Mother dies days after crash in Mass. that killed young daughter
The district attorney's office identified the woman as Minaben Patel, of Franklin. Patel was a passenger in a car driven by her husband that collided with a pickup truck being driven by 21-year-old James Blanchard, of Franklin, Morrissey's office said in a statement.
Blanchard faces several criminal charges, including motor vehicle homicide while driving negligently and under the influence of alcohol, in connection with the crash. Another juvenile, Patel's son, was hospitalized after the crash. Patel's husband was released from the hospital after treatment.
A spokesperson for the district attorney's office said no update was available on the boy's condition.
'The Norfolk District Attorney's Office and the Franklin Police Department are saddened by the loss to Minaben's family and we extend our heartfelt condolences,' Morrissey and Franklin Police Chief Thomas J. Lynch said today.
The crash remains under investigation.
As Harvard fights Trump admin in court, professors are quietly dropping courses
2 men arrested in connection with shooting near University Park in Worcester
Central Mass. man now facing manslaughter charge in connection with brother's death
PeoplesBank buys naming rights to Hartford arena
Thunderbirds, MassMutual partner for 3rd annual Community Caravan Program
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete—By Solving The Wrong Problem
Psychological safety, problems at work, mistake, fatigue, dismissal, stress and overwork. Two months ago, Harvard Business School professor Amy C. Edmondson and associate professor Michaela J. Kerrissey wrote an eloquent article in the May-June issue of Harvard Business Review., 'What People Get Wrong About Psychological Safety.' A Massive Effort To Enhance Psychological Safety With Little Effect 'Psychological safety' was once an obscure term in psychology and management research. Professor Edmondson changed all that with her best-selling book, The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth (2017) HBRP. According to her recent article, 'Today the concept is downright popular. Countless managers, consultants, and training companies have worked hard to create psychologically safe workplaces, and thousands of articles have been devoted to the topic.' In 2017, the need for the effort was obvious: 'A 2017 Gallup poll found that only 3 in 10 employees strongly agree with the statement that their opinions count at work.' Yet today, 8 years later, those Gallup numbers have hardly budged. What went wrong? According to the 2025 article, 'As the popularity of psychological safety has grown, so too have misconceptions about it.' The authors identify six common misperceptions: 'Psychological safety means being nice; it means getting your way; it means job security; it requires a trade-off with performance; it's a policy; and it requires a top-down approach.' They explain why each misperception gets in the way and give advice on how to counter it. The Key Problem: What Is The Problem? What is the problem that this massive effort is trying to solve? One useful insight sometimes (unreliably) attributed to Albert Einstein is to rethink fundamentals. 'If I had an hour to solve a problem, I'd spend the first 55 minutes defining the problem and the last five minutes solving it." The effort on psychological safety may be doing the opposite. Thus, a closer look at the lack of progress on enhancing psychological safety points to another possible cause: a focus of the effort on the team level of the firm. As Professor Edmondson's 2017 book stated, 'My field-based research has primarily focused on groups and teams, because that's how most work gets done.' So too, the 2025 article focuses almost exclusively on leaders trying to enhance psychological safety at the team level. The team level may be where most of the work gets done, but not necessarily where most of the problems are caused. The Real Problem Behind Lack Of Psychological Safety Guess what? In many other aspects of management, the principal problem today is not at the team level, and rather in the way the whole organization is run. For the last half-century, the central problem addressed by management was how to cut costs so as to maximize shareholder value and enhance bonuses for the executives. That was the official position of the U.S. Business Roundtable for several decades. Business schools still teach it. Most of the processes, systems, and mindsets that support it are still in place in many big firms. So that is the problem that managers are required to address, whether they agree with it or not. Is it any wonder that there is a lack of psychological safety in such settings? The Shift From Cutting Costs To Creating Value For Customers The good news is that in a smaller group of public firms—perhaps 20% of public companies-- the primary dynamic of a business has shifted from cutting costs and extracting value to creating more value for customers. Value-creating enterprises emerged from the combination of two elements: first, entrepreneurs began using digital technology and AI to deliver exponentially more value than traditionally-managed firms; and second, digital technology gave customers the power to demand more value from businesses. The killer insight: value-creating enterprises not only satisfy customers: they make much more money than firms focused on making money. Workplaces devoted to creating value for customers are also likely to be more congenial as workplaces than those focused on extracting value from customers and boosting executive bonuses. Meanwhile, profit-seeking firms that still focus primarily on improving efficiency and cost-cutting are generating below-average value and are having difficulty in surviving. Two-thirds of the famous blue-chip firms in the Dow Jones Industrial Average are now performing below average (See the table below). The performance problems that these firms are facing of course aggravates even further the problem of workplace psychological safety, as workers in those firms are likely to be blamed for shortfalls in performance. Thus, many of the managers in struggling efforts to enhance psychological safety may be trying to solve the wrong problem. If they shifted the focus of their efforts to updating the goal of their firms and creating more value for their customers, their workplaces could transition from the dispiriting goal of extracting value from customers to the potentially inspiring purpose of creating value for them. And read also Why Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete—It's Not Rocket Science—Or AI Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete: Master Value Creation Now 5-Year Total Returns of firms in the Dow Jones Industrial Average as of July 2025
American Press
a day ago
- American Press
Jim Beam column:What did those lawmen do?
