logo
Unanswered cry for justice and compassion a decade after MH17

Unanswered cry for justice and compassion a decade after MH17

Borneo Post17-05-2025

In the echoing silence left by the shattering explosion that ripped through the skies over eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014, lies a wound that refuses to heal. What happened was that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down. It wasn't just a plane breaking apart; it was the tragic death of 298 innocent people. It was a cruel act that devastated families and made many countries feel deep sadness for a long time.
Now, ten years on, the UN aviation agency, ICAO, has clearly stated Russia is the culprit for the MH17 atrocity. They found Australia and the Netherlands' claims valid, based on Russia violating the rule against using weapons on civilian planes. This decision gives renewed voice to the grief of victims' families, like Wan Yusuf Irfan Wan Amran, son of Captain Wan Amran Wan Hussin, whose powerful words are a passionate call for justice and compassion after such immense loss.
Irfan's words paint a vivid picture of a life irrevocably altered. For a nine-year-old boy, July 17, 2014, became the day his worldnfractured, the day his father, a pillar of laughter, discipline, and quiet strength, was stolen by a senseless act of extermination. His simple yet profound statement, 'Over a decade has passed, yet not a day goes by without thoughts of him,' speaks volumes about the enduring pain that time cannot erase. It is a testament to the indelible mark left by a loved one, a constant reminder of what was so fiercely taken away.
The ICAO's ruling, a long-awaited confirmation of what investigationsnhave painstakingly revealed, has reignited the fervent demand fornjustice. Irfan rightly asserts that MH17 was not just any plane; it was a symbol of national identity, 'our national carrier, carrying ourn people under the Malaysian flag.' The downing was an assault not only on individual lives but on the collective spirit of a nation.
To have an international body pinpoint responsibility should be a pivotal moment, a catalyst for resolute action.
To be responsible, in response, Malaysia must now lead a coalition of nations — the Netherlands, Australia, and others — to escalate accountability through international courts, leveraging the ICAO ruling to demand reparations and sanctions against those implicated.
Simultaneously, diplomatic pressure at the UN, even in the face of veto threats, could amplify global condemnation and moral clarity.
Yet, the disappointment in Irfan's voice is profound as he laments the perceived lack of 'resolve and compassion' from the authority.
Malaysia's emotionally distant and mechanical response to the MH17 tragedy, devoid of basic compassion, distressingly reveals a deeper national unease.
When a commercial aircraft carrying 298 souls was blasted out of the sky in a conflict not of their making, the world looked on in horror.
Families across continents plunged into grief, while nations scrambled to assert moral clarity and demand justice. And yet, amid this storm of anguish and urgency, the official Malaysian reaction appeared curiously muted — more concerned with protocol than with pain, more focused on preserving diplomatic poise than acknowledging raw humannsuffering. What a shame!
This aftermath desperately needed clear empathy, a voice for national grief, and leadership that could mourn while firmly seeking justice.
The lack of this wasn't just a PR mistake; it showed a clear gap between the government and the people's emotions. In such a huge tragedy, silence and coldness felt wrong. Malaysia needed then, and every nation needs — not just good administration, but the courage to feel and show it when the world is watching. It speaks of a profound disconnect between the bureaucratic machinery and the raw, visceral pain of those who have suffered the ultimate loss. To be treated as a 'footnote in a long-forgotten chapter' is an acute indignity, a further wounding of already broken hearts. This demands immediate redress: the establishment of dedicated Family Liaison Units to provide personalized updates and mental health support, coupled with a parliamentary resolution formally acknowledging the families'suffering and affirming the state's duty to protect their dignity. The call for 'significant recognition' and a 'clear path toward justice' is not an unreasonable demand; it is a fundamental expectation of a system meant to protect and support its citizens, one that has, thus far, fallen short.
Following in his father's aviation footsteps, Irfan's experience isnparticularly heartbreaking. The mentorship he was denied, seized away by both the Russian perpetrators and a system in Malaysia he believes failed to protect his father's memory, layers another profound personal tragedy onto this already devastating event.
His father, who 'served Malaysia with pride,' deserves to have his sacrifice acknowledged and honored. To transform this grief into a legacy, Malaysia could establish the 'Captain Wan Amran Aviation Scholarship,' funding aspiring pilots in his name, while integrating MH17's lessons into school curricula to ensure future generations understand the human cost of geopolitical recklessness. The fact that his service and death 'have not been met with the respect and protection they deserve' is a painful truth that demands restoration.
The plea for compensation, framed not merely as a financial obligation but as a 'national duty and a symbol of dignity,' underlines the need for a response that transcends mere legalities. It is about acknowledging the sincere value of the lives lost and offering a tangible symbol of the nation's commitment to its bereaved families.
A state-funded compensation program, including educational grants and healthcare support, must be established, not as charity, but as a moral imperative. Concurrently, Malaysia should spearhead multilateral negotiations to hold Russia financially accountable, mounting reparations as a non-negotiable component of justice. The sentiment that families should not have to 'chase what is rightfully theirs' speaks to a desire for proactive empathy and support, a recognition of their ongoing suffering.
In his heartfelt conclusion, Irfan's words echo with a profound human yearning: 'We do not ask for pity. We ask for justice. We ask for memory. We ask for compassion. We ask to be seen.'
This is not a plea for special treatment but a fundamental request for their suffering to be acknowledged, for the memory of their loved ones to be honored, and for the pursuit of justice to be carried out with genuine compassion.
To answer this call, Malaysia must erect a national MH17 memorial — a sacred space for collective mourning — and designate July 17 as a day of remembrance, ensuring the tragedy remains etched in the nation's consciousness. Leaders must also meet privately with families, offering not just apologies for past bureaucratic failures, but a pledge to center their voices on all future actions.
The ICAO's ruling provides a crucial foundation for moving forward.
Indeed, it is a validation of the truth that families have long known and a step towards holding those responsible accountable. However, the impassioned words of the pilot's son serve as a strong reminder that justice is not merely a legal outcome; it requires a human touch, a demonstration of empathy, and an unwavering commitment to remembering the lives that were so tragically lost.
Malaysia's response must transcend symbolism: by partnering with ICAO to reform conflict-zone flight protocols, it can ensure MH17 catalyzes systemic change, preventing future atrocities. Transparency through ublic progress reports and family inclusion in diplomatic delegations will further bridge the gap between policy and humanity.
The world must not allow MH17 to become a footnote. It must remain a stark reminder of the human cost of conflict and the enduring need for justice and compassion in its wake. Through legal rigor, cultural remembrance, and unrelenting empathy, Malaysia can transform this tragedy into a testament of resilience — one where Wan Yusuf Irfan's cry for justice becomes a chorus answered by a nation that refuses to forget.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran decries ‘destructive' conduct by IAEA chief
Iran decries ‘destructive' conduct by IAEA chief

