
Why is it so difficult to build new reservoirs?
There were major reservoir building projects in Yorkshire in the 1960s, when Thruscross near Harrogate was constructed, and 40 years ago, when Grimwith in the Dales was expanded - although the original reservoir on the site dated back to 1864.Last year the government announced proposals to build nine new reservoirs by 2050, but none are likely to be operational for at least 10 years.No major reservoirs have been completed in England since 1992, shortly after the water sector was privatised.
UK's first 2025 hosepipe ban declared in Yorkshire
Many of the largest sites were developed during the Victorian era, when the country rapidly industrialised and the urban population increased. City corporations - the forerunner to modern councils - purchased land in rural areas to flood, often displacing entire villages whose residents were forced to relocate.Grimwith, near Pateley Bridge, was one of 11 reservoirs built by the Bradford Corporation to supply the growing city, and Leeds Waterworks Company invested in labour-intensive projects in the Washburn Valley, where Swinsty, Fewston and Lindley Wood were built in the 1870s.In South Yorkshire, Langsett Reservoir, completed in 1904, supplies Sheffield and Barnsley, and the Sheffield Waterworks Company also built a group of four reservoirs in the Bradfield area in the late 19th Century.
Ownership of these sites eventually passed to Yorkshire Water.Dr Kevin Grecksch, associate professor of water science, policy and management at the University of Oxford, said the idea of "locking" water in storage areas was ancient and had been practised since agriculture first developed.Farmers would manage their own small-scale reservoirs before large public works commenced during the Industrial Revolution."A lot of this happened in the Midlands and Yorkshire, where the textile mills, steel and coal mining and pottery industries all needed enormous amounts of water," he said.After World War Two, there was a second wave of reservoir construction."Cities like Liverpool and Manchester had growing populations and needed water."
Why don't we build reservoirs anymore?
Building new reservoirs could be "challenging", said a Yorkshire Water spokesperson, in terms of cost, finding suitable sites, planning constraints and the environmental and community impact."It is more complicated to build reservoirs now because they will inevitably face a lot of opposition", said Dr Grecksch."In the 1950s, big environmental protest groups didn't exist, so there wasn't the big opposition we'd see today."They are all controversial, because they're massive, imposing pieces of infrastructure."The government has already said that plans for seven of the proposed new reservoirs around the country would be designated as Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP), meaning decisions would be made above local authority level.
But Dr Grecksch said this process could exclude the public."We're in a situation in 2025 where we need to discuss these things with people, and explain why we need it," he said.Reservoirs are normally built using acts of Parliament, including the Reservoirs Act 1975, which regulates their safety. But the case of the Tryweryn reservoir in Wales, said Dr Grecksch, showed what could happen when the local planning system was bypassed.When demand for water was growing in Liverpool in 1995, the Welsh village of Capel Celyn was earmarked as the site for a new reservoir to serve the city.A decade later, the village was flooded and 75 people had to leave their homes, which were submerged along with farms, a school, chapel and post office.The most appropriate locations for reservoirs are often in upland areas where an existing river valley can be flooded. The Peak District National Park proved ideal for many of them, as they were close enough to supply cities such as Sheffield, Manchester, Nottingham and Leicester.Transporting water from a more remote area to a population centre can add significant costs.In the mid-1990s, Yorkshire Water built a new ring main pipe system designed to help supplies flow from the east of the region to the more landlocked and drought-stricken western half of the county.The network moves both raw water and treated drinking water, according to the company. But while that measure has apparently been successful, the building of new major reservoirs has stalled.
Do we need any new reservoirs?
We need more water in the UK because we do not have enough, said Dr Grecksch – but reservoirs, he added, were only part of the solution.He advocates for water reuse schemes, where waste water can be redeployed for agriculture."We all need water – it's not about restricting it. We need measures to simply save a little bit of water," he said.Dr Megan Klaar, associate professor of hydrology at The University of Leeds, agreed that building reservoirs "is one tool in the toolbox"."We need to build reservoirs to capture water when it does rain, but we also need to think about reusing water much more smartly," she said.Dr Klaar, who grew up with water rationing in her native California, said she did not think such restrictions would be in place in the UK "in the near future". But she added: "We need to start preserving the resources we do have, so we don't transition into that reality."