The arrest of four Louisiana lawmen, the wife of one of them and a private citizen has left some citizens wondering exactly what they did to be indicted by the federal government. The six were allegedly breaking laws that helped immigrants get what are called U visas. The visas help them stay in the country while their asylum cases play out. The indicted lawmen are former Forest Hill Police Chief Glynn Dixon, Oakdale Police Chief Chad Doyle, Oakdale City Marshal Michael Slaney and former Glenmora Police Chief Tebo Onishea. All four pleaded not guilty last week. Alison Doyle, the Oakdale police chief's wife, was accused of rigging a bidding process in the mayor's office where she worked. Chandrakant 'Lala' Patel is a businessman accused of orchestrating the alleged visa fraud scheme. The Advocate in its report on the arrest story said Patel was a mystery to many locals. He was mainly known for running a Subway shop and two convenience stores. Allen Parish Sheriff Douglas Hebert said Patel has no local criminal record. Patel pleaded not guilty Wednesday to all charges filed against him. The Advocate's newly obtained Glenmora police reports provide the first look at what federal prosecutors allege was the bribes-for-visas scheme. The 62-count indictment includes allegations of faked police reports, fraudulent visas for foreign nationals and tens of thousands of dollars in alleged bribes. The newspaper said it portrays Rapides and Allen parishes as an epicenter of immigration fraud on a large scale. Prosecutors said each of the four lawmen got stacks of cash from Patel. Then, hundreds of people received visas based on phony police reports that portrayed them as crime victims or witnesses who were helping authorities. The Advocate said federal authorities haven't released much information about who exactly received the forged visas. Prosecutors allege that Patel and the men used the money to buy two pickup trucks, two campsites on Bundick Lake, an RV, a 2025 Land Rover, a Toyota sport van and other vehicles. Doyle's wife is accused of rigging the bidding process so Patel could acquire two city-owned properties. He paid $56,200 for two properties. Law enforcement officials said the scheme involved 'several central Louisiana parishes,' suggesting a wider reach, and that it could date back to as early as 2015. It's unclear if other public officials are involved. State Attorney General Liz Murrill said she expects her office will lodge additional state charges against the accused. The response of local citizens to the arrests was interesting. Ann Odom, 73, a lifelong Oakdale resident, said, 'Money is the root of all evil.' Oakdale has had other corruption scandals and a gift shop owner said, 'It's everywhere you go. But it's bad here. Really, really bad.' A former fellow Oakdale police officer and childhood friend of Doyle's, who wouldn't give his name, said, 'I honestly thought we wouldn't have stuff like that once (he) became chief.' Forest Hill Mayor Elizabeth Jeter said she was 'deeply saddened' over the indictment of Dixon. 'Forest Hill is a strong, close-know community and we understand how difficult this news is for our residents.' Local law enforcement in Rapides Parish said they've never had any real problems with any noncitizens, either way. District Attorney Phillip Terrell, 'Off the top of my head, I'm not aware of any felony cases that we have out of Forest Hill or Glenmora. There's not much activity there, other than, apparently, the fraudulent activity.' The Advocate in an editorial about the lawmen being arrested reminded its readers that an indictment is only an innocent until proven guilty. It said the lawmen, like those swept up in all the immigration raids that have taken place this year, deserve humane treatment and due process. '… The elderly man on his way to work in Lafayette, the nursing mother in Baton Rouge who showed up for a scheduled immigration appointment or the woman gardening in her New Orleans yard are not the problem with the nation's immigration system,' the editorial said. Targeting those folks is cruel, but that isn't the worst part. How about those arrested immigrants who are being sent to countries they have never been to before? They aren't getting the humane treatment and due process that the six who were arrested for fraud will be getting. Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at 337-515-8871 or
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
Maxwell and her Miami defense attorney in eye of Epstein storm. Trump, too
Miami defense attorney David O. Markus represents Jeffrey Epstein's infamous former girlfriend, a convicted British socialite who may hold the keys not only to her fate but that of President Donald Trump. Markus' client, Ghislaine Maxwell, found guilty of recruiting underage girls for the billionaire financier, was questioned on Thursday and Friday by the U.S. deputy attorney general about her insider knowledge of the Epstein sex-abuse case — a resurgent scandal threatening Trump's presidency as his MAGA base clamors for answers. What Maxwell might know about a long-speculated 'client list' of famous people possibly kept by Epstein, who authorities say killed himself in a New York jail cell in 2019 before his federal sex trafficking trial, could change the course of Trump's presidency. Trump and Epstein, both New Yorkers with mansions in Palm Beach, had socialized for years before falling out. In a dramatic development on Thursday, Markus and Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence at a federal prison in Tallahassee, met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche at the U.S. courthouse in Florida's capital. Markus called the meeting 'very productive.' 