logo
Signs of new life: is the British left making a comeback?

Signs of new life: is the British left making a comeback?

The Guardian12-07-2025
In the past week alone, 100 people have signed up to Majority, a progressive coalition based in the north-east of England that advocates for wealth taxes, public ownership of important utilities and upholding universal human rights.
It may not seem a huge number in a country of 57 million people, but it is part of a bigger picture of grassroots activity on the left that is fuelled by dismay at Labour's record after a year in government, anger over its perceived targeting of the poorest and most vulnerable with benefits cuts and explosive fury at the relentless killing of people in Gaza.
Almost five years after Jeremy Corbyn was suspended from the Labour party and the left retreated to lick its wounds, there are clear signs of renewed confidence and willingness to take on those standing in the way of their principles and goals.
Leftwing initiatives and coalitions have sprung up. As well as Majority, there is We Deserve Better, set up by the activist and Guardian columnist Owen Jones, who left the Labour party after 24 years, which is raising funds to support alternative candidates; and Collective, a network of campaign groups and individuals led by two of Corbyn's inner circle, which claims to be the 'engine that will drive the formation of a new, mass-membership political party of the left in the UK'.
Independent candidates on the left have done well at national and local elections. Corbyn, who was banned from standing as a Labour candidate in last year's election, won handsomely as an independent. Four pro-Palestine independents whose campaigns focused on the war in Gaza also beat Labour rivals, and another came close to defeating the Labour star and now health secretary Wes Streeting. The resurgent Greens won four seats.
In last year's local elections, Jamie Driscoll, who set up Majority after being blocked from standing as a Labour candidate for the mayor of the north-east, came second with a 28% share of the vote. Majority, whose members include Labour, Green and Liberal Democrat activists as well as non-aligned community campaigners, is now aiming to take control of Newcastle city council in next year's elections. Meanwhile, at least 200 councillors across the country have quit Labour.
And then last week came the left's biggest move in recent years. Zarah Sultana, the MP for Coventry South who was suspended from Labour after rebelling over the two-child benefit cap, announced she would co-lead a new party with Corbyn. 'The time is now,' she said in a post on X.
Two polls suggested the new party could make a mark. More in Common found that 10% of voters would back a Corbyn-led party, rising to almost a third of 18-24-year-olds. According to YouGov, 18% would consider voting for such a party.
Sultana's announcement came after Keir Starmer faced defeat over his welfare bill when scores of backbench MPs threatened to rebel. Huge concessions ensured the bill was passed, but 47 Labour MPs stood their ground in a significant act of defiance.
This week, more than 100 Labour MPs backed a new group focused on living standards. In a sign of growing activism on the backbenches, they called on party leaders to talk less about the G7 and more about the price of groceries.
Fractures in Labour's bedrock were highlighted on Friday when the leftwing union Unite said it was reconsidering its ties with the party over its stance on the long-running Birmingham bin workers' strike. It also suspended Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister.
Meanwhile, the Green party is facing an insurgent challenge in its leadership contest from Zack Polanski, an anti-Zionist Jew who advocates radical 'eco-populism' targeting billionaires, water companies and corporations.
There is 'serious vibrancy' on the left, said Rob Ford, a professor of political science at Manchester University. 'The left, far from being dead post-Corbyn, has never been stronger in the form of the Greens and the independents. I would say this move by Corbyn and Sultana is a consequence of the evident desire in parts of the electorate for a leftwing alternative, rather than a driving cause of it.'
Disappointment in the Labour government was a significant factor, but another was the 'rapidly changing and fragmenting political landscape' in which voters were rejecting the main political parties. 'More than half of the electorate are consistently saying now that they want to vote for somebody other than Labour or the Conservatives – that has never happened before,' said Ford.
'My working assumption is Labour is going to get an absolute hammering next year, from the left and from the right.'
Even so, a long history of rancorous factionalising in leftwing politics could hamper any new party's chances of success. In the hours after Sultana's announcement, underlying tensions were exposed.
Some saw Sultana as a bold figurehead, while others were uneasy about formalising leadership roles too soon. Corbyn is said to prefer 'consensus politics' and is understood to have leaned toward a looser formation – one that builds on parliamentary independents and grassroots groups rather than a fully-fledged party.
Corbyn's closest allies were not on board with the timing of Sultana's announcement. Messages shared afterwards suggest some were caught unaware and had concerns about how it would be interpreted.
