Council executive defies Reform leadership by refusing to take down Pride flag
Warwickshire county council's chief executive has been blasted by Zia Yusuf as acting like the 'monarch of Warwickshire' when she defied their party orders.
George Finch, the 18-year-old new leader of the authority, ordered the emblem to be taken down in line with Reform's policy of only flying British flags.
But Monica Fogarty responded: 'I am afraid I will not be taking the action that you are requesting,' The Telegraph reports.
The banner depicted the 'Progress Flag', which also includes colours to represent trans people.
Ms Fogarty said that throughout and before her tenure in the job - for which she is paid between £196,303 and £213,001 - the flags have been flown during Pride month.
She claimed she had already made an agreement with former Reform leader of the council Rob Howard that both the St George's flag and the Pride flag would be flown, before he resigned citing 'health challenges' last week, leaving the teenager in charge.
Yusuf claimed Ms Fogarty was undertaking a 'coup d'etat' and said it was a 'subversion of democracy'.
He said: 'These people are drunk on their own power, and for decades have been totally unaccountable. Until now – Reform elected officials are fighting back. Unlike the two old parties, Reform will fight for you.'
Finch, who only recently switched allegiance from the Conservatives to Reform UK, became interim leader of Warwickshire County Council - one of the largest local authorities in the Midlands - last week.
He took over from Mr Howard, who quit his post with immediate effect just weeks after the party's shock gains in the May local elections saw it form a minority administration in Warwickshire for the first time.
In a brief statement, Mr Howard, who had been at the helm for less than two months, said the decision was made 'with much regret'.
'The role of leader is an extremely demanding role and regretfully my health challenges now prevent me from carrying out the role to the level and standard that I would wish,' he said.
He went on to confirm that Mr Finch, his teenage deputy and fellow Reform UK councillor, would now serve as acting leader until a permanent replacement is chosen.
Mr Finch, councillor for Bedworth Central, now finds himself in charge of a local authority with over £1.5 billion in assets and a revenue budget of around £500 million.
Just earlier this month, Mr Howard told the BBC he was 'not intimidated' by the scale of the task at Warwickshire County Council and seemed optimistic about the Reform-led administration's ability to deliver results.
Before joining Reform UK, he was a member of the Conservative Party for just three months.
He reportedly switched allegiance after concluding that Reform would take a tougher stance on illegal immigration — an issue he described as central to his political beliefs.
On the New Reformer website, Mr Finch outlines his views under three core themes: 'Brexit, sovereignty and a strong and united family unit.'
Reform UK, led nationally by Nigel Farage, made unexpected strides in the local elections earlier this year, gaining council seats in areas previously considered solidly Conservative or Labour.
Warwickshire was among the party's most striking victories, with Reform overtaking the Tories as the largest group, though without an outright majority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
20 minutes ago
- Times
Story of banknotes is full of funny money
If you hold strong views about the design of Britain's banknotes, your moment has come at last. The Bank of England intends to relaunch the £5, £10, £20 and £50 notes, and in a predictable nod to our populist age, it has appealed to the public for suggestions. Very little, it seems, will be off limits, since the Bank's statement suggests that great historical characters could give way to images of 'food, film, television or sport'. So out will go Winston Churchill, Jane Austen and JMW Turner, and in might come, say, Luke Littler, chicken tikka masala and Adolescence. And to think people doubt the idea of progress in history. • Churchill may be dropped from banknotes for diverse designs As Bank officials are surely aware, though, no conceivable combination will please everybody. Indeed, no less a figure than Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg has already condemned the 'Bank of Wokeness' for its 'supine kowtowing to the gods of political correctness'.(this, remember, before a single image has been chosen). Yet even though this story seems like a gift to the permanently outraged community, no venerable tradition is in danger of being sullied, since pictures on banknotes are a modish innovation. Until the late Queen Elizabeth made her debut on March 17, 1960, no British shopper had ever seen a face on a pound note, unless you count the image of Britannia. Indeed, if Sir Jacob wants to take a properly conservative position, he might argue that banknotes themselves are a dangerous innovation. There are suggestions that the ancient Carthaginians issued promissory notes on scraps of leather or parchment, but most historians agree that the first proper paper money originated, inevitably, in China. This was a note called a jiaozi, issued by private merchants in the city of Chengdu some time around the year 1000. Printed in black ink on an early version of paper, jiaozi often showed images of merchants. Each had a different value, depending on the buyer's needs. Over time they became standardised, and eventually the imperial government took over production, stamping notes with seals to prevent counterfeiting. But the problem with paper money, as the Chinese emperors soon discovered, is that it is very tempting to keep printing it. Inflation inevitably followed; then came the first of innumerable currency reforms. Paper money, however, never went away. 