Film industry workers ‘devastated' after measure to bring more work deferred
TV and film industry workers say they are stunned and one lawmaker says people's livelihoods are at stake because of political back and forth.
Bill to give tax credits to film industry for local productions deferred
Sen. Lynn DeCoite fought tirelessly to help the struggling film industry thrive once again by looking to raise the total cap on credits per year, expanding streaming productions, tax incentives and adding bonuses for local hires, just to name a few.
'It is unfortunate that we do not have an agreement as we've been back and forth working on the different conference drafts and the changes we have made,' DeCoite said. 'I have tried my best along with some of my colleagues and at the end of the day, it was the tax credits that was not liked by the House. It is unfortunate and I am very saddened that this is where I'm at today.'
Senators Donna Mercado Kim and Samantha DeCorte commended DeCoite's hard work on the measure.
DeCoite couldn't be reached for comment following the hearing.DeCorte said the senate tried everything they could to get the measure passed and even had support from the senate president as well as the chair of Ways and Means.
'The saddest thing about this whole situation is that there are real lives effected because this bill didn't pass,' DeCorte said. 'The film industry brings millions if not billions of dollars here to Hawaii, but most importantly, they put to work thousands of our local workers and this means those workers are out of a job entirely. The lawmakers that are responsible for not being cooperative with this bill are literally taking food off the plates of these workers.'
Workers like Ralph Malani, who has done hair for about 40 TV and Film productions including 'Lilo and Stitch' and 'Rescue: HI-Surf,' says that the bill's deferment is a major loss for himself and his colleagues.'[Hawaii] is where I'm from, it's just so sad to me that the powers that be don't seem to care that local people are losing out big time and we're going to have to leave, and I never wanted to leave,' he said, referencing how the mainland has more job opportunities than in the islands.
Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news
This is the first time in two decades that there are no active productions filming on the islands. 'I have friends going to the foodbank because they can't feed their kids, people are selling their homes because they cant pay mortgages, they are taking kids out of schools because there is no work here,' he added.
He also worked on the film 'Finding Ohana,' which was shot in Thailand.
'It was supposed to be in Hawaii and it looked just like Hawaii and for one of me they could hire five in Thailand, so why wouldn't they go there?' he said. 'And that's exactly what's going to keep happening, they're going to go to New Zealand and other places.'
'Duke's Law' one step closer to reality in win against agricultural land crime
For Malani, the deferment left him questioning the actions of the legislators who opposed the bill.
'If those people who voted against this are watching, just why? What did it threaten you with to give us a good job? It's so sad. Think about the local people who grew up here, who are raised here, have families here, think about us before you sign off a piece of paper and destroy everything we had,' Malani said.
The final draft of SB 732 had 367 pages of testimony, and not a single agency or person testified against it.
'The truth of the matter is this bill died for political reasons, and the House wasn't compromising with the Senate and we did everything we could, we gave in to a lot of the things we were asked for on the Senate side,' DeCorte said. 'They made it so much harder and again these are lives that are at stake, real families that rely on this income to pay their bills and now what is going to happen?'
TV and Film Producer Eric Hays moved his family to Hawaii a few years ago after wrapping up filming NCIS in New Orleans.
HPD searching for attempted murder suspect
'When the show here shut down, we chose to stay here because we love the people, it's a privilege to shoot on the island here and we respect the culture and everything about it,' Hays said. 'We could have went back to New Orleans but we decided to stay here, and my daughter is graduating from Mid-Pacific next month and we made the right decision to stay.'
Despite his happiness with living in the islands, the reality is that Hays may have to consider relocating.
'I'm worried that we may have to go to back to New Orleans because right now, I have three to four shows I'm trying to bring here as an independent producer and financially it doesn't make sense,' Hays said. They can be written for here or New Orleans, but let's shoot it here, and rebuild the industry and make it thrive.'
He said when people come to Oahu they come to visit Waikiki, the beaches, Diamond Head, and also Kualoa Ranch.
Merrie Monarch boost Hilo businesses like Ola Brew
'They want to see fake dinosaur footprints and to see where King Kong fought Godzilla and all the other movies out there, and guess what? That is the film industry impact on tourism,' Hays said.
He said the tax incentive motivates productions to come to Hawaii and film while also pushing money into the economy.
'We could put $60 to 80 million into the economy in this county in over one year,' he said. 'And combine that into three years or another show that's here and four other movies and the next thing you know, you're putting a billion dollars into the economy.'
The state's Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism wrote testimony stating support for the legislation, citing the economic impacts film has had on the islands.
Puna woman arrested following deadly domestic dispute
'The film industry has provided hundreds of jobs, launched careers and resulted in long term employment for residents at a better than average living wage,' the testimony said. 'Together with the Legislature, we have an opportunity to restore our production activity, turning around the current 50% decline in production here through maintaining a viable tax incentive, putting our residents and vendors back to work.'
