Ex-Boston Public Schools science teacher indicted on federal child porn charges
Advertisement
He pleaded not guilty to the state charges. He was ordered held on $50,000 bail. At the time, Boston Public Schools said Gavin had been placed on leave.
He now faces new and similar charges in federal court.
Gavin allegedly used the instant messaging app Discord to exchange nude photos with at least 20 girls, who were between 12 and 17 years old, who live in six states, as well as Great Britain and Canada, according to the US Attorney's office.
'It is alleged that, in these chats, Gavin disclosed that he was a teacher, engaged in sexual conversations and often asked the minors to send him pictures of themselves engaged in sexually explicit conduct – knowing that the children were underaged," prosecutors wrote in a statement released Friday.
Advertisement
'The chats also allegedly included conversations in which Gavin expressed his sexual interest in certain students at Josiah Quincy,' prosecutors said.
At the time of his arrest on state charges, Gavin was placed on leave from his job at the school. Prior to that, Gavin was a 6thgrade teacher at the Academy of the Pacific Rim Charter Public School in Hyde Park and was former classroom aide at the Roland Hayes School in Brookline, prosecutors said.
Adam Sennott can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Most cases dismissed because of the work stoppage by lawyers were misdemeanors. Should prosecutors reopen them?
Advertisement While the mounting number of dismissals prompted prosecutors to warn of risks to public safety, a Globe analysis of the dropped cases shows a more mundane reality: the high proportion of low-level crimes clogging the court system, particularly the district courts where the work stoppage is concentrated. About three-quarters of the 100 dismissed cases involved misdemeanors rather than felonies, closely mirroring the most recent statewide data of all charges filed in district courts. A little more than one-quarter of the cases involved assaults, including 12 that allegedly included a dangerous weapon and nine involving allegations of domestic violence. Now, as the Suffolk district attorney's office begins an effort to reopen those cases, defense attorneys say there needs to be a balance struck between public safety and due process. Advertisement The cases were dismissed without prejudice, meaning prosecutors can recharge them. The Suffolk district attorney's office has vowed to re-prosecute the accused and the office said Friday it's already begun to file motions to reopen some cases. 'The past week saw escalating threats to public safety through additional dismissals and releases, continued disruption of our ability to secure justice for victims, and ongoing inaccessibility of Constitutionally mandated representation for indigent defendants,' Suffolk District Attorney Kevin Hayden said in a statement Friday. 'This is an unprecedented — and deeply disturbing — moment for our prosecutors and victim witness advocates, who come to work each day intent on helping victims and protecting the public from dangerous offenders.' The Committee for Public Counsel Services, the state public defender agency, said prosecutors and the courts should take a cue from the pandemic years, when the various sides worked together to reduce the number of prosecutions and people sent to jail. 'We are once again facing a crisis, and to get through this, we can't pretend that the same old processes are either effective or reasonable,' said Chief Counsel Anthony Benedetti in a statement. 'Clogging the system with cases that do not need to be there only exacerbates a crisis that we are working to remedy. When public safety is discussed, what gets lost is the fact that our clients are members of the public, and they are presumed innocent and merely accused of crimes.' He continued, 'Public safety requires due process, and it's harder to provide that when the system is full of cases that don't belong there.' The analysis of the dismissed cases illustrates a longstanding truth, lawyers said: Many people churning through the criminal justice system are facing charges involving petty offenses that carry little punishment. Advertisement 'For the most part, these folks would ultimately not serve any time,' Boston College Law professor Robert Bloom said. Before being told of the results of the Globe's analysis, Bloom predicted that simple drug possession, disorderly conduct, shoplifting, and motor vehicle charges such as driving on a suspended license would be heavily represented. Indeed, they are: The most common one was drug possession, alone accounting for 16 dismissed cases. Eight more are shoplifting alone, and eight are for allegations of motor vehicle infractions. 'The truth of the matter is, the ultimate disposition of most of these crimes will be probation, suspended sentence, continued without a finding,' he said. All of those typically don't involve jail time unless someone reoffends. The justice system is entering a third month of In total, 49 people have been released through the protocol over multiple hearings over the past month. The tensions caused by the work stoppage play out in court documents and hearings for dismissals and releases. On one hand, there's the reality that hundreds of people charged with crimes of addiction and poverty do not have access to a lawyer, and, at times, have sat in jail while the courts sought to find them one. Advertisement 'Very, very depressing,' said Edith Otero, 52, who had just been released at Lowell District Court after 12 days in custody. She was arrested for a probation