logo
LLM, equivalent legal courses offered online or via hybrid mode unauthorised: BCI

LLM, equivalent legal courses offered online or via hybrid mode unauthorised: BCI

Indian Express01-07-2025
The Bar Council of India (BCI) has said that offering LLM or equivalent legal courses online or through a hybrid mode without its approval was unauthorised and unrecognised. The BCI, as a result, issued an advisory against the proliferation of unapproved Master of Laws (LLM) programmes offered online, through distance or hybrid modes.
The advisory, authored by Justice (retd) Rajendra Menon, former chief justice of the Delhi High Court and co-Chairperson of the standing committee on legal education of the BCI, was sent to all the high courts on June 25 for necessary action.
'It is reiterated that any LLM or equivalent legal programme offered in online, distance, blended, or hybrid mode, or under misleading nomenclature such as LLM (Professional) or MSc (Law), without prior BCI approval, is unauthorised and shall not be recognised for any purpose whatsoever,' it said.
The advisory continued, 'This includes employment, academic appointments, research registration, or judicial service & departmental promotional eligibility. Such qualifications shall be treated as null and void ab initio, and any reliance placed on them by candidates will be treated as misrepresentation.'
The expert also urged the high courts to take judicial note of this regulatory position, and ensure no appointments, promotions, or academic decisions were made on the basis of qualifications that do not have the sanction of the BCI.
'The (High) Courts may further be pleased to direct that any candidate seeking appointment or advancement on the basis of an LLM or related qualification must furnish confirmation from BCI that the programme was conducted in compliance with the Legal Education Rules, 2008 and 2020,' he said.
Several institutions, including reputed universities and private centres, offered postgraduate legal education programs through non-traditional delivery formats without securing the mandatory approval from the BCI, and these include online-only, blended learning, and open and distance learning models, the BCI added.
'The Bar Council of India has already issued showcause notices and is in the process of issuing it to several institutions, including National Law Institute University, Bhopal; Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur; O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat; and National Law University, Delhi, for offering LL.M. or similarly designated legal programmes through online, distance, blended, or hybrid formats without requisite approval,' the letter said.
Justice Menon said some of the institutions sought to justify their programmes by suggesting that they were 'executive' in nature, or not equivalent to the traditional LLM degree.
'However, these claims were found to be untenable, particularly where the protected nomenclature 'LLM' was prominently used in advertisements, brochures, and academic communications. The use of 'LLM', a term denoting the postgraduate Master of Laws degree, without parameter approval/recognition from the Bar Council of India constitutes a deliberate attempt to mislead prospective students and misappropriate the statutory and academic status associated with this qualification,' he said.
Such practices, the latter said, were statutorily impermissible, and any degree or qualification earned from these modes won't be recognised for academic appointments, UGC-NET eligibility, PhD registration or judicial services.
'The LLM is not a private credential and it is a statutorily regulated degree. Misusing the nomenclature or circumventing regulations under the guise of 'executive' or 'professional' LLM programmes amounts to academic fraud,' the BCI said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC issues notices against illegal pubs, restaurants
HC issues notices against illegal pubs, restaurants

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

HC issues notices against illegal pubs, restaurants

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday questioned the police about the action taken against the bars, pubs, clubs and restaurants in the city that are allegedly operating illegally and serving liquor without a proper licence. The court issued notices to the Delhi government and the city police, asking them to file responses containing details of such bars, pubs, and restaurants. 'The affidavit by the respondents should also contain the details of action taken in case the bars, pubs and restaurants mentioned in the petition are found violating the provisions of law,' the court said while listing the matter for hearing next on August 27. Petitioner Mahtab Khan has claimed that bars, restaurants, clubs and pubs in the city are operating illegally, without the L-16 licence and pointed out that these establishments are prohibited from operating and selling alcohol after 1 a.m. without possessing the licence. The plea states that these establishments are located in areas where fire tenders cannot reach in case of an accident, as some of them do not have an appropriate approach to the road. The petitioner's counsel submitted that despite highlighting the illegality through a representation, the authorities have failed to take any action and stop these establishments from operating after the permitted time limit.

Land-for-jobs case: Supreme Court refuses to defer Lalu Prasad's trial
Land-for-jobs case: Supreme Court refuses to defer Lalu Prasad's trial

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Land-for-jobs case: Supreme Court refuses to defer Lalu Prasad's trial