Since then, efforts to manage tensions and reconcile the two camps are believed to be in progress, with further meetings planned to re-establish a common position. Some insiders acknowledged 'increasingly chaotic' factionalism around the time of Sultana's announcement, and described current efforts as an attempt to 'stabilise the ship' with a unified strategy. Informal discussions about how to chart a path forward could produce a shared position as soon as this weekend, they suggest. Others involved said the whole project could still unravel.
For now, the question of leadership remains unresolved. While Sultana, 31, has long been seen as one of the left's most visible next-generation figures, some supporters say the project should be built around shared ownership and diffused power, not a single leader.
The veteran leftwing MPs Diane Abbott and John McDonnell are unlikely to be formally involved, in part – it is understood – because of the loose structure being discussed.
For all the internal discord, those involved in the embryonic leftwing party insist the project remains viable. The ambition, they say, is real – and the need, even more so. The past week's turbulence, in their view, should not be seen as failure but as evidence of how hard it is to capture a rising energy and channel it into one durable, structured form.
Meanwhile, some MPs on the left say that trying to shift Labour leftwards from within is a better strategy than breaking with the party. 'We're still connected to the unions. Labour is an institution. It's not about individuals,' they said. 'Until I'm thrown out or smeared, I'm staying,' said one leftwing MP.
Another figure on the Labour left said the recent rebellions over the government's welfare bill demonstrated it was possible to wield influence within the party. 'These were not just symbolic moves. We're actually getting policy changed. That matters.'
A new party would not have the reach needed to form a mass political movement, the MP added. 'We're staying in – and encouraging our supporters to stay too. The last fortnight has shown it's still possible to win change inside Labour. That didn't feel true a year ago.'
The experience of breakaway parties is not encouraging. In the 1980s, a group of centre-right Labour MPs formed the Social Democratic party, arguing that Labour was too leftwing. Despite high hopes and some early successes, by the end of the decade it had been subsumed into the Liberal party, renamed the Liberal Democrats.
At the other end of the spectrum, the maverick George Galloway formed the hard-left party Respect after he was expelled from Labour in 2003. Respect was in essence a one-man band; Galloway won several elections but the party was dissolved in 2016.
And the challenges are not unique to Britain. In France, Jean-Luc Mélenchon's Nupes alliance has made electoral gains but remains fragile. In Spain, Podemos surged then splintered. In Germany, Die Linke has lost national coherence, while in Italy and Portugal, left movements have fragmented.
Tensions – over egos, ideology, and institutional pressures – have proved difficult to overcome. The incipient Sultana/Corbyn party 'could fall apart before it even begins', said a senior leftwing Labour MP.
There are also warnings that a rival party on the left of British politics could split the progressive vote and facilitate greater electoral success for Reform UK, the rightwing populist party led by Nigel Farage that has had a huge surge of support over the past year.
A source close to Reform said Farage had long predicted that a hard-left party could win up to 30 seats at the next general election, and said its presence would ultimately help Reform. 'I look forward to them standing in every seat across the country and helping deliver a Reform government,' the source said.
A senior Labour MP said the party should not dismiss the risks posed by Reform or a new left alliance – but warned that panic would be the worst response. 'If voters don't feel better off by the next election, if public services are still creaking and small boats keep coming, then of course people will start looking elsewhere,' they said.
'That's why Labour needs to be relentlessly focused on delivery, and be clear about what we're doing and why. We don't win trust by ignoring disillusionment on either flank – we win it by showing we're serious about fixing the country.'
In the north-east, it is already too late, according to Driscoll. 'What people were expecting from the Labour government isn't what they've got – and I'd include Labour MPs in that.
'I estimate that 80% of people support a wealth tax and public ownership of utilities and a block on arms sales to Israel. But they're also fed up with potholes in the streets.
'They don't see that anything has got better in the past year, and some are now coming to the conclusion that we've got to make change ourselves. It's time to take back control.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain's new immigration hotspots mapped: Up to one in 20 residents in some boroughs are migrants who came here last year - so what is the figure in YOUR area?
Britain's new immigration hotspots mapped: Up to one in 20 residents in some boroughs are migrants who came here last year - so what is the figure in YOUR area?

