PMX gets all-round grilling after his RM8.13b 'potential investments' from Italy unveiling
Man-on-the-street Malaysians are certainly getting bolder by the day for they already know how to distinguish between potential or pledged investment from actual, realised or approved investment.
Such rudimentary economic knowledge is essential given every time Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim embarks on an official visit abroad, the 'billion-ringgit sign' is bound to flash as fruits from his overseas exploits.
But as the degree of trust deficit widens in tandem with expansion in the Sales and Service Tax (SST) scope effective July 1, it seems that Malaysians at large who have grown accustomed to the 'potential investment' phrase have begun to equate it as nothing more than a 'promotional gimmick'.
As spill-over effect from the SST and electricity tariff review will prompt traders to raise prices, thus burning a bigger hole in their pockets (coupled with concerns over the RON95 subsidy pullback soon), it seems that every action of the Madani government has come under scrutiny.
This is evident with a ' self-praise' post on the PKR Facebook page of PMX unveiling that 'Malaysia is successful of netting RM8.13 bil in potential investment in Italy' which has since garnered 15K likes, 8.3K comments and 381 shares at the time of writing.
'What has been the outcome from potential investments unveiled during previous trips? Have they been realised? Hope there is news coverage on this … Or is the so-called 'potential'(investment) merely a DREAM,' wondered a commenter whose comment top the list with 1.3K likes.
Others snubbed PMX for either deceiving either Malaysians with his 'billion' trademark every time he steps out of the country or 'only bring home rude surprises (ie in the form of new taxes)'.
This is when a commenter advised PMX 'not to disclose (the figures) when still in 'potential' stage' but only to do so once he can confirm that the investments he brought home had been realised or approved.
This led to Madani government chieftain been hailed as 'Bapa Potensi' (on top of few other earlier unceremonious titles such as Cukaiman and father of national taxation) with some commenters bluntly ticking him off 'for glaringly bluffing the masses'.
Opposition has a field day
Adding fuel to fire is the opposition faction with twice former premier and PMX's former mentor-turned-nemesis Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad leading the chorus with his sarcasm, 'Bapa FDI is at it again'.
'Already RM680 bil (BILLION) has come (in). You cannot see it because the factories are invisible,' teased the centenarian who is now the Perikatan Nasional (PN) adviser in a post on X.
BAPA FDI
1. Hooray.
2. Now Italy 'is set to invest RM8.13 billion in Malaysia'. Great!
3. Wait for France and Brazil? More billions.
4. 'Bapa FDI' is at it again.
5. Already RM680 bil. (BILLION) has come.
6. You cannot see it because the factories are…
— Dr Mahathir Mohamad (@chedetofficial) July 4, 2025
'In the meantime, (the) Mahakaya have to pay tax. Not the Mahamiskin (yet) somehow indirectly the miskin suffers. We want more visit to foreign countries so that more invisible FDI will come.'
Former Barisan Nasional (BN) strategic communication deputy director Datuk Eric See-To applauded PMX's latest economic gallantry by listing down a slew of previously reported 'potential investments' (from various overseas trips since PMX assumed premiership on Nov 24, 2022).
Referring to The Star report, pro-opposition cybertrooper jediMASTER (@jedimaster909) enlightened that what claimed to be 'potential investment' is 'Malaysia paying out to Italy' for the purchase of:
28 Leonardo AW149 helicopters
Multi Role Support Ships (MRSS)
Littoral Mission Ships (LMS)
Two maritime patrol aircrafts
So Anwar & PH claiming RM8 billions deals signed in Italy!
Msia to purchase:
– 28 Leonardo AW149 Helicopters
– Multi Role Support Ships (MRSS)
– Littoral Mission Ships (LMS)
– 2 Maritime Patrol Aircraft's
🤦♀️🤦♂️
This is Msia Paying Out to Italy! pic.twitter.com/VHgjZ9pkyb
— jediMASTER (@jedimaster909) July 4, 2025
Central PAS Information Committee Research and Policy Department director Nurul Islam Mohamed Yusoff wondered if the magical RM8.13 bil was 'recycled from an old investment report' of a joint venture between PETRONAS and Eni S.P.A in Pengerang, Johor in the sustainable aviation fuel sector.
'If you research, you will find news about the collaboration which was announced on July 26, 2024 whereby. PETRONAS, Eni S.P.A and Euglena Co Ltd reached an investment agreement to build a bio-refinery in Pengerang,' revealed the PAS activist in a Facebook post.
