Express Investigation: Tweak in Jal Jeevan tender rule removed cap on expense, led to Rs 16,000-crore extra cost
An investigation by The Indian Express of the data uploaded by states and UTs in the Jal Jeevan Mission dashboard has revealed that a crucial change in the tender guidelines three years ago lifted the check on expenditure, and led to cost escalations.
This resulted in additional costs totalling Rs 16,839 crore for 14,586 schemes — an increase of 14.58 per cent from their estimated cost.
Before a tender is issued for a scheme, the government arrives at the estimated cost by adding various project costs including material and labour.
Over the past month, The Indian Express scrutinised details of over 1 lakh schemes for which work orders were issued on or after June 21, 2022, when the rules were amended, to August 3, 2024 when the last set of work orders were recorded on the dashboard maintained by the Ministry of Jal Shakti.
The key findings:
These findings are significant in the wake of a Central Government committee led by the Expenditure Secretary recommending a 46 per cent cut in the Jal Shakti Ministry's demand for additional Central funding of Rs 2.79 lakh crore, and given the unease over some states having approved inflated work contracts.
Tweak in criteria
The 'Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of Jal Jeevan Mission: Har Ghar Jal', issued in December 2019, stated: 'In case of any cost escalation beyond the approved cost, it will have to be borne by the concerned State and UTs with legislature and no additional expenditure out of Central share will be permitted.'
Crucially, the 2019 guidelines included the practice of 'tender premium' in its 'suggestive list of inadmissible expenses'. Tender premium refers to the additional amount quoted by a bidder that is higher than the Government's estimated cost. In other words, under the original guidelines, states were not allowed to use Central funds to award work tenders at a price higher than previously approved estimated costs.
On June 21, 2022, the Ministry deleted the words 'tender premium' from the list of 'inadmissible expenses'.
Instead, the amended guidelines stated that the approved cost 'shall be the cost as discovered through an open, transparent and competitive bidding process as per prevailing rules'. The new guidelines also stated that wherever the 'approved cost' is 10-25 per cent more than the estimated cost at which a tender was invited, approval by the head of the State Level Scheme Sanctioning Committee (SLSSC) should be taken before the contract is sanctioned.
Overall, records show, the 1,03,093 schemes during this three-year period were sanctioned in 600 districts across 30 states and UTs with a cumulative cost of Rs 3,90,732 crore — 47 per cent of the amount that was approved for all schemes in the Mission since its inception.
The Ministry of Jal Shakti did not respond to an emailed questionnaire from The Indian Express on the change in guidelines and the cost escalation. Sources said the Ministry — led at the time by Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat — changed the guidelines following demands from several states, including Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, citing a rise in cost of materials amid the Covid pandemic.
Since the launch of the JJM in 2019, 6.4 lakh water supply schemes with a total estimated cost of Rs 8.29 lakh crore have been approved by states — more than double the scheme's original outlay of Rs 3.60 lakh crore, with Rs 2.08 lakh crore from the Centre.