'All these pieces of paper,' marvelled the Venetian traveller Marco Polo at the end of the 13th century, 'are issued with as much solemnity and authority as if they were of pure gold or silver … [and] wherever a person may go throughout the Great Khan's dominions he shall find these pieces of paper in use, and shall be able to transact all sales and purchases of goods by means of them just as well as if they were coins of pure gold.' By contrast, most European countries were slow to embrace the paper revolution. Although late medieval bankers in Florence and Flanders, such as the Medici, issued promissory notes, it wasn't until 1661 that a central bank, Sweden's entertainingly named Stockholms Banco, issued notes known as kreditivsedlar. Alas, when ordinary Swedes tried to cash in their notes, the bank ran out of money, and after just ten years the whole thing collapsed. There was a lesson there in overpromising and overprinting, though we can all think of finance ministers who never learnt it. What, though, of Britain? The new central banks of England and Scotland issued their first notes in the mid-1690s as part of William III's financial mobilisation to fight the French. Neither had a monopoly, though. English private banks had the right to print their own notes well into the Victorian period, and the very last private banknotes were issued as late as 1921 by the little Somerset bank of Fox, Fowler and Company. As for Scottish banknotes, the Royal Bank of Scotland and Clydesdale Bank still print their own notes to this day. (But are they legal tender in England? The short answer is no. I look forward to Scottish readers' letters.) Back, though, to the wider story of paper money. Given the Swedish debacle, many people were deeply suspicious of this flimsy substitute for the real thing. And during the early 1790s they gazed in horror at the economic chaos in France, where revolutionary printers were churning out colossal quantities of notes known as assignats. Within just two years of the fall of the Bastille, almost 2.5 billion assignats were in circulation, and all the time the value was plummeting. As food prices rocketed, Jacobin radicals blamed the royal family, aristocratic exiles and British politicians — all implicated, they claimed, in a nefarious conspiracy to debauch France's currency. The chief printer was arrested and executed, while the finance minister, Étienne Clavière, took his own life before he could be dragged to the guillotine. Yet although the assignats were economically disastrous, they did at least look good, with illustrations interweaving eagles, Roman iconography and revolutionary bonnets. By contrast, British banknotes were remarkably plain until the 20th century. Clearly the Bank of England felt no need to show off, preferring to project an image of sobriety, simplicity and solidity. As a result, it was not until 1960 that Bank of England notes displayed the monarch's face, while the first commoner, William Shakespeare, didn't appear until 1970. He was followed by the Duke of Wellington, Florence Nightingale, Sir Isaac Newton and Sir Christopher Wren … and so the faces have changed over the years, leaving us with Churchill, Turner, Austen and Alan Turing today. But who comes next? Most readers will surely agree that the sane choices would be Harold Godwinson, Horatio Nelson, General Gordon and Agatha Christie. Alas, we live in strange times, so who knows whom the Bank will choose? Even the prospect of a John Lennon banknote, which would mark the lowest moment in our history, can't be ruled out. But if the Bank does make such a terrible choice, there is one consolation. Since cash payments now account for barely a tenth of all transactions, most of us will only rarely have to gaze upon the consequences. And if the alternative is to hand over a little portrait of the man who wrote Imagine, the ding of a contactless payment will sound sweeter than ever.
Times
33 minutes ago
- Times
Jeremy Corbyn confirms new party but left-wing allies not joining
Jeremy Corbyn has confirmed plans for a new political party to challenge Sir Keir Starmer on the left in a bungled launch that has failed to secure the backing of the former Labour leader's traditional allies. Corbyn said discussions were ongoing and that 'the democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape'. Zarah Sultana, the former Labour MP, announced on Thursday night that she would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with Corbyn. But the former Labour leader was said to be angry with the intervention, which he saw as premature. In a statement on Friday, he did not confirm Sultana's co-leadership role, only saying that she 'will help us build a real alternative'. Some of Corbyn 's most senior backers during his time as Labour leader are understood not to be interested in joining the new party. John McDonnell, the former shadow chancellor, Diane Abbott, the former shadow home secretary, and Clive Lewis, the former shadow defence secretary, have all indicated they will not be resigning from the Labour Party to join the new project. Polling from More in Common suggests a hypothetical new party with Corbyn as leader could receive 10 per cent of the vote and become the most popular single party among 18 to 24-year-olds. Labour's overall vote would decrease from 23 per cent to 20 per cent, the polling suggests, and cut the Green Party's support from 9 per cent to 5 per cent. Corbyn has been building a network of former Labour and pro-Gaza independent councillors for months, in a bid to stand formal candidates in time for the May local elections next year. He said on Friday: 'Real change is coming. One year on from the election, this Labour government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. Our country needs to change direction, now. • 'Congratulations to Zarah Sultana on her principled decision to leave the Labour Party. I am delighted that she will help us build a real alternative. The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. 