logo
Private defence suppliers seek review of rules limiting ammunition procurement to public sector

Private defence suppliers seek review of rules limiting ammunition procurement to public sector

The Hindu3 days ago
Private defence suppliers have requested the Defence Ministry (MoD) to review defence procurement manual (DPM) which restricts supply of ammunition only from public sector manufacturers, saying that they are capable of fulfilling the munitions requirement of the defence forces.
A private defence manufacturer said that if the MoD amended the existing rule to allow for open Request For Proposal (RFP) to be issued to both public and private sector, it would provide a big boost to the ammunition industry and allow private sector players, who had invested hugely to join the Make In India initiative, to supply ammunition to India's Armed Forces.
'We had a meeting where we have given presentation over the concern and the MoD assured that the proposal is under review by the MoD and Department of Military Affairs,' said a top official of a private defence manufacturer.
Adani Defence and Aerospace ammunition manufacturing facility in Kanpur, under Uttar Pradesh defence corridor, is already rolling out 150 million rounds of small calibre ammunition of — 5.56 mm (used majorly in Insas rifles), 7.62 mm (7.62x39 mm cartridge which is used in AK-47 and AK-203 rifles and 7.62x51 mm NATO round which is used in self-loading rifles (SLR) and machine guns), .338 mm (sniper rifles) and 9 mm (pistols).
'Adani already has capacity to produce 300 million rounds of small calibre ammunition and can fulfil all the requirement of defence forces with world-class quality and highly competitive costs. Having done full indigenisation, Adani Defence is also setting up the Propellant (explosive material) capacity which is otherwise imported into the country and it will reduce dependence on Europe and the U.S. It will ensure that India becomes completely self-reliant in ammunition and can overcome any global supply chain disruptions,' said Ashish Rajvanshi, CEO, Adani Defence & Aerospace, in a virtual interaction with journalists, who had been invited by the company, at its Kanpur ammunition complex.
He emphasised that the ammunition produced by Adani Defence & Aerospace is of the highest quality and NATO-certified, which allows them to export it to global markets, based on the approved list of countries by the External Affairs Ministry (MEA) and the MoD. The company is already exporting ammunition to four countries.
At the State police level, the company recently supplied ammunition to the U.P. Police, through bidding which was done on the Government e-Marketplace (GEM) portal, he said.
Recently, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had announced that the Ministry had declared 2025 as the 'Year of Reforms', aiming to transform the Armed Forces to become technologically advanced and combat-ready. He had also quoted that defence exports had surged from ₹686 crore in 2013–14 to ₹23,622 crore in 2024–25.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rahul Gandhi's Endorsement Of Trump's "Dead Economy" Remark Backfires
Rahul Gandhi's Endorsement Of Trump's "Dead Economy" Remark Backfires

