SC halves cost imposed on Narcotics Control Bureau by Calcutta HC
A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran passed the order on Centre's plea challenging the Calcutta High Court's June 16, 2024 order.
The high court imposed the cost on the NCB over the delay in appealing against an acquittal in a case.
The amount was directed to be paid to West Bengal State Legal Services Authority, Kolkata, within a week.
The NCB was directed to recover the cost from its personnel involved in the process of drafting and filing the government appeal.
The apex court, however, ordered the cost to be deposited by the government and not the officers.
"One thing is clear. There must be either the fault of your lawyer or your officer. It has to be either one of them," the bench told the Centre's counsel.
The top court continued, "We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgement. However, the compliance is to be made not by the officer in view of the specific statement made by the Additional Solicitor General but by the petitioner."
The law officer pointed out that in several cases, appeals were filed with delay and it was "disturbing".
He said some observations from the apex court on the issue would be helpful.
"Please understand your position as a lawyer. If they don't come to you, you should know what to do. You don't ask the Supreme Court to issue directions to validate your orders," the bench observed.
The NCB's appeal was against the acquittal verdict of a special NDPS court in Barasat.
The high court order observed that the NCB was required to apply for a leave to appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
"Narcotic Control Bureau did not do so. Narcotic Control Bureau proceeded to file a government appeal without applying for and obtaining an order under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023," it said.
The high court said it had pointed it out on May 19 and then in June with the NCB counsel being told that appropriate leave under the provisions was not obtained to file a government appeal.
On June 16, however, the NCB's counsel sought to withdraw the appeal along with connected applications.
"In view of the conduct of Narcotic Control Bureau, as noted above, granting unconditional leave to withdraw, as prayed for, will not suffice interest of justice. Narcotic Control Bureau must be put on terms," the high court said as it saddled the NCB with ₹ 1 lakh.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Muharram: Officials asked to tighten security
Patna: Patna divisional commissioner Chandrashekhar Singh on Thursday directed all district magistrates to ensure that no processions are conducted without proper licences and that routes for Muharram processions on July 6 are thoroughly verified. Speaking at a law and order review meeting alongside inspector general of police (central range) Jitendra Rana, Singh asked the officials to strengthen intelligence networks and take special precautions in sensitive areas. "Strict vigilance must be maintained over anti-social elements. The social media monitoring cell should remain active and any rumours must be promptly refuted," he said. He directed the deployment of quick response teams (QRTs) and striking forces with surveillance to be carried out using CCTV, video cameras and drones where needed. "All magistrates and police officers must receive on-site briefings to manage crowds and law and order. If any situation arises, the concerned DM and officials must immediately reach the spot," he added. He stressed the need for continuous CCTV monitoring during festivals and processions. Singh also raised concerns about noise pollution, saying, "During festivals, DJs often exceed permissible decibel levels." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ce Jeudi, l'alarme Verisure à 199€ HT au lieu de 999€ HT Verisure J'en profite Undo He directed DMs to take necessary action under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita using sound meter apps to monitor volume. Singh instructed officials from urban local bodies, electricity, health, fire, and traffic departments to ensure smooth coordination during Muharram. Local bodies were told to maintain cleanliness, ensure excellent traffic management, and guarantee uninterrupted power supply. In preparation for emergencies, civil surgeons were directed to deploy doctors, paramedical staff, ambulances, and essential medicines.
