Crackdown on ‘cruel' imports of kittens and puppies into UK
The legislation, championed by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers, introduces several key provisions.
It will reduce non-commercial animal entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and halt the import of dogs and cats who have been "mutilated", including having their ears docked
Dr Chambers, the Winchester MP, saw his Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill backed by the Government. It now progresses to the House of Lords on its path to becoming law.
Speaking about the proposed legislation, Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.'
He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners.
'To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial.
'Crucially, the Bill places a duty on the Government to use these regulation-making powers to first deliver three key measures – a ban on the import of puppies and kittens under six months old, a ban on the import of heavily pregnant dogs and cats that are more than 42 days pregnant, and a ban on the import of dogs and cats who've been mutilated.'
He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse.
He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation.
'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'
Labour MP Peter Lamb (Crawley) directly named Meta, which owns Facebook, as a company that publishes content featuring animal abuse.
He said: 'There are far too many groups online which are dedicated to animal abuse. Constituents of mine have been involved in attempts to try and shut these groups down over the years.
'They'll also often find that instead of finding support on the part of social media companies, to try and address these problems, instead it is they who are reported and face their own accounts being shut down by those perpetrators.'
He added: 'We cannot rest on our laurels and Meta must be made to answer for the fact that they are not acting to bring an end to animal abuse on their networks, and that they are profiting actively from the advertising which appears on that network, and advertisers must be aware that part of what they are paying for, when they pay to advertise on Facebook, is maintenance of animal abuse networks.'
Environment minister Emma Hardy said: 'These measures represent a crucial step forward in our collective efforts to tackle the pet smuggling trade.'
Ms Hardy added: 'We want to see fewer low-welfare operations supply pets to the GB market and fundamentally less animals to suffer because of this.'
She continued: 'As set out in the Government's manifesto, we are committed to ending puppy smuggling and delivering a better future for our animals and I am pleased to say that this Bill does just that.
'It's key measures deliver crucial recommendations put forward by the Efra (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) select committee and tackle multiple concerns that have been raised by stakeholders regarding loopholes in our current pet travel rules.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
LGBTQ+ figures criticise supreme court's gender ruling at London Pride
Thousands of people gathered in London for Pride on Saturday, but prominent LGBTQIA+ figures at the event voiced concern that transgender people are being 'villainised more than ever'. Singer and actor Olly Alexander and writer Shon Faye were among those to criticise a UK supreme court ruling on the definition of a woman at London's annual celebration of LGBTQI+ communities. Alexander, the Eurovision 2024 contestant, told the PA news agency: 'Trans people right now, they need our support and love more than ever, they're being villainised, demonised in the press, by a lot of the media, and trans people they're just like us … they're you, they're me. 'They deserve the same respect, the same rights, the same privileges, same opportunities, and that's why Pride is so important this year.' In April the supreme court ruled the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Before the march, Faye, author of Love in Exile and The Transgender Issue, said 'we've just seen an unprecedented attack on queer rights and trans rights across the world'. She told PA: 'For the trans community in particular here in the UK, we've seen an onslaught of misinformation, attacks in the media, and unfortunately the roll back of human rights in the courts. 'I think (Pride) is more important than ever – I think a lot of trans people have been made to feel afraid in public space and pride this year is about taking back public space, and showing what we're not going to be silenced, and we're not going to be intimidated.' US pop singer Chaka Khan is headlining a concert in Trafalgar Square after the march, at which about 500 organisations filed from Hyde Park Corner, through Piccadilly Circus and on to Whitehall Place. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: 'It was an honour and a privilege to again walk at the front of London's world-famous Pride parade as huge crowds of Londoners and visitors joined together for an incredible show of love, unity and solidarity with our LGBTQI+ communities. 'The fantastic parade and celebrations across central London have shown once again that our capital is a beacon of inclusivity and diversity. 'This year's event was also a defiant reminder that we must keep fighting for equality and take a stand against those seeking to roll back hard-won rights.' A YouGov poll released before the event found 67% of people in the UK believe the country is inclusive to LGBTQ+ people, and 60% would not welcome a shift towards more negative attitudes. Simon Blake, chief executive of charity Stonewall, which commissioned the survey, said, despite the findings, 'we know many LGBTQ+ people do not feel this in their neighbourhoods and workplaces'.
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Welfare U-turn makes spending decisions harder, minister says
Spending decisions have been made "harder" by the government's U-turn on welfare changes, the education secretary has said, as she did not commit to scrapping the two-child benefit Phillipson told BBC One's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme that ministers were "looking at every lever" to lift children out of she said removing the cap would "come at a cost" and insisted the government was supporting families with the cost of living in other comes after a rebellion of Labour MPs forced the government to significantly water down a package of welfare reforms that would have saved £5bn a year by 2030. The climbdown means the savings will now be delayed or lost entirely, which puts pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves ahead of the autumn its retreat on benefits, the Labour government was considering lifting the two-child benefit cap, a policy that restricts means-tested benefits to a maximum of two children per family for those born after April asked if the chances of getting rid of the cap had diminished, Phillipson said: "The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder."But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty."
