logo
Bro voters say they have abandoned Democrats as party ignores their issues and muddles meaning of being a ‘man'

Bro voters say they have abandoned Democrats as party ignores their issues and muddles meaning of being a ‘man'

Yahoo04-06-2025

American men are turning away from the Democratic party because they believe their issues are being ignored while also being in a 'no-win' situation about the meaning of modern masculinity, new research has found.
Hot-button topics, such as economic anxiety in combination with uncertainty over cultural issues, have led to a crisis among male voters, according to a study carried out by the SAM project (Speaking with American Men).
It was previously reported that Democrats have spent $20 million on the project, with donors and strategists being holed up in luxury hotel rooms brainstorming how to convince working-class men to return to the party.
The SAM project aims to 'study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces.'
Preliminary results, shared with Politico, show that 'Democrats are seen as weak, whereas Republicans are seen as strong,' according to Ilyse Hogue, co-founder of the SAM project.
'Young men also spoke of being invisible to the Democratic coalition, and so you've got this weak problem and then you've got this, 'I don't think they care about me' problem, and I think the combination is kind of a killer.'
The survey, which included 23 percent self-described Democrats, 28 percent Republicans and 36 percent independents, also found that the conflicting cultural definitions of masculinity put men in a 'no-win situation around the meaning of 'a man'.'
One respondent described Democrats as embracing 'the fluid masculinity of being, like, empathetic and sensitive,' while 'Republicans are more like, the traditional masculinity of a provider, strong, and the machismo type.'
In addition, the combination with general concerns over the economy, which proved to be a successful campaigning point for Donald Trump during the election, made 'traditional milestones', including buying a house and having children, 'feel impossible.'
This combination of concerns may be contributing to the decline in male support for the party, with SAM's national survey finding that just 27 percent of young men view the Democratic Party positively.
The promotion of Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential candidate may also have had some bearing, the project's findings suggested.
Democratic firm Catalist found that in 2024, the gender gap between men and women voting for the Democrats was 13 points, after men's support dropped by 6 points to 42 percent – the lowest on record in recent elections.
One Latino man from Las Vegas, quoted in SAM's findings, said that during the 2024 campaign, Harris focused on, 'Oh, I got Beyonce on stage with me. Oh, I got Lady Gaga on stage.' 'It just kind of felt like, what does that have to do with me? I'm trying to move up in life,' he said.
However, pollster John Della Volpe, another co-founder of the project, says that the current male cohort and younger generation is not 'lost' – though he added that the Democrats are 'losing it' right now.'
A previously reported part of SAM's plan for the Democrats included buying advertisements in video games, online streaming platforms, and podcasts. Influencers, including Joe Rogan and Theo Von, were credited with wooing a large proportion of the male voters.
'Democrats can't win these folks over if they're not speaking the language that young men are speaking,' Hogue told Politico. 'Most people I talked to, Democratic operatives, have never heard of Red Pill Fitness, which is just huge online.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate churns through overnight session as Republicans seek support for Trump's big bill
Senate churns through overnight session as Republicans seek support for Trump's big bill

Chicago Tribune

time24 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Senate churns through overnight session as Republicans seek support for Trump's big bill

