Trump's play on church and state threatens the foundations of both
Earlier this month, the Trump IRS announced in a legal filing that churches can endorse political candidates. That is directly contrary to federal law, which states that tax-exempt nonprofit groups, including churches, can't use those tax-exempt funds for electoral politics.
In other words, the Trump administration is inviting its conservative Christian allies to defy the law by announcing in advance that the government won't enforce it.
This is about power. It's about President Trump making good on a corrupt deal he offered religious-right leaders to get their support for his 2016 run.
Back then, Trump promised that if they told their followers to vote for him — ignoring his lack of character and record of amorality — he would give them two things. He'd give them a Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v. Wade and pledged to make them more politically powerful by eliminating the ban on politicking by churches.
One Christian writer at the time compared it to the biblical story of Satan tempting Jesus in the desert with the promise of worldly power. Church leaders, he said, should not take the deal Jesus rejected.
Narrator: They took the deal.
Religious-right leaders played a big role in Trump's 2016 and 2024 victories. Now he's counting on them to provide massive turnout operations for Republicans in next year's midterms to preserve his compliant congressional majorities. That will be a lot simpler if they can turn conservative megachurches into cogs in the MAGA machine even more than they already have.
Despite the rhetoric from the White House and its allies, this is not about religious liberty. Churches are not singled out by current law. They just have to play by the same rules as other tax-exempt groups.
Those rules don't silence anyone. They don't prevent pastors or anyone else from bringing their values into the public arena or addressing issues they care about.
It is ridiculous for Trump to claim that he is bringing religion back into our public life. It never left!
Christians and other people of faith have always played a role, sometimes as prophetic leaders of justice-seeking movements, and sadly, sometimes as apologists for cruelty, unjust policies and corrupt politicians.
Separation of church and state — or as Jesus put it, rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's — protects religious liberty and individual freedom for everyone.
As the National Council of Nonprofits noted about the recent IRS move, this is 'not about religion or free speech, but about radically altering campaign finance laws.'
The IRS is inviting corruption. It is inviting a flood of political campaign money to be laundered through churches, as tax experts have noted, 'making houses of worship a way to avoid both taxes and transparency for campaign finances.'
That's not just speculation. In recent years, the IRS has allowed right-wing political advocacy groups to dishonestly reclassify themselves as churches or church associations, a legal fiction that lets them avoid disclosure rules and evade oversight and accountability.
Some people I respect have suggested that the new policy is not such a big deal, because in practice, the IRS hasn't done much to enforce the provision against pastors and churches who violate it. I think they're wrong.
The law has been a deterrent. It has buttressed pastors who don't want to turn their churches into right-wing political operations.
Now those pastors will come under extreme pressure from religious-right political groups, right-wing pundits and MAGA politicians to get on board, as Trump's religious-right allies have themselves admitted.
All this is especially troubling when Trump's Christian nationalist allies are getting bolder in promoting their divisive and un-American vision of our future.
This month, for example, Christian nationalist Doug Wilson planted a church in Washington, D.C. Its goal, in the words of a Wilson associate, is to ' calibrate ' the Christians working in the Trump administration into Wilson's worldview, which he currently promotes through a publishing house and networks of churches and 'classical Christian' schools.
Sitting in the congregation for the new church's opening service was Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who goes to a Wilson-affiliated church in Tennessee and sends his kids to one of Wilson's schools.
Here's why that's scary: Wilson wrote a book downplaying the evils of slavery. He preaches that giving women the right to vote was a bad thing.
In the ' Christian republic ' he envisions, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and other non-Christians would not be allowed to hold public office — not even liberal Christians. There would be no public expressions of other faiths allowed, because ' the public spaces would belong to Christ.'
In America, at least for now, the public spaces belong to no one faith. They're open to all of us. Let's keep it that way.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why does the White House want to redesign gas cans? Explaining the situation
The White House says it wants to 'Make Gas Cans Great Again.' Under a plan announced July 24 by President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency, the federal government is encouraging manufacturers to add vents to portable fuel containers, also known as gas cans. It would effectively reverse a 2009-rule by federal environmental officials at the time that required portable gas cans - used for lawnmowers, chainsaws, ATVS and stranded vehicles - to have special vents that stop the vapors from escaping. Proponents of that rule - which was finalized in 2007 - said the vapors that escape contributed to ozone pollution. But the 2009 rule created an online market for pre-ban gas cans among buyers dissatisfied with the new cans. Why does Trump want to redesign gas cans? 'Gas cans used to pour gas,' Trump's head of the EPA, Lee Zeldin, said on X, formerly Twitter. 'Now they just dribble like a child's sippy cup.' But many modern designs are often infuriatingly ineffective at actually filling tanks because the vents work so poorly, critics argue. Instead of stopping vapors from flowing out the complicated spouts and relief valves, the new designs often cause gasoline spills, which some critics say are far worse than a tiny amount of vapor escaping from an older design. Some rules for gas cans will still remain in place Other rules for gas cans have to remain in place under federal law, like making sure they're child-resistant and limiting the risk of flash fires. What happens next for gas cans? The EPA's announcement is non-binding for manufacturers and doesn't prohibit the vents. Rather, the EPA is asking manufacturers to redesign the gas cans to have vents 'to facilitate fast and smooth fuel flow.' This article contains material from USA TODAY Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook This article originally appeared on Gas can redesign considered by Trump White House. Here's why
Politico
4 minutes ago
- Politico
ICE Is Overplaying Its Hand. We've Seen It Happen Before.
