Iran expels half a million Afghans in 16-day stretch since recent conflict with Israel, UN says
More than half a million Afghans have been expelled from Iran in the 16 days since the conflict with Israel ended, according to the United Nations, in what may be one of the largest forced movements of population this decade.
For months, Tehran has declared its intention to remove the millions of undocumented Afghans who carry out lower-paid labor across Iran, often in tough conditions.
The International Organisation for Migration (IOM) has said 508,426 Afghans have left Iran via the Iranian-Afghanistan border between June 24 and July 9.
A startling 33,956 crossed Wednesday and 30,635 on Tuesday, after a peak of 51,000 on Friday, ahead of a Sunday deadline from Iran for undocumented Afghans to leave.
The deportations – part of a program Iran announced in March – have radically increased in pace since the 12-day conflict with Israel, fueled by unsubstantiated claims that Afghans had spied for Israel prior to and during the attacks. Scant evidence has emerged to support claims of Afghan migrants assisting Israel has emerged, leading critics to suggest Iran is simply fulfilling a long-held ambition to reduce its illegal Afghan population and focusing internal dissent on a vulnerable minority.
Conditions for returnees are stark, with temperatures as high as 104 degrees Fahrenheit, or 40 degrees celsius, with reception centers on the Afghanistan border struggling.
Mihyung Park, chief of mission for the UN's international organization for migration, told CNN on Tuesday, 'There are thousands of people under the sun – and you know how hot Herat can be. It is quite dire. Last week was quite massive.'
Park said half of the year's returnees had arrived since June 1, with 250,000 in one July week.
'Last week it was about 400 unaccompanied, separated children – that is a lot,' she added.
Footage from the Islam Qala border crossing shows hundreds of migrants awaiting processing and transport, often in the punishing summer Afghan heat. Many have lived for years in Iran, often in semi-permanent conditions despite lacking documentation, and found their lives uprooted in minutes in the recent crackdown.
Bashir, in his twenties, said in an interview in Islam Qala, a border town in western Afghanistan, that he was detained by police in Tehran and whisked to a detention center.
'First, they took 10 million tomans (about $200) from me. Then they sent me to the detention center where I was kept for two nights and they forced me to pay another 2 million ($50). In the detention center they wouldn't give us food or drinking water. There were around 200 people there, and they would beat us up, they would abuse us,' he said.
Parisa, 11, was standing with her parents as she described being told she could not attend her school again this year, heralding her family's deportation. Schooling for girls in Afghanistan is restricted under the Taliban.
'We spent six years in Iran before they told us to apply for the exit letter and leave Iran,' she said. 'We did have a legal census document, but they told us to leave Iran immediately.'
The abrupt rise in deportations and claims of Afghans spying has attracted international condemnation. The UN's special rapporteur to Afghanistan, Richard Bennett, posted on X at the weekend: 'Hundreds of Afghans & members of ethnic & religious minorities detained #Iran accused of 'espionage.' Also reports of incitement to discrimination & violence in the media labelling Afghans & minority communities as traitors & using dehumanising language.'
'We've always striven to be good hosts, but national security is a priority, and naturally illegal nationals must return,' Iran's government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani said on July 1, according to Reuters.
State media has also aired footage of an alleged Afghan 'spy' for Israel confessing to working for another Afghan who was based in Germany.
'That person contacted me and said he needed information on certain locations,' the alleged spy claims. 'He asked for some locations, and I provided them. I also received $2,000 from him.' The report did not identify the alleged spy or provide evidence to support the claim.
State media has also released footage of Tehran police rounding up migrants, who the correspondent identified as mostly Afghans, with its officers in pursuit of suspects across open fields.
Potential deportees are moved onto buses and forcibly marched off the vehicles to an unknown destination.
The state television correspondent in the footage asks one Tehran employer of the alleged illegal migrant: 'Why did you hire the Afghan? It's against the law.' The alleged employer replies, 'I know! But I have to pay them so they can go back. They want to go and (are) waiting to get paid.'
