Pope Leo interrupts vacation to appeal for action on climate change
"Today … we live in a world that is burning, both because of global warming and armed conflicts," the pontiff said in a small outdoor ceremony in Castel Gandolfo, an Italian hill town about an hour's drive from Rome where he is spending his holiday.
"We have to pray for the conversion of many people … who still do not see the urgency of caring for our common home," said the pontiff.
Leo, who was elected on May 8 to replace the late Pope Francis, did not mention specific natural disasters caused by global warming but said the world was experiencing an "ecological crisis".
The new pope said the 1.4-billion-member Church was committed to speaking about the issue, "even when it requires the courage to oppose the destructive power of the princes of this world".
The Mass included a prayer for victims of the flash flooding in Texas, where at least 109 deaths had been reported as of Tuesday.
Leo, the first U.S. pope, celebrated Wednesday's Mass according to a new Catholic rite that exhorts people to care for creation, first published by the Vatican on July 3 in its latest push to address climate issues.
Cardinal Michael Czerny, a senior Vatican official who helped to organise the Mass, told Reuters that Leo's decision to interrupt his vacation was a sign of the importance the new pope will place on environmental matters.
"By offering this Mass … at the beginning of his holiday, Pope Leo is giving a beautiful example of thanking for God's great gift and praying that the human family learns to care for our common home," said Czerny.
Francis, who died on April 21, was also a firm proponent of care for creation. He was the first pope to embrace the scientific consensus about climate change and urged nations, opens new tab to reduce their carbon emissions in line with the 2015 Paris climate accord.
Leo is reviving a centuries-old tradition of popes taking holidays in Castel Gandolfo with a July 6-20 vacation in the sleepy hill town of about 8,900 residents on the shores of Lake Albano.
Residents told Reuters earlier this month they hope Leo's visit will help boost tourism, with visitors coming to take part in public religious celebrations with the pope on July 13 and 20.
Wednesday's Mass was held in the 55-hectare gardens of the papal villa, which Francis opened to visitors and turned into an ecological institute.
The ceremony included several senior cardinals and about 50 staff members of the villa, gathered in front of a statue of Mary among tightly trimmed hedges in the garden.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Putin's friend Gergiev set to conduct as Italy breaks ban on pro-Kremlin artists
Russian conductor Valery Gergiev has been barred from European stages ever since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.A close ally of Vladimir Putin for many years, the director of the Bolshoi and Mariinsky Russian state theatres has never spoken out against the a region of southern Italy has now invited Gergiev back to Europe, signalling the artist's rehabilitation even as Russia's attacks on Ukraine de Luca, who runs the Campania region, insists that the concert at the Un'Estate da RE festival later this month will go ahead despite a growing swell of criticism."Culture… must not be influenced by politics and political logic," De Luca said in a livestream on Friday. "We do not ask these men to answer for the choices made by politicians."The 76-year-old local leader has previously called Europe's broad veto on pro-Putin artists "a moment of stupidity – a moment of madness" at the start of the war and announced that he was "proud" to welcome Gergiev to town. But Pina Picierno, a vice-president of the European Parliament, has told the BBC that allowing Gergiev's return is "absolutely unacceptable".She calls the star conductor a "cultural mouthpiece for Putin and his crimes".Ukrainian human rights activist and Nobel laureate Oleksandra Matviichuk said the invitation by the regional government was "hypocrisy", rather than opposition activists have also condemned the director's sudden return. The Anti-Corruption Foundation, of the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny, wants his concert cancelled and is calling on Italy's interior ministry to ban Gergiev's entry to the country. Before Russia's full-scale war in Ukraine, the virtuoso Gergiev was a regular visitor to stages in Italy and across Europe, despite his closeness to long and illustrious career includes stints at the London Symphony Orchestra and Munich the invitations to Europe stopped abruptly on 24 February before the first Russian missiles were launched at Ukraine, Gergiev was on stage at Milan's La Scala opera house. Urged then by the city's mayor to speak out against the war, Gergiev chose was promptly dropped from the by his manager, despite calling Gergiev "the greatest conductor alive", he was then fired as chief conductor in Munich and removed from concert schedules across the why the invitation from Italy is so Picierno, who is from the Campania region herself, says her call to stop the event is not Russophobic."There is no shortage of brilliant Russian artists who choose to disassociate themselves from Putin's criminal policies," she told the European MP, who says she has received threats for her work exposing Russia's hybrid warfare, warns that allowing Gergiev to perform would be both wrong and dangerous."This is not about censorship. Gergiev is part of a deliberate Kremlin strategy. He is one of their cultural envoys to soften Western public opinion. This is part of their war." The cultural controversy erupted in a week when Italy was hosting heads of state from all over Europe to reaffirm their support for Ukraine and discuss how to rebuild the country once the war is Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has