This year, the Jal Shakti Ministry, currently under Minister C R Patil, approached the Expenditure Finance Committee for approval of additional Central funding of Rs 2.79 lakh crore. However, as reported by The Indian Express on April 21, the Committee recommended only Rs 1.51 lakh crore in additional support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rethinking an ambitious project
The Andhra Pradesh government's ₹81,900 crore Polavaram Banakacherla Link Project, which aims to transfer surplus water from the Godavari river to Banakacherla in the drought-prone Rayalaseema region, is in limbo. This is a contentious project as Telangana argues that it violates the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh State Reorganisation Act, 2014. Last week, the expert appraisal committee denied clearance for the terms of reference required to conduct the environmental impact assessment and environmental management plan for the project. The committee argued that the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal award must first be examined and that the Central Water Commission (CWC) should be consulted before any environmental approvals are granted. The government has not yet commented on this decision. A political dialogue between the Chief Ministers of A.P. and Telangana may be necessary to move the project forward. While the bold project seems to be a solution to Rayalaseema's acute water scarcity, a troubling question lies behind the grand ambition. Is the State mortgaging its future for a project that may never be economically viable or ecologically sound? On paper, the project is an engineering marvel. However, its scale demands scrutiny, particularly when weighed against its energy costs, environmental footprint, and legal uncertainties. The project will require an estimated 3,377 MW of power. This is a staggering demand for a fiscally stressed State. Officials point out that the scheme will eventually generate around 430 MW; this is barely a fraction of what is needed to run it. The environment footprint of the project is alarming. The 19.5-kilometre-long main tunnel will cut through the ecologically sensitive Nallamala forest and tiger reserve. A total of 17,739 acres of forest land is proposed for use. It is also unclear why the State is opting for an energy-intensive solution when gravity-fed alternatives exist. The Krishna river, particularly the Srisailam reservoir, offers a natural gradient that could irrigate Rayalaseema with significantly less financial and environmental cost. Gravity-based projects such as Galeru-Nagari, conceived decades ago for this very purpose, remain unfinished. The project is being proposed under the hybrid annuity model, which combines Central grants, State equity, loans, and private investment. A special-purpose vehicle, Jalaharathi Corporation, has been set up to execute it. The funding model envisions ₹40,950 crore in loans, ₹16,380 crore in Central grants, ₹8,190 crore in State equity, and ₹16,380 crore through private investment. Unusually, the responsibility for obtaining critical clearances from various ministries and from the CWC is being placed on contractors. Even if the finances and power needs are somehow managed, the project hinges on the assumption that excess floodwaters from the Godavari are flowing wastefully into the sea. But this is unverified. And as noted earlier, the committee has already denied permission for the terms of reference. Without clearance from the CWC, Central funding is uncertain. Telangana's Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project sets a cautionary precedent. The CWC refused to approve an add-on component after determining that water availability projections were exaggerated. The A.P. government's proposal may face similar resistance, especially in the absence of a formal agreement on sharing surplus Godavari flows. Telangana has already raised objections under the A.P. Reorganisation Act, 2014, which mandates that all new projects on the Krishna and Godavari rivers receive clearances from river management boards. A.P., however, argues that this is an intra-State project using floodwater headed for the sea. It is a legal grey zone that could lead to years of litigation. In recent years, A.P. has often found its interests sidelined. The Centre supported Karnataka's Upper Bhadra project just before elections. In Telangana, it adjusted the terms of reference on Krishna water allocation just before elections. As the TDP is back in the NDA fold, speculation is rife that the Godavari-Banakacherla project could become a political bargaining chip. Rayalaseema's long-term water security should not be reduced to Delhi's short-term arithmetic. At the same time, development in Rayalaseema must happen through projects that are sustainable, legally defensible, and based on hydrological realities.
Economic Times
33 minutes ago
- Economic Times
WeWork India's plans to raise up to Rs 4,000 crore through IPO moves ahead as Sebi lifts abeyance status