Daily Mail​

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Britain's new immigration hotspots mapped: Up to one in 20 residents in some boroughs are migrants who came here last year - so what is the figure in YOUR area?

Up to one in 20 residents in parts of England and Wales are immigrants who moved here last year, new analysis suggests. It comes after Government statistics last week revealed that the total population of the two nations shot up by 700,000 in 2023/24. Immigration fuelled the surge – the second largest since WW2. The Daily Mail can reveal that net international migration – defined as the difference between the number of people entering the country and leaving – was positive in all but one of 318 councils. Newham, home to roughly 374,000 people, saw an influx of 17,200 immigrants in the year to mid-2024. That suggests new migrants arriving from abroad in the last year now account for 4.6 per cent of the London borough's total population – roughly one in 20 people. Luton (4.3 per cent) and Coventry (4.2 per cent) had similarly high figures, according to estimates published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Experts say current immigration levels, which have hit all-time highs, are piling even greater pressure upon on housing, schools and the NHS. Our postcode search tool - available to use below - shows how the situation in your area has changed over the last 12 months, tracking births and deaths as well as net international migration. Robert Bates, research director at the Centre for Migration Control, said mass migration is 'changing the very fabric of Britain'. He said: 'Assimilation has been made impossible by the sheer scale of mass migration and our national culture is damaged as a result. 'Stretched public services - from the NHS and GP surgeries to public transport and schools - are being further eroded by a low wage, low-skill immigration system. 'Politicians have ignored the concerns of voters due to a misguided belief that open borders benefit the economy. 'We fast need a government which rejects this dogma and starts work to scrap a whole raft of failed visa routes, end foreign nationals' access to the welfare system, and invests in skills for the British workforce.' There were an estimated 61.8m people in England and Wales in mid-2024, up from 61.1m in mid-2023, according to the ONS' estimates. That increase, of 706,881 people, was eclipsed only by the 821,210 population rise in the 12 months to mid-2023, with growth in both years driven almost wholly by record rises in the number of migrants. Some 1.1m people are thought to have immigrated in the last 12 months, countered by the 450,000 believed to have emigrated. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage yesterday claimed the figures were' disastrous for the quality of life for everyone in the country'. There were slightly more births (596,012) than deaths (566,030) in the year to mid-2024, which added just 29,982 to the population. In terms of raw numbers, the biggest local authorities, such as Birmingham (38,700) had the most international migrants arriving. Given the West Midlands city has a population of 1.2million, however, the effects of international migration aren't as stark as they are in Newham. The City of London technically had the highest share of its current population down to international migration in 2024 (10.8 per cent) – although it is home to only 15,000 people. Only one local authority, South Holland in Lincolnshire, experienced a negative sum, due to more international migrants leaving than arriving. The ONS said it had 557 arrivals from abroad last year, but 695 people emigrated. Movement around the UK – known as internal migration – is recorded separately. Alp Mehmet, chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: 'The latest ONS figures are another eye-opener. 'While there is no breakdown of migration into nationality, sex, age or immigration status - as the ONS should do in the future - overall, the population of England and Wales increased by over 700,000 (the equivalent of Newcastle.) 'Just 30,000 of this was from births exceeding deaths.' Mr Mehmet also branded the government's response to the rising rates as 'complacent'. He said: 'Most worrying, these latest figures show that the speed with which the nature of our society is changing has not let up, and that the ethnic minority proportion of our population will become the majority in 30-35 years. 'The government must take decisive action to stem the immigration tsunami if we are not to become the island of strangers the Prime Minister referred to a few months ago.' The ONS cautions there might be some overlap in the data, although it is unclear by how much because of the difficulties in examining population flow. For example, the same person could be classed as both an international immigrant and internal emigrant. They could also die, further confusing the picture. Tory shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said the data showed the population is rising at 'an unsustainable pace'. She said: 'This isn't about numbers on a spreadsheet, it's about pressure on housing, NHS waiting lists, school places, wages and it's about community and our culture. 'Britain simply cannot plan or build fast enough to keep up. 'We must secure our borders and deliver a fair and sustainable immigration system that works for the British people.' However Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said yesterday the figures 'confirm the truth of the Tory legacy on immigration'. She added: 'Their failed open borders experiment resulted in net migration quadrupling to a peak of almost a million per year in 2023 even as they promised it would fall. 'Since the election, net migration has come steeply down, and as part of the Government's Plan for Change we have set out new measures in the Immigration White Paper and have already changed immigration rules to bring net migration down further. 'To be successful, effective and fair, our immigration system must be properly controlled and managed. Out of the chaos and failure of the Tory past, that is what this Government will deliver.' Keir Starmer unveiled a crackdown on immigration in May, warning that failure to control the system risked turning Britain into an 'island of strangers'. Downing Street was forced to deny angry comparisons from MPs that it was an echo of Enoch Powell's infamous 'Rivers of Blood' speech. Scrambling to blunt the threat of Reform, Sir Keir has vowed to give voters what they had 'asked for time and time again' as he announced a package to 'take back control of our borders'. However, the month after the speech Sir Keir went on to say he 'deeply regretted' it, despite polling showing most Brits had no problem with the language used. His package of long-awaited policies to curb immigration involved a hiking of the skills threshold for immigrants and a toughening of the rules on fluency in English. Migrants will also be required to wait 10 years for citizenship rather than the current five and face deportation for even lower-level crimes. Policymakers estimate the Government's package will bring down annual inflows by around 100,000. It comes after Sir Keir signed a deal with French president Emmanuel Macron in a desperate attempt to solve the small boat Channel crisis. The Prime Minister and his French equivalent announced a 'one in, one out' migrant swap deal, although it was far less ambitious than expected.

