Trump appellate court nominee defends experience at US Senate hearing
Whitney Hermandorfer is nominated to 6th Circuit
*
Democrats question Hermandorfer on her experience, birthright citizenship case
*
Four Missouri nominees also were considered
June 4 - A former clerk to three conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices who was chosen by President Donald Trump to become a federal appeals court judge faced questions from U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday about her youth and her support of the Republican president's order curtailing birthright citizenship.
Whitney Hermandorfer, 37, tapped to serve on the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, defended her record at the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee's first hearing on judicial nominees since Trump returned to office in January.
"The cases have come fast and furiously, and I've been privileged to handle a number of nationally significant matters," Hermandorfer, a lawyer serving under Tennessee's Republican attorney general, said.
The hearing comes as judges in dozens of cases have slowed or blocked some of Trump's initiatives to dramatically expand presidential authority and slash the federal bureaucracy, prompting calls from Trump and his allies for judges to be impeached or accusing them of being part of a "judicial coup."
Hermandorfer is the first of Trump's 11 judicial nominees so far to appear before the Republican panel, as the White House looks to further reshape a judiciary whose members have stymied key parts of his agenda. Four nominees to serve as trial court judges in Missouri appeared before the panel later on Wednesday.
Trump shifted the ideological balance of the judiciary to the right in his first term with a near-record 234 appointments, including three members of the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority.
Hermandorfer clerked for Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett, and clerked for Justice Brett Kavanaugh while he was a judge on a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C.
Today, she heads a strategic litigation unit in Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti's office, where she has defended the state's near-total abortion ban and challenged a rule adopted under former Democratic President Joe Biden barring discrimination against transgender students.
Republican senators appeared likely to advance her nomination to the full Senate for its consideration, even as Democrats raised questions about the positions she'd taken in court and the 37-year-old's level of experience just a decade out of law school.
"I am concerned about the striking brevity of your professional record," Democratic Senator Chris Coons said.
He noted that the American Bar Association had long had a standard deeming judicial nominees qualified only if they had at least 12 years of experience.
Several Democrats criticized the Trump administration for deciding last week to cut off the legal organization's decades-old ability to vet judicial nominees as part of its ratings process. Republicans welcomed the move, accusing the nonpartisan group of bias against conservatives.
Hermandorfer said that while as an appellate lawyer she had never tried a case to a jury verdict, she had litigated over 100 appellate cases and argued four federal appeals.
"That sounds like quite a bit of experience," Republican Senator Josh Hawley said.
Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the committee, questioned Hermandorfer on a recent brief she filed on behalf of the state of Tennessee to the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the Trump administration's bid to let his executive order on birthright citizenship to take effect.
Trump's order directed federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is a citizen or lawful permanent resident.
The Supreme Court is weighing whether to narrow nationwide injunctions blocking enforcement of that order that were issued by three judges who concluded it clearly violated the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment.
Hermandorfer told Durbin that her office felt the justices should be provided information about evidence that she said showed that the 14th Amendment as originally interpreted after it was ratified in 1868 called into question whether the constitutionality of Trump's order was an "open and shut case."
"I stand by completely those arguments and the historical sources that we advanced to the court," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Vs Putin
Trump Vs Putin | Trump Deploys Nuclear Submarines After Medvedev's Threats | US Russia War | N18G Last Updated: August 02, 2025, 19:11 IST Videos Former President Donald Trump has ordered two U.S. submarines moved amid rising tensions with Russia following nuclear strike threats from Dmitry Medvedev. Trump demanded a ceasefire agreement by August 8 and warned that U.S. submarines are in position 'in case threats turn real.' While the Pentagon refused to comment, the deployment marks a rare escalation. Putin remains open to peace talks but has ignored Trump's ultimatum. News18 Mobile App - homevideos Trump Vs Putin | Trump Deploys Nuclear Submarines After Medvedev's Threats | US Russia War | N18G CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2024 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them. © Copyright Network18 Media and Investments Ltd 2024. All rights reserved.
