The European Disease: Germany Enters The Debt Spiral
On Thursday, Handelsblatt reported a new budget gap. By 2029, previously unfunded additional debts are expected to grow from €144 billion to €150 billion, according to several government sources. These are not part of the planned federal debt but come on top of it. Most recently, the coalition agreed to bring forward a planned pension supplement for mothers to 2027, adding another €4.5 billion in spending.
It must be said clearly: Under Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Germany has abandoned its last efforts at fiscal seriousness and conservative budgeting. The costs of a shaky coalition's political consensus, designed to avoid conflict, are being offloaded onto taxpayers.
These numbers are already alarming—but we are still in the calm before the storm. In 2025, the net new debt ratio is expected to reach 3.2% of GDP. This includes roughly €82 billion in new federal debt, €15 billion in additional borrowing from states and municipalities, and about €37 billion in federal 'special funds'—off-budget shadow debt.
This forecast will collapse the moment the German economy sinks deeper into recession. Rising unemployment and falling tax revenues will put further strain on the federal budget and social welfare funds. While politicians still feel safe with public debt at 63% of GDP, once we include the €1 trillion debt program of the Merz government, debt levels could surpass 90% of GDP by the end of the decade.
Germany is now practicing a kind of fiscal policy most citizens are unfamiliar with. Mediterranean habits have arrived—but not in the form of sunny weather, rather in the mismanagement of public finances.
In a display of unprecedented hubris, German politics has kept its welfare state wide open for migration-driven poverty over the past decade—causing not only fiscal but also cultural and economic disarray. Added to this is the aging population and a self-inflicted economic crisis. All signs in the welfare system now point toward disaster.
By 2025, a combined deficit of over €55 billion is expected — foremost in statutory health insurance, which will run a record shortfall of nearly €47 billion. Long-term care insurance adds a further €1.6 billion in losses, and the pension fund faces a shortfall of roughly €7 billion.
Once touted as a system 'fit for future generations,' Germany's welfare model has become a bottomless pit. Federal bailouts, emergency loans, and ever-higher contributions now characterize a social state entering the early phase of collapse.
Vae victis — woe to the vanquished — and blessed are those who foresaw this descent and had the means to escape the welfare-state trap. The bill is now being paid by the quietly suffering workforce — the heroes who absorb the fallout from the reckless debt policies through their labor and lost time.
Social policy today is primarily a repair shop for damage caused by political interventionism. In trying to fuse artificial social glue into society, the state's share of GDP has risen to 50%. Despite massive tax hikes—think CO2 levies, road tolls, property taxes, and cold progression—the gap between government spending and actual tax revenue keeps widening.
Since pre-lockdown times, public spending has jumped by around one-third, while real tax revenues have only increased by 14%. Even an economic illiterate could deduce that this mismatch requires structural correction—urgently.
But there's no sign of retreat in Berlin. The political competition among statist parties—including the CDU—produces only one outcome: larger social budgets, endless benefit promises, and deeper interference in the economy.
With dogmatic loyalty to climate policy and open-border ideology, the German state stumbles blindly toward a crossroads. Budgetary crises can't be timed—they arrive when governments lose the ability to borrow on the capital markets. As Hemingway once said about bankruptcy: 'First slowly, then suddenly.'
Once that moment comes—when bond markets say no—a society faces two paths: total statism or radical economic liberalism. In the former, both energy and capital markets fall under state control, as economic management turns authoritarian. This is the road Germany is currently on.
The alternative is the one Argentina has chosen under President Javier Milei—symbolized by his now-famous chainsaw. That route returns to a civilization based on limited government, confined to protecting internal and external security.
Whether we like it or not, we are all part of a vast social experiment. The question is: Can Europe shed its degenerative socialism—the ideology that has inflicted so much harm on the continent and the world—or will we fall back into infantile patterns, refusing reform out of fear and sentimentality?
France's budget debate and political paralysis offer a preview of our own future. The French state quota has climbed to 57%. Its open-border policies have failed. Its bloated welfare state has made the country ungovernable.
All this culminates in a permanent state of government crisis—translating into a collapse in public trust. Economic volatility, long suppressed by the welfare state, is now erupting as social unrest in the streets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
9 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
EU probes UAE oil giant's purchase of Germany's Covestro
The European Commission yesterday announced an investigation into the takeover of German chemical firm Covestro by UAE state oil giant ADNOC, citing competition fears. "The commission has preliminary concerns that foreign subsidies granted by the United Arab Emirates could distort the EU internal market," a statement by the bloc's executive arm said. Plastics maker Covestro accepted a bid -- valuing the company at 12 billion euros ($14 billion) -- from the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company in October. The acquisition came as Germany's key chemicals sector, which makes up around five percent of the country's GDP, has been gripped by crisis. Brussels said it was investigating to see if subsidies from the UAE had allowed ADNOC to outbid competitors for the firm and would help it pump investments into Covestro that would skew the market. The commission said it would wrap up its probe and take a decision on any potential next steps by December 2. ADNOC promised to inject around 1.2 billion euros into the chemicals firm through the issuance of new shares under the terms of the takeover. Challenges facing Germany's energy-intensive chemicals industry show no signs of abating. Weak demand and high energy costs in the wake of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine have weighed on producers and led them to cut back on production in Germany. Covestro, which makes chemicals used in everything from building insulation to electric vehicles, had unveiled a savings plan ahead of the takeover announcement last year.
