
Fleet Emissions Rise As Imports Fall Sharply
A major position paper released by VIA this month— Accelerating the Path to Sustainable Transport —found that not only is the CCS failing to deliver the expected environmental benefits but is also directly undermining progress by constraining access to cleaner, affordable used vehicles—still the most relied-upon segment by 80% of New Zealand consumers.
'The Clean Car Standard was meant to green our roads, but it's stalling fleet renewal and ageing our vehicles,' says Greig Epps, Chief Executive of the Imported Motor Vehicle Industry Association (VIA).
The Clean Car Standard (CCS), launched with the intention of reducing transport emissions, is now under fire from the very industry it was meant to help reform.
'VIA initially supported the Clean Car Programme's intent to reduce emissions but warned in October 2021 that its design could lead to unintended consequences, including vehicle shortages, rising costs, market inefficiencies, fleet aging, and flawed incentives—predictions that, as much as everyone hoped otherwise, have proven to be true,' says Epps.
1. Reassess the volume trap
Data reveals that unless policy is urgently reformed, used import volumes could decline to 60,000 by 2028—a level last seen before the liberalisation of vehicle tariffs in the late 1980s.
A contracting pipeline means fewer efficient vehicles are available to replace the old, high-emitting ones still on New Zealand's roads. That dynamic, compounded by cost-of-living pressures, will incentivise owners to repair and retain older cars, which will effectively reverse the emissions gains CCS was designed to produce.
Epps says the reality is sobering, 'The average vehicle age is climbing, and with it, emissions per kilometre. Treasury warned back in 2019 that fleet refreshment—not just cleaner cars—was critical to reducing net emissions. VIA's latest reports show this advice was not heeded.'
2. Focus on fuel, not just fleets
'The fastest way to cut emissions is to target the energy source, not just the car,' says Epps.
The paper advocates for a broader approach through a transparent, user-pays fuel levy to reflect the true climate cost of driving. By making petrol more expensive at the pump, behaviour change is more likely across all vehicle types, rather than penalising just the act of importing a car.
'We believe this would shift the incentive from vehicle purchase decisions alone to everyday usage—a more equitable approach,' says Epps. 'Especially given that vehicle supply is driven by Japanese auction markets and foreign exchange rates far beyond the control of Kiwi buyers or importers.'
3. Keep it simple, and sustainable
Epps says the VIA is calling for CCS overhaul, if not replacement.
'At the heart of the issue is a misaligned set of targets and incentives. For example, current weight allowances mean that heavier vehicles receive more lenient emissions benchmarks, creating a perverse incentive that favours larger cars—despite their greater fuel use.'
Epps is calling for a flat penalty for each gram of CO over a set threshold, applied at first registration and clearly displayed at the point of sale.
'This system would be transparent, fair, and easier for consumers to understand. Crucially, it would also better align with used market realities, where options are constrained by Japan's registration patterns from a decade ago,' he says.
Broad approach to transport needed
Epps says a genuinely effective response to transport emissions in New Zealand requires a whole-of-system approach—one that goes far beyond simply regulating the cars we drive.
'Focusing solely on the Clean Car Standard (CCS) neglects the broader ecosystem of transport choices that shape daily mobility, particularly in urban areas. Investment in public transport infrastructure offers scalable emissions reductions by shifting commuters out of private vehicles altogether.
'Electrifying bus fleets, expanding train services, and supporting active transport options like cycling and walking through safe, connected cycleways can deliver rapid, population-wide benefits.'
Epps says these initiatives reduce vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) and lower dependence on fossil fuels, regardless of the vehicle fleet's emissions profile.
'The Clean Car Standard can't carry the entire weight of our climate commitments,' says Epps, and the data supports this. By rebalancing policy focus to include modal shift—encouraging more people to choose buses, bikes, or trains instead of cars—New Zealand can achieve meaningful emissions reductions while also improving health, congestion, and social equity,' he says.
This means investing not only in infrastructure but also in affordability and access: subsidised public transport, integrated ticketing systems, and support for electric bike ownership all play a role.