In total, more than 1.6 million Afghan refugees have returned from Iran and Pakistan this year alone, surpassing UNHCR's forecasts halfway through 2025. The UN agency now predicts that as many as 3 million people could return to Afghanistan by the end of the year.
Arafat Jamal, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Representative in Afghanistan warned in a press briefing on Friday that Afghanistan remains 'wholly unprepared' to receive the influx.
'We foresee dramatic challenges in housing, protecting and employing returnees, in a parched and stagnant nation,' he warned.
A recent UNDP report shows 70 percent of Afghans live at subsistence level, and the country is grappling with severe drought and a deteriorating human rights situation, especially for women and girls.
Reporting contributed by CNN's Nina Subkhanberdina.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
18 minutes ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Egypt condemns repeated Israeli attacks on Syria, Lebanon - Foreign Affairs
Egypt condemned on Wednesday the repeated Israeli attacks on Lebanese and Syrian territories, describing them as a blatant violation of the sovereignty of the two Arab nations and a breach of international law and relevant United Nations resolutions. In a statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Egypt stressed the utmost importance of respecting the sovereignty of Lebanon and Syria, expressing its complete rejection of any interference in their internal affairs. Egypt also affirmed the necessity of preserving the unity and territorial integrity of both nations. The statement further emphasized that the repeated Israeli violations deepen tensions and instability in the two Arab countries and the whole region. The attacks occur at a critical time as intensive regional and international efforts, in which Egypt is a key player, are ongoing to de-escalate the tensions and restore regional security and stability, the statement read. This comes as Israel carried out airstrikes against Syrian government forces in the predominantly Druze city of Sweida on Tuesday. The Israeli attacks followed the breaking out of clashes between residents of the city and government forces, with Tel Aviv vowing to protect the Druze population. In response, the Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it holds Israel fully responsible for the attack and its consequences, vowing to protect all citizens, including the Druze. On the Lebanese front, Israel carried out attacks in eastern Lebanon on Tuesday, killing at least 12 people, including five Hezbollah members. "Israeli warplanes conducted more than 10 strikes on multiple locations in the early hours of Tuesday," Lebanese security sources said. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
China, North Korea and Russia represent biggest security challenge since World War II, Japan says
Seoul, South Korea CNN — Japan is facing its most severe security environment since World War II as three potential adversaries in East Asia – China, Russia and North Korea – ramp up military activities in the region, the country's defense minister said Tuesday. 'The existing order of world peace is being seriously challenged, and Japan finds itself in the most severe and complex security environment of the post-war era,' Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said in an introduction to the ministry's annual defense white paper. China's military activities present 'an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge' to Japan, the report said. Beijing is 'rapidly enhancing its military capability in a qualitative and quantitative manner' while 'intensifying' activities around the region, Nakatani said, specifically mentioning the Senkaku Islands, a chain in the East China Sea that Tokyo controls but which is also claimed by Beijing, which calls them the Diaoyus. An aerial photo shows Chinese marine surveillance ship Haijian No. 66 (top) trying to approach a Japanese fishing boat (bottom) as Japan Coast Guard vessel Ishigaki cruises next to the Chinese ship, in the East China Sea, near what are known as the Senkaku isles in Japan and the Diaoyu islands in China, in this photo taken on April 23, 2013. Kyodo/Reuters The 34-page document gives a dire outlook on the future of the region, especially on the rivalry between China and the United States, Tokyo's most important ally. 'The global balance of power is shifting dramatically and competition among states continues. In particular, the inter-state competition between the United States and China is likely to intensify even further in future,' the white paper says. The paper says escalating Chinese military activity around the democratically controlled island of Taiwan poses a threat. 