NDTV

time7 hours ago

  • NDTV

Rahul Gandhi's Endorsement Of Trump's "Dead Economy" Remark Backfires

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's attempt to latch on to US President Donald Trump's "dead economy" remark to attack the Narendra Modi government has backfired, with his party colleagues and allies taking an opposite stand. Mr Gandhi's endorsement of Trump's remarks also provided the BJP a political opportunity to counter the Opposition's attacks. While Mr Gandhi endorsed Trump's remarks and used them to slam the Centre, his senior party colleagues Shashi Tharoor and Rajiv Shukla pointed to the strength of the Indian economy, with Mr Tharoor stressing that New Delhi must not cave in to Washington DC's unreasonable demands. Priyanka Chaturvedi, a key opposition voice and Shiv Sena (UBT) MP, has also slammed Trump and said such a claim can "only come from a position of arrogance or ignorance". A day after announcing 25 per cent tariffs on imports from India, Trump dropped a bombshell today. Hitting out at India and Russia, he has said he does not care about New Delhi's dealings with Moscow and that the two "can take their dead economies down together". "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world. Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way," he said in a post on Truth Social. Shortly after, Mr Gandhi told reporters at Parliament that he agreed with the US President. "He is right, everybody knows this except the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister. I am glad that President Trump has stated a fact." Accusing the Prime Minister of "killing" the economy, Mr Gandhi blamed demonetisation, a "flawed" GST for the situation. Taking a swipe, the Leader of the Opposition, Lok Sabha, said "Assemble in India" -- a play on Make in India -- had failed and MSMEs "wiped out" and "farmers crushed". Mr Tharoor, whose remarks on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, have drawn snubs from the Congress leadership, took a different stand than Mr Gandhi on Trump's remark. Stressing that the ongoing trade talks between the US and India are "challenging", he said, "We have ongoing negotiations with the EU, we already concluded a deal with the UK, and we are talking with other countries also. If we can't compete in America, we may have to diversify our markets outside of America. We are not out of options." #WATCH | Delhi | On trade negotiations between the US and India, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "It is a challenging negotiation. We are negotiating with many countries. The US is not the only negotiation. We have ongoing negotiations with the EU, we already concluded a deal… — ANI (@ANI) July 31, 2025 The Thiruvananthapuram MP also said that India must "move elsewhere" if the US is "completely unreasonable" with its demands. "That is the strength of India; we are not a totally export-dependent economy like China. We have a good and strong domestic market. We must give strong support to our negotiators to find the best deal possible. If a good deal is not possible, we may have to walk away." Rajya Sabha MP Rajiv Shukla said Trump's statement is "completely wrong". "Our economic condition is not at all weak. If someone claims they can finish us economically, it's likely due to a misunderstanding. Trump is living in a delusion," he told news agency ANI. Later speaking to NDTV on the US-Pakistan oil deal, Mr Shukla said, "Their oil deal with Pakistan doesn't concern us. No country can dictate who we can or cannot do business with." #WATCH | Delhi | Congress MP Rajeev Shukla says, "... Trump saying that the economies of India and Russia are dead, is wrong. The Indian economy is not dead. Economic reforms were made when PV Narasimha Rao and Manmohan Singh were there. Atal Bihari Vajpayee took those reforms… — ANI (@ANI) July 31, 2025 Priyanka Chaturvedi, a prominent Opposition leader, said there is enough data to know that the Indian economy is among the top five in the world. "Calling it a dead economy can only come from a position of arrogance or ignorance," she said on X. Not that one needs to say it there's enough legitimate data available to know that Indian economy is in the top 5 of the world and one of the fastest growing economies. Calling it a dead economy can only come from a position of arrogance or ignorance. Thank you for your attention… — Priyanka Chaturvedi🇮🇳 (@priyankac19) July 31, 2025 In another post, she said that while India has economic challenges and needs to work on per capita income, its economic challenges "do not equate to a dead economy". She said Trump's statement is clearly a tactic to close a deal. The BJP has hit back at Mr Gandhi. Senior party leader Amit Malviya said the Congress leader hit a new low by echoing Trump's "dead economy" jibe, terming it a "shameful insult to the aspirations, achievements, and well-being of the Indian people". "But let's be honest - the only thing truly "dead" here is Rahul Gandhi's own political credibility and legacy. Even amidst global slowdown, India remains the world's fastest-growing major economy, with the IMF and World Bank revising growth projections upwards," he said, adding, "This is not a dead economy. This is a surging, resilient India." "Who is Rahul Gandhi really speaking for? Why does he repeat foreign propaganda that undermines India?" Mr Malviya added. BJP leader K Annamalai drew a Shashi Tharoor-Rahul Gandhi comparison. "I came across remarks by two Congress leaders on the same topic today. One spoke for India's Interest, and the other spoke in a tone that would please his offshore masters," he said. I came across remarks by two Congress leaders on the same topic today. One spoke for India's Interest, and the other spoke in a tone that would please his offshore masters. When the world acknowledges India as the only bright spot on an otherwise dark horizon, here is the… — (@annamalai_k) July 31, 2025 "When the world acknowledges India as the only bright spot on an otherwise dark horizon, here is the leader of the opposition who feels otherwise. LoP Thiru Rahul Gandhi avl continues to wear ignorance like a badge of honour. He is blind to India's rise, yet ever eager to echo foreign voices that undermine it," he said.

In 7 numbers: What Trump doesn't know about India's economy he calls 'dead'
In 7 numbers: What Trump doesn't know about India's economy he calls 'dead'

First Post

time10 hours ago

  • First Post

In 7 numbers: What Trump doesn't know about India's economy he calls 'dead'