Daily Tribune
12 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Dollar rises on EU-US trade deal but European stocks turn sour
The dollar jumped Monday on the back of the US-EU trade deal, but the main European stock markets fell, reflecting unease at terms viewed as lopsided. Frankfurt closed sharply down, as shares in German carmakers plunged. Paris dipped, while London -- outside the EU -- also receded. In New York, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq rose, while the Dow largely traded flat. While Brussels defended the deal it struck on the weekend as 'better than a trade war with the United States', several EU countries expressed unhappiness. European capitals saw the agreement's 15% tariffs on most EU exports to the United States -- but none on US ones to the EU -- as skewed. As part of the deal, President Donald Trump said the bloc had agreed to purchase '$750 billion worth of energy' from the United States, and make $600 billion in additional investments. 'While the deal has avoided a much worse outcome for now, it remains to be seen whether it will last,' cautioned Jack Allen-Reynolds, a eurozone economist at Capital Economics. With average US tariffs on EU imports now around 17%, 'we think this will reduce EU GDP by about 0.2%,' he said. He predicted that 'uncertainty is likely to remain high' because Trump 'could still change his mind even after the deal has been finalised and signed'. Oil prices rose strongly. That was partly on relief from the deal -- but also because Trump shortened a deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine to August 7 or 9, after which he vowed to sanction countries buying its crude. Monday also saw the start of a fresh round of trade negotiations between China and the United States ahead of August 12, when a 90-day truce between the economic superpowers is scheduled to end. Shares in European companies tracked the unease at the EU-US deal. Volkswagen, BMW and Porsche all shed more than three% as the implications of high tariffs on their exports to the United States sank in. In Paris, shares in Pernod Ricard, which exports wine and spirits to the United States, fell more than 3%. Shares in Dutch brewer Heineken -- the world's second-biggest beer-maker -- lost more than 8% in Amsterdam after it announced a drop in sales. Traders were prepared for a busy week in the United States, with a slew of corporate earnings reports -- including from Apple, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon -- and macro data readings coming their way giving indications about US jobs and growth. The Federal Reserve is expected to keep interest rates unchanged at its meeting this week, with investors focused on its outlook for the rest of the year given Trump's tariffs and recent trade deals. What did EU, US agree? Both sides confirmed there will be a 15-percent acrossthe-board rate on a majority of EU goods -- the same level secured by Japan this month. Most significantly, that means a tariff reduction for the EU auto sector from the 27.5 percent carmakers had been forced to pay. While 15 percent is much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods -- averaging 4.8 percent -- it mirrors the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 percent imposed by Trump since April. The EU also agreed its companies would buy $750 billion of liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels from the United States -- split equally over three years -- to replace Russian energy sources. And it said it would pour $600 billion in additional investments in the United States -- based on the "investment intentions of private companies" in the bloc, a senior EU official explained. A White House factsheet said EU countries -- which recently pledged to ramp up defence spending within NATO -- "agreed to purchase significant amounts of US military equipment." But the EU official said arms procurement was not "agreed or discussed" -- suggesting Washington was alluding to purchases expected independently from the trade agreement. Will any goods be tarifffree? The White House said the deal involved 'the elimination of all EU tariffs on US industrial goods'. Brussels meanwhile said the leaders had agreed bilateral tariff exemptions for key goods -- with the exact list still to be finalised. The EU official said the bloc was ready to lower levies to zero percent on US cars, machinery products, some chemicals and items linked to fertilisers -- which could be an alternative to Russian sources. In exchange, the official said, Washington was expected to eliminate levies on European aircraft, certain medical devices and some pharmaceuticals for which the United States depends on EU imports. Discussions are ongoing about European alcohol exports becoming tariff-free -- including wine. The EU official also said the bloc would be willing to do away with levies on certain US products taxed at very low rates -- in the order of one to four percent -- including nuts, lobster, fish, dairy and pet food. Are there sector-specific terms? Semiconductors and pharmaceuticals are currently the target of US trade probes that could see Trump impose massive levies. Under the deal struck Sunday, the EU says the United States has agreed that whatever the outcome of those investigations, those sectors will not be taxed at more than 15 percent. The White House said pharmaceuticals and semiconductors would indeed be taxed at that rate. Protecting pharmaceuticals -- a major EU export to the United States and a critical sector for Ireland -- was a priority in the bloc's negotiations. Steel was another key area -- which along with copper and aluminium is currently facing a 50-percent US tariff. The White House said those sectoral tariffs 'will remain unchanged' but that it would 'discuss securing supply chains for these products' with the EU. But the EU official said the understanding was a certain quota of steel -- based on historic levels -- would enter the United States before the 50-percent levy kicks in. What happens next? The deal needs to be approved by EU states, under a process to be determined by what legal form the final agreement takes, the EU official said. On the US side, the majority of the undertakings are expected to be carried out by executive order. The EU had prepared a $109-billion retaliation package against US goods, which was due to take effect from August 7. Brussels will suspend the measures once Trump publishes his executive order.
