Shafie calls for MACC probe into Sepanggar water contractor amid UMS crisis
KOTA KINABALU (June 5): Warisan president Datuk Seri Panglima Mohd Shafie Apdal has urged the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to launch an investigation into the contractor or water concessionaire responsible for the Sepanggar area, following the ongoing water crisis affecting Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS).
'What is their track record? Were contracts awarded transparently? Is there corruption or mismanagement at play?' Shafie questioned in a statement issued on Thursday.
He said that if the Sabah state government has nothing to hide, it should welcome MACC's involvement.
'Being open to scrutiny is the first step toward solving the real problem. Let us not insult the intelligence of Sabahans by blaming others. If this government still needs to point fingers after five years in power, then it has admitted its own incompetence. Enough is enough. Water is not a political game — it is a human right,' he stressed.
Referring to the prolonged water supply issues at UMS, Shafie said the crisis has escalated beyond a local concern and has become a national embarrassment.
'When students at a major public university are forced to go days without clean water to drink, cook, and bathe, it reflects a deep failure in governance, planning and empathy,' he said.
He also pointed out that despite nearly five years under the Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) administration, no meaningful progress has been made to resolve this fundamental problem.
'If proper planning had been done, no student would still be facing water shortages in 2025 — certainly not in lecture halls, not in hostels, and not in Sabah.'
He highlighted that UMS is not a remote school but a national institution with over 23,000 students and staff who rely on the R13 tank, which also serves Hospital Likas and surrounding commercial areas.
Shafie revealed that when water levels in the tank fall below 0.5 metres, the entire supply system fails — yet repeated complaints and formal letters to the Sabah State Water Department (JANS) have reportedly gone unanswered.
'Instead of action, we have only seen denials and deflections,' he said.
More troubling, he added, is the discrepancy between public statements made by JANS claiming sufficient water supply, and those of UMS Vice-Chancellor Prof Datuk Dr Kasim Mansor, who contradicted those claims.
'This raises serious concerns about transparency and internal accountability within JANS,' said Shafie.
He described the hardships faced by students, who have had to seek alternative housing, spend on bottled water, and queue with pails just to bathe, all while trying to pursue their education.
'It's no wonder the students are protesting. They are demanding basic human dignity. We are not making accusations — we are calling for transparency,' Shafie concluded.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
42 minutes ago
- Daily Express
‘History determines politics': Ex-AG says good time to revisit M'sia's formation
Published on: Sunday, July 13, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 13, 2025 By: David Thien Text Size: TOMMY said the concerns expressed by Sabahans and Sarawakians of domination by the Centre made its naked appearance within three years of Malaysia's formation. 'Stephen Kalong Ningkan's removal as Sarawak Chief Minister and his replacement by a pliable Penghulu Tawi Sli, made predictions of Kuala Lumpur's domination come true very quickly. 'The outbreak of the May 1969 riots in Kuala Lumpur without any manifestation in East Malaysia, the National Emergency that followed and the introduction of the National Economic Policy in 1971, proved critics right that race-based politics would be exported to East Malaysia.' Tommy said the politics that developed over the 60 years since 1963 is best understood against the historical background of the Federation. 'History determines politics. Without a past, how to understand the present or hope for the future? Hence, it is critical to consider the genesis of Malaysia's formation, which takes us back to the British Empire and World War II. As we complete the first quarter of the 21st century, this is as good a time as any to revisit our foundation. 'The major actors in this decolonisation exercise of the British Empire were Britain, Malaya, Singapore, North Borneo, Sarawak and Brunei. Also playing a starring role were neighbouring Indonesia and Philippines, each hostile to any federation.' 'The United States looked at every development in international affairs from Cold War lenses.' 'Finally, the United Nations was directly involved in the final months of its creation. Prime Ministers Harold MacMillan and Tunku Abdul Rahman were pivotal, with Lee Kuan Yew having a significant presence. Leading the Opposition were the charismatic leaders of the Third World, President Sukarno and President Macapagal of the Philippines.' 'As one would expect, each of the nations and its leaders had differing interests in supporting or opposing the establishment of Malaysia.' 'None of their national interests were identical. Accordingly, it is proposed to consider how each of them acted in the run-up to 1963.' 'The primary source of information on the decision-making is found in the collection of documents compiled by one of Malaya's foremost historians, Professor Anthony Stockwell in the 'British Documents on the End of Empire' in the dedicated volume on Malaysia. 'Upon the reduction to 30 years of official documents for public release by the Wilson Government in 1965, nearly all the files and records became available for publication.' 