'A diversified strategy doesn't dilute emissions efforts—it strengthens them, ensuring more New Zealanders can participate in the transition, not just those in a position to buy a cleaner car,' says Epps.
The path forward
The original Clean Car Programme was built on good intentions, but execution has strayed into over-engineered policy that now actively hampers the transition it aimed to enable.
'Without affordable used hybrids and electrics flowing into the country at scale, emissions will continue to rise despite regulatory efforts.'
Epps says that unfortunately, VIA's consistent warnings since 2021 have come to pass.
'We encourage the Government to decide whether to recalibrate to create a greener, more sustainable transport system. The alternative is rising costs, older cars, and missed climate targets,' he says.
For more information: www.via.org.nz
ABOUT
VIA (Imported Motor Vehicle Industry Association) represents businesses involved in importing, preparing, wholesaling, and retailing used vehicles into New Zealand, primarily from Japan, Singapore, and other markets. As the industry's collective voice, VIA engages with government and stakeholders to support fair regulation and sustainable practices across the sector.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Techday NZ
16 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Exclusive: AI drives new cyber threats & resilience strategies in APJ
There is both opportunity and risk, as artificial intelligence (AI) is adopted at enterprises across the region, according to Ben Young, Field CTO for APJ at Veeam. He also sees businesses are under pressure not only to adopt new technologies but also to shore up their defences as adversarial groups increasingly harness the same innovations for malicious purposes. "Every single vertical can benefit from some form of AI adoption," Young asserts. "But it's a double-edged sword. Just as we're trying to innovate, the threat groups-cyber adversaries-are leveraging AI as well." He points to the growing accessibility of AI-powered toolkits that lower the bar for launching attacks: "There are tools you can buy for a few hundred USD a month as a subscription, and they allow non-experts to write malware or deploy very convincing phishing campaigns. Large language models can push spear phishing click-through rates from industry averages of 12% up to 54%." This sharp escalation in the sophistication and volume of threats comes at a pivotal time when organisations are also accelerating their AI strategies. Veeam, which originally established its brand in backup and disaster recovery, is rapidly expanding its portfolio to address an evolving landscape, protecting hybrid environments, SaaS platforms, and even providing storage for backup workloads. Young notes that the company's partnerships, especially with Microsoft on Azure, have enabled it to offer backup-as-a-service while leveraging global economies of scale-critically, with "no egress and no API transaction fees." However, he's quick to add that adaptability is part of its core: "It's on the roadmap for other clouds to run these things, because not everyone's an Azure shop." The broadening definition of business resilience now brings backup and security disciplines much closer together. 90% of cyber attacks focus on backup repositories, which has resulted in disaster recovery and cybersecurity being intertwined. "Backups are the last resort, and threat actors know it. If they take out your backups, your only options are to pay the ransom and hope for the best," Young explains. Veeam's acquisition of CoveWare, an incident response firm, enables the direct integration of real-world telemetry and threat intelligence into Veeam's product development and customer education initiatives. Changing regulations are also playing a critical part. The recently enacted Japanese cyber defence bill mandates the reporting of ransomware incidents and the development of regular response plans. Young applauds this direction, noting, "It's critical we talk about incidents-otherwise these are not board-level discussions and security teams struggle for budget." He points out that cyber extortion is no longer a niche risk. Financial institutions and public sector organisations, in particular, are contending with increasingly sophisticated AI-enabled attacks while balancing compliance, governance, and privacy regulations across diverse national boundaries. The surge in 'shadow IT'-where departments launch unsanctioned SaaS, AI applications or cloud projects-presents new blind spots. "We're seeing lots of little shadow IT projects, especially as people rush to experiment with AI. When that gets to production, who is looking after that system? It's the same shadow IT problem we've seen for years, now amplified by the ease of consuming AI services," Young says. This requires a step change in visibility. Veeam is responding by mapping and analysing customers' data footprints and building automated support, monitoring, and reporting features through its observability platform. The company's AI-powered 'Veeam Intelligence Engine' is designed to suggest remediations, generate code samples, and flag risks in natural language-"making support and reporting far more accessible," says Young. The complexity of emerging architectures compounds the challenge of AI adoption. "We're really good at protecting databases and webservers because we know what they are and how to back them up. But with the introduction of vector databases, AI agents, and model training checkpoints, we need new strategies," Young explains. The potential cost and risk of a failed AI project, such as losing weeks of model training due to corrupted data, is prompting enterprises to consider backup and recovery for infrastructure previously outside the IT remit. "Agents are going to be central to the future, especially with more reliable, reflective AI systems. The good news is, most of these platforms run on environments-Kubernetes, cloud infrastructure-that we already protect." Young identifies security lapses as a