
White House says Donald Trump serious about wanting Commanders to revert to Redskins
"The president was serious," Leavitt told reporters Monday while answering questions on the White House driveway. "Sports is one of the many passions of this president and he wants to see the name of that team changed."
Asked why he's getting involved, Leavitt called Trump a "non-traditional president" and said sports fans are behind him on this.
"I think you've seen the president gets involved in a lot of things that most presidents have not," Leavitt said. "He's a non-traditional president. He likes to see results on behalf of the American people and, if you actually poll this issue with sports fans across the country, and even in this city, people actually do support the president's position on this and the name change."
After Congress passed a bill late last year to transfer land from the federal government to the District of Columbia, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and the team reached an agreement in April to build on the site of the old RFK Stadium. That is still pending approval by the Council of the District of Columbia.
"I think the thing that we should focus on in D.C. is doing our part," Bowser said. "I have worked for the better part of 10 years to get our part completed, including getting control of the land, coming to an agreement with the team and advancing a fantastic agreement to the council, so we need to do our part."
Dan Snyder, who had said multiple times as owner since 1999 he would never change the name, did so in July 2020 after facing mounting pressure from sponsors and critics. Washington Football Team was used for two seasons before Commanders was unveiled as the permanent name in early 2022.
'Native Americans are not mascots'
Josh Harris, whose group bought the team from Snyder in 2023, said earlier this year the Commanders name was here to stay.
Savannah Romero, co-founder and deputy director of the Black Liberation-Indigenous Sovereignty Collective, said in a statement Monday responding to Trump that "Native Americans are not mascots."
"To equate Native people with cartoonish mascots alongside animals is a gross and ongoing tactic of dehumanization," said Romero, who is an enrolled member of the Eastern Shoshone Nation.
A spokesperson for the National Congress of American Indians said the organization was working on finalizing a statement.
At least one organization, the Native American Guardians Association, has filed petitions to bring back the Redskins and Cleveland Indians names.
A handful of fans who were asked by The Associated Press for their opinion generally dismissed Trump's comments. Ender Tuncay, who grew up in the Washington area and returns to visit family, called it "typical Trump stupidity."
"It's just him focusing on things that aren't consequential and trying to distract from the actual issues that are going on," Tuncay said, adding he does not care what the name is. "But I'd like them to get the new stadium, for sure. I like this site where it is. My parents used to tell me stories of how great RFK was back when we were really, really good."
Ford Flemmings, who worked as a vendor at the old RFK Stadium, said everyone is on the bandwagon with the name Commanders now that they are winning.
"I liked Washington when it was just plain Washington," Flemmings said. "If they change their name, so be it. I'll still be a Washington, whatever the Washington team is."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
18 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
BATRA'S BURNING QUESTIONS: U.S. signing trade deals around the world, why not with Canada?
KANANASKIS, ALBERTA - JUNE 16: U.S. President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney hold a bilateral meeting during the G7 Leaders' Summit on June 16, 2025 in Kananaskis, Alberta. Canada is hosting this year's meeting of the world's seven largest economies. (Photo by) WATCH: Sun Editor-in-Chief Adrienne Batra talks with political columnists Warren Kinsella and Brian Lilley on how Canada and the U.S. want a trade deal – but can't agree on what kind. What do YOU think? Tell us your thoughts in the comment section below or send us a Letter to the Editor for possible publication to . Letters must be 250 words or less and signed. And don't forget to subscribe to our YouTube Channel. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Sports World Ontario Toronto & GTA Canada


Winnipeg Free Press
18 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
A look at details of the settlement between Columbia University and the Trump administration
A deal between Columbia University and the Trump administration calls for the Ivy League school to pay more than $220 million to resolve multiple federal investigations into alleged violations of federal antidiscrimination laws. The agreement announced Wednesday clears the way for the school to keep billions of dollars in federal research money, including more than $400 million in grants canceled earlier this year. In return, the deal calls for a number of reforms in areas such as admissions, campus protests policies and its curriculum, including a number of changes the school agreed to previously in March. It is a document President Donald Trump's administration is calling a road map for settlements with other colleges accused of not doing enough to address campus antisemitism. Columbia University's acting president, Claire Shipman, said it protects the school's values and autonomy. Here's what's in the settlement: Financial payout The university will pay the federal government $200 million over three years. It will also pay $21 million to settle alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees that occurred following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. A pledge to end diversity programs The university agreed to end programs 'that promote unlawful efforts to achieve race-based outcomes, quotes, diversity targets or similar efforts.' Columbia, as part of the agreement, must also issue regular reports to an independent