Richton Park nursing home must pay $5.5 million in wrongful death lawsuit
Brooks was an honest, hardworking husband, father and grandfather who wore his heart on his sleeve, said his daughter Andrea Brooks, 59.
Though he had end-stage renal disease that required he receive dialysis three times per week, Andrea said Brooks was generally healthy and lived independently with his wife, Barbara, until he experienced a traumatic fall in October 2020 while watering plants outdoors at their South Side home.
Brooks faced intensive treatment for a brain bleed at Advocate Christ Medical Center and made progress before being transferred to Landmark for physical therapy Nov. 25, Andrea Brooks said.
'We were expecting him to come home, because (doctors) were like, 'oh, he just needs therapy, and then from there he should be OK,'' Brooks said.
Although COVID-19 era lockdowns remained in effect, Andrea Brooks said family members were able to regularly visit her dad at the hospital. That changed when he was admitted to Landmark, where he stayed for 13 days before he died after, according to the lawsuit, caregivers neglected to give him his required dialysis.
'We were not able to have any phone calls, there was no communication,' Brooks said. 'Nobody was updating us on anything.'
Sandy's wife, Barbara, contacted the nursing home up to 10 times per day, rarely receiving responses, Andrea said. On Dec. 6, the family was allowed a brief FaceTime call with Sandy, who was unable to speak, she said, and he was found unresponsive in his room the next day.
Sandy missed five dialysis appointments while under the care of Landmark, his family would later discover, prompting their lawsuit that concluded May 30.
'It appears that they were providing him some very basic care,' the family's attorney, Madison Cogan, said Friday. 'And by that, I mean they were going into his room, as far as we can tell. But as far as getting dialysis, that never happened, and I think that is what makes this so egregious. All it took is one nurse to recognize that Sandy needed his dialysis and that he wasn't receiving it.'
A jury agreed, holding Landmark and its management company, Infinity Healthcare Management of Illinois LLC, accountable for $5.5 million in damages for neglecting Brooks, whose need for dialysis was chronicled by the hospital where he was previously treated.
Landmark of Richton Park did not return messages requesting comment.
Cogan said the family had sought between $6 million and $8 million.
'It's really hard to put a number on a life,' she said.
Andrea said nothing has been the same since she lost her dad.
'This case, it made me relive everything,' she said. 'I could not believe the magnitude of how my dad suffered, and it just hurt me. It broke my heart that someone could just not care or not do their job.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
21 States Across US Now Reporting COVID ‘Razor Throat' Variant
At least 21 states are reporting a COVID-19 variant that spread across China earlier this year, according to newly updated data provided by a private company. A map released by the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID)
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Medicaid and Trump's tax cuts: What this means for millions of Americans
Millions of Americans who get health insurance through Medicaid will face new hurdles after the House passed President Donald Trump's massive tax cut and spending bill, which includes deep cuts to nation's safety-net health insurance program. Trump's marquee bill extends the 2017 tax cuts, ends taxes on tips and overtime and bolsters border security. It also takes aim at Medicaid, the federal and state health program that covered 78.6 million low-income children and adults as of March 2025, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The bill, approved by the Senate on July 1 and the House on July 3, is projected to cut $1 trillion mostly from Medicaid and Affordable Care Act insurance plans and eliminate insurance coverage for 11.8 million people over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Another 5 million could lose health insurance because the bill doesn't extend former President Joe Biden's COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that made Affordable Care Act plans cheaper for consumers, according to a previous CBO analysis. Health policy experts say the legislation amounts to a partial rollback of the health insurance gains under former President Barack Obama's signature 2010 health care law, the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. "It's a giant step backwards from the vision of universal coverage that was President Obama's legacy achievement in the Affordable Care Act," said Joan Alker, a research professor and executive director and co-founder of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. But Republicans say the Medicaid overhaul is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to seek work to maintain their coverage. Shortly before the House advanced the bill to Trump's desk, Speaker Mike Johnson said work requirements will "restore dignity and purpose to those on taxpayer funded benefits." How would the bill change Medicaid? The Affordable Care Act established federal and state exchanges where people can purchase subsidized health insurance plans. Obama's health law also gave states the option to expand Medicaid to eligible residents who earn up to 138% of the federal poverty level − or $21,597 for an individual. A total of 40 states and Washington D.C. have expanded Medicaid under the ACA. Ten states, including Florida and Texas, haven't expanded Medicaid. Now, under the GOP bill, those Medicaid expansion states will be required to double eligibility checks to twice a year and set up systems to verify a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation requires "able-bodied" Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours a month or qualify for an exemption, such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The job checks will apply to parents of children older than 13. Medicaid: Where you live matters The GOP bill requires the twice-a-year eligibility and job verification checks to be in place by the end of 2026. So by January 2027, the legislation mandates states should begin these checks. However, language in the Senate version allows the Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy to extend "good faith" waivers to allow states more time to implement work requirement checks, Alker said. States also might choose to launch work requirements sooner by submitting a waiver to CMS, the federal agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid. During the first Trump administration, 13 states sought a Medicaid work requirement. Arkansas was the only state during Trump's first term to implement a work requirement and remove people from coverage − shedding more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program