'The Malaysia volume was published in 2004. Obviously, these documents tell the story of the making of Malaysia from the perspective of British policy-makers, but with that caveat, it is a treasure trove.' Tommy said the post-war separation of Singapore and Malaya was deeply regretted, not only by the Left but also by many British policy-makers not least on economic grounds, but the prospect of merger was always kept alive. 'In a despatch dated 25th October 1960 from Lord Selkirk, the UK High Commissioner in Singapore, to Iain MacLeod, the Secretary of State for the Colonies, British policy was succinctly stated as follows:- 'Our first recommendation is that Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom should accept as the ultimate aim of their policy the development of a political association between Malaya, Singapore and the Borneo territories such as would enable them to take their place within the Commonwealth as a single entity strong enough to resist encroachment from their neighbours or from Communist China. 'Though the exact form of union, federation or confederation that might emerge cannot be foreseen at this stage, we consider that some such broad association provides the only satisfactory evolution which will safeguard in the longer term not only the security, economic development and welfare of the territories themselves, but also, on a basis of consent, the United Kingdom's own essential defence interests consisting of the base in Singapore and the necessary deployment areas outside it.' However, this was met by this response from Sir William Goode, Governor of then North Borneo:- 'North Borneo is a strikingly beautiful country of happy, friendly people, busy building and planting for the future and still content with colonial rule.' He narrated that as the 1960's began, British foreign policy was to reduce or eliminate her colonial and defence commitments globally. MacMillan's famous 'Wind of Change' theme was announced in Ghana in January 1960, and repeated in Cape Town in February 1960. British policy in South-East Asia must, therefore, be viewed against the background of its overall imperial policy amid the setting of the British Sun all over the world. 'With regard to her remaining colonies in South-East Asia, a high-level Committee reported to Prime Minister MacMillan in October 1960. The aims of the British Government were stated by that Committee as follows:- (a) to contain Communism; (b) to maintain Western influence; The United Kingdom also has certain special obligations in the area:- (a) as the centre of the Commonwealth and the Sterling area; (b) to her dependent territories, notably responsibility for Hong Kong and prevention of Communist control over Singapore.' Tommy noted that constraints on UK's defence policy were highlighted, viz, that British resources and facilities could not continue for another decade (that is, into the 1970s) on 'present scales and in present terms'. More decisive was the high-cost factor in the light of her economic situation. A review of her defence role in South-East Asia was, therefore, urgently needed. At the same time, the total withdrawal of British forces could not be contemplated because that would mean abandoning her colonial responsibilities and her defence treaty with Malaya. 'The making of Malaysia, at least from the British perspective, also had an economic dimension. The British economy faced balance of payments problems and galloping defence costs associated with the Cold War. Stockwell writes:- 'Strategies of decolonisation could help Britain address these problems if, by moving from formal to informal empire, it found a new role in the world. With respect to South-East Asia, the 'Grand Design' for a 'Greater Malaysia' might perpetuate Britain's influence in the post-colonial period. Those in British governing circles who welcomed Malaysia did so on account of its expected benefits for Britain.' Tommy: 'Hence, the condemnation of Malaysia from the Left as 'neo-colonialism', had ample justification, that is, the pursuit of imperialism by indirect means through favourite proxies or cronies.' What were British economic interests in real terms? British private capital investment in Malaya was estimated at about £400 million (compared with £335 million in India and £108 in Pakistan). British exports were valued at £60 million annually, while 22 per cent of Malaysia's imports were from the mother country. 'In early 1963, Sir Geofroy Tory, the United Kingdom High Commissioner in Kuala Lumpur, observed that Britain had 'a very big financial stake in Malaya and a considerable vested interest in the maintenance of a stable and prosperous Malayan economy'. Nonetheless, the impact of economic factors should not be exaggerated, for ultimately the security of the region and the cost of maintaining it was the overriding consideration. Stockwell summarised British policy this way:- 'The prospects for the 'Grand Design' were, therefore, assessed from the strategic perspective not the economic. Bases not markets, security not commerce, international influence not investment opportunities dominated the thinking of British ministers and officers'. In summary, the compelling attraction of Greater Malaysia for the United Kingdom was the prospect of retaining influence while reducing expenditure. Hence, the United Kingdom's objective to continue to play a dominant role in world affairs generally, and as a major former colonial power in South-East Asia at reduced cost, would be accomplished in the new Federation.