monitor assuring that its programs 'do not promote unlawful DEI goals.' The agreement pushes Columbia to limit the consideration of race even beyond the Supreme Court's 2023 decision ending affirmative action. That decision left open the possibility that universities could consider an applicant's discussion of how their race affected their life, including in college application essays. The agreement says: 'Columbia may not use personal statements, diversity narratives, or any applicant reference to racial identity as a means to introduce or justify discrimination.' Faculty and curriculum changes Columbia agreed to review its Middle East curriculum and appoint new faculty to its Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies who will 'contribute to a robust and intellectually diverse academic environment.' To further support Jewish students on campus, the agreement calls for a new administrator to serve as a liaison on antisemitism issues. Reporting on international students Columbia University agreed to new vetting for prospective international students. The agreement calls for introducing 'questions designed to elicit their reasons for wishing to study in the United States' and establishes processes to make sure all students are committed to 'civil discourse.' The university also promised to provide the government with information, upon request, of disciplinary actions involving student-visa holders resulting in expulsions or suspensions. 'In several instances, the agreement codifies other practices or policies already in existence, or reviews already underway. We must always comply with government regulations regarding the international student visa program, for example,' Shipman said. The agreement says Columbia also will 'examine its business model and take steps to decrease financial dependence on international student enrollment.' International students make up about 40% of the enrollment at Columbia. Abiding Trump's interpretation on sex discrimination The agreement requires full compliance with the administration's interpretation of Title IX, the federal law barring sex discrimination in education. Trump officials have used the law to force the removal of transgender athletes from women's sports. Campus protest policies The deal calls for Columbia to abide restrictions it agreed to on campus protests, including a ban on face coverings used to conceal demonstrators' identity. It says protests inside academic buildings are not acceptable under the university's code of conduct. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Interprovincial booze barrier to come down in New Brunswick
Residents in New Brunswick won't have to worry if they have to much booze on them when coming into province before long. Sweeping regulatory changes to the province's Liquor Control Act will mean personal exemptions on liquor limits will be no more. Barriers will also be dropped to allow a freer flow of alcoholic beverages between most provinces. 'We have made it clear that we will do whatever we can to support internal trade across the country, and this is an important step,' said Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Jean-Claude D'Amours in a July 7 press release. 'Direct-to-consumer sales of alcoholic beverages will give New Brunswick producers new business opportunities and a chance to access customers they could not reach previously.' The decision is part of a broader effort to drop red tape around interprovincial trade in the wake of an on-going trade war started by U.S. President Donald Trump. New Brunswick has had its interprovincial liquor laws examined before. In 2012 resident Gerard Comeau was fined nearly $300 and had upwards of 14 cases of beer confiscated by officials. 'Can you believe that? Someone being charged and going to court because they buy a case of booze in Quebec and bring it to New Brunswick,' said Ontario Premier Doug Ford during the closing press conference of the First Ministers meeting in Ontario's cottage country Wednesday. New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt was quick to jump in and mention how her province has eliminated the personal exemption and is working, like other provinces, to reduce the constraints around interprovincial trade. This includes the introduction of direct-to-consumer sales. 'I think we have made more progress than has been made in the long time on internal trade and removing exemptions, thankfully, with a partner in the federal government who's also being aggressive on that,' Holt told reporters Wednesday in Huntsville, Ont. 'I appreciate the desire to see the details and see the when. I think you'll find friends who are similarly impatient at this table of wanting to get to that simple clean document that all Canadians and entrepreneurs can understand.' Joe Mackay is a co-owner of Yip Cider, a popular cidery in Long Reach, N.B. He said the new regulations won't change a lot for operations in the immediate future. Most of the product brewed onsite is sold in the province, with some kegs shipping to Nova Scotia. He said the big difference will be for consumers. 'The change will just allow consumers to be able to buy the products from other provinces online,' Mackay said. 'This kind of aligns with how consumers like to buy things these days. If they want something, they want to be able to go online and order.' The removal of much of the red tape will make things easier to expand to other markets if and when Yip decides to do so. Then comes the challenge of finding space on shelves in other provincial liquor stores. With many provinces opening their borders for a freer flow of goods, the competition will ramp up. 'At the end of the day, it's basically just competing with the other ciders that are out there and convincing the people that are making the decision on what goes on the shelf that your cider is a good fit and it's something that consumers want,' Mackay said. He adds he would like to see the province continue to support New Brunswick brewers with more options for consumers to pick from at the store.