Hays cited other states' tax credits as a reason why films that have ties to Polynesia shoot on the mainland.
''Moana' was shot in Atlanta, but came here for exteriors. Why wasn't it shot here the whole time? Because producers chase the money they chase the tax credit,' Hays said.
Industry professionals say Georgia is leading the way when it comes to the film industry by offering many incentives and bonuses.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Senate to take up Trump DOGE cuts
The GOP's bill to claw back billions of dollars in federal funding is set to hit the Senate floor this week despite serious — and vocal — concerns among some Republicans over the cuts targeting public broadcasting and foreign aid. Consideration of the legislation comes as GOP lawmakers are staring down a Friday deadline to get the measure, known as a rescissions package, to President Trump's desk. The House approved the bill in a 214-212 vote in June. Adding to the pressure, Trump last week threatened to withhold his support from any Republican who votes against the legislation, setting the stake for a high-stakes — and potentially ugly — week in the Senate. Also this week, former Rep. Mike Waltz (R-Fla.) — who served a short stint as Trump's national security adviser — is scheduled to appear on Capitol Hill for his confirmation hearing to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. The event is likely to focus on the March Signal controversy, when Waltz added a journalist to a sensitive text chat regarding plans to attack Houthi rebels in Yemen. On the House floor, lawmakers are set to consider the landmark cryptocurrency bill that the Senate approved last month, in addition to the GOP's bill to fund the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026. Senate Republicans this week will be focused on the GOP-crafted bill to rescind $9.4 billion in federal funding, which has emerged as a central priority for Trump. The legislation seeks to claw back dollars for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS — two outlets Republicans have panned as biased, and cut funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which DOGE targeted months ago. Republicans in both chambers have until Friday to send the legislation to Trump's desk for his signature, a deadline that could be difficult for the party to meet, in part because the Senate is planning to hold a vote-a-rama this week. Whether the party can ultimately clear the package rests with a handful of GOP holdouts in the Senate, who have voiced concerns with the cuts in the bill and aired worries about the executive usurping power from the legislative branch. One of the most vocal critics of the bill has been Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine.), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, who has been particularly concerned about cuts to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which began under former President George W. Bush. She has also questioned some cuts to public broadcasting. 'I want to strike the rescission of funds for PEPFAR, which has an enormous record of success, having saved some 26 million lives over the course of the program, as well as preventing nearly 8 million infants from receiving AIDS from their infected mothers,' Collins previously said. 'So I can't imagine why we would want to terminate that program.' Republicans can only afford to lose three votes and still muscle the measure through the chamber, assuming full attendance and united Democratic opposition. Democrats have been up in arms over the legislation, warning that any rescissions would hurt future bipartisan government funding talks. Four House Republicans broke from the party and voted against the legislation last month. Upping the stakes for Republicans is Trump, who says he will not support any GOP lawmakers who oppose the rescissions package — creating a difficult situation for some senators who have reservations with the bill. 'It is very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together. Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump wrote on Truth Social last week. Waltz is headed for a grilling by Democrats on Tuesday when he appears before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for his confirmation hearing to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, which comes nearly four months after he drew criticism for mistakenly adding a journalist to a Signal chat that discussed a planned attack on the Houthis. Waltz's hearing — scheduled for Tuesday at 10 a.m. EDT — is expected to largely focus on the Signal controversy in March, which thrust the former congressman into the spotlight and sparked reports of his potential ouster. On March 24, The Atlantic's editor in chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, revealed that Waltz, then the national security adviser, added him into a Signal group chat that went on to discuss an imminent attack on Houthi rebels in Yemen. The initial story, and subsequent articles, caused a stir in Washington, with Democrats — and even some Republicans — raising alarm about how sensitive information had been handled. Those concerns are likely to take center stage on Tuesday. The confirmation hearing comes after a musical chairs of sorts in the Trump administration. Trump nominated Waltz to serve as UN ambassador in May, relieving him of his duties of national security adviser following the Signal controversy. The UN ambassador post opened up after Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), initially tapped for the post, withdrew her nomination as Republicans worried about their slim majority in the House, returning to leadership in the lower chamber. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has taken on the duties of national security adviser. The House this week is slated to consider the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act — which lays out a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins — after the Senate approved the landmark legislation last month. The bill, which has bipartisan support, would create rules for dollar-backed cryptocurrencies, and its enactment would mark a significant moment for the cryptocurrency field. The Senate passed the measure in a 68-30 vote, with 18 Democrats joining a majority of Republicans, making it the first major crypto bill to make it through the upper chamber. Proponents are hopeful that following the overwhelming bipartisan backing in the Senate, the House could follow suit. 