China chases 373mph ‘flying train' that would make HS2 obsolete
State-owned CRRC showed off a prototype magnetic levitation, or 'maglev', train in Beijing last week in a sign of its increasing confidence in the technology.
Unlike normal trains, which rarely exceed 200mph, maglevs hover millimetres above their guideways, eliminating friction and allowing them to travel at far greater speeds.
The lack of wear and tear means maintenance costs are also far lower, while their electric motors are emissions-free and the absence of wheels produces far less noise.
Only seven maglev services are operational, mostly on low-speed airport links, but CRRC is thought to be targeting the first ultra-high-speed services in as little as five years. Top speeds could reach above 300mph.
More conservative estimates envisage that the Chinese train or a competing model under development in Japan will enter service in the middle of the next decade – just as HS2, which is slated to run at 225mph, is scheduled to open for business in Britain.
Johannes Kluehspies, president of the International Maglev Board, an association of engineers and scientists specialising in the technology, says a long-range maglev would make conventional bullet trains, including HS2, redundant.
He said: 'Maglev is the future. If the Chinese or Japanese succeed and start operations – which I'm confident they will – it will be the end of high speed rail everywhere in the world.'
The leading railcar from the Chinese prototype went on display at the 17th Modern Railways exhibition in Beijing, where CRRC senior engineer Shao Nan said the train would create a new travel niche between the fastest trains and jet aircraft over distances of up to 1,300 miles.
Journey times between Beijing and Shanghai would be cut from four and a half hours by high-speed train today to just two and a half hours on the maglev, which has been named the CRRC 600 to reflect its top speed in kilometres per hour.
In Europe, the same 750-mile range would take the train from Rome to Berlin, or London to Marseille, while London to Glasgow could be achieved in one and a half hours, and the capital could be connected with Birmingham in less than 25 minutes, compared with 50 minutes on HS2.
UK to prioritise HS2
Jeremy Acklam, transport expert at the Institution of Engineering and Technology, was a one-time maglev sceptic, but says he has come round to the potential of the technology.
He says: 'The science behind it has matured with the arrival of a second generation of supercooled magnets that dramatically reduce the amount of energy needed.
'We've also got national governments that are willing to invest very significant amounts, with Japan and China clearly intent on becoming the world's exporters of this technology.'
Britain could be a potential market once costs come down, though the experience of HS2 – almost a decade late and with costs now expected to top £100bn – means it is unlikely to be an early adopter, Mr Acklam believes.
'We're more likely to back the technology when we know it works. So it could be that after the implementation of a line in Japan, for instance, something may be proposed.
'The question is whether London to Edinburgh, say, would provide enough traffic, because a maglev can't run onto the existing rail network to top up passenger numbers, unlike conventional high speed trains.'
In other words, while projects like HS2 involve laying new tracks, the trains can still run on existing infrastructure. Maglev on the other hand, can only operate on its specialist line, meaning demand must be sufficient to justify the investment.
Maglev construction costs are generally greater than for a high speed railway. However, Prof Kluehspies says the lines, built on elevated concrete piers, are comparatively cheaper when crossing hilly terrain as they do not require as many tunnels and embankments.
That could mean a maglev would cost less than HS2, which will feature 65 miles of tunnels, equivalent to 46pc of its length, plus 110 embankments, 70 cuttings and 50 viaducts.
Tech born in Britain
Britain, ironically, played a key role in the early development of maglev technology after the Second World War and until as recently as the 1980s appeared primed to lead the world in the technology.
Magnetic levitation as a form of transport was first proposed by American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard in 1909. But it was British electrical engineer Eric Laithwaite who developed the linear motor that is key to maglev propulsion, culminating in his discovery in the 1970s of an arrangement of magnets that would produce both lift and forward thrust.
Britain launched the world's first commercial service – called Maglev – in 1984 along 2,000 feet of track between Birmingham Airport and Birmingham International station. The service ran at 26mph and closed in 1995 after struggling with reliability issues.
The UK came close to getting a far more ambitious maglev network in the form of UK Ultraspeed, which proposed linking London with Glasgow at speeds of up to 310mph via stops including Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle and Edinburgh.
German maglev pioneer Transrapid backed the plan and Tony Blair signalled his support in 2006 after the Commons all-party rail group visited the firm's then recently opened Shanghai system, which to this day is the world's fastest commercially operating train at 268mph.
However, just months later, a Transrapid maglev crashed into a maintenance vehicle on its German test track, killing 23 people and undermining enthusiasm for the technology.
After claims that Ultraspeed would cost three times as much per mile as France's expanding TGV network, the government distanced itself from the project and committed itself to HS2 instead.
Transrapid itself shut down from 2010, though its maglev system was taken up by China, leading to claims from Germany that Beijing had stolen the technology. Officials said that engineers had merely 'absorbed' learnings from the Shanghai trains.
While China and Japan are now locked in a competition to deliver the first ultra high speed maglev, the way forward remains complicated.
The Japanese project, led by JR Central, aims to link Tokyo with Osaka in just over an hour, down from at least two and a half hours to cover the more than 300 mile distance on the latest Shinkansen bullet train.
