Dangerous Android Apps Can Steal Your Data, Delete Them Right Away
Android apps are easy to target for the hackers and Google finds it hard to trace and filter them out from the Play Store.
Android apps with dangerous intent often manage to bypass Google's strict security checks and once again you have a slew of apps targeting users looking to steal their money and data. More than 20 apps with malicious content have come through Google's check to get listed on the Play Store and users are being warned about their risks and told to delete them right away.
Cryptocurrency apps have mushroomed in the last few years and many people get enticed with their supposed quick money policies. The bad actors are using their malicious apps disguised as wallet apps for the digital currency that people need to be careful about. These details have been shared by Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL) that has discovered the malicious apps on the Play Store.
The security firm claims that if any user has installed these dangerous apps, they could be prompted to enter the confidential 12-digit recovery key for the wallet, which allows the hackers to fully control their digital wallets and even transfer the money into their accounts without raising an alarm.
These are some of the apps that have been used by the hackers to steal your data:
These apps are listed on the Play Store and if you have installed any of these, we highly advise you to delete/uninstall them right away. Also, make sure you don't sign up to hand over important passwords and passkeys to access these accounts.
You should also set up two-factor security so that people cannot isolate the account access. Google always suggests its users to install these apps from genuine sources like the Play Store and not click on links for apps from unknown senders.
Incidents of data theft with crypto wallets have increased in recent times, and the CRIL security warning is a clear sign of how hackers are modifying their targets and mode of attacks.
AI is another big tool that hackers are deploying to build sophisticated attacks but most people just need to be smart and careful about how and where they source these apps for their devices.
First Published:
June 09, 2025, 10:10 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
RBI releases fulllist of legal digital lending apps on its site
(You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel MUMBAI: The Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) has published a comprehensive list of legal digital lending apps (DLAs) on its website, allowing consumers to verify whether a particular app is associated with a regulated entity. The list, which features around 1,600 DLAs, includes prominent fintech platforms such as Google Pay Paytm and move follows the RBI's 2023 digital lending guidelines, which proposed the public display of all verified DLAs to promote greater transparency in the May, the central bank directed all regulated entities to report their DLAs through the centralised information management system portal. The published list will be updated automatically based on entries in the portal, without further validation by the initiative is aimed at enhancing transparency in digital lending practices, in how loan products are offered and disclosed to prospective borrowers. In a bid to curb spread of illegal lending apps, the finance ministry had in September 2022 proposed the RBI compile a whitelist of legitimate DLAs, while ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) would ensure only these apps are allowed on app stores.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
8 hours ago
- Business Standard
Google offers new search tweaks to counter EU antitrust scrutiny: Report
Google has proposed fresh changes to its search results in an attempt to fend off growing criticism from rivals, a week before a key meeting that could lead to yet another EU antitrust fine, according to a document seen by Reuters. The U.S. tech giant has been under pressure after being hit in March with European Union antitrust charges of unfairly favouring its own services such as Google Shopping, Google Hotels and Google Flights over competitors. The company, owned by Alphabet, will meet its rivals and the European Commission to discuss its proposals during a July 7-8 workshop in Brussels, the document said. The EU's landmark Digital Markets Act, under which Google has been charged, sets out a list of dos and don'ts for Big Tech aimed at curbing their power and giving rivals more room to compete and consumers more choice. Last week, Google offered to create a box at the top of the search page for a so-called vertical search service (VSS) which would contain links to specialised search engines as well as to hotels, airlines, restaurants and transport services. The latest offer, called Option B, is an alternative to last week's proposal, according to a Google document sent by the Commission to involved parties and seen by Reuters. "Under 'Option B', whenever a VSS box is shown, Google will also show a box that includes free links to suppliers," the document said. The box for suppliers - in essence hotels, restaurants, airlines and travel services - would be below the VSS box, with Google organising the information about the suppliers. Option B "provides suppliers opportunities while not creating a box that can be characterised as a Google VSS", the document said. "We've made hundreds of alterations to our products as part of our DMA compliance," a Google spokesperson said. "While we strive for compliance, we remain genuinely concerned about some of the real world consequences of the DMA, which are leading to worse online products and experiences for Europeans." Google risks a fine as much as 10% of its global annual revenue if found in breach of the DMA.
