logo
UK-wide strategy needed to tackle pensioner poverty, says committee

UK-wide strategy needed to tackle pensioner poverty, says committee

Leader Live6 days ago
The Government should also decide on – and ensure – a minimum level of retirement income, the Work and Pensions Committee urged.
Once set, a plan should be created for everyone to reach that level, it added.
Given that the state pension is the core of the Government's offer to pensioners, a guiding principle should be that it provides the amount needed for a 'minimum, dignified, socially acceptable standard of living', the committee said.
It urged the Government to commit to a UK-wide, cross-government strategy for an ageing society, that it said would help target support to tackle pensioner poverty.
If it does not effectively tackle poverty as one of the causes of ill-health, 'the Government will not be able to achieve its goal of building a health and social care service that is sustainable', the Pensioner Poverty report warned.
The report also highlighted longer-term trends that 'threaten to undermine pension adequacy', such as people renting into later life.
The committee also called for a pension credit take-up strategy for England by the end of 2025.
Despite being worth up to £4,000 a year, the take-up of pension credit has hovered between 61% and 66% for a decade, with an estimated 700,000 households being eligible but not claiming, the committee said.
A taper to pension credit should also be considered to 'mitigate the cliff-edge effect' for those who currently miss out, the report said.
Under current rules, some pensioners just above income thresholds could end up worse off than those with slightly lower incomes, it added.
Pension credit can 'passport' recipients to other benefits such as housing benefit, council tax support, the warm homes discount, a free TV licence, help with dental treatment and, in winter 2024/25, the winter fuel payment.
The committee argued that reliance on top-ups such as pension credit and housing benefit is not sufficient to ensure people do not fall below the poverty line.
The report said: 'After a decline in pensioner poverty in the 2000s, the number of pensioners in relative low income started to rise again from 2010. This has been exacerbated by increases in the cost of living since 2021.'
It continued: 'The number of people of pension age living in relative poverty (below 60% of median income) is 1.9 million or 16% of pensioners.
'Measures which factor in the cost of living show that between 2008/09 and 2022/23, the number of pensioners in households below the Minimum Income Standard (MIS)—the amount needed for a minimum dignified socially acceptable standard of living—rose from 1.5 to 2.8 million.
'The proportion of pensioners below 75% of MIS (where the risk of material deprivation increases substantially) rose from 5.9% in 2021/22 to 9.5% in 2022/23.
'In practice, this means cutting back on essentials, like food, energy use and seeing friends, in an attempt to manage costs. Health experts explained the implications for health. Financial hardship can accelerate the ageing process, making it more likely that an older person will enter hospital or need care.'
The committee said that in some places, organisations are working together towards shared objectives.
The report continued: 'However, not all areas do this. We heard that it would help to have a national cross-government strategy for our ageing society and older people.
'This could provide a framework to hold the different partners to account for their role in delivering the agreed outcomes. It could also ensure that central government departments developed policy with shared objectives in mind.'
Committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams said: 'To boost incomes, the Government needs to come up with a strategy to increase pension credit take-up. It's a scandal that so many have missed out for so many years, often through an aversion to claiming benefits altogether, or lack of support.
'The fairness of the pensions credit eligibility criteria where if you are a penny above the threshold, you miss out on thousands of pounds, also needs to be looked at.
'Ultimately, the Government should decide what it thinks is enough for a dignified retirement, and then work to ensure that all pensioners are on at least that level.
'Faced with a combination of high energy costs, ill-health and ever higher rates of pensioners in more costly privately rented accommodation, tackling pensioner poverty is not simply a DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) issue. So, we're calling for a nationwide, cross-government strategy for an ageing society that should be rooted in equity and wellbeing.'
On Tuesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said that a review into raising the state pension age is needed to ensure the system is 'sustainable and affordable'.
The Government review is due to report in March 2029 and Ms Reeves said it was 'right' to look at the age at which people can receive the state pension as life expectancy increases.
The state pension age is currently 66, rising to 67 by 2028 and the Government is legally required to periodically review the age.
A Government spokesperson said: 'Supporting pensioners is a top priority, and thanks to our commitment to the triple lock, millions will see their yearly state pension rise by up to £1,900 by the end of this parliament.
'We have also run the biggest-ever campaign to boost pension credit take-up, with nearly 60,000 extra pensioner households being awarded the benefit, worth on average around £4,300 a year.
'But we know there is a real risk that tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, which is why we are reviving the Pension Commission, to tackle the barriers that stop too many people from saving.'
Emma Douglas, wealth policy director at Aviva, said: 'The pensions industry – alongside a revitalised Pensions Commission – has a critical role to play in helping people save for retirement and then turn their hard-earned pension pots into lasting financial security.
'With many people likely to manage their money well into their 90s, we must ensure those savings work harder and stretch further – especially as later life can bring complex challenges like cognitive decline.'
She said that Aviva and Age UK were exploring a 'mid-retirement MOT' to help give people tools, guidance, and confidence to stay financially resilient throughout retirement.
Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said: 'We warmly welcome this thoughtful and wide-ranging select committee report, which comes closer to providing a thorough and progressive strategic overview of the issues facing older people on low incomes and proposing workable solutions than anything successive governments have produced in recent years.
'When the Government announced the launch of the Pensions Commission earlier this week, ministers made it clear that its task is to think about the creation of a better system for future pensioners.
'This is necessary and important, but this committee report reinforces the point that there's work to do to improve the situation of today's pensioners on low incomes as well.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Victorian approach to welfare shames Labour
Victorian approach to welfare shames Labour

