
Wilson finds a new home with FIJI
In a heartwarming tribute video titled '
Wilson's Happily Ever After
', audiences have been reintroduced to one of pop culture's most unlikely and beloved icons, whose story first captured hearts in a classic island survival story filmed in Fiji 25 years ago.
Thought to be lost forever, Wilson has been discovered right where his story began, in the place where happiness comes naturally.
Imagining what might have happened after floating away into the vast ocean, the film shows Wilson washing up on the sun-kissed sands of Fiji, where he's embraced by the warm and welcoming local community.
There, he's discovered by a young Fijian girl, Lani, who brings him into her world and into island life.
The tropical island paradise known for its warm, friendly locals has welcomed the volleyball with open arms, showing him the best that Fiji has to offer.
The pair is seen biking through the Fijian forests on the retired sugar cane railway tracks, enjoying kava with villagers, kayaking and splashing around in the crystal blue waters, and, of course, Wilson soars through the air in a game of beach volleyball.
Tourism Fiji chief executive officer Brent Hill says that the tribute is a celebration of both Wilson's enduring appeal and Fiji's spirit of happiness.
'Wilson's story is one that has stuck with so many for 25 years,' he said, 'He's the volleyball that broke hearts around the world. So when we realised it had been a quarter century since he was last seen drifting out at sea, we thought what better time to give Wilson the ending he deserves? And not only did he survive, he's thriving, making friends, and even playing volleyball again,' Hill stated.
He added, 'The short video is a way of giving fans a little closure and celebrating the heart that makes Fiji so special, where Wilson has found his happily ever after, where happiness comes naturally.'
The tribute highlights Fiji's growing role in the global screen industry, with a number of productions taking place in the islands over the decades, including The Blue Lagoon with Brooke Shields, and many TV series such as Survivor, Love Island and Shipwrecked.
Fiji's film sector has become a major contributor to the local economy, employing more than 1,200 locals and collaborating with nearly 300 local businesses, while injecting close to USD 100 million FJD during the 2023-2024 financial year alone.
'Fiji is an incredible filming destination with picturesque backdrops, warm tropical weather, and experiences for a range of different traveller types,' says Hill. 'We're excited to celebrate 25 years since one of the first major productions in Fiji, while continuing to grow the industry and showcase Fiji on the world stage.'
The latest film also taps into a long-standing online debate: What happened to Wilson? Over the years, many fans have taken to popular discussion platforms like Reddit to debate theories.
One user said, 'The scene still hits me really hard two decades later, so I was wondering', with another adding, 'Definitely a death scene. He is lost to the waves.'
These theories are lovingly put to rest with a feel-good happily ever after worthy of Wilson's legendary status.
Watch the video here:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
On 112th edition of the Tour De France cycle
Daily Quiz | On 112th edition of the Tour De France cycle Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit YOUR SCORE 0 /7 RETAKE THE QUIZ 1 / 7 | By winning on Sunday, Slovenia's Tadej Pogacar has joined five other riders with four or more titles. Who was the last rider to win four titles? DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Great Britain's Chris Froome SHOW ANSWER 2 / 7 | This year's stage winners came from nine different nationalities. Riders from which non-European country claimed Stage wins prior to the last Stage on July 27? DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Australia SHOW ANSWER 3 / 7 | What unfortunate distinction is common to Stage winners Philipsen (Stage 1), Mathieu van der Poel (Stage 2), and Remco Evenepoel (Stage 5)? DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : They withdrew from the event before the race's conclusion SHOW ANSWER 4 / 7 | Apart from getting the yellow jersey, which other jersey did Pogacar win for topping the mountains classification? DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Polka Dot SHOW ANSWER 5 / 7 | In a rare change after the start of the event, Stage 19 was cut from 130km to 95km, with two planned categorised climbs dropped, because of what specific reason? DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : Herd of diseased cattle SHOW ANSWER 6 / 7 | What was common to Stages 4, 7, 12, and 13 before the ceremonial finish with Stage 21 on Sunday? DID YOU KNOW THE ANSWER? YES NO Answer : They were the Stages won by the champion Slovenian SHOW ANSWER


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
AI ‘slop' may suit YouTube but where does it leave the rest of us?