'China seeks to create a fait accompli where the People's Liberation Army (PLA) is operating, and improve its actual combat capabilities,' it says. It cites a similar situation in the South China Sea and says PLA actions there are a legitimate Japanese concern because Tokyo has major sea lanes running through the waterway. Jiang Bin, a spokesperson for China's Defense Ministry, said Wednesday that Japan was 'hyping up the 'China threat,' and grossly interfering in China's internal affairs.' 'The Japanese side is fabricating false narratives to find excuses for loosening its military constraints,' Jiang said, referring to Japan's strict post-war constitution, which limits its military forces to self-defense only. And Japan's invocation of World War II is controversial in a region where fissures over Tokyo's devastating militarism during the period sour relations with many of its neighbors to this day. 'We urge the Japanese side to deeply learn from history, cease slandering and accusing China,' Jiang said. But the Japanese paper didn't only focus on Beijing's unilateral actions. A group of disputed islands, Uotsuri island (top), Minamikojima (bottom) and Kitakojima, known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China is seen in the East China Sea, in this photo taken on September 2012. Kyodo/Reuters Russia and North Korea As part of its expanded activities, the PLA is increasing cooperation with Russian armed forces, including joint bomber flights and naval patrols near Japan, the paper says. 'These repeated joint activities are clearly intended for demonstration of force against Japan,' it says. The report says that in the past fiscal year Japanese fighter jets scrambled 704 times, including 464 times in response to approaching Chinese aircraft and 237 times for Russian aircraft, a rate of almost two scrambles a day. Russia's three-and-a-half-year-old invasion of Ukraine, along with the buildup in the Russian military that has come with it, is a worry for Japan, especially because of its status as a key US ally, the report says. 'The security of Europe and the Indo-Pacific is inseparable,' it says, and warns that a Ukraine-like war is possible in the region – without specifically mentioning where that might occur. The report says some of Russia's newest military hardware has been deployed to the Pacific. Moscow has added troops, missiles and warplanes to islands north of Japan, which the Soviet Union took toward the end of World War II, but which Japan says are sovereign Japanese territory illegally occupied now by Russia. North Korea, meanwhile, is further developing nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles to deliver them, the report says. Pyongyang's ballistic missiles, believed to be capable of carrying nuclear warheads, can cover the entirety of the Japanese archipelago, it says. 'North Korea's military activities are posing an even more grave and imminent threat to Japan's security than ever before,' the paper says. The Japanese paper echoed many of the concerns the head of the US military's Indo-Pacific Command, Adm. Samuel Paparo, voiced in a posture paper in April. 'China continues to pursue unprecedented military modernization and increasingly aggressive behavior that threatens the U.S. homeland, our allies, and our partners,' Paparo said. The US commander also said the deepening cooperation between China and Russia as well as North Korea presents an increasing threat in the Pacific. 'Together, these countries' growing ties create a complex, interconnected challenge to U.S. national security and regional stability,' Paparo said. CNN's Joyce Jiang contributed to this report.
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump's 50-day shift on Ukraine is a big deal — but probably not for Putin
CNN — New developments Tuesday reinforced the idea that President Donald Trump has significantly shifted his view of the Ukraine war. But his short time horizons and lack of specificity on what exactly he will do for Ukraine, which are hallmarks of his leadership, mean the most critical factor preventing an end to the conflict will remain unchanged. There is little reason to believe that Russian President Vladimir Putin will change his own calculations on a war he sees as a historic imperative and that may be existential for him politically. Still, some things have undeniably changed. Worst-case scenarios for what the first six months of Trump's second term could mean for Ukraine didn't come to pass. This assessment excludes the Ukrainian civilians killed in Russia's recent deadly escalation of drones and missile strikes, including on apartment blocks. But Trump hasn't folded to his erstwhile friend Putin. He's not left Europe in the lurch under the shadow of an increasingly expansionist Russia amid the continent's worst land war since World War II. Trump seems more warmly disposed toward NATO than he has been for years. Ukrainian flags and portraits of soldiers are seen at a memorial for fallen fighters in Independence Square in Kyiv, Ukraine, on May 14. Roman Pilipey/AFP/Getty Images Ukraine faces the possibility of losing territory to a Russian summer offensive and more