The Sun

time26 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Iran decries ‘destructive' conduct by IAEA chief

TEHRAN: Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron that Tehran halted cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog due to what he called the agency chief's 'destructive' behaviour towards the Islamic republic, his office said Monday. 'The action taken by parliament members... is a natural response to the unjustified, unconstructive, and destructive conduct of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency,' Pezeshkian told Macron in a phone call late Sunday, according to a presidency statement. On Wednesday, Iranian lawmakers voted in favour of a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, citing Israel's June 13 attack on the Islamic republic and later strikes by the United States on nuclear facilities. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took hold on June 24. Since the start of the war with Israel, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the agency for failing to condemn the strikes. Iran has also criticised the watchdog for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing it of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations. In a Sunday post on X, Macron said he called for 'respect for the ceasefire' and a return to negotiations to address 'ballistic and nuclear issues.' He further called for 'the swift resumption of the IAEA's work in Iran to ensure full transparency.' On Monday, France, Germany, and Britain condemned what they called 'threats' against the IAEA chief Rafael Grossi after Iran rejected its request to visit nuclear facilities bombed during the war. None specified which threats they were referring to, but Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper recently claimed documents showed Grossi was an Israeli spy and should be executed. Iran has said Grossi's request to visit bombed sites signalled 'malign intent' but insisted that no threats were posed against Grossi or the agency's inspectors. On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the Iranian parliament's decision to halt cooperation with the IAEA reflected the 'concern and anger of the Iranian public opinion.' He further criticised the United States and European powers for maintaining what he described as a 'political approach' toward Iran's nuclear programme during his weekly press conference. Baqaei also questioned how the safety of IAEA inspectors could be ensured while the extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities -- targeted by Israel and the United States during the 12-day war -- remains unknown. 'One aspect of this issue is how to ensure the safety and security of the agency's inspectors, in a situation where there is still no accurate assessment of the severity of the damage,' he said.

