
Trump's play on church and state threatens the foundations of both
Earlier this month, the Trump IRS announced in a legal filing that churches can endorse political candidates. That is directly contrary to federal law, which states that tax-exempt nonprofit groups, including churches, can't use those tax-exempt funds for electoral politics.
In other words, the Trump administration is inviting its conservative Christian allies to defy the law by announcing in advance that the government won't enforce it.
This is about power. It's about President Trump making good on a corrupt deal he offered religious-right leaders to get their support for his 2016 run.
Back then, Trump promised that if they told their followers to vote for him — ignoring his lack of character and record of amorality — he would give them two things. He'd give them a Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v. Wade and pledged to make them more politically powerful by eliminating the ban on politicking by churches.
One Christian writer at the time compared it to the biblical story of Satan tempting Jesus in the desert with the promise of worldly power. Church leaders, he said, should not take the deal Jesus rejected.
Narrator: They took the deal.
Religious-right leaders played a big role in Trump's 2016 and 2024 victories. Now he's counting on them to provide massive turnout operations for Republicans in next year's midterms to preserve his compliant congressional majorities. That will be a lot simpler if they can turn conservative megachurches into cogs in the MAGA machine even more than they already have.
Despite the rhetoric from the White House and its allies, this is not about religious liberty. Churches are not singled out by current law. They just have to play by the same rules as other tax-exempt groups.
Those rules don't silence anyone. They don't prevent pastors or anyone else from bringing their values into the public arena or addressing issues they care about.
It is ridiculous for Trump to claim that he is bringing religion back into our public life. It never left!
Christians and other people of faith have always played a role, sometimes as prophetic leaders of justice-seeking movements, and sadly, sometimes as apologists for cruelty, unjust policies and corrupt politicians.
Separation of church and state — or as Jesus put it, rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's — protects religious liberty and individual freedom for everyone.
As the National Council of Nonprofits noted about the recent IRS move, this is 'not about religion or free speech, but about radically altering campaign finance laws.'
The IRS is inviting corruption. It is inviting a flood of political campaign money to be laundered through churches, as tax experts have noted, 'making houses of worship a way to avoid both taxes and transparency for campaign finances.'
That's not just speculation. In recent years, the IRS has allowed right-wing political advocacy groups to dishonestly reclassify themselves as churches or church associations, a legal fiction that lets them avoid disclosure rules and evade oversight and accountability.
Some people I respect have suggested that the new policy is not such a big deal, because in practice, the IRS hasn't done much to enforce the provision against pastors and churches who violate it. I think they're wrong.
The law has been a deterrent. It has buttressed pastors who don't want to turn their churches into right-wing political operations.
Now those pastors will come under extreme pressure from religious-right political groups, right-wing pundits and MAGA politicians to get on board, as Trump's religious-right allies have themselves admitted.
All this is especially troubling when Trump's Christian nationalist allies are getting bolder in promoting their divisive and un-American vision of our future.
This month, for example, Christian nationalist Doug Wilson planted a church in Washington, D.C. Its goal, in the words of a Wilson associate, is to ' calibrate ' the Christians working in the Trump administration into Wilson's worldview, which he currently promotes through a publishing house and networks of churches and 'classical Christian' schools.
Sitting in the congregation for the new church's opening service was Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who goes to a Wilson-affiliated church in Tennessee and sends his kids to one of Wilson's schools.
Here's why that's scary: Wilson wrote a book downplaying the evils of slavery. He preaches that giving women the right to vote was a bad thing.
In the ' Christian republic ' he envisions, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and other non-Christians would not be allowed to hold public office — not even liberal Christians. There would be no public expressions of other faiths allowed, because ' the public spaces would belong to Christ.'