WASHINGTON — The Senate is slogging through a tense overnight session that has dragged into Tuesday, with Republican leaders searching for ways to secure support for President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts while fending off proposed amendments, mostly from Democrats trying to defeat the package. An endgame appeared to be taking shape. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota spent the night reaching for last-minute agreements between those in his party worried the bill's reductions to Medicaid will leave millions without care and his most conservative flank, which wants even steeper cuts to hold down deficits ballooning with the tax cuts. Vice President JD Vance arrived at the Capitol, on hand to break a tie vote if needed. It's a pivotal moment for the Republicans, who have control of Congress and are racing to wrap up work with just days to go before Trump's holiday deadline Friday. The 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' as it's formally titled, has consumed Congress as its shared priority with the president. At the same time House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled more potential problems ahead, warning the Senate package could run into trouble when it is sent back to the House for a final round of voting, as skeptical lawmakers are being called back to Washington ahead of Trump's Fourth of July deadline. In a midnight social media post urging them on, Trump called the bill 'perhaps the greatest and most important of its kind.' Vice President JD Vance summed up his own series of posts, simply imploring senators to 'Pass the bill.' What started as a routine, but laborious day of amendment voting, in a process called vote-a-rama, spiraled into an almost round-the-clock marathon as Republican leaders were buying time to shore up support. The droning roll calls in the chamber belied the frenzied action to steady the bill. Grim-faced scenes played out on and off the Senate floor, and tempers flared. The GOP leaders have no room to spare, with narrow majorities in both chambers. Thune can lose no more than three Republican senators, and already two — Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who warns people will lose access to Medicaid health care, and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who opposes raising the debt limit by $5 trillion — have indicated opposition. Attention quickly turned to key senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, who have also wroked to stem the the health care cuts, but also a loose coalition of four conservative GOP senators pushing for even steeper reductions. Murkowski in particular was the subject of the GOP leadership's attention, as Thune and others sat beside her in conversation. Then all eyes were on Paul after he returned from a visit to Thune's office with a stunning offer that could win his vote. He had suggested substantially lowering the debt ceiling, according to two people familiar with the private meeting and granted anonymity to discuss it. And on social media, billionaire Elon Musk was again lashing out at Republicans as 'the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' for including the $5 trillion debt limit provision, which is needed to allow continued borrowing to pay the bills. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said his side was working to show 'how awful this is.' 'Republicans are in shambles because they know the bill is so unpopular,' Schumer said as he walked the halls. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. The CBO said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. Few Republicans appear fully satisfied as the final package emerges, in either the House or Senate. Collins had proposed bolstering the $25 billion proposed rural hospital fund to $50 billion, offset with a higher tax rate on those earning more than $25 million a year, but her amendment failed. And Murkowski was trying to secure provisions to spare people in her state from some food stamp cuts, which appeared to be accepted, while she was also working to beef up federal reimbursements to hospitals in Alaska and others states, that failed to comply with parliamentary rules. 'Radio silence,' Murkowski said when asked how she would vote. At the same time, conservative Senate Republicans insisting on a vote on their plan for health care cuts, including Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, filed into Thune's office for a near-midnight meeting. A few of the amendments from Democrats were winning support from a few Republicans, though almost none were passing. One amendment was overwhelmingly approved, 99-1. It would strip a provision barring states from regulating artificial intelligence if they receive certain federal funding. All told, the Senate bill includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, according to the latest CBO analysis, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits, which Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide. It would impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements on able-bodied people, including some parents and older Americans, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. Unable to stop the march toward passage, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress are using the tools at their disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took 16 hours, and they have a stream of amendments. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern at the start of debate late Sunday about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books.

US oil production breaks record as gasoline prices stay low
US oil production breaks record as gasoline prices stay low

E&E News

time24 minutes ago

  • E&E News

US oil production breaks record as gasoline prices stay low

Oil production in the United States crept upward slightly in April, setting another record despite frequent warnings that it is headed for a fall. Production grew to 13.47 million barrels a day in April, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said in a report Monday, about 0.1 percent higher than the month before. The production figure, which includes condensate, is about 1.7 percent above the same month a year earlier. The numbers were released as President Donald Trump celebrated some of the lowest prices in recent years at the gasoline pump ahead of the Fourth of July holiday. The White House issued a news release Monday titled 'Lower Gas Prices Just in Time for Summer Holiday Travel' that linked to numerous mainstream news outlets' stories about low fuel costs. Advertisement The United States has been breaking records for oil production frequently in recent years — including under former President Joe Biden, whose policies Trump blasted. The country has been pumping more oil out of the ground each day than any country ever.