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
HDFC Bank CEO Moves SC Challenging FIR By Lilavati Trust; Hearing On Friday
The bench, comprising Justices M M Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran, says the matter would be listed for hearing on Friday. HDFC Bank CEO and MD Sashidhar Jagdishan on Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging an FIR of cheating and fraud registered against him on a complaint filed by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, which runs the prominent Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Jagdishan, mentioned the matter for urgent listing before a bench of Justices M M Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran. The bench said the matter would be listed for hearing on Friday. 'This is an urgent matter. I request for listing tomorrow on behalf of the HDFC bank and its MD. A frivolous FIR has been lodged against the MD and the bank by trustees of Lilavati hospital who are litigating against the other group of trustees," Rohatgi told the bench. 'The bank has to recover money from them. In order to twist the arm, they have lodged an FIR through a magistrate against the MD," he submitted. Rohatgi said they had moved the Bombay High Court but three benches of the high court have so far recused themselves from hearing the matter. He said the next tentative date given for hearing in the high court was July 14. 'Everyday the bank is suffering," the senior advocate said. According to the complaint filed by the Trust, Jagdishan allegedly accepted a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore in exchange for providing financial advice to help the Chetan Mehta Group retain illegal and undue control over the Trust's governance. The Trust has accused Jagdishan of misusing his position as the head of a leading private bank to interfere in the internal affairs of a charitable organisation. Jagdishan's plea seeking quashing of the first information report (FIR) was first listed in the high court in June. The FIR against Jagdishan was registered at the Bandra police station following an order by a Bandra magistrate court under section 175 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), based on an application moved by the Trust. He was booked under alleged charges of cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal breach of trust by a public servant. In a public statement issued earlier this month, the Trust alleged that the Rs 2.05 crore payment was part of a larger conspiracy to 'loot" the Trust and manipulate its decision-making processes in favour of the Chetan Mehta Group. The Trust has also filed a petition before the high court seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the matter. PTI)
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Denied toilet access, made to kneel overnight: US deportee says he was tortured in El Salvador prison
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was supposed to be safe. In 2019, a US immigration judge ruled that the 29-year-old Salvadoran could not be deported to his home country, citing credible fears that local gangs there would persecute him and his family. But in March 2025, the Trump administration deported him anyway. What followed has triggered a political and legal firestorm over the administration's immigration enforcement, reaching all the way to the US Supreme Court. The White House has repeatedly claimed that Abrego Garcia is a member of MS-13, the Salvadoran gang the US government has designated a foreign terrorist organisation. US President Donald Trump, speaking last month, declared that Abrego Garcia 'will never live' in the United States again. Yet multiple judges, including one on the Supreme Court, have ruled that he was deported in error and that the government is obliged to help 'facilitate' his return to Maryland, where he had lived since 2012. That court order came only after Abrego Garcia had already spent nearly three harrowing months inside El Salvador's notorious Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, where he was sent immediately after his wrongful deportation. 'Welcome to CECOT. Whoever enters here doesn't leave,' one official reportedly told him upon arrival, according to court documents filed by his lawyers. Held in an overcrowded, windowless cell with bright lights on 24 hours a day, Abrego Garcia says he was forced to sleep on a metal bunk with no mattress and was denied access to a bathroom, eventually soiling himself. He said he lost 14 kg in two weeks. In his testimony, he lists harrowing details. Upon arrival, he says he was kicked and hit repeatedly, leaving his body bruised and swollen. He and 20 others were made to kneel overnight, with guards striking anyone who collapsed, he claims. At times, he was told he would be transferred to cells with known gang members who would 'tear' him apart. He also said he heard screaming through the night. He saw prisoners assaulting each other in nearby cells. He was told by prison staff that his tattoos would mark him for death—until they later admitted they weren't gang-related at all. According to the new court filings, Salvadoran prison officials determined that Abrego Garcia was not affiliated with any gang. The Trump administration initially brushed aside the deportation as an 'administrative error.' But after weeks of legal pressure, it abruptly flew Abrego Garcia back to the US last month—not to release him, but to indict him. He is now in federal custody in Nashville, Tennessee, facing charges of participating in a conspiracy to smuggle undocumented immigrants, allegedly as a member of MS-13. His lawyers argue the evidence is flimsy and that the government is backpedalling on its previous mistake by doubling down on criminal accusations. Justice Department attorney Jonathan Guynn told a Maryland judge that the US intends to deport Abrego Garcia again, this time to an unnamed third country. There is no set timeline, but his attorneys say the threat is immediate and illegal. 'This was not a mistake,' one of his lawyers told reporters. 'It was a deliberate defiance of a court order.' The Justice Department has not commented publicly on whether it will comply with the Supreme Court's latest ruling or where it intends to send Abrego Garcia next.