'Our legislation would establish a clear regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, safeguarding digital assets from potential targeting by future administrations, boosting demand for U.S. treasuries, ensuring robust consumer protections, and upholding the U.S. dollar's role as the global reserve currency,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise's (R-La.) office wrote in a floor lookout Sunday. 'By creating regulatory clarity and supporting the development of U.S. stablecoins with safety rails, the bill helps speed up international payment transactions, increase access to working capital for U.S. companies operating internationally, and promote investment and innovation.' The House this week is also scheduled to vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which splits the regulation of digital assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The House this week is scheduled to vote on a bill to fund the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026, as Republicans look to pass more of their full-year spending bills ahead of the Sept. 30 government funding deadline. The legislation includes a discretionary allocation of $831.5 billion which, according to Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee, is the same amount the department received for fiscal year 2025. Additionally, the bill boosts basic pay for all military personnel by 3.8 percent, though it also cuts 45,000 full-time civilian employees. The House Appropriations Subcommittee advanced the bill in a party-line 36-27 vote last month, sending it to the full floor for consideration. 'The FY26 Defense Appropriations Act provides the resources necessary for maintaining American military superiority, leveraging our technological innovation into tactical advantages on the battlefield, and supporting the Defense Department's most valuable assets – our warfighters,' Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), the chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, said in a statement. Despite a strong likelihood of clearing the chamber, the bill is unlikely to become law since Democrats have staked opposition to it, arguing that the legislation would injure democracy in the U.S. and abroad and hammering away about policy riders included.' 'President Trump's and Secretary Hegseth's complete disregard for the standard procedure for developing the Defense Appropriations Act will have serious consequences for our military readiness,' Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.), the ranking member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, said in a statement. The Pentagon funding bill is the second full-year spending measure of 12 that the House is voting on ahead of the Sept. 30 shutdown deadline. In June, the chamber approved the legislation funding military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs. The slow progress is raising the likelihood of a stopgap bill being needed in the fall to stave off a shutdown.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
GOP leader faces showdown with Republicans on Trump-backed funding cuts
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is headed for a showdown this week with a group of Republican senators over a House-passed package that claws back $9.4 trillion in funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and global public health programs. Members of the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, including Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), are not keen on cutting programs they have already funded through bipartisan appropriations bills. A handful of senior Republican senators are worried about ceding even more power to the Trump administration, as Congress has already done by allowing President Trump to shutter or overhaul agencies such as U.S. Agency for International Development or impose steep tariffs on many of the nation's trading partners without much pushback. 'I definitely want the PEPFAR cuts and the child and maternal health and other global health cuts removed, but I don't know how Sen. Thune's going to structure the process. He's not shared that with me,' Collins told The Hill, referring to global program that President George W. Bush launched in 2003 to combat AIDS called the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. The Maine senator said she also had strong concerns about proposed cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'As I made very clear at the hearing, there's a lot of what the Corporation for Broadcasting does that I support such as the 70 percent of the money that goes to local stations, they maintain the emergency alert system, they do local programing such as in Maine there's a very popular high school quiz show,' she said. The so-called rescissions package, which the Senate and House must send to Trump's desk by July 18, would cut $8.3 billion from international aid programs and eliminate fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports PBS and NPR affiliates. Collins, however, expressed more support for cutting funding for NPR, which she says has politically biased reporting. She described NPR as having a 'decidedly partisan bent' and highlighted a report written by Uri Berliner, a former senior business editor at NPR, for The Free Press last year. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), another member of the Appropriations Committee, says he's a 'no' on the rescissions package unless GOP leaders find a way to protect tribal radio stations in his home state that would be hit by the cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'At this stage of the game I've already told them that I am a no unless we get this resolved one way or another,' Rounds said. Rounds said he wants to protect 'Native American radio stations that [get] caught in the crossfire.' 'Other states have got the same issue, and it's in these very, very rural areas. It's about 90 percent of their funding,' he said. He said he and other GOP colleagues are also concerned about cuts to the Bush-era PEPFAR program. 