The National

time35 minutes ago

  • The National

Victorian approach to welfare shames Labour

With more than seven million low-income families still going without essentials, the JRF's cost of living tracker shines the spotlight on just how acute this situation is for low-income families with three or more children, with almost nine in 10 going without the essentials, and the highest number of families in arrears or holding a loan for essentials since their tracking began. This is a terrible indictment of Keir Starmer's government – no progress, no change, the very opposite of what Labour promised. Indeed, what strikes me most is just how little has changed since they came into power – the SNP are still pushing the UK Government to scrap the two-child cap and implement a similar benefit to our transformational Scottish Child Payment; Westminster is still digging its heels in. READ MORE: Keir Starmer commits to recognising Palestinian state after intense pressure My former colleague Alison Thewliss was dogged in challenging the Tory government on the two-child cap; yet here we are under Labour, and the asks remain the same while the situation is getting worse. The JRF says their modelling does not include impacts of cuts to health-related elements of Universal Credit for future claimants currently working its way through parliament. Damning reports like this should focus minds ahead of the delayed publication of the Child Poverty Strategy, with its recommendation to get rid of the two-child cap and strengthen the foundations of the social settlement. But is the Government listening, are they reading these reports, are they paying attention to best practice elsewhere, i.e. in Scotland? (Image: PA) On paper Labour say they are – for instance, the secretaries of state for work and pensions, and for education, say in their foreword to the introduction ahead of this new strategy that there is a lot they can learn from action already taken in Scotland. But in the chamber, it's a whole other ball game. Not a week goes by that I don't think of that phrase 'people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' while I'm sitting in the House of Commons listening to what seems to be a coordinated strategy by Labour to attack the Scottish Government in Holyrood at every available opportunity even when the focus is very much on their own failures at [[Westminster]]. That's politics I hear you say, but it's more than that. In fact, I'd go as far to say it's like a kind of 'blame shifting' to use psychological terminology. A perfect example comes from just a couple of weeks ago, when the Secretary of State for Scotland, Ian Murray MP, was answering questions in the chamber on the Government's Spending Review. My colleague, MP Stephen Gethins, challenged Murray on his party's failure to scrap the two-child cap only to be met with a defensive volley on the number of children that are homeless in Scotland. A little rudimentary digging on Shelter England's website and you can see that of course Murray failed to highlight that in England, there are 164,040 children living in temporary accommodation with their families, which is the highest number on record and represents a 15% increase in the last year alone. Additionally, there are 126,040 households in England experiencing homelessness in temporary accommodation, another record high and a 16% increase in 12 months. This is hardly a record to be proud of, and not a position of strength from which to point the finger at other governments. Fortunately, a decent amount of finger pointing has already been done by Labour's own MPs, with their welfare cuts described as 'Dickensian'. Those MPs have been punished subsequently, more blame shifting rather than addressing the key problem which is Labour's terrible policy decisions. And only one of them was a Scottish Labour MP, while the others continue to bow and scrape to Number 10. Even the UN has waded in to highlight how Labour's welfare cuts could threaten the human rights of disabled people. And this from a government led by a former human rights lawyer. It reminded me of the UN's comments on the Tory government's welfare policies, with the special rapporteur on extreme poverty describing 'workhouse' conditions and the 'systematic immiseration' of the British population thanks to austerity. Red or blue, it's the same old same old. Collaborating with Scotland on best practice on social security – not just with our Scottish Child Payment but with our efforts to reinstate the Winter Fuel Payment for pensioners before Labour's major U-turn, and now our upcoming mitigation of the two-child cap – would change the narrative on Labour's Victorian approach to welfare. This would signal a more grown-up approach to politics than the current tribal mudslinging variety that Labour favours. Don't hold your breath. So, every time you hear a Labour MP, particularly the Scottish ones, have a poke at Scotland and the SNP Government at Holyrood, remember this coordinated blame shift. Because behind every snide and spurious comment about Scotland lies a truth that Labour can't deny – they're failing to make any progress, and fast. All the more reason for Scotland to be rid of Westminster for good.