A Japanese maglev established the world rail speed record in 2015 when it hit 375mph on a test track, beating the 357mph set by a modified TGV in France eight years earlier.
However, the 9tn yen (£45bn) system, which would operate at 310mph in commercial service, has nevertheless encountered major hurdles while tunnelling through mountains to central Japan.
Work was halted in 2020 amid concerns about the impact on the local water table. The planned opening time has slipped from 2029 to 2034.
China, meanwhile, remains uncertain about which of two competing maglev technologies it should pursue, Prof Kluehspies says.
Electromagnetic suspension technology, used on the Shanghai maglev, relies on attractive magnetic forces to lift the train above its guideway. Constant power is required to maintain levitation but the infrastructure is simpler.
Electrodynamic suspension, the method favoured in Japan, instead uses repulsive superconducting magnets cooled to cryogenic temperatures to lift the train off the track when it is travelling at speeds above about 60mph. The maglev needs rubber wheels at low speeds, but is more stable at higher ones.
The situation is complicated by the involvement of the Chinese military, which is keen to explore the use of maglev technology to launch missiles from submarines.
At higher speeds, air resistance becomes an issue for all trains, with the latest maglev designs deploying a sharp 'beak' modelled on a kingfisher's bill to slice through the air.
In the longer term, maglevs could use a system similar to the Hyperloop proposed by Elon Musk and operate in a tube with reduced air pressure to minimise drag.
Whatever technology the Chinese settle on, it seems certain to leave HS2 in the dust.
'The model of maglev doesn't really matter,' Prof Kluehspies says. 'It's superior technology and it will win. The sooner it comes the better for future generations.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
By David Lawder STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months and keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most EU goods exports to the U.S., including autos. The bloc will also buy $750 billion worth of American energy and make $600 billion worth of U.S. investments in coming years. No similar breakthrough is expected in the U.S.-China talks but trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May was likely. An extension of that length would prevent further escalation and facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. A U.S. Treasury spokesperson declined comment on a South China Morning Post report quoting unnamed sources as saying the two sides would refrain from introducing new tariffs or other steps that could escalate the trade war for another 90 days. Trump's administration is poised to impose new sectoral tariffs that will impact China within weeks, including on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, ship-to-shore cranes and other products. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters on Sunday before European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen struck their tariff deal. DEEPER ISSUES Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "I'd be surprised if there is an early harvest on some of these things but an extension of the ceasefire for another 90 days seems to be the most likely outcome," Kennedy said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption -- a decades-long goal for U.S. policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. TRUMP-XI MEETING? In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon on a landmark trip to China, and a new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail planning. Sun Chenghao, a fellow at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, said that a Trump-Xi summit would be an opportunity for the U.S. to lower the 20% tariffs on Chinese goods related to fentanyl. In exchange, he said the Chinese side could make good on its 2020 pledge to increase purchases of U.S. farm products and other goods. "The future prospect of the heads of state summit is very beneficial to the negotiations because everyone wants to reach an agreement or pave the way in advance," Sun said. Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered U.S. tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.

Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hong Kong's CK Hutchison seeks Chinese investor to join Panama Ports deal
HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong conglomerate that's selling ports at the Panama Canal said Monday it may seek a Chinese investor to join a consortium of buyers, a move that could please Beijing but bring more U.S. scrutiny to the geopolitically fraught deal. CK Hutchison Holdings' initial plan to sell its port assets to a group that includes U.S. investment firm BlackRock Inc. pleased President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the critical shipping lane's operations in Panama. However, they apparently angered Beijing and drew a review from Chinese anti-monopoly authorities. A Beijing-backed newspaper posted scathing commentaries about the deal, with one describing it as a betrayal of all Chinese. Beijing's offices overseeing Hong Kong affairs have reposted some of these commentaries, widely seen as an indication of Chinese leaders' stance. A Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. After months of uncertainty brought by tensions between Washington and Beijing, Hutchison said in a statement that the exclusive negotiations period with the consortium has expired. However, it added 'the Group remains in discussions with members of the consortium with a view to inviting major strategic investor from the PRC to join as a significant member of the consortium,' referring to the People's Republic of China. It said they needed to change the membership of the consortium and the structure of the transaction for the deal to be able to pass reviews by 'all relevant authorities." The awkward position Hutchison found itself in for months highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing's expectations of national loyalty, especially when relations between China and the United States are strained. Hong Kong has overhauled its electoral system to ensure the city is run by 'patriots.' CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing. It announced March 4 that it would sell all its shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and in Hutchison Port Group Holdings to the consortium that also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, a subsidiary of the Mediterranean Shipping Company. In May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor. Its parent company is led by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li's. The initial deal, valued at nearly $23 billion including $5 billion in debt, would have given the consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, located at either end of the canal. That agreement also required approval from Panama's government. The deadline for their exclusive negotiation period ended on July 27. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Japan Expects Only 1-2% of $550 Billion US Fund to Be Investment
Japan expects only 1-2% of its recently agreed upon $550 billion US fund to be in the form of actual investment, with the bulk of it being loans, according to the nation's top chief negotiator Ryosei Akazawa. At the same time, Tokyo would save roughly ¥10 trillion ($68 billion) through lower tariff rates in its deal with America, he said.