Fresh mining push in Tumakuru forest raises ecological concerns
The Forest Department has given its consent for diversion of 119.23 acres of forestland in Tumakuru district for mining purpose that will result in axing of nearly 17,200 trees.
The proposed mining project is in Thirtharamapura Reserve Forest, and is spread across Gollarahalli, Hosahalli, Kodihalli, Tonalapura, and Lakmenahalli in Chikkanayakanahalli taluk.
The department, in its letter dated May 14, 2025, recommended for 'moving the proposal' with the Union government for according 'in-principle' approval of diversion of 119.23 acres or 48.20 hectares of forestland.
Incidentally, the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) had conducted a site inspection close to the current location and had turned down two other mining proposals in the past, by different project proponents.
The inspection report carried out by the Deputy Conservator of Forests (Central) in 2017 stated that the area was mined from 1952 to 1998, and the original lease was split to many mining companies by the Department of Mines and Geology in violation of the Forest Conservation Act.
The report also stated that 'currently, the forests are showing regeneration and during the visit there were direct sightings of chital, black-naped hare, while scats of sloth bear and leopard were also seen. The area, the report pointed out, sheltered migratory population of elephants from Bannerghatta National Park to Bhadra between September and December.
The MoEF&CC also stated that the area was the only watershed for the villages surrounding Chikkanayanakahalli, a drought hit area and hence it would be prudent not to divert it for mining, from the watershed point of view and maintained for ecological restoration.
Meanwhile, wildlife conservationist Giridhar Kulkarni has raised alarm over the Forest Department's decision to allow fresh mining in the ecologically sensitive forest areas of Tumakuru district, despite prior rejections of similar proposals by the MoEF&CC.
Mr. Kulkarni, in a letter dated June 6, 2025, has appealed to Additional Chief Secretary (Forest, Ecology, and Environment) Anjum Parwez to reject the proposal seeking diversion of forestland for mining on the grounds that the area was rich in wildlife, acts as a critical watershed, and has already suffered from ecologically damaging mining practices in the past.
He pointed out that the MoEF&CC inspection report has flagged the potential impact on waterbodies and recommended against any further mining. He warned that if approved, mining will further escalate human-wildlife conflict and undermine the ecological restoration under way in the region.
Underlining the imperatives of rejecting the proposal, Mr. Kulkarni said the project will also have a negative bearing on the livelihood of the local communities in and around Chikkanayakanahalli. This is in addition to escalation of human-animal conflict, he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Ministry approves regularisation of Vijayapura-Mangaluru train
Mangaluru: The railway ministry has approved the South Western Railway's (SWR) proposal to regularise the services of train No. 07377/07378 Vijayapura-Mangaluru Central-Vijayapura Special, thereby bringing much relief to passengers. Dakshina Kannada MP Capt Brijesh Chowta said the long-pending demand to regularise the Vijayapura–Mangaluru train has been fulfilled. "This move will benefit patients from north Karnataka seeking medical care in Mangaluru, students pursuing education in coastal districts, and regular passengers. Much gratitude to our Union minister of railways Ashwini Vaishnaw, minister of state for railways V Somanna for enabling this," Capt Chowta wrote on social media platform X. The ministry stated in a notification dated June 27 that it approved the proposal of SWR for regularisation of 07377/ 07378 Vijayapura-Mangaluru Central Special as 17377/ 17378 Vijayapura-Mangaluru Central Express. "The above regularisation may be given effect from an early convenient date,'" the ministry stated. Passengers had to pay enhanced fares on the special (train on demand) services compared to the regular services. As per the June 27 notification, the departure timing of train No. 17378 is 4.45pm from Mangaluru Central, and will arrive in Vijayapura at 11.15am. Meanwhile, train No. 17377, Vijayapura-Mangaluru Central Express, leaves Vijayapura at 3pm to reach Mangaluru Central at 9.50am. The Vijayapura-Mangaluru Junction train was introduced in Nov 2019. Later, the special trains got cancelled during the Covid-19 pandemic. After the restoration of the services from Dec 1, 2021, the route was extended to Mangaluru Central from April 2024. The trains will have stoppages at Basavana Bagewadi Road, Alamatti, Bagalkot, Guledagudda Road, Badami, Hole Alur, Mallapur, Gadag, Annigeri, Hubballi, Yalvigi, Haveri, Byadagi, Ranebennur, Harihar, Davanagere, Chikjajur, Birur, Kadur, Arasikere, Hassan, Sakleshpur, Subrahmanya Road, Kabaka Puttur, Bantwal, and Mangaluru Junction.