persistent oversight in the current rush to implement AI: "It's the shiny new thing, and the basics can be forgotten. If we can get people thinking about security as part of their DNA while deploying AI, they'll be better off." He cautions that most SaaS providers operate a shared responsibility model: "Microsoft or Salesforce take care of the platform, not your data. If it's deleted from the cloud, it's gone-vendors won't provide a full backup. Your data is your responsibility." Against this backdrop, keeping pace with threats requires organisation-wide preparation. Veeam's customer workshops and regular incident simulations demonstrate a commitment to education as a proactive defence. "Preparation is the key: practice and plan. Use your tools, test your backups, scan for vulnerabilities, and have a response plan. Yara signature rules, for example, can be imported to scan for specific attack strains in backup archives," Young says, emphasising the importance of practical readiness over theoretical robustness. Young notes that Veeam's AI and resilience roadmap is anchored in five pillars: infrastructure resilience, intelligence, security pre- and post-attack, and business value extraction from archived data. The company's long-standing data integration API, for instance, enables the surfacing of unstructured data, ranging from images to documents, for AI applications, analytics, or compliance. "AI applications require fuel, and that fuel is data. Unlocking value from our organisations means thinking beyond expensive, monolithic data lakes, and instead focusing on the ability to extract insight from all data sources, structured or not." "Our role is to assist with growing compliance, governance, and regulatory requirements, but also to bring responsible, opt-in AI features to our customers and to help make data protection, cybersecurity, and digital transformation board-level priorities," Young concludes. "It's critical we talk about incidents-it raises awareness across all organisations. If we don't, it's not going to be a board-level discussion, and teams will struggle to get budget for this stuff."

1News
2 days ago
- 1News
King Charles decommissions royal train after 156 years of service
The Royal Train will soon leave the station for the last time. King Charles III has accepted it's time to decommission the train, whose history dates back to Queen Victoria, because it costs too much to operate and would have needed a significant upgrade for more advanced rail systems, Buckingham Palace said on Tuesday. "In moving forwards we must not be bound by the past," said James Chalmers, the palace official in charge of the king's financial affairs. "Just as so many parts of the royal household's work have modernised and adapted to reflect the world of today, so too the time has come to bid the fondest of farewells, as we seek to be disciplined and forward-looking in our allocation of funding." The train, actually a suite of nine railcars that could be hitched to commercial locomotives, would be decommissioned sometime before the current maintenance contract expired in 2027. That would bring to an end a tradition that dates back to 1869, when Queen Victoria commissioned a pair of special coaches to accommodate her travels. The decision was announced during the palace's annual briefing for reporters on the royal finances. ADVERTISEMENT The royal family would for the fourth consecutive year receive public funding of £86.3 million (NZ$194.4 million), including £34.5 million (NZ$77.7 million) to fund the remodelling of Buckingham Palace, in the 12 months through March 2026. This money came from a mechanism known as the Sovereign Grant, which set aside 12% of the net income from the Crown Estate to fund the official duties of the king and other members of the royal family. The Crown Estate was a portfolio of properties owned by the monarch during his reign. The properties were professionally managed and the king could not dispose of the assets. The Crown Estate ias one of the many relics of Britain's feudal past. King George III, who ruled during the American Revolution, surrendered management of the crown lands to Parliament in 1760 in return for a fixed payment from the Treasury. The royal finances remained a topic of public debate, with Charles pledging to slim down the monarchy and cut costs as he sought to ensure the institution's survival. Buckingham Palace was quick to point out that while the Sovereign Grant has been unchanged for the past four years, inflation has eroded its value. If the grant had increased in line with inflation, it would have been about 106 million pounds this year, the palace said. The basic grant was supplemented with £21.5 million (NZ$48.4 million) of income generated by properties outside the Crown Estate. This income increased by £1.7 million (NZ$3.8 million), driven by a record year for visitors to Buckingham Palace and special tours of the newly renovated East Wing. ADVERTISEMENT Craig Prescott, a constitutional law expert at Royal Holloway, University of London who focused on the political role of the monarchy, said funding for the royals was relatively small when compared to the overall cost of the British state and it provides tangible benefits for the country. "It's something that puts Britain on the world stage in a way that few other things do," he said, noting that Queen Elizabeth II's funeral was the largest gathering of world leaders in history and the coronation was broadcast around the world. "It's one of those things that people think about when they think about Britain." Over the past year, Charles travelled to Australia and attended the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa — his first as the organisation's head. The royals also took centre stage at the 80th anniversaries of D-Day and V-E Day, which marked the end of World War II in Europe, and welcomed the leaders of Japan and Qatar as they made state visits to the UK. Overall, the royals made 1900 public appearances in the UK and overseas. Some 93,000 guests attended 828 events at the royal palaces.