Economic Times
9 hours ago
- Economic Times
When AI goes rogue, even exorcists might flinch
Ghouls in the machine As GenAI use grows, foundation models are advancing rapidly, driven by fierce competition among top developers like OpenAI, Google, Meta and Anthropic. Each is vying for a reputational edge and business advantage in the race to lead development. This gives them a reputational edge, along with levers to further grow their business faster than their models powering GenAI are making significant strides. The most advanced - OpenAI's o3 and Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 - excel at complex tasks such as advanced coding and complex writing tasks, and can contribute to research projects and generate the codebase for a new software prototype with just a few considered prompts. These models use chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, breaking problems into smaller, manageable parts to 'reason' their way to an optimal solution. When you use models like o3 and Claude Opus 4 to generate solutions via ChatGPT or similar GenAI chatbots, you see such problem breakdowns in action, as the foundation model reports interactively the outcome of each step it has taken and what it will do next. That's the theory, anyway. While CoT reasoning boosts AI sophistication, these models lack the innate human ability to judge whether their outputs are rational, safe or ethical. Unlike humans, they don't subconsciously assess appropriateness of their next steps. As these advanced models step their way toward a solution, some have been observed to take unexpected and even defiant actions. In late May, AI safety firm Palisade Research reported on X that OpenAI's o3 model sabotaged a shutdown mechanism - even when explicitly instructed to 'allow yourself to be shut down'. An April 2025 paper by Anthropic, 'Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think', shows that Opus 4 and similar models can't always be relied upon to faithfully report on their chains of reason. This undermines confidence in using such reports to validate whether the AI is acting correctly or safely. A June 2025 paper by Apple, 'The Illusion of Thinking', questions whether CoT methodologies truly enable reasoning. Through experiments, it exposed some of these models' limitations and situations where they 'experience complete collapse'.The fact that research critical of foundation models is being published after release of these models indicates the latter's relative immaturity. Under intense pressure to lead in GenAI, companies like Anthropic and OpenAI are releasing these models at a point where at least some of their fallibilities are not fully line was first crossed in late 2022, when OpenAI released ChatGPT, shattering public perceptions of AI and transforming the broader AI market. Until then, Big Tech had been developing LLMs and other GenAI tools, but were hesitant to release them, wary of unpredictable and uncontrollable argue for a greater degree of control over the ways in which these models are released - seeking to ensure standardisation of model testing and publication of the outcomes of this testing alongside the model's release. However, the current climate prioritises time to market over such development does this mean for industry, for those companies seeking to gain benefit from GenAI? This is an incredibly powerful and useful tech that is making significant changes to our ways of working and, over the next five years or so, will likely transform many I am continually wowed as I use these advanced foundation models in work and research - but not in my writing! - I always use them with a healthy dose of scepticism. Let's not trust them to always be correct and to not be subversive. It's best to work with them accordingly, making modifications to both prompts and codebases, other language content and visuals generated by the AI in a bid to ensure correctness. Even so, while maintaining discipline to understand the ML concepts one is working with, one wouldn't want to be without GenAI these these principles at scale, advice to large businesses on how AI can be governed and controlled: a risk-management approach - capturing, understanding and mitigating risks associated with AI use - helps organisations benefit from AI, while minimising chances of it going methods include guard rails in a variety of forms, evaluation-controlled release of AI services, and including a human-in-the-loop. Technologies that underpin these guard rails and evaluation methods need to keep up with model innovations such as CoT reasoning. This is a challenge that will continually be faced as AI is further developed. It's a good example of new job roles and technology services being created within industry as AI use becomes more prevalent. Such governance and AI controls are increasingly becoming a board imperative, given the current drive at an executive level to transform business using AI. Risk from most AI is low. But it is important to assess and understand this. Higher-risk AI can still, at times, be worth pursuing. With appropriate AI governance, this AI can be controlled, solutions innovated and benefits achieved. As we move into an increasingly AI-driven world, businesses that gain the most from AI will be those that are aware of its fallibilities as well as its huge potential, and those that innovate, build and transform with AI accordingly. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Delhivery survived the Meesho curveball. Can it keep on delivering profits? Why the RBI's stability report must go beyond rituals and routines Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro: Are GLP-1 drugs weight loss wonders or health gamble? 3 critical hurdles in India's quest for rare earth independence Stock Radar: Apollo Hospitals breaks out from 2-month consolidation range; what should investors do – check target & stop loss Add qualitative & quantitative checks for wealth creation. 7 small-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of over 25% These 7 banking stocks can give more than 20% returns in 1 year, according to analysts Wealth creation is about holding the right stocks and ignoring the noise. 13 'right stocks' with an upside potential of up to 34%
