This California town tops the most expensive rental market in the nation for third year running
In the Santa Cruz area, located on the Central Coast about 75 miles south of San Francisco, the hourly pay needed to afford a modest two-bedroom has risen from $63.33 in 2023 to $81.21 in 2025, according to the National Low-Income Housing Coalition's 2025 Out of Reach report.
This is up nearly 30% since 2023, when they were first put at the top of the list.
That means a renter must now earn $168,920 a year to be able to afford a modest two-bedroom at fair market rent in the metro area, the report shows. That would be a max of $4,223 a month in rent to stay under 30% of their gross income. In California, where the minimum wage is $16.50, that's the equivalent of working 4.9 full-time jobs.Billionaire In-n-out Heiress Lynsi Snyder And Family Leaving California For Tennessee
The report finds that the typical renter doesn't come close. The average renter in Santa Cruz County earns $22.13 an hour. At that rate, it would take about 3.7 full-time jobs to afford an apartment."This is a No. 1 we don't want to be," said Elaine Johnson, executive director of Housing Santa Cruz County to the Santa Cruz Sentinel. "This is an all-hands-on-deck kind of time for everyone involved."California state dominates affordability rankings, according to the Out of Reach report. The Golden State is home to eight of the ten most expensive metro areas, including San Jose, San Francisco, Salinas, and Santa Barbara. Statewide, the average housing wage for a two-bedroom apartment is nearly $50 per hour, which is the highest of any U.S. state. Timeline Of California's Yearslong And 'Disastrously Overpriced' High-speed Rail Project
At the current minimum wage, a full-time California worker would need to put in 120 hours a week to afford the average two-bedroom apartment. According to the report, "Nowhere in the United States—no state, metropolitan area, or county—can a full-time minimum-wage worker afford a modest two-bedroom rental home."The report attributes the problem to a severe and persistent supply shortage, estimating a national gap of 7.1 million affordable rental homes for extremely low-income or 'ELI' households.Critics say California's housing market is also hindered by overlapping layers of regulation."CEQA[California Environmental Quality Act] and restrictive zoning regulations are key contributors to California's housing shortage," said Dr. Wayne Winegarden, senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute. "Prevailing wage mandates coupled with expensive environmental mandates... further inflates housing costs."
Read On The Fox Business App
Santa Cruz County Republican Party Chair Mike Lelieur told FOX Business the affordability crisis is a direct result of decades of progressive policy. "The local planning department has made it so outrageously expensive to build that it's just not profitable unless you're backed by a big corporate developer," Lelieur said. "Then you add CEQA, coastal commission reviews, endless permit delays, and greenbelt restrictions. It's a bureaucratic blockade by design."
He also criticized the University of California, Santa Cruz, for expanding its student population faster than it builds housing. "UCSC keeps expanding, but they're not building dorms fast enough. So students flood the local market and landlords jack up rents — because mom and dad are paying the bill," he said.Get Fox Business On The Go"This is a housing crisis created by policy," Lelieur said. "And unless we change course, it's only going to get worse."The Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk and the Santa Cruz County Business Council did not immediately respond to FOX Business' request for comment.The full report can be found at https://nlihc.org/oorOriginal article source: This California town tops the most expensive rental market in the nation for third year running
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Intel says it is laying off 15% of workers as chipmaker grapples with manufacturing challenges
By Arsheeya Bajwa, Stephen Nellis and Max A. Cherney (Reuters) -Intel said on Thursday it is laying off 15% of its workforce and new CEO Lip Bu Tan presented a blueprint for a more cost-disciplined, streamlined chipmaker that would issue "no more blank checks." The plans are part of the effort by Tan, who took the helm in March, to turn around the storied U.S. chipmaker. Intel has divested businesses, laid off employees and redirected resources to focus on projects in which Tan believes customers are interested. The company has underperformed due to years of strategic missteps. Intel has virtually no foothold in the booming AI chip industry that is dominated by Nvidia and its longtime rival AMD has been gaining share in Intel's mainstay personal computer and server semiconductor markets. As part of the cuts, Intel attempted to take a 'surgical' approach and remove layers of middle management, finance chief David Zinsner told Reuters on Thursday. 