John Oliver on Trump deportations: ‘usually blatantly racist and always cruel'
The track 'obviously isn't the right song choice', the Last Week Tonight host said. 'The right song choice would be no song at all, because deportation Instagram reel is a combination of words that should never exist, like 'Oscar winner Mr Beast' or 'Stephen Miller nudes' or 'Bill Belichick speaks about his relationship with 24-year-old girlfriend.'' (Semisonic has denounced the choice of the song.)
The video underscored one of Oliver's key points: 'For all this administration's talk of prioritizing hardened criminals, in practice it seems to value speed, volume and spectacle over all else.'
Though Trump's administration has claimed to focus on 'violent criminals', CBS 60 Minutes was unable to find criminal records for over 75% of 238 migrants sent to a Salvadorian prison, and the government even conceded that one man, Kilmar Ábrego García, was sent there due to an 'administrative error'.
'For weeks now, it has been scrambling to come up with reasons why it was OK to send that man to a foreign prison,' said Oliver, 'which has been hard for them to do, given that it had a court order protecting him from deportation to El Salvador and no criminal record.'
So Trump posted an image on social media of a photo of Ábrego García's hand with markups attempting to show that his tattoos indicated that he was a member of the gang MS-13. And in an interview with the ABC News correspondent Terry Moran pegged to his first 100 days in office, Trump tried to argue that the clearly superimposed text of 'MS-13' were actually tattooed on Ábrego García's hand.
Oliver played the 'absolutely incredible' 90-second clip in full before responding himself: 'Terry, Terry, Terry, you're in hell, Terry. Terry, this is hell right now. I'm genuinely shocked Trump doesn't drink alcohol because that is the most 'drunk at an Ihop' conversation I think I've ever heard.
'And no disrespect to Terry, but maybe don't move on from that,' he continued. 'I know you've got other questions to get to, but if the president of the United States is trying to tell you that this amateur-hour Photoshop is real, let him go get the picture and make him say it again. Point to that Helvetica-looking 'M', and make the president say, 'Yes, I believe that artless M that's weirdly clearer and darker than all the other tattoos is real.' Make him say I believe that man went to a tattoo parlor and said, 'The skull's pretty spooky, but what I'd really like is a neatly aligned '3' directly on the bone of my knuckle, and can you please make it so that it doesn't stretch or bend with the natural curves of the human hand and also make it look like a typewriter did it?'
'Because, Terry, sometimes when Trump's doing his normal racist blue sky, you do need to cut him off to slow the flow of hatred into the world,' he added. 'But if he wants to tell America that this laughably doctored picture is evidence of a major threat to American safety, you have an obligation to let the man cook.
'And for what it's worth, if Trump's going to hash out those claims, he probably should be doing that in court, not on TV, and after he's already shipped someone off to a foreign prison,' he continued. 'But Ábrego García is just one of many horrifying stories surrounding immigration right now,' as the administration has embarked on a fear-based crackdown with blatant disregard for the rule of law. In the first 100 days of his term, Trump's administration undertook 181 immigration-specific executive actions – a sixfold increase over that same period in his first term.
To do so, it has bent arcane laws and scoured databases to absurd ends. Oliver pointed to the case of Suguru Onda, a PhD student at Brigham Young University in Utah, who had his legal status revoked after appearing on a criminal records database by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice). Onda, who is from Japan, had no criminal charges, just two speeding tickets and a citation for catching one too many fish. 'That is ridiculous,' Oliver fumed. 'If you can be flagged for deportation for catching one too many fish, then I truly fear for Henry Winkler. We could be just days away from seeing him in an El Salvador prison, which I'm sure the White House will then justify by badly Photoshopping an MS-13 tattoo on to his neck.'
Ice later reversed the decision on Onda's legal status, 'but this all feels like the inevitable result of a campaign that fearmongered about an epidemic of so-called migrant crime which, as we've discussed before, was wildly overblown', Oliver explained. 'But having promised mass deportations and even printed signs for people to wave around demanding them, they're now scrambling to deliver.'
According to multiple reports, the administration has instructed Ice officials to ramp up arrests to 1,200-1,500 people a day, and no longer target the supposed 'worst offenders' first. 'What the administration is doing is sometimes targeted, sometimes arbitrary, usually blatantly racist and always cruel,' said Oliver, such as deporting a child back to Honduras without his medication for stage four cancer.
The cruelty is 'the heart of all of this', Oliver detailed, 'which is Trump loudly selling his supporters the lie that he'll protect them from existential threats, only to further government overreach and state violence while deporting makeup artists, unlucky soccer fans and four-year-olds with cancer'.