The Spinoff
2 days ago
- The Spinoff
The cost of being: A ‘frugal' pharmacist and dad who's hoping to retire by 50
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a 34-year-old 'worrier' describes his approach to spending and saving. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here. Gender: Male. Age: 34. Ethnicity: Japanese. Role: Pharmacist and dad of three kids. Salary/income/assets: Household income is $80k, assets $500k. My living location is: Suburban. Rent/mortgage per week: Own home with no mortgage. Student loan or other debt payments per week: $40k student loan. Typical weekly food costs Groceries: $400 for a family of five and a dog. Eating out: $5. We seldom eat out as our kids are still little. Takeaways: $30 – sometimes we get McDonald's or fish n chips. Workday lunches: Always bring last night's leftovers. Cafe coffees/snacks: Make coffee at home. Other food costs: $5 for vege garden. Savings: We save between $500-$700 a week. Mainly saving for retirement. Hoping to retire early by 50. I worry about money: Always. Three words to describe my financial situation: Comfortable. Intentional. Frugal. My biggest edible indulgence would be: McDonald's. In a typical week my alcohol expenditure would be: $0. In a typical week my transport expenditure would be: $100 for petrol and parking. I estimate in the past year the ballpark amount I spent on my personal clothing (including sleepwear and underwear) was: $100 on undies and socks. Nothing exciting. My most expensive clothing in the past year was: $28 on twin pack of Bonds undies. My last pair of shoes cost: $20. New Balance casual shoes. Found on Marketplace and basically new condition. My grooming/beauty expenditure in a year is about: $0. My wife cuts my hair. My exercise expenditure in a year is about: $80 for new shoes. $500 for football membership. $300 for golf. My last Friday night cost: Nil. Stayed at home. Most regrettable purchase in the last 12 months was: I bought my sports shoes online but they were half a size too small. Still use them but not as comfortable as they could have been. Most indulgent purchase (that I don't regret) in the last 12 months was: New golf grips. $150. One area where I'm a bit of a tightwad is: Everywhere. I'm always trying to buy things at the cheapest price. Five words to describe my financial personality would be: Frugal. Thoughtful. Worrier. Learner. Indexer. I grew up in a house where money was: My parents were well off and spent money on the things they cared about (food, travel, education) but cut costs everywhere else. We never had to worry about money but also never felt rich as my parents would mainly only buy needs not wants. The last time my Eftpos card was declined was: Never. In five years, in financial terms, I see myself: Having more money in investments but still saving for retirement. Hopefully having more options like working part time or changing to a new job that I'll enjoy more. I would love to have more money for: Giving to others and travel. Describe your financial low: A few years ago when my first child was born we moved cities and I had no job for a few months. Financially we went through a lot of our savings but emotionally it was worth it to spend time at home. I give money away to: I give to any fundraisers that people I know are doing. Like school ones or friends doing Movember. I also give to friends and family who have kids or birthdays.