Out of this breach emerged the Compromise of 1850, a grand bargain designed to preserve the Union. Under its provisions, California entered the Union as a free state, but the citizens of other former Mexican territories were left to make their own determinations about slavery. Congress abolished the slave trade, but not slavery, in Washington, D.C. And, in return for these concessions, Southern politicians secured what would prove to be the most incendiary component of the deal: the Fugitive Slave Act (FSA) of 1850. The new act inspired widespread disgust throughout the North. The law stripped accused runaways of their right to trial by jury and allowed individual cases to be bumped up from state courts to special federal courts. As an extra incentive to federal commissioners adjudicating such cases, it provided a $10 fee when a defendant was remanded to slavery but only $5 for a finding rendered against the slave owner. Most obnoxious to many Northerners, the law stipulated harsh fines and prison sentences for any citizen who refused to cooperate with or aid federal authorities in the capture of accused fugitives — much in the same way the Trump administration has threatened to jail persons who impede its immigration raids. Before the FSA, formerly enslaved people were able to build lives for themselves in many northern communities. They found homes, took jobs, made friends, started families, formed churches. But after the FSA, they were permanent fugitives — and anyone who employed them, associated with them or provided them housing were accomplices. Early enforcement made immediate martyrs of ordinary people and pierced the illusion that slavery was just a Southern problem. In 1851 federal agents in Boston arrested Thomas Sims, who had escaped enslavement in Georgia, and marched him to a federal courthouse under guard by more than 300 armed soldiers to prevent a rescue. For Boston, a city whose history was steeped in the struggle against King George's standing army, it was an ominous display. Sims' hearing was, just as the law intended, shambolic, and he was ultimately returned to Georgia. (He would later escape a second time during the Civil War.) Want to read more stories like this? POLITICO Weekend delivers gripping reads, smart analysis and a bit of high-minded fun every Friday. Sign up for the newsletter. That same year, Shadrach Minkins, a waiter who had also fled enslavement to Boston, was seized in broad daylight. This time, word traveled fast, and a local 'vigilance committee' — interracial groups formed to monitor and, when necessary, resist enforcement of the fugitive slave law — assembled, with an eye toward liberating the accused man. Awaiting a hearing in federal custody, Minkins was suddenly rescued in a dramatic confrontation witnessed by attorney Richard H. Dana, Jr. 'We heard a shout from across the courthouse,' Dana recalled, 'continued into a yell of triumph, and in an instant after down the steps came two negroes bearing the prisoner between them with his clothes half torn off, and so stupefied by his sudden rescue and the violence of the dragging off that he sat almost dumb, and I thought had fainted. ... It was all done in an instant, too quick to be believed.' Minkins made it to Montreal, where he lived the rest of his life in freedom.
Los Angeles Times
6 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Two SoCal bishops respond to ICE raids, but in different ways
Two of Southern California's largest Roman Catholic dioceses have criticized the federal government over raids and roundups of undocumented immigrants over the last few weeks. The Los Angeles Archdiocese and San Bernardino Diocese have responded differently in tone and action. Yet both have asked the government to show restraint and empathy toward migrants. Here is a look at how Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez and Bishop Alberto Rojas of San Bernardino have responded to a historic moment that upended the lives of countless congregants in immigrant communities they serve. Combined, roughly 5 million people claim to be Catholics in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and Diocese of San Bernardino, which includes Los Angeles, Riverside, Santa Barbara, San Bernardino and Ventura counties. About 58% of people living in the United States who were born abroad consider themselves Christian, according to findings from the Pew Research Center released this year. Of those, 30% identified as Catholics, the largest share of any denomination. In the Los Angeles and Riverside metro areas, 28% of all Christians consider themselves Catholic, the highest of any denomination by several points, according to Pew. Rojas told his diocese of roughly 1 million parishioners on July 8 that they can stay home on Sundays to avoid Mass because of concerns over area federal immigration sweeps. Rojas wrote in the decree that many churchgoers have shared 'fears of attending Mass due to potential immigration enforcement action' and that 'such fear constitutes a grave inconvenience that may impede the spiritual good of the faithful.' The dispensation was announced after multiple people were arrested at or near diocese churches on June 20, including a man at Our Lady of Lourdes in Montclair, according to the National Catholic Register. ICE officials disputed any allegation of targeting churches. 'The accusation that ICE entered a church to make an arrest [is] FALSE,' wrote Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin in an email to The Times earlier this month. 'The illegal alien chose to pull into the church parking lot [and] officers then safely made the arrest.' Rojas wrote on Facebook that he respected and appreciated law enforcement's role in keeping 'communities safe from violent criminals,' but added that 'authorities are now seizing brothers and sisters indiscriminately, without respect for their right to due process and their dignity as children of God.' The Archdiocese of Los Angeles announced plans to bolster delivery of hot meals, groceries and prescription medicines to parishioners living in fear of deportation amid ongoing enforcement raids. Immigrants targeted by raids are 'good, hard-working men and women' who are 'making important contributions to our economy,' Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez said in a statement. 'Now they are afraid to go to work or be seen in public for fear that they will get arrested and be deported,' he said. Yannina Diaz, a spokesperson for the archdiocese, said she was unaware of any arrests made on Archdiocese of Los Angeles property. She also said Gomez was not considering issuing a dispensation for its congregants yet. In an open letter, Gomez wrote that he was 'deeply disturbed' by the detentions and called on the government to reform the immigration process. We'll continue to follow how the church reacts and adapts to the Trump administration's immigration policy. Crime, courts and policing Immigration policy and raids Los Angeles fires and rebuilding Educational policy Have a great weekend, from the Essential California team Jim Rainey, staff writerDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience internKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew J. Campa, reporterKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