Focus Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
'Turun Anwar' rally: A call for unity to save Malaysia from impending crisis of sorts
THE United Rights of Malaysian Party (Urimai) is calling on all Malaysians – Malays, Chinese, Indians and all others who believe in justice and democracy – to participate in the peaceful 'Turun Anwar' rally which is a nationwide call for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to step down. Editor's Note: The PAS-backed rally will take place on July 26 (Saturday) at Dataran Merdeka in Kuala Lumpur. Anwar who has yet to complete even one full term in office has betrayed the trust of Malaysians by failing to uphold democratic values. The most alarming issue is his interference in the judiciary – a cornerstone of democracy. His refusal to extend the service of former chief justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat despite her stellar record and the quiet removal of other senior judges raises serious concerns of executive overreach. In stark contrast, the term of Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki, a figure mired in controversy has been extended three times under Anwar's leadership. Under Anwar's administration, Malaysia has drifted further into a crisis of inequality. While the PM speaks grandly of foreign direct investments (FDI) and national progress, ordinary Malaysians are left to suffer: The Sales and Services Tax (SST) tax hike has further squeezed the working and middle class. Consumer prices are soaring, placing essential goods out of reach for many. Youth unemployment remains high with no clear policy direction to create meaningful, sustainable jobs. Public healthcare and education systems are under-funded while lavish funds continue to flow into mega projects that do not benefit the rakyat. 'Progress has stifled' Anwar has become a symbol of broken promises and elite capture. The rhetoric of reform has been replaced by authoritarian practices and protection for political allies, ie the use of state institutions like the MACC as weapons against opponents. Malaysia's foreign debt is now in the trillions of ringgit yet Anwar continues to promote the illusion of economic stability. Promised billions in FDIs remain invisible with no factories, jobs or infrastructure to show for them. The people are right to ask: Where is the progress? Where is the prosperity? The so-called Madani Economy has failed to lift the rakyat's quality of life. Instead, Anwar's leadership has plunged the country deeper into political instability, economic stagnation and social discontent. The Turun Anwar rally is more than just a protest. It is a collective cry from the people – a demand for accountability, justice and the restoration of democracy. Malaysians from all walks of life, all races, and all religions must come together to reclaim the future of the nation. Let this be a turning point in Malaysian history. Let us stand united against tyranny, corruption and incompetence. Let July 26 be the day Malaysians rise – not for any political party – but for the nation. – July 13, 2025 Former DAP Bagan Dalam state assemblyman, Satees Muniandy, is today the interim secretary of United Rights of Malaysian Party (Urimai). The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Images credit: HarakahDaily
Daily Express
2 hours ago
- Daily Express
Hajiji's emphatic ‘No' to Sabah mining welcome
Published on: Sunday, July 13, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 13, 2025 By: Datuk John Lo Text Size: NOT new on Attempts to control Sabah's Government and Resources Such attempts have existed since MA 63 because of political disunity. Sabah is famous for religious and racial unity. BUT political unity has been elusive from the very beginning of MA63, from Donald Stephens [later Fuad] and Mustapha down to this very day. Because of persistent political disunity, there have been continuous attempts to control Sabah's government and resources most which have succeeded to varying degrees. Sabah has never had a truly independent Sabahan Government. The party or parties in government had to rely on Malayan parities to stay in power. Such dependence has existed even when the government was under a Sabah based party or a coalition of parties with Malayan parties in charge. Over the years, Sabah has lost control and ownership of the economy. Sabahans do not own/control the 5 major economic sectors of oil