Property tax row: GMC officials delay meeting minutes, councillors protest
The minutes, which document the repeal of the proposed property tax hike, were to be shared publicly.
Officials blamed a basement fire at the GMC office on Friday for the delay, but councillors have alleged deliberate delay and foul play. A group of councillors had earlier staged a sit-in protest at GMC's headquarters in Navyug Market, demanding the immediate release of the meeting minutes.
"We called off the protest after officials, including municipal commissioner Vikramaditya Singh Malik, assured us that the minutes would be provided at 10am on July 25, after the kanwar yatra," said Himanshu Sharma, councillor of Ward 75.
You Can Also Check:
Noida AQI
|
Weather in Noida
|
Bank Holidays in Noida
|
Public Holidays in Noida
"The officials missed the deadline, and mysteriously, the same afternoon, the basement of the GMC office was gutted in a fire. Now officials are saying that no work could be carried out at the office because the fire disrupted operations, preventing them from sharing the minutes on the assured date. This is a very uncanny coincidence," added Sharma.
Meanwhile, Mayor Sunita Dayal said, "I was told that officials would share the minutes with my office at 10 am on Friday, but I have not received them.
I ensured that the hike in property tax proposal was annulled, and it is for the officials now to answer anything related to the matter."
In response, commissioner Malik has formed a committee led by additional municipal commissioner Jung Bahadur to ascertain the cause of the fire. "Minutes of the meeting could not be provided on the scheduled date because of the fire, and to rule out any foul play, the commissioner has formed a committee to probe the incident.
Instructions have been issued to normalise working at GMC as soon as possible. The minutes of the meeting will be provided after that," said a GMC official.
On the issue of property tax, a case was filed in the Allahabad High Court against GMC's decision to impose a hike, and the court is due to hear the matter on July 30. The hike in property taxes took effect on April 1. The property tax rates before April 1 were between Rs 0.32/sq foot on properties with less than 12m of road width, Rs 0.48 to Rs 2 for roads 12–24 metres wide, and Rs 0.65 to Rs 2.41 for wider roads. The revised rate is between Rs 0.75/sq foot to Rs 4/sq foot.
In March this year, the board passed the proposal to link tax with the DM circle rate. GMC calculates tax based on the annual rental value (ARV) of a property.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Meghalaya Minister claims heavy rains may have caused disappearance of 4,000 metric tonnes of illegally mined coal
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Meghalaya's Cabinet Minister and United Democratic Party MLA from the Kyrmen Shylla has kick started a controversy suggesting that heavy monsoon rains 'may have washed away over 4,000 metric tonnes of illegally mined coal'.The coal has disappeared from two depots in South West Khasi Hills Justice (Retd) B.P. Katakey Committee submitted its 31st interim report to the Meghalaya High told mediapersons in Shillong on Monday that the state's intense rainfall could have contributed to the coal's disappearance from storage sites in Rajaju and Diengngan villages.'I'm not trying to justify anything, but Meghalaya receives one of the highest amounts of rainfall in the country. Anything can happen during such downpours. There are even allegations that floods in Assam were triggered by rains here, and rainwater from East Jaintia Hills flows to Bangladesh. So, who knows—the coal might have been washed away,' Shylla Meghalaya High Court, however, has taken a stern view of the missing Meghalaya Basin Development Authority (MBDA) recorded 1,839.03 MT of coal at a depot in Diengngan village in the Ri-Bhoi district. However, during a recent inspection, only 2.5 MT of coal was found along with residue and traces of only about 8 MT of coal, along with residue and traces of coal, were found at the Rajaju village depot in West Khasi Hills district against 2,121.62 MT of coal recorded by the MBDA earlier.A two-judge division bench of Justices Hamarsan Singh Thangkhiew and Wanlura Diengdoh, in an order, said the matter was of concern as the illegally mined coal had been lifted and transported by unknown people despite high court directed the state government to take urgent steps to identify the individuals or officials responsible for letting the coal said there was no concrete proof to support such claims. 'There are multiple departments monitoring these activities. I believe that if our people engage in this, it is only for survival. Nobody intentionally wants to harm the state,' he National Green Tribunal (NGT) banned the unscientific 'rat-hole mining' and transportation of coal in the state 10 years ago. The Supreme Court later allowed transportation of already mined coal left in the open. Prior to the 2014 ban, coal mining generated approximately Rs 700 crore in annual revenue for March this the first scientific coal mining started in a mine in East Jaintia hills.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Delhi HC upholds Medha Patkar's conviction and sentence in L-G VK Saxena's 2000 defamation case