In America, at least for now, the public spaces belong to no one faith. They're open to all of us. Let's keep it that way.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
Biden's top aides lived in ‘fog of denial' over president's cognitive decline: insider
As lawmakers continue their investigation into what former President Joe Biden's inner circle knew about his alleged cognitive decline, one insider who's written about the issue says he continues to be stunned by the 'fog of denial' that surrounded the aging president. 'They [just] convinced themselves, in effect, they believed what they wanted to believe instead of their lying eyes, even during the debate when everything went south,' said Chris Whipple, author of the book 'Uncharted,' which chronicled the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election. Advertisement Whipple interviewed several members of Biden's inner circle in the aftermath of his widely criticized debate performance, which ultimately led to the suspension of his re-election campaign. Former chief of staff Ron Klain, who reportedly told House lawmakers this week that Biden had grown 'more forgetful' in office, was among sources who opened up for Whipple's book. 'Despite that devastating debate, which was lights out, game over, everybody knew it, Klain was still all in on Joe Biden's nomination and re-election and somehow thought he could beat Trump,' Whipple told 'America's Newsroom' Friday. 'He's been in the doghouse with Joe Biden and his inner circle ever since he was devastatingly candid to me about Joe Biden's condition in that pre-debate prep at Camp David.' Advertisement Author Chris Whipple said he was stunned by the denial he saw after interviewing former President Biden's top aides about his alleged cognitive decline. AP House Republicans have launched a probe into the former president's cognitive health and have called on former Biden administration officials to testify about what they witnessed. Most of those called have pleaded the Fifth and refused to answer lawmakers' questions, including the former president's physician. But based on his conversations, Whipple does not believe there was a secretive scheme to control the presidency. Advertisement Former Biden chief of staff Ron Klain leaving an interview with the House Oversight Committee Chairman on July 24, 2025. Getty Images 'The notion that this was somehow, you know, Biden's last year was 'Weekend at Bernie's' and that there he was non compos mentis and there was a cabal running the country with an autopen is just silly,' he said. 'The notion that they're [Republicans are] going to be able to prove that there was this dastardly cover-up on the part of Biden's inner circle is just crazy to me. I think the answer is that this thing goes nowhere.'


UPI
6 minutes ago
- UPI
Calif., Illinois may fight new Texas congressional maps with their own
1 of 2 | California Gov. Gavin Newsom says he may seek to change his state's congressional maps if Texas redraws its borders. File photo by Jonathan Alcorn/UPI | License Photo July 26 (UPI) -- As the Texas Legislature plans to redraw congressional maps in an effort to increase Republican members in the U.S. House, the governors of California and Illinois may devise their own new borders. Traditionally, the boundaries are changed every 10 years with the latest U.S. Census data but Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has called a special legislative session after pressure from the White House to preserve the GOP majority in the U.S. House. President Donald Trump believes an additional five seats could be created by changing the borders. Of the state's 38 districts, 25 are held by Republicans. Democrats hold seats in big cities of Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston, Laredo, McAllen, San Antonio. Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, Republicans hold a 219-212 advantage in the House with four vacancies -- three Democrats who died and one Republican who resigned this week. More than a dozen Texas House members flew to Illinois and California -- two blue states -- on Friday for a meeting with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzkeper, during which they revealed their intentions. "Donald Trump called up Governor Abbott for one simple reason: to rig the 2026 elections. California's moral high ground means nothing if we're powerless because of it," Newsom said after meeting with Democrats from the Texas House. "This moment requires us to be prepared to fight fire with fire. Whether that's a special election, a ballot initiative, a bill, a fight in court. If they proceed in Texas, we will be ready." "This is not a bluff. This is real, and trust me, it's more real after listening to these leaders today, how existential this is," Newsom said. As the most populous state in the nation, California has 43 Democratic members of the house and nine Republican members, while Illinois is represented by 14 Democrats and three Republicans. "Everything is on the table," Pritzer said. The Illinois governor said he doesn't want to redraw the maps but "if they're going to take this drastic action, then we might also take drastic action to respond." "We want the country to understand [that] what's going on in Texas is a national battle," State Rep. Richard Pena Raymond, a Democrat from Laredo, said. Raymond told Pritzner that redistricting is "clearly aimed at affecting the entire country." Responsibility for determining Congressional district maps differs from state to state. In California, an independent