John Swinney's approach to Donald Trump didn't look good for Scotland
John Swinney's approach to Donald Trump didn't look good for Scotland

The National

time35 minutes ago

  • The National

John Swinney's approach to Donald Trump didn't look good for Scotland

In 2019, Murray backed a House of Commons motion accusing Trump of 'misogynism, racism and xenophobia'. Fast forward six years and Trump's second administration has turbocharged a global rollback of human rights. In the US, it has carried out enforced disappearances, halted protections for abortion patients facing violence, and signed executive orders steeped in white supremacist ideology. On the global stage, Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement marks a surrender in the fight against climate breakdown – one of the greatest human rights threats of our time – as we now cross the grim milestone of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial temperatures. Meanwhile, his sanctions on International Criminal Court officials have sent a chilling message that Israel is above international law, as we watch it carry out a live streamed genocide in Gaza. By undermining the institutions that uphold and advance human rights, Trump has compounded the damage done by other leaders and accelerated our plunge into a brutal new era of authoritarian practices and corporate greed. READ MORE: John Swinney gives statement after Donald Trump meeting – read in full Yet on Friday, he stepped off Air Force One to a warm welcome from the UK Government. 'I hope you're looking forward to a bit of downtime with some golf this weekend,' Murray reportedly told him. Perhaps the Scottish Government would take a firmer stance? The initial signs weren't promising. On Saturday, hundreds gathered in protest at Trump's visit. As speakers described the horrors of genocide in [[Gaza]] fuelled by the 2000-pound bombs the United States sends to Israel, we learned that First Minister John Swinney had written a cheque for £180,000 of Scottish public money for Donald Trump's Aberdeenshire hotel to host a golf tournament. Swinney insisted the funding would 'help drive economic growth and contribute to environmental sustainability while promoting Scotland through global profile.' But the First Minister should know better. Almost two decades ago as Finance Secretary he intervened to save Trump's controversial golf course development at the Menie Estate in Aberdeenshire after local councillors rejected it. What followed should have been a cautionary tale the Government never forgot. It's all documented expertly in the film "You've Been Trumped". The thousands of jobs promised never materialised – some estimates put the true number as low as 81. Trump's hostility to press freedom was made plain in his treatment of the film's director Anthony Baxter: 'I want real journalists … it's only questions like you ask that cause trouble'. Trump's development, approved against the advice of the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, irreversibly damaged protected sand dunes that were home to wildlife and helped guard against coastal erosion. Molly Forbes, a 90-year old local resident, lived without access to clean water for years because a billionaire wanted a golf course. Scotland's 'global reputation' was cynically used to justify this disgrace. One Aberdeen Business School professor asked a protester objecting to Trump's attempts to force the sale of the homes neighbouring his development: 'Have you seen some of the ramshackle dumps … do you think that does any good to the vision of Scotland throughout the world?' Sadly, Swinney's decision to open the public purse for Trump's [[Aberdeen]]shire course suggests the lesson still hasn't sunk in. It sent an alarming message that despite Scotland's previous experience with Trump and despite the authoritarian practices on full display in his current administration – the [[Scottish Government]] is still open for business. By Monday any hope that the First