The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to entertain a plea filed by RJD president Lalu Prasad seeking deferment of trial court proceedings in the land-for-jobs case against him. Lalu moved the SC seeking directions to the trial court to adjourn proceedings till the Delhi High Court concludes hearing his petition to quash the case. Refusing to put brakes on the proceedings in the lower court, a division bench comprising Justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh clarified that the trial court's framing of charges in the case would not render Lalu's quashing petition in the HC infructuous. "We are not passing any order. Taking note of the apprehension, we say framing of charges will not make the pending petition before the HC infructuous," the bench said. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Operations Management CXO Others Data Science Degree MBA Data Analytics Technology Management Public Policy Digital Marketing healthcare Product Management Design Thinking PGDM Cybersecurity Finance Artificial Intelligence Leadership MCA Project Management Healthcare others Data Science Skills you'll gain: Quality Management & Lean Six Sigma Analytical Tools Supply Chain Management & Strategies Service Operations Management Duration: 10 Months IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in Strategic Operations Management & Supply Chain Analytics Starts on Jan 27, 2024 Get Details Lalu had moved an application in the top court seeking deferment of trial court proceedings in the land-for-jobs case at least till after August 12, when the Delhi HC is slated to hear his plea seeking quashing of the case. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Undo Earlier this month, the apex court had refused to entertain a plea filed by Lalu to stay trial court proceedings in the land-for-jobs case in which he, his kin and other accused stand chargesheeted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) over corruption and conspiracy. Lalu had moved the SC challenging a May 29 order of the Delhi High Court refusing to stay the trial court proceedings. Refusing to put brakes on the trial, a division bench comprising Justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh on July 18 had said it would ask the Delhi HC to decide Lalu's plea that seeks quashing of the CBI case. The apex court then asked the high court to decide Lalu's plea expeditiously. Live Events ET had reported earlier this month that Lalu had moved an application in the trial court seeking to summon old records of the land-for-jobs case investigated by the CBI. The CBI has already concluded its arguments on framing of charges against Lalu, his kin and other co-accused.

Microsoft restores services to Nayara, lawsuit disposed of
Microsoft restores services to Nayara, lawsuit disposed of

The Print

time4 hours ago

  • The Print

Microsoft restores services to Nayara, lawsuit disposed of

Microsoft restored services just before the Delhi High Court was to hear Nayara's petition against the 'unilateral' suspension of services. New Delhi, Jul 30 (PTI) Microsoft Corp has restored all services, including email access, to Russian oil giant Rosneft-backed Nayara Energy, following which a lawsuit brought against the move has been disposed of in favour of the refiner. 'Nayara Energy confirms that all Microsoft services critical to its operations have been fully restored, with no disruption to business continuity and data integrity remaining fully intact,' the company said in a statement. The oil refiner was using paid services from Microsoft Corporation India Pvt Ltd. These were abruptly and unilaterally discontinued by Microsoft on Monday. In response, Nayara moved the Delhi High Court, which on July 28 issued notice on the petition. Subsequently, and prior to the hearing, Microsoft restored full access to email, Microsoft Teams, and other services for Nayara on Wednesday at 10.00 Hrs. When the matter was taken up, the Court recorded that the immediate grievance stood resolved, while expressly granting Nayara the liberty to approach the Court again if issues recur, and directed Microsoft to address any further concerns raised by Nayara. The petition was disposed of by the High Court in favour of Nayara Energy. 'We acknowledge the prompt intervention of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in facilitating the resolution of this matter. The petition was disposed of by the High Court in favour of Nayara Energy,' the statement said. Microsoft on Monday suspended its services to Nayara Energy after the European Union included the company in a new round of sanctions against Russia over the Ukraine war. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed restoration of Nayara services. 'Microsoft is committed to supporting all its customers in India and worldwide, and has restored services for Nayara Energy. We are engaged in ongoing discussions with the European Union towards service continuity for the organization,' the spokesperson said. Nayara Energy said it 'is an Indian company, committed to fueling the nation's growing energy needs.. 'As a trusted partner in India's energy journey, we remain focused on ensuring uninterrupted energy supply, advancing the country's refining and retail capabilities, creating employment opportunities, and supporting India's path toward energy self-sufficiency and economic growth,' it said. Nayara had called the action by Microsoft unilateral. 'Nayara Energy has initiated legal proceedings against Microsoft following the abrupt and unilateral suspension of critical services. Microsoft is currently restricting Nayara Energy's access to its own data, proprietary tools, and products – despite these being acquired under fully paid-up licences,' the company had said in a statement on July 28. Rosneft owns a 49.13 per cent stake in Nayara Energy Ltd, formerly Essar Oil Ltd. Nayara owns and operates a 20 million tonnes per year oil refinery at Vadinar in Gujarat and runs over 6,750 petrol pumps across the country. An investment consortium SPV, Kesani Enterprises Company, holds another 49.13 per cent stake in Nayara. Kesani is owned by Russia's United Capital Partners (UCP) and Hara Capital Sarl, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mareterra Group Holding (formerly Genera Group Holding S.p.A.). 'This decision, based solely on Microsoft's unilateral interpretation of recent European Union (EU) sanctions, sets a dangerous precedent for corporate overreach and raises serious concerns regarding its implications on India's energy ecosystem,' Nayara had said. The firm had said it had filed a petition before the High Court of Delhi seeking an interim injunction and resumption of services to safeguard its rights and ensure continued access to essential digital infrastructure. 'These steps are aimed at preventing any potential disruption to Nayara's ability to meet its obligations to Indian consumers and stakeholders,' it had said. Nayara believes that while the sanctions originate exclusively from the EU, Microsoft – a US-headquartered corporation – chose to withdraw services from the company without any legal requirement to do so under US or Indian law. 'This action has been taken unilaterally, without prior notice, consultation or recourse, and under the guise of compliance. Such moves signal a worrying trend of global corporations extending foreign legal frameworks into jurisdictions where they have no applicability,' it had said. Nayara accounts for about 8 per cent of the country's total refining capacity and 7 per cent of its retail petrol pump network. PTI ANZ ANZ MR This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store