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India stays pragmatic amid Trump's tariff blitzkrieg; US moves N-submarines closer to Russia; Canada to recognise Palestinian state
Amid Trump's tirade, India says will protect national interest, closely watches US's renewed closeness with Pakistan and trade deal with China; data shows Indian refiners had begun cutting down on Russian oil imports before Trump's announcement of tariff 'penalty'; the US calls Medvedev's statements 'foolish and inflammatory', moves two Nuclear Submarines closer to Russia; as Canada joins the UK and France in recognising the statehood of Palestine, Israel faces little restraint in its deadly attack in Gaza – here is weekly roundup of key global news. US President Donald Trump's announcements of 25 per cent tariff on India, 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia, 10 per cent BRICS tariff, and a pointed remark whether Pakistan could 'some day' sell oil to India have sparked concerns about its impact on India's GDP growth, while deepening diplomatic challenges amid the ongoing trade talks. Instead of getting dragged into a tit-for-tat response, India adopts a pragmatic approach, anchored in its longstanding strategic partnership with the US, to weather the tariff blitzkrieg. It reiterated its stance for 'a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement', aligned with national interests and the welfare of farmers, entrepreneurs, and Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). Nonetheless, Trump's pointed tirade has raised some pertinent questions: How will this affect the ongoing India-US trade talks? How can India withstand Trump's pressure tactic and safeguard its traditional red lines? In what ways could India navigate Trump's unspecified 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia? Is there room to secure a 10-20 per cent tariff differential with China? And how to look at the US's renewed closeness with Pakistan? Trump's surprise 25% tariff Trump's announcement of the 25 per cent tariff, probably layered on top of the 10 per cent baseline tariff announced in April, comes as a US delegation is expected to visit New Delhi later this month for the sixth round of trade talks. The trade deal is largely bogged down in India's red lines around agriculture and dairy sectors, primarily over concerns around genetically modified crops and dairy imports from animals fed with internal blood meal, a high-protein feed made from animal blood. The US is India's largest trade partner, accounting for around 18 per cent of its goods exports. According to economists, the elevated tariff could reduce India's GDP growth by approximately 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points, with sectors like gems and jewellery, clothing/textiles and phones likely to be hit. Trump also issued a proclamation to impose a 50 per cent universal tariff on semi-finished and derivative copper imports starting from August 1. He has already increased tariffs on steel and aluminium from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. However, India's domestic industry is likely to absorb any decline in the demand from the US – India's third-largest copper export market – given copper's status as a critical mineral and its extensive use across various sectors. Notably, now there is greater receptiveness within India's policy circles to cut tariffs on some industrial goods, and grant concessions in sectors such as public procurement and agriculture, provided these are matched by the other side, like in the case of the UK deal. India has also made preemptive economic concessions after Trump's initial tariff threats. It lowered some import duties and indicated willingness to make more defense and energy purchases from the US to manage the trade gap. Trade data shows that India's oil imports from the US jumped over 270 per cent year-on-year in the first four months of 2025. Nonetheless, Trump also threatened additional penalties on India for its membership in the BRICS, accusing the group of pursuing 'anti-American policies'. However, India has brushed off 'anti-America' rhetoric by saying that de-dollarisation is not its economic, political, or strategic policy and transactions in domestic currencies are intended to de-risk Indian trade. Experts have largely zeroed in on at least two key reasons behind Trump's impulsive policy decisions. One, Trump is testing his familiar strong-arm tactics to browbeat and bully the adversary by imposing high tariffs (as he did with China). Second, some in the Indian establishment feel that the US President has not taken very kindly to Delhi fact-checking Trump's claims on brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. In the meantime, reports of India refusing to consider F-35 fighter jets emerged. But the MEA said that India has a 'strong defence partnership with the US, which has been strengthening over the last several years. However, Trump's latest unilateral measure, subjecting India to a higher tariff than the UK (10 per cent), the European Union, Japan and Korea (15 per cent), Indonesia (19 per cent) or Vietnam (20 per cent), runs counter to the larger story of growing cooperation between the two countries. US-Pakistan reset Hours after announcing the surprise tariffs on India, Trump posted on Truth Social that the US had concluded a deal with Pakistan to develop what he described as the South Asian nation's 'massive oil reserves', and said, 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day.' In a final tariff announcement on Friday (August 1), Trump gave Pakistan a rate of 19 per cent, down from the original 29 percent. The US-Pakistan reset has raised subtle red flags in Delhi. Indian diplomats point to the deep mistrust caused by Pakistan's strong defence relationship with the US, especially when it got top-of-the-line equipment including F-16 jets. Now, the trade deal with Pakistan and, more specifically, the remark that Pakistan could 'some day' sell oil to India