'It's one I would like to see resolved. I have not been putting the pressure on it, I think other people have,' he said, referring to the internal GOP debate over reworking the bill. The last time Trump tried to push a rescissions package through Congress was in 2018. It failed after Republicans senators balked. That year's proposal to claw back $15 billion in previously appropriated funding failed in the Republican-controlled Senate by a 48-50 vote. Collins and then-Sen. Richard Burr (N.C.) where the two Republicans who voted no. Now Thune — who was the Senate GOP conference chair in 2018 — is facing as many as five Republican holdouts on the bill, with a few more GOP colleagues declining to say publicly how they will vote on the controversial package. Some Republican senators are disgruntled about ceding more authority to the administration after the Department of Government Efficiency shuttered federal agencies, pushed federal workers into early retirement and cut congressionally appropriated funding without getting any input or authority from lawmakers on Capitol Hill. These GOP lawmakers worry that if they send the pending $9.4 billion rescissions package to Trump's desk this week, the administration will follow up with additional requests to claw back the money they've already approved. 'The bigger question is that I don't like the rescissions process at all,' a GOP senator who requested anonymity said. 'It basically gives the keys to the car to the administration to everything that we're doing on the appropriations side. 'We're not getting basic information. We're being told, 'This is what we want to do and here's how much we want for it,'' the senator added. 'We're letting them call everything and then rescissions are coming in on top of all of this?' The other major concern of Republican appropriators is that passing a partisan rescissions package could derail work on the 12 annual appropriations bills. They note that Democrats are threatening to block the fiscal 2026 spending bills if the Trump administration and its GOP allies backtrack on funding deals from previous years by clawing back funds. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) warned in a 'Dear Colleague' letter last week that 'Republicans' passage of this purely partisan proposal would be an affront to the bipartisan appropriations process.' Schumer said that 'a number of Republicans know it is absurd for them to expect Democrats to act as business as usual and engage in a bipartisan appropriations process to fund the government, while they concurrently plot to pass a purely partisan rescissions bill.' Republicans hold a 53-to-47 Senate majority and Thune can only afford three defections from his conference and still pass the package of spending cuts, which needs a simple-majority vote. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) shares Rounds's concerns about the impact of eliminating the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and other colleagues' concerns about cutting global health programs, according to Senate GOP sources familiar with the behind-the-scenes negotiations 'I'm going to be very interested to see what amendments might come forward,' Murkowski told reporters Thursday. 'We're working with others on the public broadcasting [issue].' Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), a member of the Appropriations panel, who threatened to vote against the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act because of steep cuts to Medicaid and rural hospitals, hasn't yet said whether he would vote for the rescissions package. 'I'm going to see what's there and how the process works,' he said, when asked how he would vote on the bill. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( another appropriator who balked last month at an immediate phaseout of tax credits for clean hydrogen energy production in the 'big, beautiful bill' is also taking a wait-and-see approach on the rescissions package. 'We're talking about it. I'm very supportive but we'll see what the details are,' she said.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
The challenger who narrowly lost to GOP Rep. Scott Perry wants another chance to beat him in 2026
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Democrat Janelle Stelson, who lost to Republican U.S. Rep. Scott Perry by barely a percentage point in 2024, will run again in the right-leaning congressional district in Pennsylvania. Stelson, a one-time local TV anchor and personality, mounted a challenge to Perry, the former leader of the hardline House Freedom Caucus . It was designed to sway moderate Republicans , portraying him as an extremist on abortion rights and slamming Perry's votes against Democratic-penned bills that carried benefits for firefighters and veterans. 'The story about Scott Perry just keeps getting worse,' Stelson said in an interview. Stelson called Perry the 'deciding vote' in the House's 218-214 vote on Republicans' tax break and spending cut package that she said would strip Medicaid benefits from thousands of his constituents, possibly shut down rural hospitals and further stretch health care facilities, such as nursing homes. 'This has disastrous, possibly deadly consequences, and Scott Perry did that,' Stelson said. For his part, Perry is already touting the bill's provisions to curb billions of dollars in spending across clean energy , cut spending on the safety-net health care program Medicaid and reduce subsidies to states that offer Medicaid coverage to cover immigrants who may not be here legally. It will, he said in a statement, 'end damaging 'Green New Scam' subsidies, lock in critical and additional reductions in spending' and ramp up efforts to make sure Medicaid benefits are reserved for 'vulnerable Americans and not illegal aliens.' Perry's campaign, meanwhile, has said that Perry's fundraising is its strongest since he's been in Congress, and that the issues that propelled President Donald Trump and Perry to victories in 2024 will still be relevant in 2026. With Washington, D.C., completely controlled by Republicans, recruiting strong House challengers is of the utmost importance for Democrats. They need to flip just three seats nationwide to retake the House majority they lost in 2022 and block Trump's agenda. Stelson lost in a damaging 2024 election for the Democratic Party, despite outspending Perry in a race that cost over $24 million, according to FEC filings. It wasn't one of the most expensive House races in the nation, but Perry's victory of slightly over 1% point made it one of the closest. Democrats took heart that Perry ran well behind Trump — by 4 points — in a district that is becoming more moderate with Harrisburg's fast-developing suburbs. Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro won the district in 2022's gubernatorial race, when he blew out his Republican opponent. Shapiro will lead Pennsylvania's ticket again in 2026, and is supporting Stelson by headlining a fundraiser for her in the coming days. Shapiro's support could ward off a potential primary challenger to Stelson. ___ Follow Marc Levy on X at: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