Trump says not offering Iran ‘anything', nor speaking to them
Trump says not offering Iran ‘anything', nor speaking to them

The Sun

time32 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Trump says not offering Iran ‘anything', nor speaking to them

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Monday he was not offering Iran anything nor talking to it 'since we totally obliterated' the country's nuclear facilities. 'I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'Nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities.' The statement comes as Iran's deputy foreign minister told the BBC that talks between Washington and Tehran cannot resume unless the US rules out further strikes on Iran. Majid Takht-Ravanchi told the British broadcaster that the US had signalled it wants to return to the negotiating table, a week after it struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. 'We have not agreed to any date, we have not agreed to the modality,' said Takht-Ravanchi. 'Right now we are seeking an answer to this question. Are we going to see a repetition of an act of aggression while we are engaging in dialogue?' The US needs to be 'quite clear on this very important question', he said. The two countries were in talks over Tehran's nuclear programme when Israel hit Iranian nuclear sites and military infrastructure this month, with the US joining by bombing three nuclear sites -- Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan -- on June 21. The deputy minister revealed to the BBC that the US had signalled it did 'not want to engage in regime change' by targeting Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Takht-Ravanchi also said Iran should still be allowed to enrich uranium. 'The level of that can be discussed, the capacity can be discussed, but to say that you should not have enrichment, you should have zero enrichment, and if you do not agree, we will bomb you, that is the law of the jungle,' he said. Israel claims that Iran's nuclear programme is close to producing a bomb, whereas Tehran says it is for peaceful purposes. It is not clear yet how much damage the strikes inflicted on Iran's nuclear facilities, which Trump has said were 'totally obliterated'. UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said Iran would probably be able to begin to produce enriched uranium 'in a matter of months'. Takht-Ravanchi said he did not know how long it would take. Under a 2015 deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium below 3.67 percent purity for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants. Trump abandoned the agreement in 2018 and Iran responded by producing uranium enriched to 60 percent -- above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs.

US must rule out more strikes before talks can resume: Iran
US must rule out more strikes before talks can resume: Iran

The Sun

time33 minutes ago

  • The Sun

US must rule out more strikes before talks can resume: Iran

LONDON: Diplomatic talks between Washington and Tehran cannot resume unless the US rules out further strikes on Iran, its deputy foreign minister told the BBC late Sunday. Majid Takht-Ravanchi told the British broadcaster that the US had signalled it wants to return to the negotiating table, a week after it struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. 'We have not agreed to any date, we have not agreed to the modality,' said Takht-Ravanchi. 'Right now we are seeking an answer to this question. Are we going to see a repetition of an act of aggression while we are engaging in dialogue?' The US needed to be 'quite clear on this very important question', he said. The two countries were in talks over Tehran's nuclear programme when Israel hit Iranian nuclear sites and military infrastructure earlier this month, with the US joining by bombing three nuclear sites -- Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan -- on June 21. The deputy minister revealed to the BBC that the US had signalled it did 'not want to engage in regime change' by targeting Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Takht-Ravanchi also said Iran should still be allowed to enrich uranium. 'The level of that can be discussed, the capacity can be discussed, but to say that you should not have enrichment, you should have zero enrichment, and if you do not agree, we will bomb you, that is the law of the jungle,' he said. Israel claims that Iran's nuclear programme is close to producing a bomb, whereas Tehran says it is for peaceful purposes. It is not clear yet how much damage the strikes inflicted on Iran's nuclear facilities, which US President Donald Trump had said were 'totally obliterated'. UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said Iran would probably be able to begin to produce enriched uranium 'in a matter of months'. Takht-Ravanchi said he did not know how long it would take. Under a 2015 deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium below 3.67 percent purity for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants. Trump abandoned the agreement in 2018 and Iran responded by producing uranium enriched to 60 percent -- above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store