palm, oil and gas, tourism, manufacturing, and timber. The loss of ownership of the oil palm industry is most dramatic when Malayan plantation companies 'bought' cheap land from political leaders who have applied for hundreds of thousands of acres at dirt cheap premium. Results? More than 90% of 4.4 million acres of oil palm belong to non-Sabah. No downstream, no jobs for Sabahans. Sabah has created/contributed to enriching many Malayan millionaires and billionaires. Sabah has also created the worst poverty. Past Tactics to Control Sabah and Siphon off Sabah's Resources. Subtle, seldom openly. Many Sabahans know that there have been hidden hands from Malayan politicians and businessmen manipulating Sabah's politics and economy/finance. Sabah's elected politicians were never 'in charge' in the true sense, having to 'refer to KL' or 'ask for greenlight'. Always kowtow. Frequently, Malayan politicians have been accompanied by 'predatory businessmen' to fix lopsided deals that were to Sabah's disadvantage. Many Sabahans, especially senior officials, professionals, and businessmen, know this sort of 'arrangements', helplessly looking at all these exploitations. What's Different in the latest Scandal? The objective and audacity are scary. The entrapment is frightening. The tactics are at a whole new level and dimension, well planned, executed and frighteningly extensive and crude. It is set to entrap ministers and key YBs holding important posts in GLCs by hidden videos like those in the James Bond movies. It has penetrated in the management of a GLC. It is well funded. Never seen before is the possibility of involvement of foreigners. MACC has confirmed it is investigating. 'Taiko' or mastermind has yet to surface and unlikely to appear anytime soon. Blackmail in the form of 'exposé' and threat of 'overthrow' of government to CM Hajiji. Never done before. The whole episode smells foul like a failed CIA plot of 'regime change' in some Latin American countries which have refused to subservient to the big bad Uncle Sam in Washington. Thanks to be to God, Hajiji has the Courage to say 'NO' RESOLUTELY. From information in the public domain, one can quite imagine at some point that Hajiji must have been confronted of the 'scheme' and imminent threat to destabilize his government. Coming so near to the election 2025, he could have taken the easy way out and said yes or play the delay tactics and waited for the election to be over. Hajiji did not take the easy out. This, Sabahans must give him credit for his uncompromising stance to protect Sabah's interest. He has said NO DEAL! He has chosen to reject and not to surrender to the threat to his government. He told them to 'fly kite' and 'get lost.' Courageous. The decision to say 'NO' is not a simple matter. It takes lots of conviction. What Would Happen if Hajiji were to Give in? Not difficult to imagine the dire consequences for Sabah and for Sabahans' future. Sabah would have lost much more than the mineral resources. Sabah would have lost dignity. respect, and possibly the whole economy. Who can tell what would be their next demand? Investors would lose confidence and become wary. Existing investors may not stay and new ones will be reluctant to come. The hard-earned equitable Sabah/Federal relationship would have been lost. With it, also likely the fight for our 40% share of revenue, TSA2012. The CM and the whole Sabah government would be controlled by non-Sabahans with vested interest. Surely, no right minded Sabahan wants this. Disastrous for our future generations. This is Sabah's first existential threat. Major Political Leaders must not glee with happiness over this Scandal. What Hajiji is facing is the worst trial and tribulation that any Sabah CM has been confronted with since MA63. Other CMs and Sabah leaders who have held substantive federal cabinet posts have experienced similar coercions, albeit not as blatant and as crude as this mining scandal. Had Hajiji not firmly put a stop to it, could have festered into an existential threat for our State. Such threats must be treated with the utmost seriousness. As such, all leaders of political parties, who claim to love Sabah, must sink their political differences and condemn this in strongest, unequivocable condemnation because it is an existential threat to Sabah's soverignity and integrity in malaysia by outsiders. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