violation related to a 2019 drug conviction. In jail, said Otero, who uses a wheelchair, 'I did nothing. I just waited. I just waited.' In other instances, prosecutors have stressed that a broad approach to culling cases creates a public safety risk. The public defenders office is prioritizing lawyers for the most troubling charges, which allows those cases to proceed as normal. Many serious felony cases involving sexual assault or major violence are moved to Superior Court, where court-appointed attorneys are paid a higher rate and are generally still taking cases. No cases involving allegations of sexual assault were dismissed, though one included a charge of open and gross lewdness. But allegations of violence and abuse were included among some of the dismissed cases. And once dismissed, officials cannot impose conditions intended to protect public safety, such as GPS monitoring or orders to stay away from alleged victims or witnesses. The dismissed cases include 28 alleged assaults, half of which are felonies; four involve allegations of assault and battery on a police officer. Nine cases included allegations of assault and battery by a family member, one of a Dorchester man accused of telling his pregnant girlfriend he'll 'personally do an abortion' and then punching her in the stomach. The woman could not be reached for comment about the dismissal. Advertisement In another case, a woman was accused of using cologne and a lighter to create a makeshift flamethrower to burn her nephew. She was reported to police by her mother, who did not respond to a message seeking comment about the dismissal. Sometimes the realities are complex: Prosecutors had sought to instead find a lawyer for a domestic assault and battery case in Dorchester that was up for dismissal, stressing it was a 'a very upsetting and frustrating situation.' But they couldn't, and the case was dismissed. Reached by phone Friday, the woman who was allegedly struck in the incident said: 'I'm happy that the case is dismissed. We're a happy couple. We had an argument. I didn't want it to become a big thing.' In Boston Municipal Court central division downtown, a woman anxiously awaited a hearing in her son's case. He'd been in custody for more than seven days on a probation violation, she said, and did not have a lawyer. 'Honestly, people in the public seem kind of glad about it,' she said of people remaining in jail. 'But they've gotta have due process.' Sean Cotter can be reached at
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Music teacher accused of giving lap dance, kissing teen girl takes the stand as twisted emails are revealed
A music teacher who was photographed kissing an underage teen girl in a cinema photo booth has taken the stand to defend herself at trial, claiming it was a 'pretend kiss' that she did not want or expect. Janelle Colville Fletcher, 40, is contesting the allegations that she groomed and sexually abused a teen girl some years ago and testified this week at the South Australian District Court before Judge Joanne Fuller. Advertisement The prosecution, led by Chris Allen, allege Fletcher abused the girl in various locations and also that she communicated with her and another teenage girl to make them amenable to sexual activity. 6 Janelle Colville Fletcher is contesting the allegations that she groomed and sexually abused a teen girl some years ago. 7News Some of the alleged offending happened when the two girls and Fletcher were alone together in a room, the prosecution said, with the teacher allegedly performing a lap dance on a chair. She then allegedly 'dared' the two girls to kiss each other and asked if they would 'date' each other. Advertisement That same night, Allen said, Fletcher then spent time alone with one of the girls and touched her genital area. The alleged grooming and abuse of the girl then went on for months at various locations, the prosecution said, including the home of Fletcher and in Fletcher's car. This week, the prosecution presented emails and messages between the girl and Fletcher and also various photographs that they allege demonstrate Fletcher was in a sexual relationship with the child. 6 The prosecution allege Fletcher abused the girl in various locations. YouTube/ So Flutatious Advertisement A photo taken from a photo booth at a cinema shows the pair kissing, but Fletcher, under questioning from defense lawyer Andrew Culshaw, said she was 'pulled in and the photo went off'. 'In the second photo from the bottom … we can see you and (the girl) appear to be kissing … can you explain to Her Honour what happened,' Culshaw asked. 'It was meant to be a pretend kiss like we had done previously where our lips don't actually touch, and in that particular photo we got close and she did sort of pull me in and the photo went off, yeah,' Fletcher said. 'When you say 'she pulled you in and the photo went off', what happened?' Culshaw pressed. Advertisement 'Just like around my neck sort of thing, just like, just so we would touch, yeah. 'Did you voluntarily engage in a kiss with her?' Culshaw pressed 'No, I did not,' Fletcher said. 6 The alleged grooming and abuse of the girl then went on for months at various locations, the prosecution said. 7News Other photos, exhibited in court, show the girl at Fletcher's house. 'You appear to be leaning against her (the girl),' Allen said. 'Yes,' Fletcher replied. 'Is that a selfie taken by you?' Allen asked. Advertisement 'It does appear that way, yes,' Fletcher said. 'Does it appear that it is taken in your house?' Allen continued. 