Gulf Insider
a day ago
- Gulf Insider
The European Disease: Germany Enters The Debt Spiral
Germany is on a path to losing its reputation as a fiscally responsible state. Through unchecked spending, the federal government is steering the country into stormy waters. On Thursday, Handelsblatt reported a new budget gap. By 2029, previously unfunded additional debts are expected to grow from €144 billion to €150 billion, according to several government sources. These are not part of the planned federal debt but come on top of it. Most recently, the coalition agreed to bring forward a planned pension supplement for mothers to 2027, adding another €4.5 billion in spending. It must be said clearly: Under Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Germany has abandoned its last efforts at fiscal seriousness and conservative budgeting. The costs of a shaky coalition's political consensus, designed to avoid conflict, are being offloaded onto taxpayers. These numbers are already alarming—but we are still in the calm before the storm. In 2025, the net new debt ratio is expected to reach 3.2% of GDP. This includes roughly €82 billion in new federal debt, €15 billion in additional borrowing from states and municipalities, and about €37 billion in federal 'special funds'—off-budget shadow debt. This forecast will collapse the moment the German economy sinks deeper into recession. Rising unemployment and falling tax revenues will put further strain on the federal budget and social welfare funds. While politicians still feel safe with public debt at 63% of GDP, once we include the €1 trillion debt program of the Merz government, debt levels could surpass 90% of GDP by the end of the decade. Germany is now practicing a kind of fiscal policy most citizens are unfamiliar with. Mediterranean habits have arrived—but not in the form of sunny weather, rather in the mismanagement of public finances. In a display of unprecedented hubris, German politics has kept its welfare state wide open for migration-driven poverty over the past decade—causing not only fiscal but also cultural and economic disarray. Added to this is the aging population and a self-inflicted economic crisis. All signs in the welfare system now point toward disaster. By 2025, a combined deficit of over €55 billion is expected — foremost in statutory health insurance, which will run a record shortfall of nearly €47 billion. Long-term care insurance adds a further €1.6 billion in losses, and the pension fund faces a shortfall of roughly €7 billion. Once touted as a system 'fit for future generations,' Germany's welfare model has become a bottomless pit. Federal bailouts, emergency loans, and ever-higher contributions now characterize a social state entering the early phase of collapse. Vae victis — woe to the vanquished — and blessed are those who foresaw this descent and had the means to escape the welfare-state trap. The bill is now being paid by the quietly suffering workforce — the heroes who absorb the fallout from the reckless debt policies through their labor and lost time. Social policy today is primarily a repair shop for damage caused by political interventionism. In trying to fuse artificial social glue into society, the state's share of GDP has risen to 50%. Despite massive tax hikes—think CO2 levies, road tolls, property taxes, and cold progression—the gap between government spending and actual tax revenue keeps widening. Since pre-lockdown times, public spending has jumped by around one-third, while real tax revenues have only increased by 14%. Even an economic illiterate could deduce that this mismatch requires structural correction—urgently. But there's no sign of retreat in Berlin. The political competition among statist parties—including the CDU—produces only one outcome: larger social budgets, endless benefit promises, and deeper interference in the economy. With dogmatic loyalty to climate policy and open-border ideology, the German state stumbles blindly toward a crossroads. Budgetary crises can't be timed—they arrive when governments lose the ability to borrow on the capital markets. As Hemingway once said about bankruptcy: 'First slowly, then suddenly.' Once that moment comes—when bond markets say no—a society faces two paths: total statism or radical economic liberalism. In the former, both energy and capital markets fall under state control, as economic management turns authoritarian. This is the road Germany is currently on. The alternative is the one Argentina has chosen under President Javier Milei—symbolized by his now-famous chainsaw. That route returns to a civilization based on limited government, confined to protecting internal and external security. Whether we like it or not, we are all part of a vast social experiment. The question is: Can Europe shed its degenerative socialism—the ideology that has inflicted so much harm on the continent and the world—or will we fall back into infantile patterns, refusing reform out of fear and sentimentality? France's budget debate and political paralysis offer a preview of our own future. The French state quota has climbed to 57%. Its open-border policies have failed. Its bloated welfare state has made the country ungovernable. All this culminates in a permanent state of government crisis—translating into a collapse in public trust. Economic volatility, long suppressed by the welfare state, is now erupting as social unrest in the streets.