'This story has long settled but because we want to paint a beautiful picture from PMX's latest trip, the best resort is to recycle an old story'. – July 6, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
41 minutes ago
- The Star
Tax reform journey – A long and arduous road
SINCE the 2000s, Malaysia has been continually advancing tax reforms, adjusting these in response to the nation's fiscal needs, economic developments and the demands of businesses and the public. Among the most impactful reforms was the goods and services tax (GST), introduced during former premier Datuk Seri Najib Razak's administration in 2015. Although globally recognised as a more transparent and fair tax system, its execution was somehow flawed. Delays in input tax refunds severely affected businesses' cash flow, and rising prices led to public discontent, resulting in the cancellation of GST in less than five years due to political pressure. Following the GST's cancellation, filling the resulting revenue gap became a key challenge for the new government. Since Budget 2022, several tax reform measures have been announced each year. These include the tax identification number, voluntary disclosure programmes by the Customs Department and Inland Revenue Board, tax compliance certificates, taxation on overseas income remitted to Malaysia, low-value goods tax, capital gains tax, personal shareholder dividend tax and subsidy rationalisation policies. These aimed to improve the nation's financial situation and close tax evasion and avoidance loopholes. Over the past two years, significant reforms have included electronic invoicing and the expansion and adjustment of the sales and service tax (SST) rates. Initially, e-invoicing was to be implemented in four stages, with full implementation by Jan 1, 2027. However, the timeline has been revised several times, most recently to July 1, 2026, with exemptions for micro-businesses earning less than RM500,000 annually. These frequent changes have led many to expect further reversals, prompting delays in action. The extension was partly due to realistic pressures, as many small and medium enterprises remain unfamiliar with e-invoicing, and misinformation is widespread. Rushing implementation without adequate training, departmental coordination and system readiness could lead to chaos. The expansion of the SST faced similar issues. The swift announcement and implementation left businesses with insufficient time to understand and prepare. Industry groups highlighted flaws, urging guideline revisions. Consequently, within a week of the announcement, exemptions, amendments and adjustments occurred. While listening to public feedback is necessary, obvious issues could have been resolved during policy drafting through comprehensive consultation, avoiding post-announcement amendments. Frequent policy reversals not only create confusion but also damage government credibility. The expanded SST took effect on July 1, and while ministers and experts claimed its impact on prices would be minimal, many industry groups disagree. The market's reaction remains to be seen, and the government, especially the Domestic Trade and Costs of Living Ministry, must monitor prices closely. Price increases Regardless, some goods and services will see price increases due to higher SST. Whether this expansion helps improve the nation's financial situation remains a question. In fact, both the government and the business community, having experienced GST and SST, understand that the GST, with its input and output tax offset mechanism, is the most effective tax system. It doesn't accumulate taxes nor increase costs of goods and services due to its tax offset mechanism; moreover, most essential goods are zero-rated or exempt. If the government effectively monitors prices and efficiently handles refunds, the public's impact wouldn't be as severe as perceived. However, the SST mechanism causes tax layers to accumulate throughout the supply process. While it appears businesses bear the tax, they inevitably pass on the increased costs to consumers to maintain margins. Direct or indirect impact Despite assurances that only a limited range of services and products are affected, consumers inevitably face direct or indirect impacts. For instance, businesses paying an additional 8% service tax on rent will transfer this cost to consumers, affecting competitiveness and raising product or service prices. The public's lack of understanding of the GST mechanism, coupled with previous implementation shortcomings, fuels resistance to its reintroduction. Although the government repeatedly states it won't reintroduce GST soon, recent tax measures reflect GST principles. Essentially, we're implementing GST mechanisms without the name. Tax reform, no matter how comprehensive, will inevitably impact livelihoods and business costs initially. However, if the reform direction is correct, it benefits the nation's fiscal health and economic development in the long run. Sufficient time needed The government must not only increase revenue but also allow sufficient time for engagement and consultation before implementing new policies or systems. Educating businesses and the public on the necessity and details of new tax systems prevents policy reversals and misinformation, avoiding a repeat of the GST's past failures. Balancing government revenue with public welfare, especially for middle and low-income groups, without overly burdening high-income individuals is challenging. It requires effective inter-departmental and ministry coordination and tests our leaders' resolve to drive necessary but unpopular reforms for the nation's long-term development. Datuk Koong Lin Loong is the managing partner of Reanda LLKG International. He is also the treasurer general cum chairman of SME committee, The Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysia. The views expressed here are the wirter's own.