'He took a full day and asked a lot of questions and Ms. Maxwell answered every single question,' Markus told reporters after the meeting at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the courthouse. 'She never invoked a privilege. She never declined to answer. She answered all the questions truthfully, honestly and to the best of her ability.' The trio — Maxwell, Markus and Blanche — met again on Friday in the same location, in what many legal observers have called a highly unusual gathering. 'How many defendants turned witnesses does a deputy AG personally interview?' said a South Florida defense lawyer, who did not want to be identified. 'Get your popcorn.' Harvard law grad Markus, 52, a Miami native who went to Harvard Law School, heads his own firm and hosts a popular blog and podcast. Known as a top-tier defense attorney whose career started in the Federal Public Defender's Office in Miami, Markus has been thrust into the national spotlight along with his client, Maxwell. In late 2021, she was convicted in Manhattan federal court of sex trafficking minor girls for Epstein at his homes in Manhattan, Palm Beach, New Mexico and the Virgin Islands — over the course of a decade. Curiously, the closed-door meetings this week with the deputy attorney general come at a critical stage in the appeal of her conviction, which will be considered as a possible case by the U.S. Supreme Court in the fall. The Justice Department has opposed her challenge every step of the way, in the federal district and appellate courts in New York. Markus declined to comment about the meetings between his client and Blanche in Tallahassee. In their negotiations, Maxwell and Markus are walking a fine line, but so are Blanche and Trump. Before Blanche was appointed by Trump as second in command behind Attorney General Pam Bondi, he represented him in a criminal fraud trial in the Manhattan state court in 2024. Trump was convicted of 34 counts of falsifying business records, stemming from a scheme to conceal a $130,000 payment to an adult film star Stormy Daniels that was made to keep her quiet just before the 2016 presidential election about their alleged affair. After Trump won the 2024 election, the judge gave him no prison time, but Trump became the first U.S. president with a felony conviction. After the trial, Markus hosted Blanche on his Apple podcast, 'For the Defense,' which focused on his experience representing Trump. On a parallel track, Trump had hired Blanche to be his lead attorney in the 2023 classified documents case brought against him by the federal special counsel Jack Smith. Markus was among other lawyers approached by Trump's defense team, but he turned them down. Blanche and Markus' 'cozy' relationship, as some have described it, may have led the deputy attorney general to reach out to Markus this month to discuss how Maxwell might be a witness in the rekindled Epstein investigation. In early July, the Justice Department and FBI issued a memo shutting down the investigation, saying there was nothing more to report about Epstein's suicide or the existence of a client list — only to reopen it amid a bombardment of criticism by Trump's right-wing base. Adding fuel to the fire: Bondi had told Fox News in February that an Epstein client list was 'sitting' on her desk, but then changed her story after the FBI memo was released. Trump's MAGA supporters grew more enraged. They repeated all kinds of conspiracy theories on social media and in podcasts, suggesting without proof that Epstein didn't kill himself and that Democratic President Bill Clinton and other major public figures may have sexually abused the underage girls that Epstein recruited to his residences. They continued to fuel speculation about his client list and who might be on it, despite Trump's relationship with Epstein before he was convicted of soliciting minor girls in a state plea deal in West Palm Beach in 2008. Since then, the House Oversight Committee has voted to subpoena the Department of Justice for its files on Epstein, and issued a subpoena to interview Maxwell on Aug. 11. Reacting to backlash, Trump said he would continue to push for the release of relevant information in the case. This week, his Justice Department unsuccessfully asked a South Florida federal judge to release grand jury records in the original Epstein probe dating back almost two decades. Political storm escalates Most Americans believe that the U.S. government is concealing information, including about who else may have been involved in Epstein's abuse of the young girls at his residences, according to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll. As the political storm escalated, Blanche announced earlier this week that he intended to meet with Maxwell, who has maintained her innocence and is appealing her conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court. Blanche said he had reached out to Maxwell's lawyer to see if she might have 'information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims.' On Tuesday, Markus issued a short statement, saying: 'I can confirm that we are in discussions with the government and that Ghislaine will always testify truthfully. We are grateful to President Trump for his commitment to uncovering the truth in this case.' Maxwell testimony Miami lawyer Joseph DeMaria, a former federal organized crime prosecutor, said the conversation between Maxwell, Markus and Blanche is very different from the typical effort by a prosecutor to gain the cooperation of a convicted defendant to testify against her co-conspirators. As a rule, prosecutors are very wary about making a deal with a convicted felon because the testimony may not be credible to present to a jury. 