'Yes,' Fletcher said. 6 This week, the prosecution presented emails and messages between the girl and Fletcher. YouTube/ So Flutatious Advertisement In a series of emails read out in court, Fletcher appears to express strong feelings for the girl. In one, Fletcher wrote: 'My feelings for you are not lust but love.' 'In your mind, what is the difference between the two?' Culshaw asked. 'Lust is like with you are attracted to someone. You have the hots for them, so I guess similar,' Fletcher replied. Advertisement 'Love is not necessarily sexual or romantic, it is love.' In other emails, Fletcher told the girl: 'I am being selfish wanting you to myself when I need to let you live your life with someone your own age', and also 'right now, we can't be open. Right now we will have to continue as we are in secret …' 6 In a series of emails read out in court, Fletcher appears to express strong feelings for the girl. 7News But Fletcher argued these messages were written to keep the girl happy and also to guide her away. Advertisement 'Really, all the emails, the intention behind it was to try and make (the girl) feel that she is not abandoned, she is loved, she is wanted and that in another time or place, maybe she could entertain that she could be with me, but my sole intent of all of these was to slowly get her to think it was her idea to not be with me but to be with … someone her own age and I wanted her to think it was her idea,' Fletcher said. She told the court the girl had expressed romantic feelings for her and that she was struggling with her sexual identity. Fletcher said the girl started exhibiting 'concerning behavior' and she sought to point her in the direction of a more age-appropriate relationship. In one email, she told the girl she was 'completely in love' with her, but she told the court that was a lie. 6 Fletcher argued these messages were written to keep the girl happy and also to guide her away. YouTube/ So Flutatious 'I did think she was a beautiful person,' Fletcher said. 'It wasn't true that I was in love with her.' 'Why did you write it there,' Culshaw asked. 'Because that's what I knew she wanted to hear,' Fletcher said. Allen, in his opening cross-examination of Fletcher, reiterated the prosecution's allegations of extended sexual abuse at various locations and Fletcher flatly denied each allegation. When Allen said Fletcher was grinding on a chair inside a room with the girl and another girl present, Fletcher appeared to giggle. 'Do you think that's funny?' Allen said. 'Sorry, I don't mean to be rude. No, that's not,' Fletcher replied. Fletcher holds a PhD in music education. She told the court that she was heterosexual and believed in the Catholic faith. She was still legally married to a man, though the pair had separated, she told the court. Closing arguments in the judge-alone trial are expected on Monday.
Boston Globe
3 days ago
- Boston Globe
Worcester city councilor pleads not guilty to assaulting police during chaotic ICE interaction
'As both a mother and an elected official, I will always stand up for my constituents, particularly women and children,' Haxhiaj told reporters outside court, per footage that MassLive Advertisement Supporters erupted in cheers as the councilor spoke, but police framed her actions differently in an incident report filed with the court. The report said Worcester police on May 8 responded to the area of 36 Eureka St. for a report of a large group 'surrounding federal officers.' Responding city officers learned federal agents had made an arrest and that members of the large group were yelling at them and 'interfering' with their efforts to safely leave the area with the person they'd placed into custody, the report said. The incident report didn't identify the federal agencies involved in the arrest, but Haxhiaj, the report said, was allegedly seen 'pulling the restraints of the arrested as they were being escorted to the transport vehicle.' Advertisement She also allegedly 'continued to obstruct the federal officers as they attempted to leave the area,' the report said. Worcester Police Officer Shauna McGuirk approached Haxhiaj as the councilor held onto the side mirror of the transport vehicle, telling her 'several times' to move away, according to the report. It said Haxhiaj 'ignored several verbal requests' and allegedly pushed the officer away by 'striking P.O. McGuirk in the chest.' A few minutes later as McGuirk was arresting someone else, the report continued, Haxhiaj 'approached P.O. McGuirk from the side and pulled at P.O. McGuirk's arm.' That alleged act of civil disobedience 'interfered with the arrest and caused officers to divert their attention to Haxhiaj and away from the arrest,' the filing said. The Globe Outside court Wednesday, supporters of Haxhiaj cheered when she said she'd entered a plea of not guilty, according to the YouTube footage. 'I am resolute and unapologetic in maintaining my innocence,' Haxhiaj said. 'The overwhelming number of Worcester residents and Americans across the country are opposed to armed, masked men snatching our people off our streets and neighborhoods, terrifying mothers, children, fathers, families, and whole communities.' She said that while it's 'disappointing and disheartening to invest time, effort, and resources fighting these charges, it is absolutely nothing compared to Worcester families living in fear of being torn apart.' Haxhiaj also said she would 'always, now and forever, stand up and stand by our immigrant brothers and sisters, our neighbors, who are facing a horrific regime.' Advertisement Her next court date is scheduled for Sept. 25. Material from prior Globe stories was used in this report. Travis Andersen can be reached at
