'The fruits of October 7': The sickening phrase used by Hamas to describe Labour's plan to recognise a Palestinian state, 22 months on from massacre
The statement came as furore around the Prime Minister's proposal showed no sign of dying down at the weekend.
Senior Hamas politician Ghazi Hamad enflamed the situation as he told news network Al Jazeera: 'The initiative by several countries to recognise the Palestinian State is one of the fruits of October 7.
'Why do all countries recognise Palestine today? Before October 7, was there a single country that dared to recognise the State of Palestine? Just give me one example.
'Now, the achievement we accomplished on October 7 is what brought the Palestinian issue to the world's attention and prompted powerful action in support of it,' Hamad said.
Sir Keir and the leaders of France and Canada have faced accusations that plans to recognise a Palestinian state would be rewarding the group responsible for the biggest slaughter of Jewish people since the Holocaust and for emboldening the terror group with no clear incentive for a ceasefire.
Adam Rose, a lawyer acting for the British hostage families, said: 'It comes as absolutely no surprise to us that Hamas would welcome the UK's decision to recognise the state of Palestine without first requiring Hamas to release the 50 hostages it still holds, 667 days on from 7 October, 2023.
'Indeed, and as we predicted, in the past few days since the UK's announcement, we have seen an emboldened Hamas, which released videos of emaciated hostages Rom Braslavski, 22, and 24-year-old Evyatar David, the latter being shown digging his own grave in the dungeon in which he is being held, starved and tortured.'
Last week British-Israeli Emily Damari led condemnations from hostage families saying the PM was 'not standing on the right side of history' with his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire before September's UN meeting.
In contrast, no conditions were placed on Hamas to release the remaining hostages, giving the terror group no reason to stop the fighting.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy last night posted on X: 'The images of hostages being paraded for propaganda are sickening. Every hostage must be released unconditionally. Hamas must disarm and have no control over Gaza.
'We are working with partners on a long-term solution and plan for peace. This must begin with an immediate ceasefire that frees the hostages, as well as removing inhumane aid restrictions.'
Noam Sagi, whose elderly mother Ada was kidnapped into Gaza, told the Daily Mail: 'Britain should lead with moral courage, not appease evil'.
Last night, Hamas said it is conditionally ready to deliver Red Cross aid to the hostages it is holding in Gaza.
The terror group said that if Israel opens humanitarian corridors permanently and halts 'all forms of air traffic' during the delivery of packages to the hostages, it would allow aid to reach them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump ‘pushing for all or nothing deal' on Gaza as Netanyahu ‘wants full occupation'
Donald Trump is pushing for an 'all or nothing' agreement to end the war in Gaza while Benjamin Netanyahu wants to occupy the entire Gaza Strip, according to reports. After months of ceasefire talks stalled, Mr Netanyahu and Mr Trump are reportedly working on a deal that presents Hamas with an ultimatum: release the hostages and agree to terms to disarm or the war continues. 'No piecemeal deals. That doesn't work,' US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff reportedly told hostage families in an audio leaked to Israeli news outlet Ynet. 'We think that we have to shift this negotiation to 'all or nothing' - everybody comes home,' Mr Witkoff was quoted as saying later in the recording. International leaders have ramped up pressure to reach a deal as Gaza faces widespread starvation and videos of two emaciated Israeli hostages circulated online. Domestic pressure in Israel has also been growing as the videos prompted thousands of people to protest in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem to release the hostages and end the war. Nearly 600 retired Israeli security officials and former intelligence agency heads have written to Mr Trump urging him to put pressure on Israel to end the war in Gaza immediately. Mr Netanyahu is set to update his military plan for Gaza this week amid local media reports he wants to occupy all of the besieged enclave. 'The die is cast - we are going for a full occupation of the Gaza Strip,' senior officials close to Netanyahu is quoted as saying in Ynet. 'There will be activity also in areas where hostages are being held. If this doesn't suit the IDF Chief of Staff, he can resign.' An official was also quoted as telling Israeli Channel 12: 'The decision has been made… we are going to occupy the Gaza Strip.' The Jerusalem Post and i24NEWS also reported senior sources confirming plans for a full occupation. Mr Netanyahu's office has been approached for comment. Meanwhile, 'the worst-case scenario of famine' is playing out in Gaza, according to a UN-back food security agency. Israel has repeatedly denied that there are restrictions on aid or that there is a hunger crisis in Gaza. It blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza and says it is taking steps to get more aid to Palestinians. In total, 289 airdrops have been conducted since Israel permitted them to restart two weeks ago, delivering 305 tonnes of aid. However officials in Jordan warned that they have had warehouses of aid for Gaza gathering dust since Israel reimposed its devastating blockade in March. More than 60,000 people have been killed in Gaza since October 2023, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.
BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
'More transparency' needed on immigration status of suspects, says Cooper
There should be "greater transparency" around the immigration status and ethnicity of crime suspects, and guidance for police forces on when to disclose this information "needs to change", the home secretary has said. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has called on police to release details of two men arrested in connection with the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Warwickshire. The men are reportedly Afghan nationals but police have not confirmed if she believed that kind of information should be in the public domain, Yvette Cooper told the BBC: "We do want to see more transparency in cases, we think local people do need to have more information." On Monday, Farage said he "absolutely" believed that such details should be Police has previously said once someone is charged with an offence, the force follows national guidance that does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status. Speaking to BBC Breakfast on Tuesday, Cooper said: "It is an operational decision about how much information can be revealed in the middle of a live investigation but we do want to see greater transparency."She later told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We do think the guidance needs to change".She said the government had asked the Law Commission - an independent body which reviews laws in England and Wales - to speed up a review into "what the rules are" around what information can be released and when during a legal case."We're also working with the College of Policing on strengthening and changing their guidance," she two men accused of the offence in Warwickshire are: Ahmad Mulakhil, who has been charged with two counts of rape; Mohammad Kabir, who has been accused of kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting the rape of a girl aged under Mulakhil, 23, appeared before magistrates in Coventry on 28 July, and Mr Kabir, also 23, appeared in court on were remanded in custody. In a statement, Warwickshire Police and Crime Commissioner Philip Seccombe said: "It is essential to state that policing decisions - such as whether to release details about a suspect - must follow national guidance and legal requirements."He added that he would not speculate on the personal circumstances of those involved while court proceedings were Law Commission is conducting a review into what information or opinions someone should lawfully be able to publish after a suspect has been a government request, it has agreed to speed up its reporting on the parts of the review that relate to what the government and law enforcement can do to counter misinformation, including where there are possible public order consequences of failing to do independent watchdog concluded in March that failure to share basic facts about the Southport killer led to "dangerous fictions" which helped spark rioting. Jonathan Hall KC, the UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, said it would have been "far better" for the authorities to share more accurate detail on the arrest of Axel Rudakubana on 29 July last said the "ineffectual near silence" from police, prosecutors and the government after the attacks led to disinformation that sparked widespread rioting in the days after the attack.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
If you come to Britain and can't support yourself, you must leave
For the 25 years up to 1997, according to the Centre for Policy Studies, net migration was 68,000. In the 25 years that followed, however, that figure shot up to nearly 6 million. Our immigration system is out of control. It isn't just about the number of people who've come here, unsustainable though that is. Our migration system has also been highly un-selective. The vast majority of those who've arrived in the last few years haven't come to work, and didn't need to be earning a particular salary – or often anything at all – to get their visa. Even those who did come here to work are often employed in low-paid jobs, and won't be paying enough in tax to account for the pressure that they put on public services, or the costs that they'll incur later in life. According to the researcher Karl Williams, 72 per cent of those who came as 'skilled workers' in 2022-23 earned below the UK average salary, with 54 percent likely earning less than half of that average. But after just five years here, most of these people will qualify for Indefinite Leave to Remain, or ILR. With ILR, migrants can access welfare, social housing, and free healthcare, as well as stay permanently in the UK and apply for citizenship. On average, the Government spends £34,000 looking after somebody in the last year of their life. Only a small minority of recent migrants will pay enough in tax to cover those costs over the entire time that they're here – let alone to cover the cost of the benefits and services that they and their family will use over their lifetimes. It's going to cost us hundreds of billions of pounds. We simply can't afford it. But it can be fixed. Earlier this year, the Conservatives proposed a plan to reform our immigration system, including by introducing a hard cap on visas and stopping ILR from entitling people to state support. We also proposed extending the qualifying period from five years to ten. This wouldn't just mean that it takes longer for migrants to be eligible for ILR status. It would also give us an opportunity to review the visas of those who are already here. Those who come to Britain from abroad must be able to support themselves, and must be earning enough to contribute more in tax than they will cost over their lifetime. If they can't, their visa must not be renewed, and they must leave. The Government voted against that plan, but they've committed to a consultation on ILR in the autumn. We must use that opportunity to push them not just to extend the qualifying period for ILR, including for those who are already here, but also to refuse to reissue visas to those who won't end up contributing enough. The era of mass migration has been a disaster. People can see it in their rising rents, in the pressure on their public services, and in their increasingly divided communities. Most disgracefully of all, the British people have voted to avert that disaster, time and time again. Government after government has failed to heed their warning. It's a complete scandal, and it's probably the single biggest reason why trust in our political system is in such short supply. Rebuilding that trust means building a migration system that's limited and selective – but it also means undoing the harm that has already been done. We can still avert the coming disaster around ILR, and we must.