'We took out about 50% of the layers of the company,' Zinsner said. The company is cutting its workforce by 15% from 96,400 that it reported at the end of June, and plans to further reduce the company's headcount to 75,000 by the end of the year. The remainder of the cuts to bring the headcount to 75,000 will be through attrition and "other means," according to the company. In a memo to employees, Tan said Intel is changing its strategy for building manufacturing capacity and now plans to build factories only when the demand for its chips is there. Previously, the company had built factories ahead of demand. Intel is now working to bring its so-called 18A manufacturing process, which has few external customers, to high volume. In the memo, Tan said the company plans to take a disciplined approach to investments in the next-generation 14A manufacturing process. Intel shares were down 0.4% in choppy after-hours trading on Thursday. In its securities filings, Intel said that if it fails to find a significant external customer for 14A, it may be forced to exit the chip manufacturing business. The company said it is retaining the option to make all products that need performance beyond its 18A generation at external foundries. Prior to Tan's tenure, Intel had committed to tens of billions of dollars of new factory construction in the U.S. and elsewhere. On Thursday, Tan wrote the company now plans to slow construction work on new factories in Ohio and halt planned factories in Poland and Germany. Tan also said the company would consolidate chip packaging operations in Costa Rica with its other packaging operations in Vietnam and Malaysia, breaking with a longtime Intel practice of maintaining operations in separate global regions for supply-chain resiliency. STEEP LOSSES The Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker disclosed the layoff goals as it forecast steeper third-quarter losses than Wall Street estimates on Thursday, despite anticipating higher sales than analysts expected. The company said it expects a third-quarter loss of 24 cents per share, steeper than estimates of losses of 18 cents per share, according to data from LSEG. Intel expects revenue of $12.6 billion to $13.6 billion for the September quarter, with a midpoint of $13.1 billion that was higher than analysts' average estimate of $12.65 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. Growth in the PC market is uncertain after customers pulled shipments forward to the first half of the year amid ongoing trade negotiations, analysts have said. Shipments of PCs rose 6.5% in the June quarter according to data from International Data Corporation. While semiconductors are currently exempt from U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs, Intel and its fellow chipmakers are facing customers who are reluctant about spending commitments amid widespread macroeconomic uncertainty. Intel's second-quarter revenue for the period ended June 28 was flat at $12.9 billion, snapping a four-quarter streak of sales declines. The result beat estimates of $11.92 billion, according to LSEG data. In April, Intel agreed to sell a 51% stake in its Altera programmable chip business for $4.46 billion. Intel said job cuts contributed to restructuring costs of $1.9 billion in the second quarter. It recorded June quarter adjusted losses of 10 cents per share, compared with estimates of a profit of 1 cent per share. Its unadjusted loss was 67 cents per share in the second quarter, steeper than analyst estimates of a 26-cent-per-share loss.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Intel to slash workforce by year-end as it forecasts steeper losses than expected
By Arsheeya Bajwa, Stephen Nellis and Max A. Cherney (Reuters) -Intel said on Thursday it plans to slash its headcount to 75,000 by the end of this year, down from 99,500 at the end of 2024 and laid out a blueprint of a more streamlined chip manufacturer. Shares of Intel jumped roughly 2% in extended trading. The Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker disclosed the layoff goals as it forecast steeper third-quarter losses than Wall Street estimates on Thursday, despite anticipating higher sales than analysts expected while new CEO Lip-Bu Tan steers the company through a historic turnaround. In a memo to employees, Tan said that Intel is changing its strategy for building manufacturing capacity and now plans to build factories only when the demand for its chips is there. Previously, the company had built factories ahead of demand. Tan wrote that Intel will continue to slow down construction work on new factories in Ohio and has decided to not to move