The prevailing wisdom is that AI-generated content, or 'slop' as it's colloquially known, should make our skin crawl. AI models tend to generate uncanny faces, mangled hands and fantastical scenarios. For example, a YouTube Short video shows a baby that finds itself being shimmied up a baggage loader onto a jumbo jet, before donning an aviation headset and flying the plane. It has racked up more than 103 million views. So too have other AI-generated videos which are starting to dominate the platform in much the same way they have proliferated across Facebook, Pinterest and Instagram. Several of YouTube's most popular channels now feature AI-generated content heavily. I'd originally thought this would be a problem for YouTube as it grappled with what looked like a new form of spam, but the general lack of complaint from advertisers, coupled with the gangbusters growth of AI content and appreciative comments from viewers, changed my view. It seems people are happy to gorge on slop, and that's not a problem for Alphabet's most valuable asset after Google Search. Quite the opposite. Also Read: How to prevent brain rot Earlier this month, YouTube—which could surpass The Walt Disney Company this year as the world's largest media company by revenue—updated its policies to strike a balance, allowing AI-generated videos to flourish on its platform without treating them as spam. The new rules cut ad revenue from low-effort, repetitive content. Their creators might exploit AI tools like Eleven Labs to create a synthetic voice that reads out a script, scraped from Reddit, over a slideshow of stock images. Some of these videos get hundreds of thousands of views. The video platform's overall approach, however, is that AI-generated content is fine so long as it's original, provides value to viewers and includes some human input. For now, it seems to be measuring that on a case-by-case basis, which is as good an approach as any with new tech. YouTube is also no stranger to fighting spam. Indeed, the policy update seems to have put advertisers at ease, even as 92% of creators on the site use generative AI tools, according to the company. Advertisers have a tacit understanding that more AI on YouTube means more content, and more revenue. It helps that the industry has years of experience trying to monitor icky content—from racism to conspiracy theories—shown next to their brands online. They have learnt that it's a years-long game of whack-a-mole. YouTube clearly wants AI content to thrive. Sister company Google has said that later this summer, it will bring its video-generation tool Veo3 to YouTube Shorts, making it even easier to create lifelike AI videos of Storm-Trooper vloggers or biblical characters as influencers. The company says AI will 'unlock creativity" for its content creators. Also Read: In Delhi, Gen Z is touching grass to counter brain rot But unlocking new forms of profit is more straightforward for Alphabet than it is for creators. Take Ahmet Yiğit, an Istanbul-based creator who was behind the viral pilot-baby video. Though his channel has racked up hundreds of millions of views, he's only received an estimated $2,600 for his most viral post, with the bulk of his audience coming from countries like India, where ad rates are low. Yiğit says he spends hours on a single scene and juggles a dozen tools, suggesting that even this new generation of AI creators could end up working harder for less, while Alphabet reaps ad revenue from their output. As long as the content machine runs, it doesn't matter whether AI videos are quick and easy or gruelling to make—only that they drive views and ads. That's why YouTube is leaning harder into welcoming slop than policing it. While the company does require creators to say if their videos contain AI, the resulting disclaimer is listed in a small-text description that viewers must click through to read, making it tough to spot. That does little to address the growing confusion around what's real and what's synthetic as more YouTubers race to capitalize on AI content. Also Read: Google's ad-tech dominance is easier to fix than its search monopoly The risk is that as slop floods our feeds and juices YouTube's recommendation algorithms, it'll drown out more thoughtful, human-made work. The earliest big YouTube hits were slices of life like the infamous clip Charlie Bit My Finger. What happens when the next wave of viral hits have no bearing on reality, instead offering bizarre dreamlike sequences of babies dressed as Storm Troopers, or Donald Trump beating up bullies in an alleyway? Perhaps they will both reflect and deepen our sense of disconnection from real life. AI might turn out to be a boon for YouTube, but it offers an unsettling future for the rest of us. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology.


Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Love Island effect: The unrealistic beauty and dating standards of reality TV
Love Island USA wrapped up its latest season earlier this month. Like its previous renditions, Season 7 moved just as relentlessly. Within seven days, Huda (Mustafa) and Jeremiah (Brown) had already coupled up, shared a bed, and were even talking about moving in together. At some point, Huda revealed to a fellow contestant, Nic (Vansteenberghe), that she was a mom. Nic called her 'Mamacita,' then asked in all naivety, 'Mom of what — a dog?' It was awkward, a little ridiculous, and instantly everywhere. Even if you have never watched a full episode of Love Island, you would have seen the clips. Whether it's through Instagram reels, reaction clips, or memes in group chats, the show finds a way to reach you. The structure is simple. Gather a group of beautiful people, place them in a luxury villa, and see who couples up. They share beds within days, while producers introduce new contestants to test their loyalty. The public votes on who stays, and by the end of six weeks, they are expected to form serious relationships or at least make it look like they have. The pace stays intense, and the connections are shaped more by the demands of the format than by the people themselves. For teenagers like me, these shows often become unwitting blueprints for how we begin to understand relationships. The stories unfold at triple speed, with perfect lighting and carefully edited reactions, building a version of romance that focuses more on momentum than on connection. Slow or uncertain beginnings start to feel like 'red flags', and not being chosen can feel less like part of a show and more like a sign that you weren't worth picking in the first place. The show is built around the thrill of being desired. Getting chosen becomes the prize. That logic does not stay inside the villa. It follows us home. Over time, it becomes all too easy to associate love exclusively with sculpted abs, flawless skin, and bleached teeth. During the 2021 season of Love Island UK, Google searches for lip fillers rose by 49 per cent, searches for liposuction increased by 33 per cent, and mentions of Botox went up by 82 per cent. This growing trend of body dissatisfaction and desire for cosmetic procedures even earned the name 'the Love Island effect', driven by the show's promotion of narrow beauty standards. According to a 2018 poll by the UK-based YouGov research firm, two in five women aged 18 to 34 who watched the show said they felt more self-conscious about their bodies and appearance after viewing it. Additional research from the feminist group Level Up found that nearly a third of viewers had considered dieting to lose weight. One in five viewers said they would whiten their teeth, and more than one in ten were more likely to consider getting lip fillers. The contestants may change every season, but the body types stay the same. This constant repetition of a single body type shapes how we see ourselves, especially as teenagers still learning to navigate identity and self-worth. When shows continually reward the same physical features, they reinforce the idea that desirability depends on conforming to a narrow and often artificial standard. The more we see that version of beauty celebrated on screen, the more we internalise it as the only way to be wanted. It begins to distort how we relate to our bodies, how we measure ourselves against others, and what we come to expect from romantic attention. Beauty starts to feel less like something personal and more like a checklist, one that is difficult to reach and even harder to maintain. This does not mean Love Island should be cancelled. It's fun, no doubt. But just because something is entertaining doesn't mean it is harmless. Season 7 of Love Island USA became the most-watched original season of television on the streaming platform Peacock. It even had a huge social media presence, racking up 1.7 billion video views and impressions on Peacock-owned social channels. Research into past viewership shows that Love Island, a franchise that has existed since 2015 across countries, attracts a large audience aged between 16 and 24, a highly impressionable group. In 2019, the BBC reported that children as young as eight were also watching the programme, even though it aired after the 9 pm slot in the UK. Arguably, the show's reach makes it a prevailing cultural phenomenon. Then there are spin-offs like Netflix's Too Hot to Handle or Perfect Match that follow similar formats. These shows shape how we think about intimacy, about bodies, about each other. Recognising that influence does not ruin the experience; it simply makes space for reflection. Streaming platforms could play a role in creating such a space by including short post-show segments that feature therapists or relationship educators to offer perspective on what the viewers have just watched and how it may shape their ideas about love, self-worth and appearance. These segments could even include former contestants to reveal the 'behind the scenes'. Greater transparency around the contestants' cosmetic treatments or enhancements could also help challenge the illusion that what we see on screen is completely natural or effortless. Many schools have already begun teaching students media literacy. It is important to incorporate lessons on social and emotional learning and have conversations about how emotion and desire are constructed in reality television. The goal is not to shame people for enjoying the show, but to give viewers the tools to recognise what is scripted, what is curated, and what deserves to be questioned rather than absorbed without thought. At the very least, we should be aware of what we are watching and what it's asking us to believe. The writer is a student in Mumbai