commission approved by voters in 2010 works on the maps. Illinois maps, on the other hand, are put together by the state lawmakers have been drawn strongly to favor the Democrat Party in the state. Newsom said he is considering having a referendum to change the rules before the 2026 election, unless the Legislature comes up with another solution, which would take two-thirds of legislators voting in favor of. "We have to fight fire with fire," Newsom said. Other states Two other Democratic governors are considering new maps -- Phil Murphy in New Jersey and Kathy Hochul in New York. "There's other states that are violating the rules," Hochul said during a news conference on Thursday. "I'm going to look at it closely with Hakeem Jeffries," a New York member of the House, as well has House minority leader. In New York, Democrats have a 19-7 advantage as a result of their districting maps. "It's deplorable," Murphy said during an interview at the summer meeting of the bipartisan National Governors Association in Colorado Springs. "If they're going to play these games, we're going to have to be just as aggressive. We can't bring a knife to a gunfight." Democrats hold nine of the 12 seats in New Jersey. In Florida, the state Supreme Court on July 17 upheld its newest congressional map. He said he believes the state had been "malappropriated" and redistricting "would be appropriate" in a few years. Florida's congressional delegation is controlled by Republicans, 20-8. In Ohio, legislators are required to redraw maps before 2026. The GOP has 10 of the 15 seats. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis is against redistricting more frequently. The state's maps are overseen by an independent commission and it's eight U.S. House seats are evenly split 4-4. Texas situation Texas last redrew its borders in mid-cycle in 2003 after the GOP gained control of both chambers for the first time since Reconstruction. In Texas, Abbott noted a July 7 letter from the Justice Department that said majority Black and Hispanic districts in Dallas need to be redrawn based on a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit last year. The DOJ said those districts are "unconstitutional racial gerrymanders," but Abbott argued the opposite in 2021. In federal court in El Paso, he argued race had not been taken into account there. "We are no longer compelled to have coalition districts," Abbott said in an interview with KDFW in Dallas. U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro, a San Antonio Democrat, appeared at a state House hearing. "That's what's at stake here, whether you all are going to work for the people of Texas, as we used to do, to try to do, or whether you take your commandments from Donald Trump and the White House," Castro said. "I hope that you all will choose to do the business of the people of Texas, as this body has a history of being independent from the federal government."


UPI
6 minutes ago
- UPI
Philippine Supreme Court blocks Duterte impeachment effort
Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte criticized Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and accused him of being unfit for the job of the president during an Oct. 18 news conference. File Photo by Rolex Dela Pena/EPA-EFE July 26 (UPI) -- An impeachment proceeding against Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte can't proceed due to a constitutional limit on the annual number of impeachments, the Philippine Supreme Court ruled. The Philippine Constitution bans multiple impeachment proceedings in a given year, so Duterte could not be impeached until February, the nation's Supreme Court announced on Friday, the BBC reported. The ruling does not prevent Duterte's impeachment, but it delays it until an impeachment proceeding would not violate the Philippine Constitution. "It is not our duty to favor any political result," the court said in its ruling. "Ours is to ensure that politics are framed within the rule of just law." The court said it is prepared to address the claims against Duterte "at the proper time and before the appropriate forum." Lawmakers in the Philippine Parliament's lower house in February voted to impeach Duterte for allegedly misusing taxpayer dollars and threatening to kill President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. It was the fourth impeachment case received by the lower chamber from December to February, one of which was transferred to the Senate. Duterte is the daughter of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte and formerly was a close political ally of Marcos. She is considered to be a viable candidate for the nation's presidency during the 2028 election cycle after she and Marcos had a political fallout. Duterte and Marcos in 2022 formed what they called the "Uniteam," which temporarily united two of the nation's most powerful political families. After the pair secured wins in the May 2022 elections, the Uniteam began to fray. Duterte's father called Marcos a "drug addict," and Duterte in November said she ensured the president would be killed if she were killed first. The elder Duterte afterward was extradited to the Hague to be tried for alleged crimes against humanity due the deaths of thousands arising from his administration's war on drugs. Rodrigo Duterte was president for six years from June 2016 to June 2022. Sara Duterte says the accusations against her are politically motivated, although many supporting her impeachment note that 12 of the nation's 15 Supreme Court justices were appointed by her father.