
German politicians furious at von der Leyen over new EU-US trade deal
The deal, struck under pressure from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz both in public and behind the scenes to avoid threatened 30% punitive tariffs, triggered unprecedented cross-party criticism in Germany, where lawmakers described the arrangement as a "capitulation" and "betrayal of Europe".
Merz himself initially appeared satisfied. "With the agreement, we have succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard," the German chancellor said on Sunday.
By Monday evening, however, Merz suddenly had a change of heart, expressing strong reservations. The agreed tariffs were now a "considerable burden" for the German economy, in the eyes of Merz.
Under the agreement announced Sunday, EU products face 15% US tariffs while American goods enter Europe levy-free. For the EU, the US tariff rate for steel and aluminium imports will remain at 50%.
The EU also committed to purchasing $750 billion in US energy and pledged $600 billion in European corporate investments in America.
The deal led to an unprecedented wave of shock and outrage across all camps of German politics. Now, for the first time in a long time, all German parties are criticising the move.
"Due to pressure from the German chancellor, the EU has agreed to a deal that abandons fundamental principles of rules-based global trade. Instead of long-term stability, the agreement creates uncertainty," Sandra Detzer from the Greens said, slamming the deal at the Bundestag.
In fact, this agreement hits Germany particularly hard. According to the Institute for Economic Research (IfW), the deal will cost the German economy around €6.5 billion in terms of its GDP in the first year.
"This is an inadequate compromise and sends a fatal signal to the closely interlinked economies on both sides of the Atlantic," warned Wolfgang Niedermark from the Federation of German Industries (BDI).
A rate of 15% is set to have immense adverse effects, and the lack of an agreement for steel exports was an "additional low blow", he pointed out.
'Von der Leyen should resign for this worst deal ever'
German EU politician Fabio De Masi (BSW) is also shocked.
"This bad deal will do immense economic damage to Europe - it is a betrayal of Europe. Mrs von der Leyen should resign for this worst deal ever," he told Euronews.
"While the US is to export duty-free to the EU, EU exporters will be subject to a 15% tariff. In addition, European companies are to make direct investments worth hundreds of billions of US dollars."
"So Trump is hitting us with new punitive tariffs and, as business, we are filling his order books with purchases of dirty US fracking gas and defence equipment."
EU politician Svenja Hahn (FDP) concurs. "15% tariffs are better than the threatened 30 - but the deal is not a success. At best, it is damage control," she told Euronews.
The deal struck on Sunday represents "unbalanced to the detriment of the EU, contains no substantial successes" and weakens "rules-based trade".
"Ursula von der Leyen has damaged the EU's reputation and economic strength with her weak conduct of negotiations, she must finally deliver: less bureaucracy, a strong internal market and real progress on free trade agreements, especially Mercosur," Hahn explained.
German-Polish MEP Tomasz Froelich (AfD) told Euronews that the agreement reached is "not a deal", but "a capitulation of the EU", as there had been no serious attempt to exert pressure on the US, according to him.
"This declaration of bankruptcy stands in stark contrast to the EU's otherwise grandiloquent behaviour on the international stage: confrontation in all directions, leaving hardly any options, especially in the area of energy imports," he explained.
"I will work in the EU Parliament to ensure that this humiliating and ruinous agreement is prevented after all," Froelich, who serves as the first deputy head of the AfD delegation at the European Parliament, added.
Governing parties lob criticism too
Ruling CDU/CSU lawmaker Johannes Winkel stepped up to the plate.
"This humiliation of Europe by the US must above all be a reason for self-criticism," Winkel warned on X.
"Energy saving, bureaucracy, ESG instead of innovation, growth and technology. This politically motivated economic self-deprecation must end."
Others representing the coalition partner SPD also dared to come forward with particularly harsh criticism.
Bremen's mayor, Andreas Bovenschulte said on X: "The worst thing is how our EU leader is allowing herself to be humiliated into licking Trump's boots and flattering him as a 'tough - even fair - dealmaker'. Not a spark of honour in her body."