Minister would rise to the occasion had largely evaporated. On social media he set out the issues he intended to raise with Trump. Among tariffs, trade and whisky was [[Gaza]]. There should be a significant increase in aid, an urgent ceasefire, and recognition of the state of Palestine as part of a viable two-state solution he said, failing completely to set himself apart from the limited position occupied by Keir Starmer earlier in the day. He left his bilateral with Trump on Tuesday morning praising the president's "pleasant company". READ MORE: The National Trump front page sold out – so you can buy it as a poster The First Minister clearly needs to decide what his vision for Scotland's global reputation is. Trying to do business with Trump while being seen as a principled global actor is like trying to ride two horses galloping in opposite directions. We're undeniably at a critical juncture for human rights, but there is hope. The residents of the Menie Estate took Trump on in a David and Goliath battle and saved their homes against the odds. Similarly, those protesting over the weekend – and I believe many more people in Scotland won't stand by quietly while rights are violated and the world becomes a more unequal and dangerous place. To fall for the suggestion that the global rise in authoritarian practices and dismantling of human rights is inevitable would be the greatest gift we could give leaders like Trump. If our own political leaders remain silent at this critical juncture, that is a choice we must judge them upon, but we can also make our own choices. If everyone who cares about justice and equality makes their voice heard, even in small ways, we can turn the tide.

Cutting emissions is below punctuality in people's aviation priorities
Cutting emissions is below punctuality in people's aviation priorities

South Wales Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Cutting emissions is below punctuality in people's aviation priorities

Some 63% of UK adults polled said ensuring planes take off and land on time should be a priority for the sector. That is compared with 56% who said the same for cutting emissions. The figure for reducing emissions is up from 53% in 2024, but down from 70% in 2020. Air traffic control (ATC) provider Nats commissioned the research. The Government has a target for the UK aviation industry to reach net zero for carbon emissions by 2050. There are concerns that green policies – such as using more sustainable aviation fuel – could lead to higher air fares. Nats said it has worked closely with aviation partners over the past 12 months to enhance punctuality and resilience. This includes using tools such as intelligent approach, which optimises the distances between arriving aircraft. Nats said it was responsible for 1.2% of total delays to flights en route to Europe in June, despite handling nearly a quarter of air traffic. Thousands of UK airline passengers have suffered delays because of industrial action by French ATC staff in recent months. The survey indicated that 52% of UK adults had flown internationally in the previous 12 months, while 32% flew domestically. Some 26% of respondents expected to fly more in the following year. The poll also suggested there is growing acceptance of aviation innovation such as drones, flying taxis and AI-enabled services. For example, 68% of respondents supported using AI to screen bags while 50% were in favour of it managing flight routing. Simon Warr, Nats' communications director, said: 'The 2025 Aviation Index highlights the public's clear priorities: reliable service, greater environmental performance, and smart use of innovation. 'As the aviation industry continues to modernise, aligning with these expectations will be key to maintaining public trust and delivering the benefits aviation brings to society.' – The survey of 1,217 UK adults was conducted online by research company Ipsos on April 9 and 10.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store