Jess Phillips: Nigel Farage would enable ‘modern day Jimmy Saviles'
Jess Phillips: Nigel Farage would enable ‘modern day Jimmy Saviles'

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Jess Phillips: Nigel Farage would enable ‘modern day Jimmy Saviles'

Jess Phillips has joined criticism of Reform UK's pledge to repeal the Online Safety Act, suggesting such a move would empower 'modern-day Jimmy Saviles'. Ms Phillips, the Home Office minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, appeared to accuse Nigel Farage of being more concerned about 'clicks for his monetised social media accounts' than children's safety online. She backed her colleague Peter Kyle after his row with the Reform UK leader last week. The Technology Secretary said Mr Farage was putting himself on the side of 'extreme pornographers' and people like Savile by opposing the law. Under rules that came into effect on July 25 as part of the act, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Mr Farage has said the legislation threatens freedom of speech and open debate. Writing in The Times, Ms Phillips said: 'Farage said it's the biggest threat to freedom of speech in our lifetimes. 'My colleague Peter Kyle said he was siding with modern-day Jimmy Saviles preying on children online.' She said she would like to speak to Mr Farage about 'one of those modern-day Saviles, Alexander McCartney'. McCartney, who posed as a teenage girl to befriend young females from across the globe on Snapchat and other platforms before blackmailing them, 'just needed a computer' to reach his targets, Ms Phillips wrote. Believed to be one of the world's most prolific online offenders, McCartney abused at least 70 children online and drove one girl to suicide. Ms Phillips said the Online Safety Act exists to try to provide a 'basic minimum of protection, and make it harder for paedophiles to prey on children at will'. She said police have told her that paedophile networks use 'normal websites where their parents assume they're safe' to coerce and blackmail young people. 'Perhaps Nigel Farage doesn't worry about that — there's no political advantage in it, and no clicks for his monetised social media accounts. But I do. 'I worry about what it means now and what it will mean when boys reared on a diet of ultraviolent online child abuse are adult men having children of their own. I can't ignore that, neither can Peter Kyle, and, most importantly, nor can millions of parents across the country. 'I defy Nigel Farage to tell me what any of that has to do with free speech. 'I defy him to meet even one parent who has lost a daughter to suicide because she was being blackmailed online and tell them that is just the price of civil liberties. Maybe he'd feel differently after that kind of meeting, or maybe he wouldn't care.' Her comments echo those of Mr Kyle, who said last week: 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Mr Farage demanded an apology from the Technology Secretary, who refused to withdraw the remarks.