The SPD politician later walked back on a part of his statement. "I take back the honour thing. That was a bit harsh," he said.
In his hometown of Bremen, thousands of jobs at the ArcelorMittal steel plant are in jeopardy.
Bavaria's Minister President Markus Söder (CSU) was honest and made it clear on Monday: things cannot go on like this.
"The customs deal has prevented the worst," Söder said, "but the situation is now more difficult than before, especially for the automotive industry."
"That's why it must be clear: There must be no additional taxes in Europe, as the EU is currently planning."
Relief would now be needed to offset the tariffs. Söder criticised von der Leyen: "We simply need to do less of a Green Deal in Europe and more of an Economic Deal."
Economic expert and longstanding German MEP Markus Ferber (CSU) also made it clear to the Bild newspaper: "If you consider that our offer was the complete elimination of all tariffs, then the deal is not a great success."
"Fifteen per cent makes European products massively more expensive in the US and will hit the German economy particularly hard. Even if a non-agreement would have been even more expensive, a good deal looks different."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Switzerland's US tariff blow threatens its go-it-alone approach
The two-minute video isn't subtle. Wielding a medieval halberd, the president of the conservative Swiss People's Party lays out the choice Switzerland faces: a simpler life that the country's founders spelled out in a one-page declaration more than 700 years ago or a 2,000 page treaty with the European Union. It's a choice between 'freedom and serfdom,' Marcel Dettling says before tossing the treaty documents onto a bonfire. The trouble for Dettling and Switzerland's other EU naysayers is that the alternative vision of a nimble nation trading freely with the rest of the world isn't looking so good anymore. On the day the video was released — Aug. 1, Switzerland's national day — the White House delivered a bombshell by announcing the country would face tariffs of 39% on all exports to the US, among the highest anywhere in the world. President Karin Keller-Sutter is traveling to Washington on Tuesday as she and her colleagues race to get Donald Trump to reconsider. They don't have much time, with the levies due to kick in on Thursday. Helene Budliger-Artieda, one of the chief negotiators for Switzerland, held a phone call with business representatives on Monday. She told them that Switzerland's main goal is to get the overall tariff number down, but didn't reveal any potential concessions it might make, according to people briefed on the call. Budliger also received a clear message from businesses: there's no substitute for the US market. While the Swiss try to figure out how to deal with Trump and the US, the episode has cast a new light on the country's relationship with the EU. That's long been a divisive issue, with arguments about trade and economic benefits clashing with concern about immigration and sovereignty. For the pro-EU voices, the chaotic back and forth with the US will give them fresh reason to push the benefits of ties with the bloc, particularly as it secured a far better 15% rate. 'This will undoubtedly strengthen the camp of those who argue that Switzerland needs to move closer to the EU,' said Rene Schwok, a professor of political science at the University of Geneva. 'Their argument is that the EU is a much more reliable partner than the US and China.' Keller-Sutter and her officials had expressed confidence right up until late last week that they'd secured a far better deal with the US. But it all fell apart at the end during a phone call with Trump. Critics say she didn't have anything to offer and came unprepared to the negotiation table. The US president sees his country's 39 billion dollar trade deficit with Switzerland as tantamount to theft, and didn't appreciate being told otherwise by Keller-Sutter. 'I don't believe that the US is a reliable partner under this presidency,' Andri Silberschmidt, a Liberal lawmaker and member of Keller-Sutter's party, told Bloomberg. 'As a small nation, we are dependent on reliable partners who abide by agreements.' Switzerland is in the midst of a separate debate on an agreement with the EU that it hammered out late last year and is due to go to a national vote. In a survey – conducted before Trump's self-declared Liberation Day announcement on tariffs — 47% of Swiss respondents were in favour, while 35% were against it. To be sure, Switzerland's low unemployment, low inflation economy is robust enough that it could withstand the 39% tariff hit. If pharmaceutical exports were included at the unchanged rate, this would translate to a hit of at least 0.7-percentage point hit to the economy, according to Hans Gersbach at KOF economic research institute in Zurich. If drug exports were excluded, the hit would be between 0.3 and 0.6 percentage points. That would be a harsh blow but not enough to tip the economy into recession. Still, that would jeopardise 'tens of thousands of jobs' in key manufacturing industries, said Stefan Brupbacher, director of trade group Swissmem. However Keller-Sutter's last-minute bid in Washington works out, the lesson for Switzerland is that it needs to realise it's not in the same league as the US, China or the EU but a small player. This may push the Swiss to reconsider the advantages of 'splendid isolation,' Kirkegaard said. 'When the elephants are dancing, the mice get trampled and that's a little bit of what's happened here.'


Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Hugo Boss to raise prices globally amid rising US tariffs
German fashion house Hugo Boss AG plans to raise prices globally, partly to cushion the impact from higher US tariffs. The company will introduce moderate price adjustments with the upcoming Spring 2026 collections, chief financial officer Yves Müller said on a conference call Tuesday. China, where Hugo Boss faces particularly subdued demand, is excluded from the hikes. 'I think we have been very humble,' Müller said, citing 'very moderate' price action over the last four to five years. 'We are really focusing on a very good price-value proposition.' The move follows price hikes in the US by other companies, including Hermès International SCA, Adidas AG, and Nike Inc. Overall, Hugo Boss's US exposure is lower than many rivals, Müller said, with the country accounting for about 15% of annual sales. About half of its US products are sourced from Europe, particularly Turkey, for which US President Trump announced a 15% levy on imports, while less than 5% come from China. Hugo Boss shares rose 0.4% at 1:15 pm in Frankfurt after posting better-than-expected earnings in the second quarter and confirming its full-year guidance. Chief Executive Officer Daniel Grieder, who has repositioned Hugo Boss for a younger audience, is seeking to reignite growth with strict cost control. His revamp plans faced some setbacks last year as consumer spending weakened in key markets. 'Quite clearly, Boss's overachievement on cost discipline is becoming a material defensive boost at a time of heightened tariff/macro uncertainty,' Jefferies analysts including Frederick Wild said in a note.


Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Zalando's Q2 GMV and revenue rise, e-tailer ups guidance after About You buy
That was helped by continued investment in customer experience and it expects this week's launch of its AI-driven discovery feed that it says will 'deliver even more personalised inspiration and boost organic customer engagement' to help it further in Q3. B2C growth in the second quarter was also supported by strong progress in its two other growth pillars, which are 'differentiation through quality and lifestyle expansion'. Its upgraded loyalty programme reached more than 10 million customers at the end of the quarter as it rolled out to more markets. It also delivered 'over proportional growth' in its Lounge, Designer, and Beauty propositions, 'making progress on building out more areas that address more lifestyle needs of customers, thus enabling Zalando to capture a higher share of customers' wallets'. Meanwhile Business-to-Business (B2B) maintained 'strong momentum, driven by double-digit growth in ZEOS Fulfilment'. The launch of a new Shopify application that connects Shopify merchants directly to the ZEOS platform was also key. B2B revenues increased 12.2% to €262 million. Adjusted EBIT was €11 million, with the margin increasing by 1.3 percentage points to 4.3%. And there's plenty of potential for this to rise. UK retailer Next is now leveraging Zalando's fulfilment infrastructure for its largest mainland Europe market, Germany, after already using ZFS for the majority of its Zalando-based business. In the second half, it will expand the collaboration to include its own webshop and additional European marketplace business. Finally, following the About You acquisition in July, the company has issued its first full-year 2025 guidance for the combined group. It expects annual GMV of €17.2 billion-€17.6 billion, revenue of €12.1 billion-€12.4 billion, and adjusted EBIT of €550 million-€600 million. Forecast GMV volumes up by 12%-15% will be a big step forward from the previously expected range of 4%-9%.