Minister doubles down on colleague's claim Farage on side of Jimmy Savile
Asked if she agrees with Mr Kyle's statement, Ms Alexander told Sky News: 'Nigel Farage is, in effect, saying that he is on their side because he's saying he's wanting to repeal the Online Safety Act.
'I think that the position of Reform in saying that they want to repeal the entirety of the Online Safety Act, which is one of the most important pieces of legislation when it comes to the protecting of our children and the safety of young people online, I think that, in effect, what Nigel Farage is saying is that he's totally happy for there to be a free for all on the internet.
Heidi Alexander said Nigel Farage is 'happy for there to be a free for all on the internet' (James Manning/PA)
'That's not the position of the Labour Government. It's not the position of me. It's not the position of Keir Starmer or Peter Kyle, and that is the point that the Technology Secretary was rightly making yesterday.'
Mr Farage has demanded an apology from Mr Kyle, describing the remarks as 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'.
Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, the minister had said: 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side.
'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.'
Following this, Clacton MP Mr Farage urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed.
Writing in the Telegraph, Mr Kyle said proposals to overturn the Act 'makes my blood boil', as he argued repealing it would benefit 'disgusting predators who contact children and groom them online'.
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said repealing the Act would benefit predators (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
He added: 'I make no apologies for putting the interests of vulnerable children ahead of the interests of predators and child abusers – and the Reform leader's ego.'
Also writing for the newspaper, Mr Farage said 'all of this is of course a deflection from the real problem with the Online Safety Act', as he raised concerns over ID checks.
He added: 'In the name of safety, the Act poses the biggest threat to freedom of speech in this country in our lifetimes.
'In the name of protecting children, the law aims to regulate what adults are allowed to say or see – while doing nothing to make our children safer.'
Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said making statements about overturning the Bill is 'very lazy' and 'not responsible'.
Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide.
Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone.
'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.'
The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
27 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Former Monmouth Conservative candidate defects to Reform UK
Hannah Jarvis, a former deputy chairman of Monmouthshire Conservatives who has stood for the Welsh Conservatives in two general elections and two Police and Crime Commissioner elections, announced her switch to Reform UK, citing the party's commitment to veterans and national priorities. Ms Jarvis, a veteran and mother of two who recently returned from delivering medical supplies to troops in Ukraine, said: "It's time to put country first, and Reform UK are the only party that recognise the concerning state our nation is in and that are serious about tackling the issues that matter to the people of Wales and the UK." She highlights the amount of support for Reform UK that is growing across Monmouthshire. Ms Jarvis said: "I have been overwhelmed at the amount of support for Reform across Monmouthshire, reflecting the strength of feeling of the need for a real change in the county and country – as the polling shows. "The Conservatives have ignored the concerns of the membership for too long and the diminishing party shows just how far they've fallen." She believes Reform UK is the only party prioritising the needs of the armed forces and veterans, pointing to its proposals for a dedicated veterans ministry and an Armed Forces Justice Bill. Her defection follows those of South East Wales MS Laura Anne Jones and former Monmouthshire Conservative chairman Barrie O'Keefe. Ms Jones said: "It's clear with every day that passes that Reform has all the momentum in Welsh politics. "It is great to hear that Hannah is now coming on board too, with her experience and tenacity. "Reform Wales have only just got started, and over the coming months we intend to show everyone our made-in-Wales plans to Reform Wales." She says that Reform is the 'only party' offering 'real change' from what she calls the 'failures of establishment parties at both end of the M4.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Police should be 'more transparent' over suspects, says home secretary
Police should reveal the ethnicity and immigration status of criminal suspects, Yvette Cooper has said. The home secretary told Sky News there needs to be "greater transparency" about people arrested and charged, with the Law Commission conducting a review of guidance in this area. The issue has been the subject of debate in a series of high-profile cases, including recently over the charging of two men - reported to be Afghan asylum seekers - over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. The suspects' ethnicities have not been confirmed. Asked if she thought police should routinely reveal this detail, as Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has called for, Ms Cooper said: "We want more information, more transparency, and more information to be provided. "We've said this for some time, and it's why we asked the Law Commission to accelerate their review into the issues around contempt of court, because that's about what information can be released once there are legal proceedings underway, once there's a trial process under way." Contempt of Court rules restrict the information that police can put out on the basis that it could prejudice a suspect's right to a fair trial. Speaking later to BBC Radio Four, Ms Cooper said that while it is an operational decision for police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to decide what information to reveal in individual cases, "we do think that the guidance needs to change". Mr Farage has argued that retaining details on ethnicity and immigration status helps fuel unrest, as seen in the riots last summer after the Southport stabbings, when false rumours spread online that killer Axel Rudakubana