Keep away from foolish and ignorant arguments — they end in quarrels
Congratulations to Gerrard Eckhoff for his entertaining "King James"-styled creative writing published in the ODT (Opinion 16.4.25)
It requires a response. Here are a few facts to add some balance and perspective to his yarn.
Otago is the second-largest region in New Zealand geographically, covering a land area of 32,000sqkm with 7500sqkm conservation estate and protected area and 24,500sqkm of developed land
The population of Otago, referred by Eckhoff as "the people of the land", is 255,000 (from 2023 figures). .
The urban population of Otago's main centres is about 200,000 (Dunedin and Mosgiel, 130,000; Queenstown, 27,700; Oamaru, 14,350; Balclutha, 4430, and Central Otago, 27,000). The rural population is about 55,000.
There are 440 dairy farms, 100 arable crop farms, 200 deer farms, 910 sheep and beef farms, 190 horticultural units and 235 vineyards (ORC industry advisory group, 2022).
Both rural and urban populations have environmental interests which need representation by the elected members of the Otago Regional Council.
There is a significant responsibility and focus by the council on the quality, allocation and use of water for the purposes of farming, drinking water and recreation.
The challenge for the current and future elected councils is how do we respond to the environmental challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss and water quality while looking after the economic, social and cultural life of our regions?
Things are not as black and white as they may appear to Eckhoff.
A great deal of time during this triennium has been spent consulting on and developing the land and water regional plan (currently shelved while awaiting a new national policy statement for freshwater).
The notification version of this plan was informed by the many hours of engagement from our community, which included agricultural, horticultural and forestry representatives.
Other plans designed to deliver outcomes are the long-term plan and annual plans. Yes, "Rules to protect the wildlife of the fields".
We all agree, "a great rate increase has been imposed" on the ratepayers of Otago in the past two years, but does anyone remember Covid-19?
During periods of national lockdowns, the New Zealand economy was protected with vast amounts of cash from fiscal injection to prevent widespread panic. This was followed by the inevitable spending spree, and the economic mechanics caused inflation to leap out of its containment.
At the same time the ORC sustained millions of dollars of deficits, particularly in its provision of public transport.
The biggest contributor to rates increase has been the need for the ORC to recover the $10m deficit accrued against the public transport rating pool.
No doubt "the people are weary and greatly burdened" but we are all still feeling the impact of the Covid era.
Eckhoff has referred to the ORC headquarters as the great temple of the council, which is an interesting comparison.
This much-needed facility for the ORC staff has been at least 20 years in the making.
If previous councils had had the courage to make a decision, which might have hindered their chances of re-election, the staff of the ORC would have been provided with a modern, functional, single-site place of work years ago at half the cost.
If the cost to a councillor of being decisive and making hard calls is not being re-elected, that is fine.
It is up to the electorate to decide the type and character of leadership they want on their council.
The enduring chairmanship of Gretchen Robertson has been a miracle of biblical proportions and needs to be acknowledged as such.
She has proven to be hard-working, resilient, persistent and human.
It is not an easy job to wrangle a group of people with such diverse views into a council that has been, at the least, functional.
In conclusion, and in keeping with Eckhoff's scriptural references, as it says in the good book: "A rich man may be wise in his own eyes, but a man who has discernment sees through him." — Proverbs 28:11.
■Tim Mepham is an Otago Regional Council councillor.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
ORC moving to system where no votes are ‘wasted'
An elections law specialist is urging people not to be too daunted by the Otago Regional Council's decision to switch to a single transferable vote (STV) system for this year's council elections. The councillors last year approved the shift from first past the post, bringing it in line with the Dunedin City Council, the only one of Otago's five territorial authorities to use the electoral system where voters rank their preferred candidates. University of Otago political science professor Janine Hayward said Dunedin had been using the system for several years with little difficulty. "I do think it's a great idea to give voters a little bit more confidence in how straightforward it is." Under STV, voters rank their preferred candidates from best to last, with "1" being the highest ranking, also known as first preference. Once the votes are collated, they go through a process called an iteration, where there is a quota each candidate has to reach in order to be elected. Anyone who reaches that quota is declared elected. "The least popular candidate drops out of the race and their votes are redistributed to the next preference of the people who voted for them. "If the person who got elected, or the people who got elected, had surplus votes, then those votes are redistributed as well. So what the STV process is ensuring is that there are no votes that are wasted." Prof Hayward urged people to be careful, if they particularly did not want a candidate to sneak in on redistributed votes. "Put simply, if you don't like the candidate, don't rank them. "After first past the post (FPP), there was a tendency among some people to rank every single candidate on the ballot sheet, but really that's unnecessary." STV avoided the premise of a "wasted vote", Prof Hayward said. "Votes get wasted in two ways. "When you're voting for multiple people, they get wasted because too many people vote for somebody, and they get more votes than they needed to get elected, or people vote for somebody who's really unpopular and was never going to get elected. "So the point about the transferring of the single transferable vote is to keep as many voter preferences alive, basically, as possible until the number of candidates required meet that quota that they're aiming for." It was also a good indication of the "depth" of someone's voter support, she said. "When you're doing something like electing Otago Regional Council, it's likely to see somebody or a couple of people elected on first preferences. "But having a large vote in your first preferences doesn't necessarily mean that you have enough support across the whole community to get elected, and I think that's the point about single transferable vote. "It really tests, beyond the first vote, whether somebody has the breadth and depth of support that they need to get elected." Council elections take place from September 9 to October 11.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council discards proposal for direct Dunedin to Oamaru bus service