before a federal court order ended the work requirement. Georgia − among the 10 states that didn't broadly expand Medicaid to nondisabled, low-income adults − is the only state currently with a Medicaid work requirement. Georgia Pathways extends Medicaid to eligible adults who work at least 80 hours a month or qualify for exemptions such as being full-time students or volunteers. The Biden administration stalled the program, but Georgia sued and the program began enrolling people in 2023. Fewer than 7,500 Georgians had secured Medicaid under Georgia's Pathways program as of April 30, according to data analyzed by the Georgia Budget & Policy Institute. States also might be motivated to act sooner because the bill changes how many states fund their portion of Medicaid. States have adopted "provider taxes" that assess taxes on hospitals and other health providers to leverage larger Medicaid payments from the federal government. The GOP bill freezes the current tax rates and in 2028 will require states to reduce provider taxes to 3.5%, down from the current limit of 6%. Although the bill doesn't require states to begin curtailing provider taxes until 2028, some states might choose to act sooner to address potential budget gaps. "States are going to anticipate that loss of revenue and will be looking to make changes," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. Consumer advocates: Medical debt concerns mount Consumer advocates said the loss of health insurance for millions of American will likely cause more people to take on medical debt. Medical bills accounted for more than half of debt collection on consumers' credit records, according to a 2022 report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Before Biden left office, the CFPB finalized a medical debt rule that would ban medical debt on credit reports and prohibit lenders from using a person's medical debt history to make lending decisions. The three largest credit reporting companies already agreed to remove unpaid medical debts less than a year old and medical debt less than $500. The Biden rule would have eliminated larger debts, too. But, the CFPB is seeking to erase the rule that would ban the inclusion of all medical debt on credit reports. The CFPB had layoffs earlier this year, and the GOP bill will further slash funding for the consumer protection agency. The combination of a weakened consumer watchdog agency and the loss of health insurance coverage will harm consumers, said Sally Greenberg, CEO of the National Consumers League. "Consumers are going to pay − and patients are going to pay big time," Greenberg said.
5 hours ago
FDA vaccine official restricted COVID vaccine approvals against the advice of agency staff
WASHINGTON -- The government's top vaccine official working under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently restricted the approval of two COVID-19 vaccines, disregarding recommendations from government scientists, according to federal documents released Wednesday. The new memos from the Food and Drug Administration show how the agency's vaccine chief, Dr. Vinay Prasad, personally intervened to place restrictions on COVID shots from vaccine makers Novavax and Moderna. Both vaccines were approved by the FDA in May after months of analysis by rank-and-file FDA reviewers. But internal correspondence show Prasad disagreed with staffers who planned to approve the shots for everyone 12 and older, similar to previous COVID vaccines. The scientists had concluded the benefit from the vaccines and the risk of COVID-19 outweighed the risk of possible side effects, which are rare. Instead Prasad decided the shots should be limited to those who face special risks from the virus— seniors or children and adults with underlying medical issues. Prasad explained that the COVID vaccine benefits must be reconsidered in light of falling rates of death and hospitalization and the possibility for vaccine side effects. It's the latest in a series of vaccine restrictions imposed by officials working under Kennedy, who has long questioned the benefits of vaccines. 'Even rare vaccination related harms both known and unknown now have higher chance of outweighing potential benefits' Prasad wrote in a five-page memo explaining his decision. COVID-19 remains a public health threat, resulting in 32,000 to 51,000 U.S. deaths and more than 250,000 hospitalizations since last fall, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most at risk for hospitalization are seniors and children under 2 — especially infants under 6 months. Top FDA leaders are typically not involved in the review of individual products. Officials like Prasad can overrule staffers, but such cases are rare and often controversial. News of the FDA documents was first reported by the New York Times. Prasad was hired to lead the FDA's vaccine center in May, after the previous director, Dr. Peter Marks, was forced to resign over disagreements with Kennedy. An academic researcher specializing in cancer therapies, Prasad came to prominence during the pandemic for criticizing public health measures, including the FDA's approval of COVID boosters for healthy adults and children. Since arriving at the agency he has worked with FDA Commissioner Mark Makary on new guidelines that will limit approvals of future COVID boosters to higher-risk Americans, mainly seniors and those with medical conditions like asthma and obesity. Those limits match the terms FDA recently approved for Novavax's shot, Nuvaxovid and Moderna's mNexspike. Novavax's vaccine is the only protein-based coronavirus vaccine available in the U.S. Moderna's vaccine is an updated, lower-dose version of its existing mRNA-based vaccine. The review team for the Novavax vaccine pointed to data from a study in 30,000 adults, concluding that 'the risk-benefit assessment for this vaccine technology remains favorable.' FDA staff reached a similar conclusion for the Moderna vaccine, deeming it similar in safety and effectiveness to the company's original shot. Last week, the FDA finalized new warning labeling about the risk of myocarditis, a rare form of heart inflammation, on shots from Moderna and Pfizer, the other maker of an mRNA-based shot for COVID. In his 'override memo,' reversing FDA staff's decision on the Moderna shot, Prasad pointed to the ongoing risk of myocarditis and questions about its frequency. The agency ordered Moderna to conduct further studies of the risk as a condition for the approving its updated shot. A spokesman for the administration said Prasad 'has raised serious concerns' about the issue. 'We will not ignore these risks and will ensure that the gold standard of science is used for any decisions,' said Andrew Nixon, in an emailed statement. Outside researchers have noted that cases of the heart condition tend to resolve quickly and are less severe than those associated with COVID infection itself, which can also cause myocarditis. ___