horror that civilians must bear. But diplomatically, it's in a more favorable position with the Trump administration than anyone could have dared hope when President Volodymyr Zelensky got an Oval Office dressing-down in February. That means its hopes of surviving as an independent, sovereign state have improved. Trump's hostility toward Kyiv and misgivings about pumping US aid into a World War I-style quagmire might mostly be motivated by his dismay that Putin snubbed his peace plans, which were slanted toward the Kremlin. But he at least has now shed some misconceptions that by force of personality alone he can bend Putin to his will. And by promising Patriot missiles to Kyiv — which Trump said on Tuesday are 'already being shipped' — and being open to a new Russia sanctions push in Congress, he's added steel to American peacemaking. Trying to coerce Putin to the table may not work either. But at least Trump isn't giving Ukraine away. A recalibration of expectations Trump's shift will allow all sides to recalibrate to new realities. Although, as CNN's Matthew Chance pointed out, Trump's 50-day deadline for Moscow to talk peace offers a seven-week window for the cynics in Moscow to lock in as many gains as possible by raining fire and death on Ukraine. Still, Trump has given himself some time to decide where he wants to go on Ukraine. And NATO states can enhance their own utility to Trump following a successful alliance summit. Zelensky can try to build more goodwill with Trump to shape his approach to any future peace deals — though his experience in the Oval Office is a warning not to try to push the president too far. And while the caveats about Putin being willing to wage indefinite war still apply, there's a small chance a few more weeks will persuade Putin to contemplate a US off-ramp to a deal likely to hand him territory he's seized in the three-year war and that he could spin as a win for Russian pride and security as well as a rebuke to the West. Trump appeared optimistic Tuesday as he defended the ultimatum's timeline. 'A lot of opinions change very rapidly — might not be 50 days, might be much sooner than 50 days,' the president said. How long will Trump's new outlook last? It would be unwise to assume Trump's estrangement with Putin is permanent. His anger seems mostly born of disappointment that Putin has not delivered him a win with a peace deal that might yield a Nobel Prize rather than any deep sentimental or geopolitical concern for the implications of abandoning Ukraine. And, as usual, the president has tempered previous vehement criticism of the Russian leader. After slamming Putin's 'bullsh*t' last week, Trump on Monday told the BBC: 'I'm not done with him.' Trump is transactional, operates in short windows of time and constantly seeks to land minor wins he can highlight. So, if he turned around and said he was meeting Putin in a summit next month or got mad at a new perceived slight from Zelensky, no one would be surprised. 'My concern here is that Donald Trump has the ability to be swayed very quickly,' said Sabrina Singh, a former Pentagon deputy press secretary who is now a CNN global affairs commentator. 'I fear that it's only a matter of time until there's another call between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin where Putin gives some sort of concessions and says we'll give a temporary five-day ceasefire and then turns around and says well, 'Ukraine violated this ceasefire so we're going to continue on with our war,'' Singh said on CNN News Central. Still, Trump's change of position is significant. By following through on his vow to send 'top of the line weapons' to Ukraine quickly, he is taking a big step. Patriot anti-missile defense systems could save many civilian lives, but Trump is embracing a political risk in ditching campaign-trail skepticism toward Ukraine shared by many MAGA supporters. A US Army commander discusses Patriot battery readiness with soldiers assigned to an Air Defense Artillery Regiment on February 19. Staff Sgt. Clara Harty/US Army Trump has also shown more openness to sanctions. Trade between the US and Russia is minuscule at this point, so bilateral punishments won't mean much. But if Trump does make good on a threat to impose secondary sanctions on nations that buy Russian products, especially energy exports, he could choke Moscow's economy and war machine. Still, would he really target India and China — two leading purchasers of Russian goods, in a move that could severely disrupt US relations with those giant powers and throw the global economy into turmoil? His erratic history of imposing and then suspending tariffs as part of his global trade war suggests not. Moscow may be banking on it. It also matters what, if any, additional weapons Trump may send to Ukraine. Its most optimistic supporters were delighted on Tuesday when the Financial Times first reported that the president had asked Zelensky in a phone call about Kyiv's capacity to target both Moscow and St. Petersburg. But Trump toned down the speculation on Tuesday, although aides told CNN that he has not ruled out shipping certain categories of offensive weapons to Ukraine that he's so far been unwilling to provide. 