Trump on Thursday attacked India's ties with Russia, calling both economies 'dead', a remark that starkly contrasts with India's booming, globally recognised economic rise. His claim reflects ignorance of facts, as India remains one of the fastest-growing major economies read more Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House, in Washington. PTI US President Donald Trump on Thursday launched a scathing attack on India's economic partnership with Russia, dismissing both countries as having 'dead' economies. In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, 'They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' while blaming India's high tariffs, 'among the highest in the world,' he claimed, for hampering trade ties with the United States. However, Trump's portrayal stands in stark contrast to India's actual economic trajectory, which is marked by robust growth, increasing global relevance, and strong performance across key sectors. Far from being 'dead,' India is steadily establishing itself as one of the world's most dynamic and resilient economies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A snapshot of India's economic momentum: 6–7% Economic Growth: India continues to rank among the fastest-growing major economies, with real GDP growth averaging 6–7 per cent in recent years. The IMF projects a 6.4 per cent growth rate for both 2025 and 2026. Despite global headwinds, India has managed to keep retail inflation at 4.6 per cent, its lowest since 2018–19—while many Western nations grapple with surging costs of living. World's 4th-Largest Economy: India is currently the fourth-largest economy by nominal GDP, projected to overtake Germany and reach third place by 2027. For FY25, India's nominal GDP is estimated at $3.8 trillion. Services Sector Engine: Contributing over 50 per cent of the Gross Value Added (GVA), India's services sector, driven by IT, telecom, banking, and real estate, remains a major economic engine. It also employs nearly 30 per cent of the country's workforce. Manufacturing on the Rise: Under flagship initiatives like Make in India and the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, India is fast becoming a global manufacturing hub. It recently overtook China as the top smartphone exporter to the US. The manufacturing sector currently contributes 17 per cent to GDP and employs over 27.3 million people, with the government targeting a 25 per cent share by 2025. Explosive Export Growth: India's total exports soared to a record $824.9 billion in FY 2024–25, a 76 per cent jump over the past decade, fueled by growth in engineering goods, electronics, and pharmaceuticals. Strong FDI Inflows: India remains a magnet for foreign direct investment, recording $81.04 billion in FDI inflows in FY25, up 14 per cent year-on-year. The services sector received the highest FDI equity share, followed by software & hardware, and trading. FDI in manufacturing alone grew by 18 per cent. The US continues to rank among India's top three sources of foreign investment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Digital Payments Leadership: India has revolutionized its payments ecosystem through the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), which processed a staggering 172 billion transactions in 2024. The country's digital infrastructure is now considered a global model. Trump's comments may serve short-term political rhetoric, but they misrepresent the facts on the ground. India's economic fundamentals are strong, its global influence is expanding, and its growth story continues to attract investors and partners worldwide. Far from being in decline, India is firmly on an upward trajectory—vibrant, ambitious, and increasingly central to the global economy. Dismissing that progress does little to change the reality of a rising India.

India must not retaliate to Trump's tariff tactic. Secure interim deal, fix internal issues
India must not retaliate to Trump's tariff tactic. Secure interim deal, fix internal issues

The Print

time12 hours ago

  • The Print

India must not retaliate to Trump's tariff tactic. Secure interim deal, fix internal issues