![[UPDATED] AGC: Allegations of irregularities in judicial appointments unfounded, speculative](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FAGC13-6_c87295008fbd4bbc8ef3673828c9caa3_1751943461.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] AGC: Allegations of irregularities in judicial appointments unfounded, speculative](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] AGC: Allegations of irregularities in judicial appointments unfounded, speculative
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has dismissed allegations of irregularities and delays in judicial appointments, saying that such claims must be assessed within the framework of the Federal Constitution. Responding to public statements made by Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli and several other PKR members of Parliament yesterday (July 7), the AGC said the prime minister cannot be viewed merely as a conduit for recommendations from any party, as he holds a constitutional responsibility to advise the King on judicial appointments. This duty, the statement said, is essential to safeguard the independence, credibility and integrity of the judiciary. The AGC added that the King had consented to the appointment of several High Court and Court of Appeal judges last month, but that these appointments were still undergoing necessary formalities. "Such appointments must be conducted with proper order and decorum," it said. Addressing claims that a Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) meeting had been convened without sufficient notice, the AGC said that under Section 13(2) of the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009 (Act 695), the JAC is empowered to regulate its own procedures. In urgent circumstances, meetings can proceed with short notice if all members agree. "Procedural matters should not invalidate the JAC's deliberations unless there is clear evidence of mala fide intent or prejudice," it added. The AGC also addressed a serious allegation involving a Federal Court judge allegedly influencing judicial decisions and judge reassignments. It said deliberations within the JAC are legally protected and remain confidential, and such claims cannot be equated with proven misconduct or taken as a threat to judicial independence. "These remain premature and purely speculative allegations," it said. The AGC added that comparisons with the 2007 VK Lingam case were unwarranted, as that case involved clear evidence of interference, which led to the formation of a royal commission of inquiry (RCI). "In contrast, the current situation is based merely on unsubstantiated claims," the AGC said. Yesterday (July 7), nine PKR MPs called for an RCI to investigate what they claimed were alleged irregularities in the appointment of senior judges, including the Chief Justice. He claimed that nominations for the positions of Chief Justice and President of the Court of Appeal had already been decided by the JAC before the retirement of Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat and submitted to the prime minister, but the appointments were not made, resulting in the current vacancies. He also claimed a JAC meeting was called last Friday without adhering to the required 10-day notice period, allegedly to renominate candidates for the vacant positions. Led by Pandan MP and former PKR deputy president Rafizi, the group said they would formally request that proceedings and an inquiry be conducted by the Parliamentary Special Select Committee on Human Rights, Elections and Institutional Reform, including top government officials to testify. "The Parliament, as an independent legislative body, must play a key role in safeguarding the independence of the judiciary," he said in a special press conference. Rafizi outlined four issues surrounding the judicial appointment controversy which are now circulating in the public domain that require clarification from the government. This includes that in the appointment of new judges (whether to the High Court, Court of Appeal, or Federal Court), nominations submitted by the JAC to the government were not acted upon in a timely manner, leading to urgent vacancies.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
No judicial crisis in Malaysia, says AGC amid calls for RCI over top court vacancies
KUALA LUMPUR, July 8 — The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) has dismissed claims that Malaysia is facing a judicial crisis, rejecting calls for a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) or a parliamentary select committee to investigate judicial appointments. In a statement today, the AGC said the current situation does not constitute a constitutional crisis, and that the appointment process is proceeding in accordance with the Federal Constitution, according to a report published today in Free Malaysia Today. 'Discrepancies in timing or procedure related to appointments do not automatically amount to a constitutional crisis,' the AGC said. Citing Article 122B, the AGC explained that superior court judges are appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the prime minister, following consultation with the Conference of Rulers. While Parliament may review governance issues, the AGC warned against politicising the roles of the prime minister or the King, saying such matters must be handled in line with constitutional principles. The statement follows demands by Pandan MP Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli and several PKR lawmakers for an RCI amid delays in naming new top judicial figures, including the chief justice. Responding to claims of procedural flaws, including alleged short-notice meetings by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), the AGC said such meetings are valid if members agree and no clear evidence of misconduct is present. The AGC also rejected 'speculative' accusations that a Federal Court judge influenced judicial decisions or postings, adding that JAC deliberations are legally protected and should not be misinterpreted as wrongdoing. It further said comparisons to the VK Lingam case in 2007, which resulted in an RCI, were 'unwarranted' due to the lack of solid evidence in the current situation. The AGC urged all parties to respect the separation of powers and avoid public pressure or political rhetoric that could compromise institutional credibility. Concerns over a judicial crisis arose ahead of the mandatory retirement of then Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat and Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim last week. Chief Judge of Malaya Datuk Seri Hasnah Hashim is now acting chief justice, while Federal Court judge Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof is serving as acting Court of Appeal president. Sarawak PKR information chief Abun Sui Anyit also said calls for an RCI were unnecessary, pointing to Article 131A of the constitution, which allows a Federal Court judge to assume interim duties to maintain judicial continuity. He stressed that judicial appointments involve four key institutions — the JAC, the prime minister, the Conference of Rulers, and the King — and are not solely decided by the executive.