A 2-month rally pushed the stock market to record highs — but watch for these risks in July
A 2-month rally pushed the stock market to record highs — but watch for these risks in July

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A 2-month rally pushed the stock market to record highs — but watch for these risks in July

The stock market shrugged off the U.S. bombing of Iran, the continuing global trade war and a Wall Street adage advising investors to 'sell in May and go away' — and now looks to end June near record territory. Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite hit record closing highs on Friday, surpassing previous highs reached in February and December, respectively. There are a few things that could push this rally further, but there are also risks that investors should be aware of. My wife and I have $7,000 a month in pensions and Social Security, plus $140,000 cash. Can we afford to retire? I'm a stay-at-home mom. Do I take a part-time job to spend more time with my kids — or get a job for six figures? The stock market is hitting records — three reasons why top Morgan Stanley strategist sees more room to run Companies are issuing the least amount of 30-year bonds in 14 years. What that tells investors. Trading in risky penny stocks is booming. Why it could be a sign of trouble ahead for the market. First, here are the tailwinds. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, S&P 500 SPX and Nasdaq Composite COMP all hit 52-week intraday lows on April 7, during the selloff that followed President Donald Trump's 'liberation day' tariff announcement. But the bounce back since then has been pretty dramatic. After the three indexes slipped into correction and bear-market territory in early April, news of a 90-day pause on tariffs caused the indexes to recover from some of those losses. While the Dow dropped 3.2% in April, the S&P only lost 0.8%, and the Nasdaq was actually up about 0.9% for the month. This led into an especially strong May, and although June has one trading day left, stocks are poised for a significant two-month rally. The Dow gained 3.9% in May and 3.7% so far in June; the S&P gained 6.2% in May and 4.4% so far in June; and the Nasdaq was up 9.6% in May and 6.1% in June to date. This throws a wrench in the old Wall Street saying of 'sell in May and go away' — doing so would've been a terrible idea. Read more: Investors who followed 'sell in May and go away' are missing what could be the best May for the S&P 500 in decades Because of these gains, the S&P 500 was able to stage its quickest-ever recovery to all-time highs after dropping 15% or more. It dropped 18.9% from its previous closing high on February 19 to its closing low on April 8. With the index closing at a record high on Friday, it only took 89 days to regain all-time highs — beating the previous record turnaround of 90 days in 1998. 'History told us that that was going to happen. It took us 22 calendar days to go from the all-time high to the minus-10% threshold. Normally, it takes more than 80 calendar days,' Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at market research firm CFRA Research, told MarketWatch. 'So looking at the swiftest quartile of declines of 10% or more, they end up also being the shallowest quartile and the quickest to recover what was lost.' In other words, swift downturns are often followed by a brief period of lows before the market pops back up. Stovall said that historically when stocks stage this sort of recovery, they often continue to rally beyond the initial highs. 'Once we have recovered all that we lost in a prior decline of 10% to 20%, there's another advance between 6% and 10% on average, before slipping into a new decline of 5% or more,' Stovall said. 'We can be adding another 300 to 600 points on the S&P 500, before we end up turning around and digesting those gains.' This coincides with a strong window of time in terms of market seasonality. Historically, the S&P 500 ended the year higher 77.1% of the time after gaining in both May and June, according to Dow Jones Market Data, resulting in an average annual gain of 6.8%. July also tends to be a solid month for markets: Historically, it has been the strongest month for the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 in terms of average monthly performance. The Dow's average July performance is a 1.5% gain, while it's 1.7% for the S&P and 0.9% for the Nasdaq, according to Dow Jones Market Data. But even with these historical trends potentially propelling stocks higher, there are a few macroeconomic risks that investors should watch out for in July. The White House has said that it hopes to get President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed before July 4. If this deadline holds up, investors could get an important update on the country's tax policy going forward. The stock market rallied last November following Trump's win in the presidential election. One of the reasons was Trump's promise to cut corporate taxes; lower corporate tax rates are expected to benefit stock fundamentals, because they result in lower costs for businesses. Trump cut corporate taxes in his Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017, which caused the stock market to rally at the time. Many of those tax cuts are due to expire at the end of 2025. Yet despite the new tax bill promising to extend and further those cuts, stocks may not see the same bump as they did in 2017. 