The host called for pressure on elected officials to try to stop Trump's illegal overreach. 'To their credit, a number of prominent Democrats have gone to El Salvador to call attention to this,' he said. 'Which is definitely preferable to the approach others have taken.' He cited anonymous House Democrats quoted as asking, 'Should it be the big issue for Democrats? Probably not,' and 'complaining that rather than talking about the tariff policy and the economy, we're going to go take the bait for one hairdresser?
'Which is absolutely enraging,' he continued, 'especially as many voters do seem to get the clear problem with deporting people without due process to a prison for life, even in red states.'
Oliver urged viewers to call their representatives and make them aware of public opinion. 'It can make a difference,' he said, pointing to the former supreme court chief justice William Rehnquist's assertion that, 'no honorable judge would ever cast his vote because he thought the majority of the public wanted him to vote that way but that in certain cases, judges are undeniably influenced by the great tides of public opinion.'
'I would argue the moment we're in right now isn't just worthy of a great tide,' Oliver concluded. 'It is worthy of a fucking tsunami because this is an absolute outrage and it is one where it is important to remind our elected leaders that all people are worthy of safety, protection and due process.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump tax bill cuts taxes, Medicaid: How this might affect you
The bill, approved by the Senate on July 1 and the House on July 3, is projected to cut $1 trillion mostly from Medicaid and Affordable Care Act insurance plans and eliminate insurance coverage for 11.8 million people over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Another 5 million could lose health insurance because the bill doesn't extend former President Joe Biden's COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that made Affordable Care Act plans cheaper for consumers, according to a previous CBO analysis. Health policy experts say the legislation amounts to a partial rollback of the health insurance gains under former President Barack Obama's signature 2010 health care law, the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. "It's a giant step backwards from the vision of universal coverage that was President Obama's legacy achievement in the Affordable Care Act," said Joan Alker, a research professor and executive director and co-founder of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. But Republicans say the Medicaid overhaul is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to seek work to maintain their coverage. Shortly before the House advanced the bill to Trump's desk, Speaker Mike Johnson said work requirements will "restore dignity and purpose to those on taxpayer funded benefits." How would the bill change Medicaid? The Affordable Care Act established federal and state exchanges where people can purchase subsidized health insurance plans. Obama's health law also gave states the option to expand Medicaid to eligible residents who earn up to 138% of the federal poverty level - or $21,597 for an individual. A total of 40 states and Washington D.C. have expanded Medicaid under the ACA. Ten states, including Florida and Texas, haven't expanded Medicaid. Now, under the GOP bill, those Medicaid expansion states will be required to double eligibility checks to twice a year and set up systems to verify a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation requires "able-bodied" Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours a month or qualify for an exemption, such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The job checks will apply to parents of children older than 13. Medicaid: Where you live matters The GOP bill requires the twice-a-year eligibility and job verification checks to be in place by the end of 2026. So by January 2027, the legislation mandates states should begin these checks. However, language in the Senate version allows the Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy to extend "good faith" waivers to allow states more time to implement work requirement checks, Alker said. States also might choose to launch work requirements sooner by submitting a waiver to CMS, the federal agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid. During the first Trump administration, 13 states sought a Medicaid work requirement. Arkansas was the only state during Trump's first term to implement a work requirement and remove people from coverage - shedding more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program before a federal court order ended the work requirement. Georgia - among the 10 states that didn't broadly expand Medicaid to nondisabled, low-income adults - is the only state currently with a Medicaid work requirement. Georgia Pathways extends Medicaid to eligible adults who work at least 80 hours a month or qualify for exemptions such as being full-time students or volunteers. The Biden administration stalled the program, but Georgia sued and the program began enrolling people in 2023. Fewer than 7,500 Georgians had secured Medicaid under Georgia's Pathways program as of April 30, according to data analyzed by the Georgia Budget & Policy Institute. States also might be motivated to act sooner because the bill changes how many states fund their portion of Medicaid. States have adopted "provider taxes" that assess taxes on hospitals and other health providers to leverage larger Medicaid payments from the federal government. The GOP bill freezes the current tax rates and in 2028 will require states to reduce provider taxes to 3.5%, down from the current limit of 6%. Although the bill doesn't require states to begin curtailing provider taxes until 2028, some states might choose to act sooner to address potential budget gaps. "States are going to anticipate that loss of revenue and will be looking to make changes," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. Consumer advocates: Medical debt concerns mount Consumer advocates said the loss of health insurance for millions of American will likely cause more people to take on medical debt. Medical bills accounted for more than half of debt collection on consumers' credit records, according to a 2022 report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Before Biden left office, the CFPB finalized a medical debt rule that would ban medical debt on credit reports and prohibit lenders from using a person's medical debt history to make lending decisions. The three largest credit reporting companies already agreed to remove unpaid medical debts less than a year old and medical debt less than $500. The Biden rule would have eliminated larger debts, too. But, the CFPB is seeking to erase the rule that would ban the inclusion of all medical debt on credit reports. The CFPB had layoffs earlier this year, and the GOP bill will further slash funding for the consumer protection agency. The combination of a weakened consumer watchdog agency and the loss of health insurance coverage will harm consumers, said Sally Greenberg, CEO of the National Consumers League. "Consumers are going to pay - and patients are going to pay big time," Greenberg said.