'Discussions are ongoing, and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve. Together, we can create something that is desperately missing from our broken political system: hope.' Sultana said on Thursday night that she was quitting Starmer's party, accusing the government of 'wanting to make disabled people suffer', and being an 'active participant in genocide' in Gaza. In a dig at the government's much-revised welfare reform, Sultana accused the government of wanting to 'make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much'. Four of the seven MPs who had the Labour whip suspended last summer for supporting an amendment to the King's Speech relating to the two-child benefit cap had it restored earlier this year. The three who remain as independents are McDonnell, Sultana and Apsana Begum. McDonnell said he was 'dreadfully sorry' to see Sultana quit the party. Last year Corbyn formed an independent alliance with four others who were elected as independents in the general election, all standing on a pro-Palestine ticket in heavily Muslim inner-city areas. Sultana's departure makes her the sixth MP in the alliance, alongside Corbyn, giving the group a bigger presence in the Commons than the Greens and Plaid Cymru. The creation of a new party would consolidate independents but could also splinter the vote on the left. But Zack Polanski, the favourite to win the Green leadership contest, suggested he could work with the new party. 'Anyone who wants to take on the Tories, Reform and this failing Labour government is a friend of mine', he said. 'Looking forward to seeing what this looks like in practice.' George Galloway, whose Workers Party candidate came within 700 votes of unseating Jess Phillips, the Home Office minister, said he would not be joining up because of 'significant differences on the issues of trans and LGBTQ+, the Russia-Ukraine war, net zero and other things'. But, he added, 'we are open to an electoral agreement which avoids us both fighting each other for the benefit of Starmer'. Corbyn was suspended from Labour in 2020 after he refused to fully accept the Equality and Human Rights Commission's findings that the party had broken equality law when he was in charge, and said antisemitism had been 'dramatically overstated for political reasons'. He was blocked from standing for Labour at last year's general election and expelled in the spring of 2024 after announcing he would stand as an independent candidate in his Islington North constituency, which he won with a majority of more than 7,000.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Swinney's high tax boast ‘offensive' to Scots, say Tories
John Swinney has been criticised for arguing that the UK Government could have avoided a 'fiscal nightmare' by emulating his party's tax assault on higher earners. Opposition politicians described the SNP leader's claim as 'deluded' and 'offensive' to many families in Scotland who pay more income tax than those south of the border. Mr Swinney responded after Sir Keir Starmer was forced into a U-turn on his flagship welfare reform programme following a rebellion by backbench Labour MPs. Writing for The Scotsman on Friday, the First Minister said: 'Labour could have avoided the fiscal nightmare currently tearing them apart if Keir Starmer had the courage to do what the SNP have done, and ask high earners to pay more tax.' It prompted a backlash from the Scottish Conservatives, who described Mr Swinney's position as 'astonishing' and accused him of 'contempt for hard-working, over-taxed Scots'. The party also highlighted that the SNP had presided over sluggish economic growth north of the border. 'To boast that hiking taxes is an act of courage by the SNP is deluded and offensive,' said Craig Hoy, the Scottish Conservative shadow finance secretary. 'The brave thing to do would be to reduce Scotland's unaffordable benefits bill and bloated public sector, as the Scottish Conservatives are committed to doing. 'But John Swinney repeatedly ducks that challenge in favour of yet more tax hikes which are choking economic growth and squeezing household budgets to breaking point. 'Keir Starmer is deeply unpopular precisely because he has clobbered the public and businesses with a series of tax rises which broke Labour's pre-election promises. 'It beggars belief that the SNP leader, who has made Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK, thinks the Prime Minister should actually be raising taxes further still on hard-working households.' At present, workers in Scotland who earn more than £30,300 pay more into the state than their English and Welsh counterparts. The tax differential rises with earnings, with a taxpayer on a £50,000 annual salary paying £1,528 more a year in Scotland than in the rest of the UK. An individual on £100,000 pays £3,332 more and those earning at least £125,000 pay £5,221 more, equivalent to a 7 per cent reduction in their after-tax income. Earlier in the week, Mr Swinney accused the UK government of taking an 'absolutely appalling' approach to reform. Labour ministers were forced to U-turn on some cuts to Universal Credit and plans to introduce stricter eligibility rules for personal independence payment (Pip) claimants. The changes to Pip would not have directly applied in Scotland, where the benefit is being phased out for a devolved alternative but could have affected the amount of money allocated to Holyrood. Ian Murray, the Scottish Secretary, has said that failure to reform the welfare system will see it 'explode in terms of [it] being unsustainable financially for the taxpayer, but also we're writing hundreds of thousands of people out of the workforce.'