'The fruits of October 7': The sickening phrase used by Hamas to describe Labour's plan to recognise a Palestinian state, 22 months on from massacre
'The fruits of October 7': The sickening phrase used by Hamas to describe Labour's plan to recognise a Palestinian state, 22 months on from massacre

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

'The fruits of October 7': The sickening phrase used by Hamas to describe Labour's plan to recognise a Palestinian state, 22 months on from massacre

Keir Starmer 's plan for Palestinian state recognition is 'one of the fruits of October 7,' a top Hamas official has boasted. The statement came as furore around the Prime Minister's proposal showed no sign of dying down at the weekend. Senior Hamas politician Ghazi Hamad enflamed the situation as he told news network Al Jazeera: 'The initiative by several countries to recognise the Palestinian State is one of the fruits of October 7. 'Why do all countries recognise Palestine today? Before October 7, was there a single country that dared to recognise the State of Palestine? Just give me one example. 'Now, the achievement we accomplished on October 7 is what brought the Palestinian issue to the world's attention and prompted powerful action in support of it,' Hamad said. Sir Keir and the leaders of France and Canada have faced accusations that plans to recognise a Palestinian state would be rewarding the group responsible for the biggest slaughter of Jewish people since the Holocaust and for emboldening the terror group with no clear incentive for a ceasefire. Adam Rose, a lawyer acting for the British hostage families, said: 'It comes as absolutely no surprise to us that Hamas would welcome the UK's decision to recognise the state of Palestine without first requiring Hamas to release the 50 hostages it still holds, 667 days on from 7 October, 2023. 'Indeed, and as we predicted, in the past few days since the UK's announcement, we have seen an emboldened Hamas, which released videos of emaciated hostages Rom Braslavski, 22, and 24-year-old Evyatar David, the latter being shown digging his own grave in the dungeon in which he is being held, starved and tortured.' Last week British-Israeli Emily Damari led condemnations from hostage families saying the PM was 'not standing on the right side of history' with his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire before September's UN meeting. In contrast, no conditions were placed on Hamas to release the remaining hostages, giving the terror group no reason to stop the fighting. Foreign Secretary David Lammy last night posted on X: 'The images of hostages being paraded for propaganda are sickening. Every hostage must be released unconditionally. Hamas must disarm and have no control over Gaza. 'We are working with partners on a long-term solution and plan for peace. This must begin with an immediate ceasefire that frees the hostages, as well as removing inhumane aid restrictions.' Noam Sagi, whose elderly mother Ada was kidnapped into Gaza, told the Daily Mail: 'Britain should lead with moral courage, not appease evil'. Last night, Hamas said it is conditionally ready to deliver Red Cross aid to the hostages it is holding in Gaza. The terror group said that if Israel opens humanitarian corridors permanently and halts 'all forms of air traffic' during the delivery of packages to the hostages, it would allow aid to reach them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store