Undoubtedly, India has posed one of the highest import tariffs worldwide across many products, and maintained daunting non-tariff barriers. This is unsustainable for its globally integrated economy. Analysts have feared that Prime Minister Modi's Make in India mission signals India's return to higher tariffs. However, the lowering of import tariffs is an inevitable shift, despite some key Indian industry leaders seeking to rely on the callipers of high import duties. The Make in India mission can only benefit from riding on the wave of enhanced manufacturing competitiveness amidst an environment of lower regulatory cholesterol and a much higher ease of doing business. Business groups batting for protectionism will predictably register their discomfort but would eventually relent to lower import tariffs as the new rules of engagement. India must allow this pragmatic realisation to spur the next round of trade negotiations with the US. The unfavourable announcement is likely to pose headwinds for India's GDP growth. The US has simultaneously pushed the boundaries of trade negotiations towards strongarming India to comply with its stance on the war in Ukraine by levying a yet-unspecified penalty for India continuing to purchase Russian oil and defence equipment. A 25 per cent tariff will leave India worse-off against its immediate competitors until a new deal is struck. Rather than retaliating unwisely to these pressure tactics, India must do whatever it takes to fast-track the BTA negotiations. At a time when active negotiations to secure the US-India Bilateral Trade Agreement or BTA are underway, the US' decision to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods starting 1 August is surely not good news for the Indian economy and business sentiments. India's exports of automotive components, pharmaceuticals, marine products, apparel, gems and jewellery, chemicals, oilseeds and leather goods are expected to be worst affected due to this levy. US-India BTA As is well known, the major roadblock has been over tariffs for US agricultural commodities and dairy products exports to India. Washington has been pushing for greater access to India's agriculture sector, viewing this untapped market as a huge opportunity. New Delhi has been resisting this expectation due to its domestic sticking points over food security and securing the interests of hundreds of millions of small and marginal farmers earning below subsistence levels of income. The apprehension of hurting the sentiments and interests of small Indian farmers is not an imaginary fear but a serious political reality. The Indian government has been reluctant to overlook these concerns, particularly after the domestic backlash to its efforts to liberalize the agriculture sector through three Farm Bills which were repealed following large-scale farmers' protests in 2020-21. Compounding India's concerns is the issue of genetically modified (GM) crops which has led to resistance to the lowering of tariffs on American GM produce like maize and soya. India does not allow such products due to the perceived health risks for its 1.4 billion-strong population. The US needs to appreciate that India has very limited elbow room to bend significantly on these issues. A key feature of India's economic history this decade has been its growing willingness to enter into free trade agreements (FTAs) and preferential trade agreements with major Western economies. Following the Australia-India Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) in 2022, and the U.K.-India Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) in 2025, India is already negotiating an FTA with the European Union. With a recent thaw in the frosty diplomatic relations of the last two years, India has also resumed negotiations for an FTA with Canada, which had been suspended since 2023. The most notable of these efforts to open its doors to the West is the US-India BTA, which had already concluded its fifth round of negotiations. A full-blown BTA intends to improve mutual market access, reduce tariff barriers, remove non-tariff barriers, expand consumer benefits, and improve the integration of supply chains. Despite the fact that some irritants still remain and the US has already announced a 25 per cent tariff and a penalty on Indian exports, the US and India need to expedite discussions leading to an interim trade deal, pending a full-blown BTA. Also read: Modi's 'Make in India'—a case study in what happens when strategy is replaced by storytelling Win-win trade deal The post-pandemic world has been contemplating a partial relocation part of its manufacturing supply chains to destinations other than China. India is a major prospect on this front as an alternate manufacturing destination. While trying to capitalize such opportunities, India has tasted limited success as not very many supply chain shifts to India have actually occurred so far. A win-win trade deal between the US and India would bring more FDI especially from the US into India, create more jobs, provide both nations better access to raw material and capital goods, and improve the competitiveness of Indian manufacturing. Such a scenario would surely pave the way for India's emergence as a viable alternative to China in the global exports market. The US' total goods trade with India in 2024 was USD 129 billion out of which the US goods exports to India were USD 42 billion (up 3.4 per cent vis-à-vis 2023) and US goods imports from India were USD 87 billion (up 4.5 per cent vis-à-vis 2023). India has a large trade deficit with its largest trading partner China, but enjoys a goods trade surplus with the US of around USD 46 billion in 2024. Prime Minister Modi and President Trump have set an ambitious target of doubling bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030. In most countries, international trade represents a significant share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). India's trade to GDP ratio was reported at 44.67 per cent in 2024, according to the World Bank. The impending US-India trade deal offers India a major opportunity to further boost its trade-to-GDP ratio which is generally considered a healthy indicator for any economy. India has already emerged as the world's fourth largest economy having equalled the GDP of Japan. It is also the fastest growing economy among major countries. With a long history of non-alignment and strategic independence in its trade policy, India has largely shielded itself from international pressure. With the high approval ratings of the BJP-led regime and its strong nationalistic overtures, there is unlikely to be any significant domestic perception of India being bullied by the US and therefore, this is unlikely to affect the impending trade deal with the US. Win-win negotiations are always about give and take, a deft combination of assertion and acquiescence. A mutually acceptable trade deal would do a lot of good to both countries. It will be a shot in the arm for India. Once in the bag, the EU-India trade deal will be finalised in due course of time. These deals would mean a significant liberalization of India's trade regime ensuring far more open markets with two major Western economies. As long as these deals do not rock the boat for the Indian agriculture and dairy sectors, they will also find traction amongst its constituency of middle-class voters for whom Western markets are aspirational. For any future FDI, India would emerge a very lucrative destination as border roadblocks would reduce. The US stands to gain by way of greater access to Indian markets and the emergence of India as a viable manufacturing destination. Avoiding laying most of its eggs in the Chinese basket will also be consistent with the US's strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific. Though President Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff may seem a setback in the short-run, India's national interest lies in treating this as an opportunity to urgently seal, at the very least, an interim trade deal with the US for immediate relief. This will provide legroom to iron out India's domestic concerns, de-link trade negotiations with its long-standing ties with Russia, and arrive at a sustainable long-term free trade agreement with the US down the line. Jayant Krishna is a senior fellow (non-resident) with the Chair on India and Emerging Asia Economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC, and an adjunct professor of business negotiation at the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Lucknow. Ujjwal Krishna is an academic fellow with the Australia India Institute at the University of Melbourne, an adjunct research fellow with the Centre for Human Security and Social Change at La Trobe University, and a consultant at The Asia Foundation's Regional Governance Unit. Views are personal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store