'In this case, Mr. Blanche is trying to develop testimony to be presented to Congress in a political forum,' DeMaria told the Herald. 'If Ms. Maxwell presents congressional testimony that is favorable to the president, whether or not that testimony can be corroborated, that testimony can be used to end the constant inquiries about his [Trump's] relationship with Epstein. 'But Ms. Maxwell won't offer to clear the president with her congressional testimony for free,' he added. 'Mr. Blanche will have to find a way to offer Ms. Maxwell a get-out-of-jail card in order to secure positive testimony for the president.' However, Maxwell's testimony may present other potential pitfalls for herself or Trump, because of her well-documented lack of credibility. After Maxwell's sex-trafficking conviction, prosecutors branded her crimes as 'monstrous' and cast strong doubt about her honesty. 'In short, the defendant has lied repeatedly about her crimes, exhibited an utter failure to accept responsibility, and demonstrated repeated disrespect for the law and the Court,' prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York wrote in June 2022 before her sentencing. Two of Markus' former colleagues in the Miami Federal Public Defender's Office said Maxwell is in good hands, noting that he 'lives and breathes the law.' 'Nobody wins everything, but he wins often,' Miami attorney Henry Bell said. 'He thinks like a criminal defense lawyer and fights to the end for his client,' Miami lawyer Orlando do Campo said. Both seasoned defense attorneys said Maxwell's potential testimony could have repercussions not only for herself and Trump but for any number of prominent figures in Epstein's social circles. 'The reason the Justice Department doesn't want to disclose the Epstein files is that it could harm the reputation of innocent people who associated with him,' Bell said. 'If Jeffrey Epstein's client list, or what I consider his 'association list,' were revealed, this could not only be a left or right thing, it might affect a lot of people across the political spectrum,' do Campo said. 'There are a lot of weird bedfellows here.' History of Epstein-Maxwell cases In June 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting teenage girls at his Palm Beach mansion and served about one year in jail — after Miami U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta chose not to present a 53-page indictment to the grand jury alleging the more serious federal charges of sex trafficking dozens of minor girls. If convicted, those charges would have carried potential punishment ranging from a mandatory 10 years in prison up to a life sentence. Epstein's victims called it a 'sweetheart plea deal' that allowed him to go to work or do whatever he wanted for six days out of every week. The deal also shut down an FBI probe into whether there were more victims and other powerful people who took part in Epstein's sex crimes. Acosta's 'non-prosecution agreement,' signed in September 2007, was initially kept secret from Epstein's victims. The agreement also immunized several of his co-conspirators from federal prosecution. The Herald's investigation of the secretive plea deal, part of its 'Perversion of Justice' series by reporter Julie K. Brown, led to Acosta resigning as U.S. Secretary of Labor in 2019 during the first Trump administration. In July of that year, federal prosecutors in New York filed an indictment charging Epstein, 66, with conspiracy and sex-trafficking charges — similar to the case that was not pursued by federal prosecutors in South Florida. But the following month, Epstein hanged himself in a federal lock-up in New York, according to authorities. Upon the death of the notorious defendant, prosecutors turned their attention to his former girlfriend, Maxwell. In 2020, she was indicted on conspiracy and sex-trafficking charges and convicted the following year for her role in the abuse of underage girls. On Dec. 29, 2021, she was found guilty of five of the six counts against her, including sex trafficking of a minor, transporting a minor for illegal sexual activity, and related conspiracy charges. In June 2022, Maxwell, 63, was sentenced to 20 years in prison. Markus had worked as her appellate attorney during the trial. After her conviction, he filed Maxwell's appeal. His argument: Epstein's non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors in South Florida should have protected Maxwell from facing charges in New York. But both the federal district and appellate courts in New York found that the deal, which promised to immunize Epstein's co-conspirators, only applied to South Florida. In the fall, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to decide whether to consider her appeal.