'In 2017-2018, you went from 35% [corporate tax rate] to 21%. The first derivative impact of that was quite meaningful to overall corporate earnings. This time around, I think it's going to be less meaningful,' Dan Skelly, head of Morgan Stanley's wealth-management market research and strategy team, told MarketWatch. Skelly said if Congress doesn't pass the tax bill, it would be the equivalent of a corporate tax hike when the old bill expires, and the stock market may react poorly to the impact on corporate earnings. But even if the bill is passed, it might not have an impact quite as dramatic as the 2017 tax bill. On top of that, there are elements of the new tax bill that may negatively impact markets in the short term because it would increase deficit spending. 'I think most people perceive passing the bill as being pro-growth, pro-business and pro-spending over time, and I do as well. That should be good for the market in the long run,' Skelly said. 'But in the short run, when the bill gets through … Congress is going to vote to lift the debt ceiling,' he added. 'Once the debt ceiling's lifted, that means that the Treasury Department is going to refill the Treasury General Account, which will actually be liquidity-negative, and that actually could be a short-term hiccup for markets.' The stock market recovered from its April lows after the Trump administration announced a 90-day pause on most of the newly announced tariffs. However, that 90-day pause is due to expire July 9. The White House has downplayed this deadline as 'not critical' and said that it could provide its own trade-deal terms if negotiations aren't met. But even if this isn't a strict deadline, there's a chance that tariffs and trade policy could recapture headlines and swing markets. Investors got a taste of this on Friday: After stocks opened firmly higher in the morning, they lost steam in the afternoon after Trump said he was ending trade talks with Canada. 'The idea that all is done and settled on tariff negotiation outcomes I think is misguided,' Skelly said. As tariffs regain the attention of investors, they'll have to factor in the impact that tariffs could have on the overall U.S. economy, inflation and the companies in their portfolios. 'We think it likely that at least some of the April 2 reciprocal tariffs will apply, and that should create pressure on the U.S. economic sectors in the form of higher prices, lower corporate profits or reduced business investment,' analysts from the Wells Fargo Investment Institute wrote in a note. July represents the beginning of the third quarter of 2025, and companies will start to report quarterly earnings in the middle of the month. This will give investors updates on how businesses are navigating macroeconomic challenges like the new tariffs. 'I think this earnings season is going to be particularly important,' David Lundgren, chief market strategist at Little Harbor Advisors, told MarketWatch. 'We've had these tariffs, and the impact of these tariffs — from what I can tell — are not showing up anywhere. So somewhere these tariffs are being eaten by somebody, and it may be we discover that they're being eaten by corporations, by depressed profit margins.' Such depressed profit margins could easily spook investors, Skelly said, especially because many of the leading stocks are trading at such high valuations. He noted that the rally of the S&P 500 off of its recent lows has mostly been driven by a few large-cap names, resulting in concentration risk for the market. If those large-cap stocks report poor earnings, they could bring down the whole market with them. The 'Magnificent Seven' tech companies are expected to report earnings at the end of July going into early August. That's when the market could react if those large companies disappoint investors. 'The last week of July and first week of August is going to be really crucial in terms of whether or not [the Magnificent Seven] can maintain the kind of sequential momentum from last quarter,' Skelly said. Stocks ended the last full week of June on a positive note. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 3.8% for the week. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 gained 3.4% and Nasdaq Composite added 4.2%. Investors will get updates on the U.S. labor market this upcoming week. Data on job openings in May is slated for Tuesday, ADP employment data for the month of June comes out on Wednesday, and Thursday will bring the June employment report and unemployment rate. My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him? We're living in 'end times' when you can't retire on $1 million How June's bond rally might give way to a round of volatility in Treasury bills My friend asked me to chip in $1,600 for her son's prom-night limo. Has the world gone mad? Tech stocks are powering this record-setting rally on Wall Street — but how long can it last? Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store