been a strong and consistent critic of Vladimir Putin from the start. But her culture ministry is one of the backers of Un'Estate da RE, which has invited Gergiev.A senior MP from Meloni's Brothers of Italy party, Alfredo Antoniozzi, has described Gergiev as "simply a great artist"."If Russians have to pay for the mistakes of their president, then we are committing a kind of cultural genocide," he month, Canada formally barred Gergiev from entry and declared it would freeze any the European Union has shied away from formal sanctions against the conductor, who has avoided voicing open support for the has been a vocal supporter of Putin since the 1990s, later campaigning for his re-election and backing Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea in was handed management of Moscow's Bolshoi Theatre, in addition to the Mariinsky Theatre, taking over from a director who signed an open letter against Russia's is a state employee, but in 2022 an investigation by Alexei Navalny's team uncovered properties in several Italian cities that they say he never declared. They also alleged he used donations to a charitable fund to pay for his own lavish activists argued that was Gergiev's reward for his public loyalty to BBC has so far been unable to reach the conductor for comment.A spokeswoman for the European Commission, Eva Hrncirova, has clarified that the Un'Estate da RE festival is not receiving EU cash: it is financed by Italy's own "cohesion funds".But she added that the commission urged European stages not to give space "to artists who support the war of aggression in Ukraine".In Campania, the artistic director who crafted this year's festival programme declined to comment. A spokesman was confident Gergiev's performance would go ahead, though – despite the controversy."Yes," he assured the BBC. "For sure."Additional reporting from Rome by Davide Ghiglione.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘We don't want to be climate refugees': Torres Strait uncles fear for their islands and their people
Uncle Paul Kabai and Uncle Pabai Pabai are afraid for the future of their ancestral homelands. Their country on the outer islands of Zenadth Kes (Torres Strait), less than 10km off Papua New Guinea, is under siege from the impacts of the climate crisis. The two men fear the loss of their islands, their culture and their way of life, forcing their families and communities to become Australia's first climate refugees. The uncles have taken the federal government to court in the landmark Australian climate case, seeking orders which would require the commonwealth to undertake steps to prevent further harm to their communities. This would include cutting greenhouse gas emissions in line with the best available science. The commonwealth has argued it is not legally required to consider the best available science or the impacts of climate change when setting emissions reduction targets. On Tuesday, the federal court is due to make a decision in the case and the men hold hope that their fight might safeguard the future of their people. Uncle Pabai and Uncle Paul launched the action against the federal government in 2021. They are arguing that the commonwealth owes a duty of care to Torres Strait Islanders to take reasonable steps to protect them from harm. During on-country hearings in 2023, witnesses described how devastating their loss of culture due to climate change had been. 'We don't want to be climate refugees,' Uncle Pabai, who has spent his life on the low-lying island of Boigu, says. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Uncle Paul remembers a time when his family would hunt, fish and eat produce from gardens grown by the community. But that has all changed, he says. The beaches on his island, Saibai, have receded, turning to mud and mangroves. Its river system is inundated with saltwater and, alarmingly, even the island's cemetery has been affected by flooding. 'Even our cultural sites are being destroyed by rising seas,' he laments. 'We're both very worried about what we are losing, our hunting grounds are being destroyed by strong currents. 'Where can we show our culture to the younger generation?' he asks. 'In this way we are losing our culture, everything that belongs to our ancestors.' Drawing closer to a decision in the case is a significant milestone for the men. It has been an emotional journey for them, their communities and supporters, but as the uncles approach the end of this battle, they hold close the reasons they began such a long fight. Pointing to the example of fellow Torres Strait Islander Eddie Mabo – whose lifetime of campaigning resulted in a landmark high court ruling, recognising the rights of First Nations people to their lands, countering the idea of 'terra nullius', asserted by the British at colonisation – Uncle Pabai says the battle has been waged for his ancestors. 'I'm standing firm on his shoulders,' he says. 'If we come to winning this case, this is a victory for my family and communities on Boigu and all the community around the country and around the world.' As much as this is about the people who came before and protecting what they've left, Uncle Pabai says his two-year-old son and the generations to come – in the Torres Strait and further afield – are front of mind. 'My main focus is on the new generation,' he says. 'This is why I'm doing it – for the love of my son, for all the people in my community in the Torres Strait, for bushfire and flood survivors, for the farmers and the children and grandchildren.' No matter the legal outcome, Uncle Paul says he believes the action he and Uncle Pabai have taken will make a difference. 'We will be very proud, even if we win or if we lose,' he says. 'The government is listening now, they know what is happening and they must do something about climate change.'
