&w=3840&q=100)
iOS 26: Apple to curb spam calls and messages on iPhones with these tools
Call screening and Hold Assist
Among the key features in iOS 26 are two new tools designed to make handling phone calls more efficient and less intrusive.
Call Screening will prevent unidentified numbers from ringing the iPhone directly. Instead, the device will automatically answer the call, ask the caller to state their name and purpose, and relay that information to the user. This aims to curb the growing issue of scam and spam calls.
Hold Assist, the second feature, is designed to handle calls when users are placed on hold during customer service interactions. It monitors the call and notifies the user when a human operator returns, eliminating the need to wait through hold music or silence.
Smarter SMS filtering
In addition to call enhancements, iOS 26 will offer improved spam detection for messages. Suspected junk texts will be automatically filtered into a separate folder, helping users keep their main inbox free of clutter.
Visual and UI upgrades
iOS 26 introduces a new Liquid Glass theme that adds semi-transparency and reflective animations to menus, widgets, and panels. The Home and Lock Screens now offer more personalisation, including a 'clear look' setting for widgets and dynamic repositioning of the clock based on wallpaper.
App-specific improvements
Messages now includes AI-based real-time translation, tools to filter messages from unknown numbers, the ability to set custom chat backgrounds, and in-chat polling for group chats.
Apple Music adds animated lock screen visuals and supports live lyric translation.
Phone and Camera apps have been redesigned with cleaner interfaces and integrated features like Call Screening and Hold Assist.
Safari adopts a translucent interface, while Apple Maps introduces a new 'Visited Places' tab and smarter route planning.
With these updates, Apple is aiming to streamline communication, reduce disruptions, and enhance productivity for iPhone users. The features are currently available in beta and will roll out widely with the stable build of iOS 26 later this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
22 minutes ago
- News18
iPhone 17 Pro Max To Lose Titanium Body This Year? Here's What We Know
iPhone 17 Pro is unlikely to feature a titanium body as Apple looks to make big changes to bring the new Air model this year. Apple could be making a host of changes to the flagship iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max models this year and Titanium could be another big feature missing from the premium devices. Yes, the titanium build quality of the 17 Pro could now be limited to the iPhone 17 Air variant, while the Pros only feature an aluminium casing this year. These details suggest Apple is planning for an overhaul of its lineup, and maybe give the iPhone 17 Air a higher price tag than we have assumed. The news comes just a few days after there were leaks about new iPhone 17 Pro colours being introduced this year. iPhone 17 Pro Without Titanium: Why Apple Might Do It? The fact that Apple could ditch titanium build for the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max clearly hints at a new direction for these products from the company. After all, these are your flagship models, and titanium has been used since the iPhone 15 Pro series, but ditching it now and going with only aluminium build for the frame and case sounds were un-Apple like. To be fair, the Air has got a lot of space on the rumour mill, mainly because the company could have a new premium offering coming out this year. iPhone 17 Air is tipped to be Apple's thinnest ever iPhone, measuring at 5.5mm, making it leaner than the Galaxy S25 Edge. It will get this size by carrying a smaller battery and Apple is likely to adopt silicon carbon tech to pack a higher density unit on the device. Going by the rumours, iPhone 17 Air launch price could be around Rs 1,20,000 especially if Apple manages to hike the iPhone 17 Pro prices, starting at Rs 1,34,999 this year. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 hours ago
- Business Standard
The AI browser market turns a new page: What are users getting now?
The AI browser market is expected to be worth around $76.8 billion by 2034, from $4.5 billion in 2024, according to a report by Shivani Shinde Mumbai Listen to This Article Nvidia-backed Perplexity AI is launching Comet, a new web browser with AI-powered search capabilities, as it looks to challenge the dominance of market leader Alphabet's Google Chrome. The AI browser market is expected to be worth around $76.8 billion by 2034, from $4.5 billion in 2024, according to a report by Chrome held a commanding 68 per cent share of the global browser market in June, according to StatCounter, cementing its position as the world's most widely used browser — far ahead of Safari, Microsoft Edge and Firefox.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Consumer panel asks Apple, Croma to refund customer's iPhone cost over microphone defect
Mumbai: A consumer commission here has directed Apple India and Croma to refund an iPhone cost of ₹65,264 to the legal heirs of a customer for failing to resolve a microphone defect in the device, holding the two companies deficient in service. Both the manufacturer and the seller are "jointly and severally liable for the defective product", the commission said in the order passed earlier this month, as the two companies failed to resolve the defect in the device purchased by the customer (now deceased). The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (Suburban) held that the "manufacturer (Apple) merely mentioning certain unauthorized modification or damage in hardware cannot be the correct resolution" for the customer's grievance. It further ruled that the seller (Croma) too cannot escape liability merely by stating the "defect is attributable to the manufacturer". "Once the product was sold through their outlet, they assumed responsibility for ensuring that the product was free from defects and serviceable," the commission noted. It said the "principle of vicarious liability squarely applies", as the seller stands in a position of trust and derives commercial benefit from the sale. The complainant purchased an iPhone 11 for ₹65,264 from a Croma store in Mumbai on June 4, 2021. Shortly after the purchase, the device developed an issue as the speakerphone function was not working during calls, with specifically "no speech from mic". The complainant approached Apple's authorised service centre, but repairs were denied on the grounds of "unauthorized modifications in the device," rendering it ineligible for warranty service. Despite repeated complaints and emails, the opposite parties failed to address the grievance, following which the complainant approached the commission. During the course of proceeding, the customer passed away, but the complaint was continued by his legal heirs. The Apple India Private Limited, in its response, admitted the purchase and the issue with the microphone. But it reiterated that the device had unauthorised modifications, voiding the warranty. Infiniti Retail Limited (Croma) failed to appear and was proceeded against ex-parte. The commission, after perusal of documents on record, held that Apple failed to specify exactly which term or condition of the warranty was breached by the complainant. "Merely referring clauses of warranty terms and condition cannot be sufficient to attribute the particular defect as certain unauthorized modification or damage to software," it noted. The commission concluded that documents and evidence brought on record are sufficient to ascertain the defect in goods coupled with deficiency in service provided by the opposite parties. It ruled that both the manufacturer and the seller are "jointly and severally liable for the defective product". The commission directed both the opposite parties to refund the iPhone cost of ₹65,264, along with a 6 per cent interest per annum from the date of the complaint (August 6, 2021) until the date of actual payment. The two companies were also directed to pay ₹15,000 as compensation for mental agony and ₹2,000 for legal expenses to customer's family.