forward with planned factories in Poland and Germany. He also said the company would consolidate chip packaging operations in Costa Rica with its other packaging operations in Vietnam and Malaysia, breaking with a longtime Intel practice of maintaining operations in separate global regions for supply-chain resiliency. The outlook comes as investors pushed Intel's shares up 14% this year, in the hopes of Tan undoing years of strategic mistakes that have exempted the company from the AI boom dominated by Nvidia. Intel conducted the layoffs in early July, and the cuts amount to roughly 15% of its staff at the end of June. The remainder of the cuts to bring the headcount to 75,000 will be through attrition and "other means," according to the company. The company said it expects a third-quarter loss of 24 cents per share, steeper than estimates of losses of 18 cents per share, according to data from LSEG. Intel expects revenue of $12.6 billion to $13.6 billion for the September quarter, with a midpoint of $13.1 billion that was higher than analysts' average estimate of $12.65 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. Growth in the PC market is uncertain after customers pulled shipments forward to the first half of the year amid ongoing trade negotiations, analysts have said. Shipments of PCs rose 6.5% in the June quarter according to data from International Data Corporation. While semiconductors are currently exempt from U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs, Intel and its fellow chipmakers are facing customers who are reluctant about spending commitments amid widespread macroeconomic uncertainty. Intel's second-quarter revenue for the period ended June 28 was flat at $12.9 billion, snapping a four-quarter streak of sales declines. The result beat estimates of $11.92 billion, according to LSEG data. CEO Tan has been focusing on a next-generation chipmaking process called 14A to win big external customers, shifting away from 18A, a technology that his predecessor Pat Gelsinger had spent billions of dollars to develop, Reuters has reported. Tan has also focused on streamlining the organization and reducing its workforce. In April, Intel agreed to sell a 51% stake in its Altera programmable chip business for $4.46 billion. Intel said job cuts contributed to restructuring costs of $1.9 billion in the second quarter. It recorded June quarter adjusted losses of 10 cents per share, compared with estimates of a profit of 1 cent per share. Its unadjusted loss was 67 cents per share in the second quarter, steeper than analyst estimates of a 26-cent-per-share loss.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Why In-N-Out is ‘still saying no' to East Coast expansion
Don't expect to see an In-N-Out Burger on the East Coast anytime soon. Lynsi Snyder, president and owner of In-N-Out, garnered national attention this week after announcing that she and her family would be relocating to Franklin, Tennessee, where the company is set to open an eastern office to support its growth. Snyder said country music artist Kid Rock played a role in In-N-Out's expansion into the Southeast, adding he drew a new "map" of locations that included Tennessee as the burger empire's easternmost state. "I guess I would say, a man plans his ways and God's got his steps. So, we had a plan and then he stuck that in there," Snyder told "Relatable" podcast host Allie Beth Stuckey in a recent interview Despite the expansion in Tennessee, Snyder said she was not looking to move the burger chain farther east. "Florida has begged us and we're still saying no," Snyder said. "The East Coast states, we're still saying no." In-N-Out doesn't want to 'ever' compromise on quality, executive says While expanding locations is important, Snyder suggest it's not her top priority. "My No. 1 priority is really keeping the company the same company that my grandparents started," Snyder said. "I want the legacy to continue." Snyder revealed the company will be able to serve ingredients to its Tennessee locations from its Texas warehouse. "Texas can reach some other states," Snyder said, potentially hinting that the chain's facility there could supply ingredients to neighboring states. According to KTLA, In-N-Out restaurants are generally located within 500 miles of its distribution centers. As Snyder looks toward the future, she is trying to find a balance between giving In-N-Out employees on the management track the space to grow and thrive while also not opening a restaurant on "every corner." Snyder agreed with Stuckey's assessment that In-N-Out's presence across the West gives the chain a sense of "novelty" that customers are attracted to. "We don't want to be in every state. And we don't want to ever compromise our values and standards and the cornerstones that my grandparents laid down," Snyder said.
