Influencer accused of sneaking into celebrity's home backpedals on guilty plea, says she'll prove innocence
Her counsel, Mohd Anif Rafih, informed Magistrate Saiful Sayoti that the accused intended to change her initial plea, following which the charge was re-read to her.
Nurul Nur Ariani, 41, claimed trial to a charge of criminal trespass for allegedly entering the premises of a house in Kampung Chelet, Nilai at around 5.00pm on May 7.
She was charged under Section 447 of the Penal Code, which carries a maximum sentence of six months' imprisonment, a fine of up to RM3,000, or both, upon conviction.
Police prosecuting officer ASP L. Rathna requested a new mention date for the submission of documents.
On May 19, the influencer pleaded guilty to the charge before Sessions Court Judge Mohamad Kamil Nizam.
The court had then fixed today for the presentation of case facts and sentencing to take place at the Magistrates' Court.
Meanwhile, another defence counsel, Amer Haiqal Mohd Yusof, told reporters after the proceedings that the accused had not received proper legal advice before entering the earlier plea.
'My client now wishes to proceed with a trial to contest the case and prove her innocence,' he said. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
23 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Citizens can arrest but mustn't go overboard, say lawyers
Members of the public have a moral duty to prevent the commission of a criminal offence, but any use of force must be within lawful and reasonable limits, says lawyer Baljit Singh. PETALING JAYA : Malaysian law permits a citizen to arrest a person suspected of having committed a crime, but can only use reasonable force to do so, a lawyer said. Baljit Singh said Section 27 of the Criminal Procedure Code empowers citizens to arrest individuals alleged to have committed a crime, provided the offence is non-bailable and seizable, and is committed in the arrestor's presence. A non-bailable offence refers to offences for which bail is not automatically granted, while a seizable offence is one for which police officers are empowered to arrest without a warrant. Both categories usually involve more serious crimes, including murder, rape, robbery and drug trafficking. 'The person making the arrest must hand the suspect over to the police without unnecessary delay,' he said. Baljit said members of the public have a moral duty to prevent the commission of a criminal offence, but any use of force must be within lawful and reasonable limits. He said the force used must be proportionate to the threat and necessary under the circumstances. 'One cannot take the law into their hands,' he said. The lawyer was commenting after a 51-year-old man was reportedly assaulted to death on July 27 by members of the public after he allegedly exposed himself in a public place. Seven people have since been arrested, with the death classified as murder. Five days earlier, another man succumbed to injuries sustained after he was assaulted by members of the public who had spotted him in the act of robbing a kindergarten teacher in Cheras. The case has also been classified as murder, with eight men arrested. Baljit said the prosecution would have to establish in court the specific roles each individual played in the incident, including who delivered the fatal blow. Lawyer Kitson Foong said any conduct or act beyond what is permitted will amount to vigilante action. He said a person conducting a citizen's arrest has the right to self-defence if the suspect, armed with a dangerous weapon, retaliates. 'But you cannot go overboard on the offensive under the disguise of self-defence,' he added. For example, a person attempting to arrest a suspect should not use a gun unless he has first fired a warning shot. 'If in the process of apprehending you find that your life is endangered, you can use reasonable force to disarm and repel the perpetrator,' he added.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
No expulsion, no transfers: Sabah Education Dept refutes viral claims about students in Zara Qairina case
KOTA KINABALU, Aug 2 — Three students who were among 60 people questioned by police in the investigation into the death of Zara Qairina Mahathir remain enrolled at the same religious school in Sabah and have not been transferred elsewhere. The state Education Department also confirmed that the students are not related to any Very Important Persons (VIPs), contrary to claims circulating on social media that they have been expelled or transferred elsewhere, Sinar Harian reported today. 'All of them are still in school; none have dropped out,' Sabah Education Director Datuk Raisin Saidin told the Malay daily. He also said the three students are not linked to any VIPs or the police. He said the Sabah Education Department fully trusts the police to conduct a thorough investigation and will await the official findings. Zara Qairina, a Form One student who died after falling from the hostel building at a religious school in Papar. Following her death, three names – 'Kak Wana', 'Kak Dedeng', and 'Tomboi' – appeared online, fuelling rumours of a connection.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
RM8.6m copper factory busted in Perak for operating illegally, man in 40s arrested
IPOH, Aug 2 — The General Operations Force (GOF) seized various types of copper materials, several machines, and other equipment valued at RM8,586,000 in an enforcement operation at an unlicensed factory in Simpang Pulai yesterday morning. Northern Brigade (Ulu Kinta) GOF Commander, SAC Shahrum Hashim, said a local man was also arrested during the operation, which was named Op Hazard. 'The GOF, assisted by the Perak Inland Revenue Board, the Batu Gajah Municipal Council, and the Perak Department of Environment (DOE), arrested a local male who is in his 40s, along with the seized items at a factory that processes copper dust and raw materials into copper scrap, which is suspected to be for export,' he said in a statement. He added that intelligence gathered over the past month found that the activity had been ongoing for about a year, and inspections revealed that the factory was operating without any approval from the DOE. He said the case is being investigated under Section 34A and Section 34B of the Environmental Quality Act 1974, and the Perak DOE also took action by issuing a stop-work order under Section 38(1)(a) of Act 127. 'The case is also being investigated under Section 113(2) of the Income Tax Act 1967, which pertains to making incorrect declarations to eliminate or reduce income for oneself or others. Or providing any false information regarding any matter that affects one's own or another's tax liability,' he said. He stated that if convicted, the penalty will be 45 percent of the tax evaded. — Bernama