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday upheld the conviction and sentence of activist Medha Patkar in a defamation case brought by now Delhi Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena against her in 2000. Patkar was accused of making defamatory statements against Saxena in 2000, labelling him a 'coward', and alleging his involvement in hawala transactions. A magistrate court held the statements to be defamatory on May 24, 2024, and on July 1, 2024, Patkar was sentenced to a five-month jail term and was directed to pay a Rs 10 lakh fine. Appealing against the conviction, Patkar had approached the sessions court, which dismissed her appeal on April 2 and upheld the conviction. The sessions court, however, reduced the punishment from a five-month jail term to a one-year probation, and the fine from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 1 lakh in an order on April 8. Pronouncing the verdict in open court, Justice Shalinder Kaur upheld the conviction and sentence while only modifying a condition of the probation. The sessions court had stipulated that Patkar shall appear before the trial court once every 3 months. The Delhi High Court modified this, granting Patkar the liberty to appear physically or virtually or be represented through an advocate during such appearances before the trial court. 'This court finds no illegality, perversity or material irregularity in the findings recorded by the learned trial court/appellate court. The order under challenge appears to have been passed after due consideration of the evidence on record and the applicable law. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate glaring defects from following the procedure or manifest error on the point of law resulting in a grave miscarriage of justice that would justify interference by this revisional jurisdiction…,' Justice Kaur held. A detailed order is awaited to be made public.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Delhi HC upholds Medha Patkar's conviction in defamation case
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday maintained the conviction of activist Medha Patkar in a criminal defamation case filed against her by V.K. Saxena – now Lieutenant Governor of Delhi – back in 2001. A single-judge Bench of Justice Shalinder Kaur rejected the revision plea filed by Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar, challenging a Saket Court's order that had earlier dismissed her criminal appeal and upheld her conviction. Justice Shalinder Kaur observed that Medha Patkar failed to point out any procedural defect that would amount to a miscarriage of justice in the case, noting that her conviction was based on due consideration of the evidence and applicable law. However, in a bit of relief to Patkar, the Delhi High Court modified the probation condition requiring her to appear before the trial court every three months, permitting her to appear virtually or be represented by an advocate. Further, it refused to entertain Medha Patkar's plea challenging the dismissal of her application to introduce a new witness in her defamation case against Saxena. In 2001, Saxena filed two defamation suits against Patkar— one over allegedly derogatory remarks made during a television interview, and the other concerning a press statement. The legal tussle arose from an earlier suit filed by Patkar in 2000, accusing Saxena of publishing defamatory advertisements targeting her and the NBA. In July last year, Metropolitan Magistrate Raghav Sharma sentenced Patkar to five months in jail and ordered her to pay Rs 10 lakh as compensation to Saxena. On appeal, Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Vishal Singh of the Saket Court upheld Patkar's conviction but ordered her to be released on probation of good conduct for a period of one year, subject to prior deposit of a compensation amount of Rs 1 lakh, which will be released in favour of the complainant (Saxena). It had opined that an insensitive approach towards others' reputation and abuse of the right to free speech must be met with criminal sanction, adding that Patkar, being herself a person of repute, must know the value of one's reputation and how defamation can result in loss of face and public esteem of the victim. Advocate Gajinder Kumar, along with advocates Kiran Jai, Chandra Shekhar, Drishti, and Somya Arya, represented L-G Saxena before the Delhi High Court.