Hopes of Oamaru getting a direct bus service to Dunedin have been dashed for now, after the Otago Regional Council last week discarded proposals to establish a link. Waitaki District Mayor Gary Kircher had lobbied strongly for the regional council to provide a bus service to Oamaru during its recent annual plan submissions but said he recognised the challenges of funding it. "There's a lot of calls from other areas wanting to expand their services. For us, obviously, it's about starting a service and it's really difficult if the co-funder, [NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi] NZTA, doesn't have the money there. "Fundamentally, that's the issue and it's something that the government has to address because it's causing issues not just with public transport, but with projects everywhere. "It would just be too expensive if ORC paid for the whole thing themselves without the co-funding. It would just be too costly on our ratepayers." Mr Kircher had also submitted to the regional council about providing a connecter service between central Oamaru and the North End. He said the service would need to be funded by ORC, not the district council. "Again, it would come at a cost and public transport doesn't cover its costs, unfortunately. So, there has to be some other money coming from somewhere and with all of the pressure on rates, that'd be a difficult thing for the [district] council to be able to underwrite. It is a regional council responsibility." Mr Kircher said he was meeting with regional council representatives and would be talking about what other opportunities there might be to "make something happen". ORC chairwoman Gretchen Robertson said the council remained committed to connecting Oamaru. "Some regional upgrades will not happen due to co-funding gaps, but we're committed to finding ways to improve connectivity options for Ōamaru, Balclutha and Central Otago," she said. Transport Minister Chris Bishop said public transport was funded from both public and private revenue sources, noting government funding for public transport in Otago has increased from $90 million to $125m. "Private share refers to the proportion of funding that comes from private sources, including fares paid by passengers, advertising on buses, bus stops, trains, train stations, as well as other commercial opportunities like renting or leasing commercial space," he said. "The Government Policy Statement on land transport 2024 [GPS 2024] sets the expectation that there will be increases in private share revenue to support the growing operational costs for public transport, as well as to reduce the burden on ratepayers and taxpayers. "Under the previous government the private share revenue dropped as low as 10%, meaning far more of the costs had to be covered by taxpayers and ratepayers. "To reach agreement on targets, NZTA asked PTAs [public transport authorities] to show they had considered methods appropriate to each region that did not drive adverse outcomes such as patronage decline."
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Pandemic Perspectives Focus Of COVID-19 Inquiry Public Hearing Next Week
The Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons Learned will next week hear a range of perspectives on the pandemic as the Inquiry's first public hearing begins. The Inquiry's 'Pandemic Perspectives' public hearing will take place between Monday 7 July and Friday 11 July. This hearing will allow Commissioners to hear from groups, organisations, and individuals from around Aotearoa New Zealand about their experiences of the pandemic and the Government's response to COVID-19. 'The Pandemic Perspectives public hearing will allow us, in the open, to hear a range of experiences as well as suggestions for future pandemic responses. It is important we listen to these voices and ask key questions, so we can develop robust findings and recommendations,' says Grant Illingworth KC, Chair of the Inquiry. Individuals, organisations and experts will talk about the effects of key public health decisions, including social division and isolation, health and education, and business activity. Commissioners are focusing the hearing on three key areas of the Inquiry's terms of reference and that have been key themes raised in public submissions already received by the Inquiry: · Lockdowns in 2021, in particular the extended lockdown in Auckland and Northland from September 2021. · Vaccine approvals and safety. · Introduction and use of vaccine mandates throughout 2021 and 2022. The hearing schedule and list of witnesses is available on the Inquiry's website: A second and final public hearing will take place from 20 August to 27 August in Pōneke Wellington, where Commissioners will hear from key decision makers who led the Government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and from senior public servants. 'As Commissioners, our job is to identify lessons from the country's COVID-19 response to ensure that as a nation, we can be better prepared for future pandemics,' says Mr Illingworth. 'Our goal is to provide recommendations – that can be understood by all New Zealanders – to help build a strong response for the future. 'We need a well-organised, resilient, robust defence, and we need to be able to come together as a country to face future pandemics.' Alongside the public hearings, the Inquiry has also held interviews with key decision makers, met with individuals and organisations who experienced the pandemic and the response to it, gathered 31,000 public submissions, and sought extensive written evidence from Government departments and other organisations. 'We are encouraged by and thank the 31,000 of you who shared your experiences through our recent public submissions process. I also thank the huge number of people and organisations we've met in engagements up and down the country. Your experiences and perspectives are vital to our work,' says Mr Illingworth. The 'Pandemic Perspectives' public hearing will be streamed on the Inquiry's website so it can be watched live by the public. Registered media will be able to attend the hearing for reporting purposes. A range of accessible resources will also be available during and after the hearings. Due to physical limitations, the Inquiry cannot accommodate members of the public.