has triggered introspection about India's expectations from the second Trump presidency. Experts argue that while India believed that Trump would rebalance US ties with India – given his predecessor Joe Biden was more favourable towards Pakistan – and stopped short of making pragmatic assessments of the situation – something that Islamabad did. Pakistan seems to have made its recaliberation early on and moved swiftly to invest in the Trump entourage, buying up support. Over the last few months, Pakistan nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the India-Pakistan military confrontation, awarded a top military honour to the US Central Command chief, and signed a deal with a US cryptocurrency company. In June, Trump hosted Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir for lunch at the White House. But it was Pakistan's outreach to the Trump family and the inner circle through investments in the cryptocurrency business that seems to have tilted the scales in its favour, Delhi feels. India watches final tariff on China While India faces the surprise tariff announcement, China, which is currently facing a 30 per cent tariff, is at an advanced stage of trade negotiations with the US. It is understood that Beijing could have a favourable tariff rate and potential waivers on secondary tariffs, including possibly the tariff on account of Russian oil imports and the proposed 10 per cent BRICS tariff. India has been pinning hope on the US to maintain a 10-20 per cent differential with China, which will help New Delhi tide over some of its structural downsides, namely infrastructural bottlenecks, logistics woes, high interest cost, the cost of doing business, corruption, etc. India is closely tracking the effective duty on Chinese products on a landed basis across US ports, particularly in commodity categories, where Indian producers are reasonably competitive, to identify potential export opportunities. However, US and Chinese officials announced no breakthrough after wrapping up two days of discussions in Stockholm on Tuesday, except Beijing saying that the two sides agreed to push for an extension of a 90-day tariff truce struck in mid-May. It is argued that in the case of the US-India trade deal, indications are that the outer time limit, currently pegged at around October from New Delhi's perspective, could be brought forward, if fresh negotiations are positive from India's point of view. Once the interim deal is clinched, if the final US headline tariff on India ends up between 10 per cent and 15 per cent, the tariff points offered to the UK and Japan, respectively, New Delhi would have reasons to be satisfied. But the advantage starts to taper off once the tariff goes over 15 per cent and inches up closer to 20 per cent, as was offered to Vietnam. A trans-shipment clause, of the kind slapped on Vietnam which levies an additional 20 per cent tariff, could be a problem for India too, given that a lot of Indian exports have inputs and intermediate goods in sectors such as pharma, engineering goods and electronics coming in from outside, including China. In a bid to put pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine, Trump threatened an unspecified 'penalty' for India for buying Russian oil and weapons, while slapping a secondary tariff of 100 per cent on its oil buyers. Trump said India has always purchased a significant amount of military equipment and energy products from Russia at a time when everyone wants Moscow to stop the 'killing' in Ukraine. He also registered his pet complaint that although India is America's friend, 'we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their (India) tariffs are far too high…' The US President went to the extent of calling the economies of India and Russia 'dead', and said, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care' — seen as offensive by many. Nonetheless, India rebutted Trump tirade by asserting that its 'bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership.' Similarly, on buying Russian defence equipment, India asserted that the sourcing of 'defence requirements is determined solely by our national security imperatives and strategic assessments.' While India does depend on Russia for the defence supplies, much of it is because of the legacy from the Soviet Union era. Although the dependency is about 60 to 70 per cent, India has, in the past few years, steadily diversified its defence purchases from countries including the US. India's energy imports from Russia shot up following the country's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, which prompted much of the West to ban Russian crude. In the financial year 2024-25, oil imports from Russia accounted for almost 36 per cent of India's total oil imports. In the meantime, data shows Indian refiners had begun cutting down on Russian oil imports, much before Trump's announcement of tariff 'penalty'. The share of Russian crude in India's oil import basket in July contracted notably to around 33.8 per cent from June's 44.5 per cent. It may be recalled here that New Delhi stopped importing oil from Iran in mid-2019 after sanctions on the Islamic Republic by the Trump administration. As part of its latest 'maximum pressure campaign' action against Iran's energy trade and shipping network, the US this week sanctioned eight India-based companies and five Indian nationals. Frustrated with Russia's intransigence to meet his August 8 deadline to end the war in Ukraine, US President Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia, announced tariffs on its oil buyers, and said details were being hammered out to supply Ukraine with weapons using funds from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Trump's decision to move two Nuclear Submarines closer to Russia came after what he dubbed 'foolish and inflammatory statements' from Dmitry Medvedev, former Russian President and currently deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. Medvedev told Trump to remember 