'No, he shouldn't target Moscow,' Trump told reporters, referring to Zelensky. 'I'm on nobody's side. You know whose side I'm on? Humanity's side.' Though he'd likely not admit it, the president is in a similar spot to one long occupied by his predecessor President Joe Biden. He's considering how far he can push Putin while avoiding inflammatory steps that might cross his invisible red lines and widen the war. NATO basks in Trump's rare praise Trump's new tolerance and even appreciation for NATO follows genuine fears that his new term might trigger the political earthquake of a US withdrawal. Credit goes to quiet diplomacy by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, who've worked on Trump and counseled Zelensky on how to approach the US in recent months. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, meanwhile, choreographed an alliance summit in the Netherlands last month that delivered a political triumph for the president. An agreement that NATO states would spend 5% of GDP on defense by 2035 allowed Trump to argue he'd forced Europe to get serious about protecting itself and alleviating the burden on the US. Alongside Rutte in the Oval Office on Monday, Trump praised Europe's spirit for the war in Ukraine, adding, 'Ultimately, having a strong Europe is a very good thing — it's a very good thing.' Now, NATO has solved another political problem for the president. It's effectively being used as a front for him to send Patriot missiles to Kyiv. European nations are sending the batteries to Kyiv, after which US NATO allies will buy replacements from the US. President Donald Trump, right, shakes the hand of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on Monday. Evan Vucci/AP Rutte portrayed this diplomatic ballet as another win for Trump. 'Mr. President, dear Donald, this is really big, this is really big,' Rutte said, using characteristic praise that comes across as sycophancy to many but that Trump takes at face value. 'You called me on Thursday, that you had taken a decision, and a decision is that you want Ukraine (to have) what it needs to have to maintain — to be able to defend itself against Russia — but you do want the Europeans to pay for it, which is totally logical,' Rutte said. The NATO conduit offers at least symbolic distance for Trump as he sends weapons to Ukraine for use in a war against Russia. It allows some level of plausible deniability if MAGA activists disapprove. And it satisfies Trump's obsession with driving a good financial deal. Expect to hear him argue he's secured new sales and even jobs for US defense workers. The promise that other offensive weapons could also get to Ukraine using the same route is unspecific, however. It's not clear whether Ukraine will get weapons that will enable it to make battlefield advances against Russia. And it's unlikely that any US assistance will mirror the vast packages of military assistance and aid that were approved by Congress in the Biden administration. New moves in Congress The atmosphere on Capitol Hill is also changing. A drive to sanction Russia more severely already had strong bipartisan support in the Senate, and Trump has shown he can muster majorities in the House for his priorities. Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham and his Democratic co-sponsor Sen. Richard Blumenthal said Monday that their bill could be a 'real executive hammer' to isolate Russia. But the measure could still stir dissent in the GOP base at a time when Trump is already upsetting some supporters over the Jeffrey Epstein case. Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who opposes more aid to Ukraine, said Tuesday he doesn't see an urgent need for a bill now that Trump has threatened to impose sanctions on Russia and even secondary punishments on India and China. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul blasted the initiative as 'one of the most dangerous bills ever to come before the Senate.' He predicted a total cut-off of trade with China, India and Turkey if they were to be hit by US punishments. So the domestic politics of Trump's Ukraine shift are not yet fully settled. And neither, really, is the geopolitical situation. Trump has adopted a tougher policy toward Putin, but it's not definitive or guaranteed to last. The extent of future US military support for Ukraine remains unclear, even if Kyiv's government is in better standing with the president than ever before. And European NATO states can breathe a sigh of relief about Trump, but his trade war threats have caused a deep transatlantic rift. All of this means that Putin's key calculation all along — that he can outlast the West on the war in Ukraine — seems unlikely to significantly shift.
