision not to release details about the alleged Nuneaton attackers a "cover-up that in many ways is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings last year.""It is not... in any way at all a contempt of court for the British public to know the identity of those who allegedly have committed serious crimes," he added."I felt that in the wake of the Southport attacks, and I feel that ever more strongly today." Ahmad Mulakhil has been charged with two counts of rape, while Mohammad Kabir has been accused of kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting the rape of a girl aged under Mulakhil, 23, appeared before magistrates in Coventry on 28 July, while Mr Kabir, also 23, appeared in court on were remanded in of Warwickshire County Council George Finch told the same news conference on Monday morning that he was "begging" for information to be released following the who at 19 became the youngest council leader in the UK and represents Reform UK, said he had contacted the chief executive of the council, Monica Fogarty, saying he wished to speak to Warwickshire Police "to urge" them to release the immigration status about the first man charged."I was begging for this to be released, screaming, phoning, asking [for the information] to be released", he the charging of the second suspect, Finch said he wrote a letter addressed to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Warwickshire Police's Chief Constable Alex Franklin-Smith calling for the immediate release of the two suspects' published the letter on his social media accounts on Sunday, in which he said Ms Fogarty had told him that Mr Kabir was an asylum seeker living in a house of multiple occupancy (HMO). Speaking on Monday, Finch said he would be working to "fight against" houses of multiple occupancy that "have been put up to house illegal immigrants".He also claimed Reform UK needed to "change things" and are "the last line of defence against the blob, the cover-ups of the councils".When asked if police should release the ethnicity of people charged with offences, the prime minister's official spokesman said the police and courts were operationally independent but the principle was to be "as transparent as possible"."We've always said and continue to say that transparency is important," he said."That is our position. For police up to central government, we should always be as transparent as possible when it comes to cases."He added: "This is clearly a deeply upsetting and distressing case which the public are right to feel shocked and angry about."In relation to this case, the individuals have been charged and we are now in a live investigation."In a statement, Warwickshire Police and Crime Commissioner Philip Seccombe said: "It is essential to state that policing decisions - such as whether to release details about a suspect - must follow national guidance and legal requirements."He added that he would not speculate on the personal circumstances of those involved while court proceedings were BBC has contacted Warwickshire County Council for comment.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Does Whitehall really have nothing better to do than spend our money on ‘trans listening circles'?
It's possible they'll be too busy attending events like the 'Invisible Women' presentation that took place there at 10.30am on a weekday, according to those Freedom of Information documents. (And I'm curious to know which particular brand of rubbish was being peddled here? Also, was it hosted by invisible women, attended by these ghostly apparitions – or both?). Then, with that unmissable 'Race equality allyship working group catch-up' at 4pm, you could see how it might be hard to get much work done in between. 'Allyship'. That's some premium-level balderdash we're subsidising. It's just as well there's no direct nuclear threat from Vladimir Putin or indeed a pressing issue with soaring energy bills in the UK, because over at the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, employees may have been too immersed in a 'listening circle for trans colleagues and allies' at 11am on May 7 to be thinking about, you know, energy cost and security. They'll get around to reviewing the key defence infrastructure around our undersea gas pipelines once they've completed their more important work: promoting understanding, empathy and inclusivity in the workplace. While we're on inclusivity (and when are we not?), anyone wondering why the Department for Transport took so long to produce its recent evaluation of HS1 may have their answer. With their nine-to-fives as jam-packed with LGBT events as they appear to be, it's astonishing the department managed to publish the report at all. And should we really be expecting them to get stuck down in the weeds with the UK's only operational purpose-built high-speed line, when they could be having 'conversations on lesbian identity'? Is it not, similarly, asking a little too much of the Department for Education to prioritise issues such as persistent teacher shortages, funding gaps and rising pupil absenteeism over yet more 'sapphic sounds' events? Someone needs to explain the overwhelming need for musical sapphism in Whitehall's day-to-day life. I think I speak for all of us when I say: I'm confused. Elliot Keck, head of campaigns at the TaxPayers' Alliance, is not amused: 'Taxpayers are sick of seeing staff time wasted on pointless meetings and irrelevant events, none of which benefits the Britons paying for them.' It's hard to remember a time when the government was faced with more crises than it is today, and in almost every policy area, Keck points out, 'with illegal immigration skyrocketing, energy bills through the roof and the economy in the doldrums. 'Yet pusillanimous pen pushers are devoting huge amounts of their time to ignoring these issues and focusing on their own pet projects. Ministers need to take on The Blob and demand an unconditional end to events and meetings during working hours.' The Blob is currently away from its desk celebrating 'Pansexual Visibility Day'. But it will get back to ministers in due course.