WeWork India Management plans to raise up to Rs 4,000 crore through an IPO comprising solely of an offer for sale. Promoters Embassy Buildcon LLP and investor 1 Ariel Way Tenant will offload a total of 4.37 crore shares. The issue follows SEBI lifting the abeyance on the draft offer document, with the IPO now pending final regulatory observations. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WeWork India Management Limited, a leading player in India's premium flexible workspace segment, plans to raise up to Rs 4,000 crore through an initial public offering (IPO), according to IPO, as detailed in the DOD, will be an offer for sale (OFS) comprising up to 43,753,952 equity shares. The OFS will see Embassy Buildcon LLP, the promoter selling shareholder, offload 33,458,659 shares, while 1 Ariel Way Tenant Limited, an investor selling shareholder, will offer 10,295,293 shares. No fresh issuance of shares is planned, meaning the proceeds will go directly to the selling shareholders.'The firm expects to raise anywhere between Rs 3000 crore and Rs 4000 crore and will start the road show soon considering the abeyance has been lifted,' said a person aware of the fund India did not reply to ET lifting of the abeyance status comes after a period of regulatory pause during which SEBI likely sought clarifications or additional disclosures. While SEBI did not provide detailed reasons for the earlier abeyance in the public domain, such actions are often undertaken when a company's draft documents require closer scrutiny due to operational complexity, sectoral challenges, or disclosure per the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)'s July 4, 2025 update, the company's Draft Offer Document (DOD) has been moved out of abeyance and is now pending final observations from the market regulator.'Now back on track, WeWork India awaits SEBI's final observations — the last step before it can proceed with the IPO launch and red herring prospectus filing,' said another as a joint venture between WeWork Global and Bengaluru-based Embassy Group, WeWork India has emerged as the largest co-working space operator by total revenue over the past three fiscal years, according to CBRE. WeWork India is currently operational across eight cities including Chennai, New Delhi, Gurgaon, Noida, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Pune and Hyderabad. Its portfolio includes over 100,000 desks across its 68 flexible workspace centres in these global volatility in the flexible workspace sector — especially after the bankruptcy filing of its U.S.-based counterpart WeWork Inc. in 2023 — WeWork India has remained relatively resilient. The company operates independently from its global namesake, with local leadership and Embassy Group ownership playing a crucial role in its financial and operational to market experts, the timing of the IPO comes amid renewed investor interest in commercial real estate-linked business models, particularly those focused on asset-light operations and scalable tech-enabled platforms.'Demand for premium, agile office solutions continues to grow among startups and enterprises alike. The recently planned public listing could further institutionalize the flex space segment and set a benchmark for other operators eyeing scale and capital. With India's Grade-A office absorption rebounding this segment is well-positioned to tap into both occupier demand and investor interest,' said Sankey Prasad, chairman & managing director, Middle East & India at IPO is being managed by a consortium of leading investment banks. JM Financial , ICICI Securities, Jefferies India, Kotak Mahindra Capital, and 360 ONE WAM are acting as Book Running Lead Managers (BRLMs) to the issue. Their role will be instrumental in marketing the IPO to institutional and retail investors SEBI's final approval, WeWork India will file its Red Herring Prospectus (RHP) and launch a roadshow to engage with potential investors. Market sources suggest the IPO could hit the markets as early as September 2025, subject to market conditions and final regulatory successful, this IPO will mark one of the largest public issues in the co-working space sector in India. It will also serve as a test for investor appetite in flexible workspace operators, especially at a time when hybrid work models continue to shape the future of commercial real estate.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Noida proposes 3 names for its e-bus service
Noida: Noida Authority has proposed three names for its fleet of 500 e-buses that are to be rolled out across Noida, Greater Noida and Yamuna Expressway region this year. Officials said the three shortlisted names—NGY Urban Mobility Service, GBN Easy Ride Service and GBN Green Transport—have been submitted to the UP govt for vetting, but the branding would reflect a larger vision to reshape urban mobility in the region. The electric bus project gained momentum last month after two private operators were finalised for procuring buses, managing operations and maintaining depot infrastructure. Travel Time Mobility India Pvt Ltd will run 250 nine-metre buses at Rs 55 per km, while Delbus Mobility Pvt Ltd will operate 250 12-metre buses at Rs 68 per km. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida The fleet is to run on 25 high-demand routes, including airport links and intra-city connections, with 10-15 minute frequencies during peak hours and 15-20-minute intervals throughout the day. Authorities estimate that each bus could travel up to 300 km daily. UP has proposed a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), comprising officials from Noida, Greater Noida, and Yamuna authorities, including finance and traffic cell members, to manage the service. Once registered, the SPV will oversee staffing and service rollout for a 12-year term. The initiative is expected to significantly strengthen Noida's public transport ecosystem, providing reliable, eco-friendly alternatives to private vehicles. Routes have been designed to improve last-mile connectivity, reduce congestion, and serve key hubs including the upcoming Noida International Airport. While the project's total cost stands at Rs 675 crore, fare and ad revenue is expected to cover only a fraction of operational expenses. Authorities anticipate an annual revenue of Rs 145 crore against operating costs of over Rs 370 crore.