'how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be', a reference to a secretive semi-automated Russian command system designed to launch Moscow's nuclear missiles if its leadership had been taken out in a decapitating strike by a foe. He also called Trump's threat of hitting Russia and buyers of its oil with punitive tariffs 'a game of ultimatums' and a step closer towards a war between Russia and the US, Reuters reported. On Tuesday (July 29), Trump cut short the deadline for Russia, giving it '10 days from today' to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil buyers (of which the biggest are China and India), with tariffs. Meanwhile, the US and NATO are also working on a novel approach to supply Ukraine with weapons using funds from NATO countries to pay for the purchase or transfer of US arms, Reuters reported citing three sources familiar with the matter. Nonetheless, Moscow appears unlikely to comply with the US deadline, and has set out its own terms for peace, which Kyiv says amount to demanding its capitulation. Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday (August 1) that Moscow hoped for more peace talks with Ukraine but that the momentum of the war was in its favour, signalling no shift in his stance despite a looming sanctions deadline from Washington. During the last peace talks, Russia rejected Ukraine's offer of an unconditional ceasefire and rather demanded its capitulation to its conditions. Moscow currently controls about a fifth of Ukrainian territory and insists Kyiv must relinquish it, envisioning a permanently 'neutral' Ukraine. Kyiv, on the other hand, demands a full Russian withdrawal, alongside NATO membership. Trump deployed the familiar tactic of economic pressure even in Gaza and threatened Canada that signing a US trade deal would now be 'very hard' after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the plan to recognise a Palestinian state. Canada's move came after France and the UK said they will recognise the Palestinian state at September's UN General Assembly meeting. However, such moves demand closer scrutiny, particularly because Israel has faced little restraint in its deadly strike in Gaza, where international experts say a 'worst-case scenario of famine' is playing out. Two historical agreements merit close attention here: the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916) and the Balfour Declaration of (1917). The former was a secret agreement between France and Britain involving the division of territories of the Ottoman empire after WWI, while the latter laid the foundation for a 'Jewish national home' in Palestine in exchange for the support of the European Jews for Britain in WWI. It is argued that the creation of an independent State of Israel in May 1948, and its success in fending off five Arab states, meant that the Balfour Declaration's contradictory promises catalysed a conflict that continues to bring devastation to the West Asian region. Over a century later, the UK has said it would move to recognise Palestinian statehood if Israel fails to meet a set of conditions – agreeing to a ceasefire, a two-state solution, and halting its de facto annexation of parts of the occupied West Bank. However, the question remains: if Israel meets all the conditions, will the UK not recognise Palestinian statehood? It wouldn't be an exaggeration to call the chorus from parts of the West more a pressure tactic to push Israel into accepting a ceasefire than a genuine commitment to recognise the state of Palestine. Notably, 147 of 193 UN member states, including India, have formally recognised the State of Palestine. Nonetheless, amid pressure tactics and verbal assurances, the fate of more than 2 million Palestinians in Gaza hangs in the balance, with reports of Israel's continued deadly attacks, starvation deaths, and warning of 'worst-case scenario of famine'. In the meantime, US President Trump's Mideast envoy on Friday (August 1) visited a food distribution site in Gaza operated by an Israeli-backed American contractor, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Media reports have highlighted that aid-seeking Palestinians have been attacked nearly-daily at GHF-operated aid sites, prompting severe criticism from the UN and other Arab nations questioning the credibility of the organisation. In a report issued on Friday, the New York-based Human Rights Watch said GHF was at the heart of a 'flawed, militarised aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths,' Reuters reported. At least 24 people, including 13 aid seekers, have been killed on Saturday (August 2) in Israeli attacks across Gaza, while two more children and an adult have died due to 'famine and malnutrition', bringing the number of deaths from starvation in the territory to 162, including 92 children, Al Jazeera reported citing the enclave's Health Ministry. Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 60,332 people and wounded 147,643 others. An estimated 1,139 people were killed in Israel during the October 7 attack, and more than 200 were taken captive. Send your feedback and ideas to Ashiya Parveen is working as Commissioning Editor for the UPSC Section at The Indian Express. She also writes a weekly round up of global news, The World This Week. Ashiya has more than 10 years of experience in editing and writing spanning media and academics, and has both academic and journalistic publications to her credit. She has previously worked with The Pioneer and Press Trust of India (PTI). She also holds a PhD in international studies from Centre for West Asian Studies, JNU. ... Read More
News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
Taiwan's Dilemma: U.S. Support in Question as Tensions with China Rise Tariff War
As tensions rise over Taiwan, questions loom about U.S. support under Trump. With Taiwan's president canceling a trip amid potential Chinese aggression, analysts ponder if Trump will prioritize Taiwan or leverage it in negotiations with China. n18oc_wlorld