The Guardian
15 hours ago
- The Guardian
Young people don't feel part of the EU – and they're right
The former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi produced his much-awaited prescription for how to reboot Europe's economy last year. The Draghi report was rightly applauded as a rude awakening for a European Union that is far too complacent about its own obsolescence. Draghi concluded that an €800bn-a-year public spending boost would be needed to end years of stagnation. If Europe did not catch up with its rivals, he warned, it would face a 'slow and agonising' decline. And yet, one ingredient was missing from Draghi's recipe. In his nearly 400-page roadmap for rescuing the EU, the word 'democracy' is mentioned only three times (once in the bibliography). By contrast, 'integration' is used 96 times and 'defence' 391 times. It's true that Draghi's report was explicitly devoted to the future of European competitiveness (and not more widely to the Europe of the future). But if the EU can't find a way to better engage its citizens, it will be difficult to achieve any more of the integration that Draghi says is indispensable to make a still-fragmented single market more competitive and Europe more capable of defending itself. One thing is sure: the old method of decision-making that a generation of European leaders relied on is obsolete. We urgently need to reform the EU, but the top-down approach to doing so is no longer fit for purpose. True, the debate on the 'democratic deficit' is as old as the EU itself. Direct elections to the European parliament, the first and only international assembly elected in this way, were introduced in 1979 to respond to the same criticism. However, at least until the end of the last century, the discussion on European democracy was seen as a niche for thinktanks – something nice to have to complete an integration project mostly run by an enlightened elite. Today, the picture has radically changed: the European parliament's powers have increased over time, but only about half of people who are entitled to vote in European elections bother to do so. Less than 50% of those vote for the two political 'families' (centre-right and socialist) that for decades provided the consensus that the EU project required to function. And no less worryingly, according to a recent survey from Cluster17, a French polling company, the percentages of European citizens who say the EU is not democratic and instead describe it as bureaucratic and disconnected are higher among younger age groups (becoming a solid majority among those aged 34 and under). More competitiveness requires a larger EU budget (it currently stands at just 1% of GDP) and more money for European 'public goods' (goods for which there is a clear economic case for producing them at EU level, for example, satellite-based telecommunication services or trans-European high-speed trains). But you can't ask for new taxation to fund joint EU spending without more representation. More common defence should be a commonsense direction given the existential threats that Europe is facing and the inefficiencies that running 27 military budgets imply. However, it requires a sufficiently wide public perception that such spending is going to benefit every citizen of the community we want to defend. And yet, surprisingly perhaps, according to Cluster17's poll, younger people feel less European even than their parents, preferring to call themselves citizens of the world. Without a European demos, it will be difficult to create an EU army – if that is what emerges from the debates on security – but also a real European democracy. And if we have neither citizenship nor engagement, we risk a political backlash like the ones we have seen on the green deal or the austerity measures that came after the global financial crash and the eurozone crisis, even when the policies are theoretically right. Last month about 100 policymakers, politicians, journalists, academics and students from all the major European countries (EU and beyond) gathered in Siena to consider how a Europe of the future could deal with some of its biggest challenges, such as common defence, the threat posed by global trade wars and AI. The outcome is a paper that prioritises identifying ways to better engage voters in each of the big decisions. A recent European Commission initiative – a citizens' panel in which 150 randomly selected EU citizens were enlisted to help the EU decide how to spend its money in the future – was considered a good start. But the conference in Siena identified changes that will be essential if citizens' recommendations are to be included in a systematic way. In EU budgetary decision-making for example, the language must change so that citizens can understand what goal is being achieved in any spending plans. The budgetary logic must be 'zero based' (which in accountancy parlance means not decided on the basis of incremental adjustments to past spending). Such an approach could ensure that 'participatory democracy' becomes a mainstream instrument of EU policymaking. No less crucial is a set of 'positive actions' that a group led by Luca Verzichelli of the University of Siena drew up to promote the European demos. The most eye-catching proposal – and one that attracted the broadest consensus – was to make the Erasmus student programme free and mandatory for all EU students in secondary and tertiary-level education. A quarter of the money spent by the EU on farmers would be enough to cover an expanded version of Erasmus, the Vision thinktank that convened the Siena conference calculates. I have no doubt the results would be more transformational. The democracy deficit is not just a European problem. Representative institutions are suffering more broadly from what seems to be a form of technological obsolescence. The internet has massively altered the control of information, which is power. This requires a radical transformation of the mechanisms through which power is acquired, restrained and exercised; and of the instruments we use to transmit individual preferences and convert them into collective choices. The EU needs more clarity about what it is for, and it needs to go well beyond superficially involving citizens to give its messages cosmetic legitimacy. But it has the paradoxical advantage of being an unfinished project. This means it has the flexibility to experiment with new forms of participation, policymaking and citizenship. It must urgently acknowledge that the only way to protect democracy is to adapt its forms to a radically different technological context. Francesco Grillo is a visiting fellow at the European University Institute, Florence and director of the thinktank Vision
