
Children at play in Jeff City: Secretary of state and legislature upend 22 lives
Meanwhile, nearly two dozen state employees have been needlessly fired, their lives upended because of a secretary of state who appears to have no human decency and a childish feud among Jefferson City politicians.
I have seen the resulting carnage firsthand. As one of dozens of volunteers at the Missouri State Archives, I visit the wonderful research room in Jeff City once a week to help staffers dig into public requests for information.
This past week, the research room was emptier and significantly less joyful.
Secretary of State Denny Hoskins had mercilessly eliminated 17 of the 60 employees under his purview in the Records and Archives Division the previous Friday. For good measure, he canned five of 16 workers in the State Library upstairs from the Archives.
Hoskins became Missouri's secretary of state, a job that includes running elections, handling business filings and protecting the state's public records, after winning the November election in a landslide. He ran on a pro-MAGA, anti-woke platform, so maybe it's no surprise he would pull such a stunt.
You might remember Hoskins, a former state senator, as one of the three Freedom Caucus members who maliciously — and wrongly — identified an Olathe man in social media posts as the shooter at the Chiefs' deadly Super Bowl celebration in 2024. He never apologized, and the falsely accused man was found dead in April as he pursued lawsuits against the three public officials.
Now Hoskins has turned his attention to other innocent victims, and the situation stinks to high heaven. It resulted, by all appearances, from a feud between him and his former Republican cohorts in the state Senate — primarily Mike Cierpiot of Lee's Summit.
This much is certain: Hoskins is solely responsible for how he dismissed these 22 state employees under his leadership.
With no notice or even a suggestion that anybody might be fired, his victims were ambushed at their desks one by one. They were walked into a meeting room, where a supervisor, a human relations person and a state legal counsel informed them they were unemployed as of the end of the fiscal year on June 30. Then, after getting a few minutes to clean out their desks, they were escorted out of the building.
Hoskins was nowhere to be found, of course. He evidently didn't have time in his schedule, just as when he was asked for an interview on the matter. He did send an email statement in which he boasted about his agency's operation, then said, 'This is not a decision I wanted to make, nor one I would ever make lightly.'
His spokeswoman, Rachael Dunn, followed with, 'Secretary Hoskins did not choose these cuts — the legislature did.'
As that great Missourian, Col. Sherman T. Potter of 'M*A*S*H,' liked to say, 'Horse hockey!'
Usually, a story about job cuts such as these transitions into something like, 'This is part of wider cuts caused by the budget crisis' or 'an economic emergency.' But, no, there is no budget crisis or economic emergency in Missouri.
Just some grownups acting like children.
It is no secret in Jefferson City that Hoskins and his Freedom Caucus cronies made a lot of enemies in the General Assembly over the past three years by holding the lawmaking process hostage as they promoted their far-right agenda.
Things got personal between Hoskins and Cierpiot. The Lee's Summit Republican decided to lob a grenade at his foe by pushing through a budget amendment earlier this year to cut 25 of the secretary of state's roughly 60 unfilled full-time equivalent employees (of 267 total positions) and $680,000 from a fund that helps pay salaries.
But Hoskins chose to trim real people instead of unfilled positions.
Caught up in the fracas were 22 faithful employees, including at least two who were due pay raises of 10% in the next fiscal year under the new budget rewarding longtime employees. It's probably just a coincidence that Hoskins eliminated them just before their raises were to kick in and put a bigger dent in his budget.
State Sen. Mike Bernskoetter, a Jefferson City Republican, issued a statement saying in part: 'The budget we passed did not require any layoffs or cuts to current staff. … The decision to cut current employees and use that money elsewhere ultimately lies with the secretary of state.'
Although Cierpiot and other senators have confirmed that sentiment, Dunn insists her boss 'had no choice' and 'our hands were tied.'
Even if that were true — and she and Hoskins might be the only people who think so — Hoskins could have distributed the cuts throughout his agency so that one department wasn't so thoroughly ravaged, especially when that department works so intimately with the public.
He could have stepped up to publicly defend the reasons for his actions.
He could have treated the victims of his purge with some semblance of humanity.
Instead, he issued canned statements and played the blame game.
Dunn used the word 'dignity' in describing the firing process. Sure, if you consider it dignified to treat your employees as if they were enemies of the state.
'There's no dignity here,' Bob Priddy said.
Priddy knows dignity. The near-legendary Missouri broadcaster also knows the State Archives, which he called 'the most visible part of the secretary of state's office.' He's on the board of directors of the Friends of Missouri State Archives and is a former president of that group.
The veteran of Missouri politics also writes a blog, and he was working on a new entry last week.
'It basically says that the state Senate and the secretary of state are engaging in a urinary contest, and the only people getting wet are the more than 20 people who don't deserve to get wet.'
Still, Priddy maintains a somewhat optimistic outlook.
'I'm hopeful there can be some grownups in the room that can get together and work this thing out,' he said. 'But history is not in favor of grownups these days in the Capitol.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Senators Came to Their Senses on AI Regulation Ban
Some sense has prevailed in the Senate — a 99-1 vote against a provision in its huge tax and spending bill that would have banned state-level artificial-intelligence laws for the next 10 years. It's been just 944 dizzying days since ChatGPT was launched into the world — imagine what might have happened over the next 3,653. A last-gasp effort to amend the bill, which included reducing 10 years to five, also failed. The new wording would have been more onerous than the original, decimating existing state laws on facial recognition and data privacy. New laws will need to tackle AI-triggered issues on discrimination, recruitment and mental health. The matter is simply too urgent to be left only in Washington's hands. Senators rightly saw through the moratorium as doing the bidding of big tech companies that want free rein to do as they please in the insatiable race to build and sell AI.


CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
35 people charged in "dismantling" of Norristown drug rings that flooded Montco with crack cocaine, DA says
July 4 events proceeding as scheduled in Philadelphia despite DC33 strike | Digital Brief July 4 events proceeding as scheduled in Philadelphia despite DC33 strike | Digital Brief July 4 events proceeding as scheduled in Philadelphia despite DC33 strike | Digital Brief Thirty-five people were criminally charged Tuesday after a monthslong investigative operation targeting the drug market in Norristown, Pennsylvania, Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele said in a news release. Hundreds of pages of court documents show how "Operation Cocaine Goldmine" used wiretaps, confidential informants, controlled buys and other surveillance to track three drug trafficking organizations in Norristown — the county seat — from late 2024 to June 2025. Steele said the investigation took place as opioid and fentanyl use declined, but "cocaine and crack cocaine...[experienced] a resurgence, in part due to the dramatic decline in wholesale cocaine prices." As bulk traffickers, mid-level suppliers, and street-level dealers were able to get easier access to large quantities of the drug due to the price shifts, county detectives worked with the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, FBI, DEA and Norristown police on targeting networks operating in Norristown. Steele said the investigation has helped identify "intertwined networks of individuals who are most responsible for the trafficking of bulk quantities of cocaine into Montgomery County." The documents show some dealers were also involved in the illicit dealing of prescription drugs, like Klonopin and Percocet. Seven pounds of powder and crack cocaine, over $138,000 cash and 17 guns were seized during the operation. Steele said the operation and other recent arrests in shootings are "a concerted effort to rid Norristown of this criminal element that will not be tolerated in our county seat. I want to thank our state and federal partners for their ongoing assistance, especially the Attorney General's Office." Alleged ringleaders identified and charged Steele's office identified these five people as the alleged ringleaders of the three drug networks: · Terrell Bailey, 50, of Norristown · Jerome Berry, 32, of Norristown · Malik Noel, 49, of Philadelphia · Oscar Gordon, 37, of Norristown · Donta Wells, 40, of Norristown All of those five have been arrested and charged. Warrants have been issued for seven other people: Denise Baird, Darnell Cotton, Tyya Griffin, Tyleek Lee, Michael Taylor, Curtis Thomas and Cori Wagner.


CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
Michigan lawmakers, officials react to passage of federal spending bill
The U.S. Senate narrowly passed President Trump's massive tax and spending bill Tuesday, with a tie ultimately broken by Vice President JD Vance. The bill that was referred to by Republicans as the "Big, Beautiful Bill" now goes back to the House for a final vote and then to the president's desk, possibly by the end of this week. All Senate Democrats voted against the bill, including Michigan Senators Gary Peters and Elissa Slotkin. Here are some of the reactions and statements issued by Michigan officials and organizations as the vote was announced. U.S. Senator Gary Peters, D-Michigan "Democrats did everything in our power to stop this legislation, but President Trump and Republicans in Congress are dead set on selling out hardworking Michiganders so they can pay for a massive tax cut for billionaires. This bill is reckless, irresponsible, and an unconscionable betrayal of American families. I voted no," Sen. Gary Peters said. U.S. Senator Elissa Slotkin, D-Michigan "After more than 25 hours on the Senate floor, I voted no on the so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' No matter which way you slice it – health care, energy, housing – the President just rammed through a bill that will make Michiganders pay in every part of their lives. All so the wealthiest among us can get a tax break," Sen. Elissa Slotkin said. Curtis Hertel, chair of the Michigan Democratic Party "Millions of Michiganders will see their costs go up thanks to Republicans in DC choosing to help billionaires over working families. Republicans are trying to gut Medicaid and SNAP programs and put thousands of jobs, and even more lives, at risk as hospitals are forced to close and families lose coverage," Michigan Democratic Party chair Curtis Hertel said. "This budget is not just cruel, it's stupid and a financial disaster for our state and the whole country." Charlesetta Wilson, director of nursing homes at SEIU Healthcare Michigan "This legislation is a direct attack on the health and dignity of Michigan's working families. It would rip more than a trillion dollars from Medicaid and other essential programs our communities rely on just to fund more tax breaks for billionaires. ... We're calling on Michigan's U.S. House delegation to vote no," Charlesetta Wilson, director of nursing homes at SEIU Healthcare Michigan, said. Michigan League for Public Policy "The shock of this bill is hard to overstate. Republican leaders just voted to spend trillions of dollars to increase poverty and hunger, to strip away health coverage, and to create the biggest redistribution of wealth from poor to rich in U.S. history. Much of the bill — including billions of dollars to be spent on a 'mass deportation plan' that could upend our nation's immigration system — lacks specificity and gives full discretion to the Trump administration, not Congress. And this shortsighted, harmful bill also adds $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficit. It's just staggering," read a statement from the Michigan League for Public Policy.