was a Muslim asylum seeker. "What caused unrest on our streets after Southport last year was us not being told the status of the attacker. That led to crazy conspiracy theories spreading online," the Clacton MP said at a news conference on Monday. Referring to the alleged rape in Nuneaton, Mr Farage said police should "spell out the basic and sober facts", calling the lack of detail about the suspects' ethnicity "a cover-up that in many ways is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings". The force has defended its decision not to release further details of the suspects, saying that once someone is charged with an offence they follow national guidance, which "does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status". Asked about the case on Monday, the prime minister's official spokesman said the police and courts were operationally independent but "we should always be as transparent as possible when it comes to cases". A College of Policing spokesman said: "Media relations guidance for police is already under review and is looking at how forces can best balance their obligations under contempt of court legislation with their responsibility to prevent disorder.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Brexit has been a resounding disaster. Starmer must find the courage to change course
Brexit isn't working, and the British people know it. Poll after poll shows that people are feeling the terrible damage caused by the deal forced upon us by Boris Johnson, Kemi Badenoch and the rest of the Conservative party, and want something different. There's no doubt that fundamental change is needed. There's no doubt the public will is there to make it happen. The question is: will Keir Starmer seize the moment and deliver it? There are big prizes on offer if he does. Giving our economy the boost it desperately needs, pulling it out of the cycle of low growth and high debt that the Conservatives plunged us into. Helping to raise more funding to lift our NHS and other public services off their knees. And, crucially, showing people that there is a better, more hopeful way forward than the nasty, nonsensical 'solutions' they hear from Nigel Farage and his fellow snake-oil salespeople on the right. Because people are, understandably, fed up. After so many failures of Conservative and Labour governments, people's faith in politics is at an all-time low. Many people just don't believe that any government of any party can really make their lives better. And beyond our shores, they see a world rife with conflict and instability, making it even harder to envisage our domestic challenges being solved. It's no surprise that all this disillusionment is fuelling the rise of rightwing populists such as Farage. Restoring faith in politics is critical if we are to save our country from a Reform UK-Conservative coalition of chaos. And acting decisively to fix our broken relationship with Europe is Starmer's big chance. To be fair, the prime minister has made some tentative steps in the right direction. He has at least shown a willingness to take a more positive and pragmatic approach to Europe than his Conservative predecessors. He has talked about a youth mobility scheme and bringing down trade barriers in key sectors such as farming and energy. But so far, all these amount to little more than promises to 'work towards' new deals. For all the smiles at the 'reset' summit in May, there's very little in the way of concrete progress to date. Like so much of this government's record, it risks becoming too much like 'continuity Sunak': all process and promises, no real change. But with growth still flatlining, Donald Trump wreaking havoc on the global economy and populism on the march, this challenge is much too urgent for such timidity. Of course, we know why Starmer has been reluctant to go further. He's spooked by the combined threat of the Conservatives and Reform, both of whom are itching for the chance to plunge Britain back into the nasty Brexit wars of the past decade. Well, I say let them try. With so many serious problems in need of urgent solutions, the British people have absolutely no appetite for all that division and distraction, and they will have no truck with politicians who do. The way to see off the populist right isn't to cower in its shadow; it's to step up and offer a compelling, positive alternative. So what does that look like? The first thing the prime minister should do is raise his sights when it comes to negotiating with the EU. This can't be about the odd limited improvement for this sector here or that sector there. The government has to be far more ambitious than just trying to polish up the rough edges of Johnson's bad deal. Just imagine if, instead, the prime minister set a clear target of leading the UK into a new customs union with the EU by 2030. That could be truly transformative. It's the single biggest thing the government could do to turbocharge our economy in the medium and long term. It would set us firmly on the path back to the single market, with all the benefits that would bring. It would be a game-changer – not just for our economy, but for the future of British politics. And not only that. A clear commitment to work towards a customs union would unlock big benefits for the UK now. It would give us the power to finally sign a veterinary and plant health agreement to boost British farming, and secure that youth mobility scheme to give our young people incredible new opportunities to live, work and travel across Europe, while also helping British employers to recruit the workers they need. Or even something less headline-grabbing but potentially just as impactful, such as joining the European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Post-Brexit rules mean that air cargo firms – such as the one run by a constituent of mine – can't have repair work done in Europe, apart from by the single German workshop that is recognised by the UK. It means they have to fly their planes all the way to the US just to get them serviced – at huge expense. With a more ambitious approach to Europe, we could get rid of that ridiculous red tape, and so much more like it. We could free British businesses to get on with their work, create jobs and grow our economy. That is the real change people across the country are crying out for. The opportunity is there and the rewards are great. I really hope the prime minister is listening. Ed Davey is the leader of the Liberal Democrats and MP for Kingston and Surbiton