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump's spending bill passes: Does it have a stimulus check?
House Republicans won final passage by a four-vote margin, with all Democratic members, as well as Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Thomas Massie of Kentucky voting against it. The mega-bill does not include provisions a stimulus check, despite Trump previously floating that he would consider a payment connected to claimed savings from the Department of Government Efficiency. Here's what to know about a potential stimulus check in 2025. Is there a stimulus check in the Trump mega-bill? No. The legislation, dubbed the "big beautiful bill," will touch nearly every aspect of the American economy, from the social safety net and income taxes to business and clean energy incentives. The largest cut is to Medicaid, which will pull roughly $1 trillion from the joint federal and state program over the next decade, according to recent estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The Senate's version of the bill could leave 11.8 million Americans uninsured by 2034, according to the report. GOP passes Medicaid cuts: Trump's megabill heads for White House, securing a big win for Republican's agenda What about a DOGE check? A push on social media for a so-called "DOGE check" swirled following the sweeping cuts from the quasi-government agency formerly fronted by Elon Musk that left thousands of workers fired or put on administrative leave. Trump previously claimed he was considering a stimulus payment, but no legislative action has been put forward to create a stimulus payment. The February pronouncement came on the same day as reporting from USA TODAY showed that DOGE's website published misleading information on the amount of money it has claimed to save, including a nearly $8 billion error. Did people receive stimulus checks in 2025? Some did, yes. The IRS issued a stimulus check to taxpayers who did not claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The credit was for taxpayers who did not receive previous stimulus payments. The stimulus, announced in December under the Biden administration, was authorized after internal IRS data showed that many eligible taxpayers who filed a 2021 tax return did not claim the Recovery Rebate Credit. The stimulus payments were issued in December and January. Those who were eligible received up to $1,400, according to the IRS. The deadline to claim the previous stimulus passed on April 15. Contributing: Kathryn Palmer and Greta Cross, USA TODAY
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
How will student loans, repayment change under 'Big Beautiful' bill?
The bold, nearly 900-page bill sets narrow tax breaks for tips and overtime; launches new benefits for businesses, and rolls back former President Joe Biden's clean energy tax credits. It will also slash benefit programs like Medicaid, leaving nearly 12 million Americans uninsured and remove accessibility of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for 2 million people. Trump, alongside the Republican-majority House and Senate, are also significantly shaping student loans by cutting the number of repayment plans available to borrowers. A Biden-era program that tailored payment requirements to the person's income will be replaced with a new fixed-rate program that would disadvantage lower-income families. Those planning to continue their education beyond their undergraduate degree are slated to be impacted by new caps toward graduate, medical and law students. The bill also impacts how much parents can borrow to help their children pay for tuition. Here's a breakdown on what borrowing federal student loans will look like if the bill is signed into law. What are the new caps on student loans? The bill would enforce a lifetime cap of borrowing $100,000 for graduate students as well as $200,000 cap for medical and law school students. The legislation also reduces opportunities for deferments or forbearance and new limits on lending for part-time students. How will student loan repayment be different? Repaying student debt is expected to shift as the bill guts loan forgiveness programs that have been in place for years and alters payment requirements that previously benefited disadvantage lower-income families. There are now just two repayment plans, including a standard repayment plan that allows borrowers to repay over 10 to 25 years based on their loan amounts regardless of income. The other is a "Repayment Assistance Plan" based on borrowers pay monthly payments between 1% and 10% of their discretionary income. How are parents impacted? The bill also sets a $65,000 cap on Parent PLUS loans, which are unsubsidized loans offered for parents aiming to support dependent undergraduate students. These loans will also no longer be eligible for repayment programs. What happens to the SAVE program? The around eight million borrowers enrolled in Biden's SAVE (Saving on a Valuable Education) repayment plan will stay in limbo awaiting a judge's decision about the program's legality. The bill requires SAVE borrowers to find a new repayment plan between July 2026 and the end of June 2028. If they don't after July 1, 2028, then they will automatically be enrolled in the Repayment Assistance Plan based on discretionary income. Which student loan borrowers are unaffected? The new changes will most likely impact new federal student loan borrowers instead of the more than 40 million Americans already in student loan debt. Contributing: Zachary Schermele and Sarah D. Wire, USA TODAY