The Hindu
11 hours ago
- The Hindu
Translocation of colony trees draws controversy
Removal of trees from the margins of a colony road in the city has become controversial, when Forest Department officials issued permission for translocation of the trees from a different address than given in the application. According to the details available, all residents except one, along Road No. 4, Anand Nagar Colony, Bandlaguda of Nagole, decided to do away with the trees on the road margins, as the colony road had become narrow, denying manoeuvrability for four-wheelers. They felled a couple of trees a year ago, which was reported to Forest officials, who inspected the site and penalised the offenders. After learning the proper procedure from the foresters, a resident, K. Suresh Babu, later approached the Forest Department seeking permission to fell the remaining six trees — Jamun, Guava, Tella Maddi, two Seetaphal, and a Moduga, giving his address as the location. The resident approached the Urban Biodiversity wing of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) too, for a 'No Objection Certificate' (NOC). This was the twist. The applicant had no trees lining his house. The pictures of the trees lining the opposite house were given with the geo-coordinates of Mr. Suresh Babu's house, as alleged by the owner of the opposite house, Rahul Rachakonda. 'I wanted to retain the trees, because they once protected us from an uprooted electrical pole. I fought tooth and nail for them. I made 15 representations to the Forest department and GHMC not to allow felling of the trees, but to no avail,' Mr. Rachakonda said. On Saturday, the trees except Tella Maddi were uprooted by labourers in an unscientific manner, and carried away. Interestingly, the NOC from the Urban Biodiversity wing of Hayatnagar circle says that the trees at the applicant's address 'may be translocated by the owner of the tree in his own premises'. As it transpired, neither Mr. Suresh Babu nor Mr. Rachakonda was the 'owner' of the trees, nor were the trees at the given address, nor have they been translocated inside the owner's premises. 'They tried to convince me to allow the trees to be translocated into my premises as mandated in the permission, but I put my foot down and said they should be retained where they were,' Mr. Rachakonda said. Upon seeking clarification, FRO, Uppal, K. Sharat Chandra Reddy said that majority of the residents wanted the trees to go as the road was narrow, and hence permission was given. He said the trees were translocated to the road margins at a different location. However, the Forest permission says that they should be moved to 'Residential' premises at the given address only. The road width was shown as 25 feet in the colony layout, but only about 18 feet remains after the residents, including the applicant, built ramps extending onto the road. 'This is the most bizarre way to get rid of trees. Some person applies for permissions to remove trees from another person's home!!! and all concerned departments will see the other way till the trees are removed [sic]' read a post by Vata Foundation, which brought the incident to light.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
Five years on, Tiruchy museum renovation still in limbo
TIRUCHY: The State Archaeology Department started renovation of Rani Mangammal's Darbar Hall, which acts as the government museum, started five years ago, but very little progress has been made so far. The museum was relocated from Cantonment to the Darbar Hall in 1998. Historians expressed concerns that hundreds of invaluable artefacts – ranging from stone sculptures and coins to palm-leaf manuscripts – that are cramped up in a single room to facilitate the renovation work could get irrevocably damaged without adequate protective measures. The State Archaeology Department approached the Union government with a proposal to restore the building, built in the 16th century by King Chokkanatha Nayak, after frescoes and decorative elements began to fade and in some places disappeared entirely. In response, the union government sanctioned Rs 3.75 crore under the Museum Grants Scheme in 2019 to renovate the hall. The first phase included cementing and interior painting, which were completed. However, due to the COVID-19 lock downs, the work came to a halt, and has not resumed. Open-air exhibits are particularly at risk. Several rare sculptures and historical objects, including a four-foot-tall Buddha statue, a 10th-century Mahaveer sculpture, 14th-century Pallava artefacts, an East India Company cannon, and idols of Hindu gods and goddesses, are exposed to the elements. Dr R Kalaikovan, director of the Dr Rajamanickanar Historical Research Centre, said his team had handed over 16 granite sculptures, including those of Buddha, Mahaveer, and Chola-period artefacts, to the museum. 'All the sculptures and artefacts must be preserved properly so this historical legacy can be passed on to future generations. If timely action is not taken, we risk losing our history,' he warned. Kalaikovan stressed that there is ample space around the hall for expansion and urged the district administration to allocate land within the premises for protective storage and display. He also opposed the proposal to shift the museum to Panjapur. 'The current location is ideal, surrounded by schools and colleges. Since the land is already government-owned, there's no need to relocate. Even the Madras Museum was expanded at its original site,' he added. Speaking to P Manimuthu, Curator of the Government Museum, told TNIE, 'We are waiting for funds to be released by the government. Once the funds are sanctioned, the work will be completed. We have already submitted the request.'