As an alternative to building new reservoirs, Yorkshire Water has looked at other options, including increasing the use of ground and surface water collection."We have been looking at all options for additional water and ways in which we can reduce demand together over the longer term," said a company spokesperson.The firm was building two new boreholes - large wells dug deep into the ground to access water - the spokesperson added.They said the company was also building "new water treatment works to support our grid network so we're able to add resilience into our water supply network". However, they added, these were only short-term measures."In the longer term, we're reflecting on the rapid effects of climate change, data centres (which use huge amounts of water), and customer demand increases."We'll be thinking and planning for how we can meet the future needs of our customers. One of the options that we will be considering if whether additional reservoirs are needed."With additional reporting from Spencer Stokes.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
25 minutes ago
- The Sun
Huge blaze breaks out at factory with 100 firefighters raced to scene & thick plumes of smoke billowing through sky
OVER 100 firefighters are tackling a massive blaze that has engulfed a factory in Birmingham. Witnesses reported spotting huge plumes of smoke billowing from the four factory units on Great Bridge Street in Great Bridge at around 10.40am today. West Midlands Fire Service sent 15 crews to the scene and members of the public have been told to avoid the area. There have been no reported casualties but 'several' homes were evacuated. A West Midlands Fire Service spokesperson said: "We have 15 crews in attendance at Great Bridge Street, Great Bridge, where they have responded to a Factory Fire. "Please avoid the area, where possible."


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Methodist church in Boston gets £250,000 for renovation work
Boston's Centenary Methodist Church has been awarded £250,000 for renovations by the borough church said the funding was vital for the upkeep of the Grade II* listed plans to create a new community room, and said the money would help support the services it provides to people in money has been allocated from Levelling Up funds. The Reverend Val Ogden told BBC Radio Lincolnshire: "We need to do things like doors and floors and walls."We had damp problems to fix. We needed to refurbish one of the upper rooms that's underused at the moment, which will be for community space."The church provides services including community meals and providing a warm space during cold church said in a statement: "This investment ensures the long-term future of a cherished community space that serves people across the town and the borough."Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Museums 'could close' over UK watchdog guidance on single sex spaces
Museums Galleries Scotland made the claim in light of guidance issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission A publicly-funded body has claimed museums could shut over guidance about trans people and women's toilets. Museums Galleries Scotland said the 'time and resources' needed to implement new guidance by a watchdog could force closures. In a landmark decision in April, the Supreme Court ruled that "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refers to biological sex. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) recently closed a consultation on proposed changes to statutory guidance in the wake of the ruling. An interim EHRC update said trans women should not be permitted to use women's facilities and trans men should not be allowed to use men's facilities. A response from MGS said the Commission's proposals may "risk leaving trans people with no facilities at all" if changes could not be made. It urged the UK-wide watchdog to understand the "impacts and needs of trans individuals and organisations committed to trans inclusion". A consultation response from MSG said: "We have concerns that the content and process of the EHRC Code of Practice does not uphold the spirit of inclusion. "There is no guidance on how to include trans people, there is only information on how to exclude them. This has not made sufficient effort to offer advice to organisations who wish to remain or become trans inclusive." The response added: "When there is a need to 'prove' your sex, what proof will be acceptable given gender recognition certificates are not, nor are altered birth certificates. It is likely this role would fall on front-of-house staff, which we believe puts undue pressure on them." It added: "To avoid discrimination, it would require every person using toilets to be checked, adding substantial workload and staff costs. "The guidance implies that to allow trans people to use toilets that fit their identity would put organisations at risk of legal consequences. Yet, to not check everyone could lead to individuals in museums taking decisions to exclude trans people based on subjective tests, related largely to appearance." It also warned that some museums may be forced to close "while they invest time and resources to ensure adequate facilities". The response said MSG was aware of the public "policing toilets at heritage sites by making assumptions based on stereotypes". They said this created an "environment of suspicion and policing of everyone's gender presentation'. The response concluded: "We strongly encourage the EHRC to review their processes around this guidance and take the necessary time to understand the impacts and needs of trans individuals and organisations committed to trans inclusion." However, a spokesperson for analysts MurrayBlackburnMackenzie said: 'It is deeply concerning that a major national institution signed off and submitted such an ill-informed response to the EHRC consultation. The response fails to consider the needs of women and instead repeats trans activist talking points.'