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How ‘net zero stupidity' inspired an NHS spending spree
When Sir Simon Stevens unveiled plans for the NHS to become the first healthcare system in the world to hit net zero, the former NHS chief made 'no apologies' for setting the target during Covid. In his words, putting the health service at the forefront of the fight against climate change was vital in tackling the 'most profound long-term threat to the health of the nation'. The NHS has set an ambition to reach net zero emissions from its own activities by 2040 – 10 years ahead of the national target. However, this 'world-leading' objective is now under increasing scrutiny as the NHS faces the biggest crisis in its 75-year history, with more than 7m people stuck on waiting lists and financial pressures mounting. It is not only hospitals and GP surgeries that have been set stretching targets. Suppliers of medicines and medical equipment will also have to hit net zero by 2045 if they want to keep working with the health service. Crucially, the rules will also force all NHS suppliers to publicly report their emissions by 2027, excluding them from bidding for contracts if they fail to make progress on net zero by the end of the decade. Such bold goals are now becoming a target for politicians on the Right, who fear it is adding unnecessary strain on the beleaguered health service. Zia Yusuf, the former chairman of Reform UK, made the point in a damning social media post last month, as he advanced the party's pledge to scrap a target to hit net zero by 2050. 'Instead of prioritising the record waiting lists or the tens of thousands who wait more than three days in A&E each year, the Westminster elite decided the NHS should achieve net zero by 2040 and for NHS suppliers by 2045,' he said. 'All these insane rules result in taxpayers endlessly forced to put more into the NHS and yet struggle to see a doctor.' Underpinning the argument are concerns that strict net zero targets will increase costs for the 80,000 suppliers that work with the NHS, pushing up a procurement bill already at £27bn a year. The timing of the debate is also key, coming just days after the Labour Government announced its 10-year plan to reform the NHS. Despite growing strain on the public finances, Sir Keir Starmer has demanded that every part of the country must offer access to care six days a week in what he promised was 'one of the most seismic shifts in care in the history of the health service'. Edward Argar, the shadow health secretary, says this planned and costly overhaul makes it even more important to avoid distractions such as net zero. He says: 'The NHS needs to be focusing its energy and its funding first and foremost on what makes a direct difference for patients, what will improve the quality of their care, and what will improve their access to it.' Chris Naylor, a senior fellow at the King's Fund charity, argues that the strict climate targets will help businesses that work with the NHS to plan ahead and prepare for the future. 'What suppliers for the NHS often say is, 'We just want to know what it is we're going to be required to do and to be given some notice of that,'' he says. 'I think this supplier roadmap does that.' Yet even he admits that the impact on smaller suppliers could be disproportionate. 'I do think it's really important that support is available to them around stuff like carbon measurement,' he says. According to a recent report from the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), only 15pc of small firms have measured their carbon footprint, posing a significant challenge for many suppliers if they want to compete for NHS contracts in future. Of the small businesses that have been asked to measure their emissions by the Government, only 35pc were able to do so. This highlights the growing risks associated with embracing decarbonisation too quickly, even if the NHS argues some of its net zero plans will help save money. A spokesman points to a planned £59m of savings in travel and transport, which they say will be reinvested into patient care. Yet such small savings will do little to help win the argument against net zero sceptics, particularly as more hospitals lose money and battle high waiting lists. Research published earlier this year by the think tank Nuffield Trust found that 55pc of NHS trusts had a deficit in 2023-24, an increase from 48pc in 2022-23. Despite the growing financial constraints, NHS trusts are also pushing their own sustainability drive, with one London hospital trust launching a contract to decarbonise its hospitals. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust has asked energy companies to pitch green power systems for one of its central London hospitals, with the potential to expand the work across other public sector buildings. Richard Tice, the energy spokesman for Reform, claimed to have found examples of unnecessary NHS green spending in his own constituency of Boston and Skegness. He took aim at a new £42m, 19-bed mental health unit in Boston, Lincolnshire, that will be entirely carbon-neutral, arguing its focus on net zero would take away from other resources the NHS needs. 'That means that other facilities are denied, whether it's extra staff, whether it's extra medicines, whether it's another facility, a bigger A&E,' Tice said. The Pilgrim hospital in Boston has been awarded £23m to upgrade its energy infrastructure, including making its heating system net zero-compliant. Tice said the NHS was wasting millions on 'net zero stupidity' in Boston, adding: 'It's the patients who suffer because the money spent on this means it can't be spent on patient care.' Mark Platts, chief finance officer at Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, said: 'In line with all new NHS buildings, the unit will meet high national standards of sustainability and the NHS commitment to net zero. Doing so will also help reduce our energy costs in the future, which can be reinvested in clinical care.' Tice isn't the only person concerned about unnecessary costs. Last month, Sir Jim Mackey, the head of the NHS, said the health service was too often 'deaf' to criticism and 'wasted a lot of money'. In recent years the NHS has become increasingly reliant on the costly services of US tech giants such as Palantir and Larry Ellison's Oracle. Mackey's comments came as he warned that failing to listen to public frustration could mean the end of a publicly funded state health service. Indeed, while Reform has said that the NHS should remain free at the point of use, Nigel Farage has previously called on its funding model to be re-examined. 'Everyone knows we are not getting value, let's re-examine the whole funding model and find a way that's more efficient,' he told the BBC in March. Meanwhile, questions remain over how achievable the NHS's net zero ambitions really are. Nick Watts, the founding chief sustainability officer of the NHS, told the New Statesman last year that there was a '50-50' chance that it would reach the 2040 target. Lord Mackinlay, former chairman of the net zero scrutiny group, says net zero spending adds to growing scrutiny of just how much cash is being sucked up by the health services. 'The NHS one is very serious because it's an institution that absorbs money like it's going out of fashion,' he says. 'It is a very, very hungry beast and it's not doing the stuff which is customer-focused.' A Government spokesman said: 'We are helping hospitals across the country save hundreds of millions on their energy bills so they can reinvest those savings into frontline services. 'Thanks to this Government's investments, money that is currently being wasted in high energy bills will be redirected to patients and services - we are providing over £1bn of funding over three years to fund hundreds of local energy schemes to decarbonise public buildings and help them access clean, affordable power.'
