Strong EU, UK demand sees Sri Lanka's apparel exports rise 5.2% in June
Despite these increases, there was a noted decline in exports to the US by 5.7%, totaling $164.39m amid ongoing uncertainty around US president Trump's tariffs.
There was also a contraction of 9.3% in other markets, which amounted to $64.75m.
Looking at the first half of the year, from January to June 2025, there was an overall climb of 8.95% in Sri Lanka's apparel exports from $2.26bn in 2024 to $2.46bn in the current year.
The EU region, excluding the UK, saw a significant rise of 16.7%, reaching $769.89m and shipment to the UK was up by 6.45%, totaling $366.53m.
During this period, exports to the US increased by 4.1%, amounting to $910.92m and exports to other destinations grew by 8.9%, resulting in $413.60m.
'The figures reflect encouraging momentum in key markets like the EU and UK. The industry continues to navigate global headwinds with resilience, supported by strategic diversification and sustained buyer confidence in Sri Lankan apparel,' JAAF said in a statement.
The country's apparel exports was particularly strong in March, with JAAF data showing a 11.65% growth to reach $467m and the first quarter exports saw an increase of 11.7%, amounting to $1.3bn.
In April, JAAF endorsed the Sri Lankan Government's initiative to prioritise trade discussions with the US with an aim to establish equitable and reciprocal trading relationships.
"Strong EU, UK demand sees Sri Lanka's apparel exports rise 5.2% in June" was originally created and published by Just Style, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
Trump's EU trade deal win: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 4, 2025
The Issue: President Trump strikes a landmark EU trade deal before his new tariffs take effect. President Trump and his team keep on striking massive deals ('EU got a deal!,' July 28). How long can the biased media and Democrats not give credit where credit is due? Advertisement Now it's time for Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell to cut interest rates and really get the economy moving. Bob Robustelli Stamford, Conn. Advertisement This is what happens when you elect a businessman as president, instead of a politician. Democrats lambasted Trump on the tariffs, but look how wrong they were. Robert Berk Manhattan Advertisement Saying the tariff deal with the EU is a lopsided win for the United States doesn't consider the whole picture. Sure, tariffs for EU products are 15% versus zero tariffs on US products to the EU, but this doesn't take into consideration the European Value Added Tax. VATs (somewhat similar to sales taxes in the United States) are on average 21.8%, compared to the US sales tax average of 7.25%. Add the US sales tax average to the new 15% EU tariff, and the US total average 'sales tax' is 22%. One can certainly argue this is not good for the EU or US consumers who foot that tax bill, but at least the revenue percentages for each government are similar. Advertisement Brice Russell Naples, Fla. Powell says he's against cutting interest rates because he wants to see how Trump's tariff policies and trade deals play out. That's not the absolute worst position to take. However, with each trade deal Trump inks, particularly the European Union one touted as 'the biggest deal ever made,' the United States becomes even more of an economic powerhouse. How much greater could we be doing if the US economy was turbo charged with an interest-rate cut to 3%? After the Fed stalling for months on a rate cut, Trump's mammoth EU deal has more than made his case for a stable and vibrant US economy. It's time that Powell abandons his cautious position and allows Trump to take full ownership of the US economy, which he is so far doing a spectacular job of managing. Eugene R. Dunn Advertisement Medford Touché, Miranda Devine ('Don deal proves all wrong — again!,' July 31). I guess the screams from those leftist idiots that the sky is falling shouldn't have been taken so literally. Hysteria was spewed by the media and their political minions, but they'll do whatever it takes to undermine Trump. Even many on the left, as hard as it is for them, cannot deny that Trump has a magical power that has the world coming around to even up the playing field. As Trump said, 'Victory is its own reward!' Advertisement Shame on the Democrats for trying to undermine what is best for everyone in this country. Kevin Judge Naples, Fla. Here's how I would deal with the tariff dilemma: Make tariff-free zones with some countries, let's say all Caribbean Community nations. Impose a basic minimum tariff, let's say 10%, with the opportunity to negotiate at a later date. Advertisement Then have conversations with like-minded nations to negotiate the tariff rates. Finally, call for a world conference, and I am sure it will be well-attended with solid suggestions from experts. Anant Nagpur Ottowa, Canada It didn't take Trump long to get the wheels in motion, and now our economy is like a well-oiled machine. Advertisement The naysayer Democrats were hoping that his tariffs would cause pandemonium and utter gloom, but take a good look — that didn't happen. Although prices haven't fallen (especially when dining out), what was once unaffordable has all of the sudden become within your budget simply because of consumer confidence. That's a good feeling that was absent for the last four long years. Ron Zajicek Cortlandt Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Sen. Padilla on BLS chief firing: ‘I think an investigation is certainly in order'
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said on Sunday he would support an investigation into President Trump's firing of the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'I think an investigation is certainly in order,' Padilla said in an interview on NBC News's 'Meet the Press.' Padilla noted he recently called for an investigation into potential violations of the Hatch Act related to the White House's involvement in the GOP redistricting effort. 'The example after example of Donald Trump weaponizing, no longer just the Department of Justice, but he's trying to weaponize the Bureau of Labor Statistics,' Padilla said. Trump on Friday directed his team to fire the BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer following a large jobs data revision that he blamed squarely on the appointee of former President Biden. The jobs report released Friday showed a significant downturn in May and June of this year, suggesting the U.S. added 258,000 fewer jobs over those months than had initially been reported. Trump said McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers' before the 2024 election in order to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris's White House bid, citing labor statistics revisions during the Biden administration that boosted job numbers ahead of the election. Padilla said Trump's decision to fire the commissioner reveals their anxiety about the economy. 'That tells you a lot about their insecurity about the economy and the state of Economic Affairs in America because everything that they're claiming to be true is not true,' he said. 'Prices are still going up. This is from a president who promised to bring prices down. And so the American people are feeling it. The impact of tariffs, $2,400 a year for working families across the country. That's the reality of tariffs.'
Boston Globe
a minute ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's tariffs are making money. That may make them hard to quit.
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labor market. Advertisement Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than $2 trillion in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that doesn't happen and the United States abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit. Advertisement 'I think this is addictive,' said Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are.' The Port of Baltimore on June 30, 2025. ALYSSA SCHUKAR/NYT Trump has long fantasized about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of Trump's tariffs and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the United States away from taxing earnings and toward taxing goods. Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That's because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades. Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more of their earnings on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to a larger tax increase for them compared with richer Americans. Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the government collects every year. Advertisement 'Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways,' said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden administration official. 'But it's really a political question.' Workers welded steel components together at a Thomas Built Buses plant in High Point, N.C., on July 21, 2025. TRAVIS DOVE/NYT Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street. And replacing the tariff revenue with another type of tax increase would require Congress to act, while the tariffs would be a legacy decision made by a previous president. 'Congress may not be excited about taking such a politically risky vote when they didn't have to vote on tariffs in the first place,' Tedeschi said. Some in Washington are already starting to think about how they could spend the tariff revenue. Trump recently floated the possibility of sending Americans a cash rebate for the tariffs, and Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recently introduced legislation to send $600 to many Americans. 'We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate, but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt,' Trump said last month of the tariffs. Democrats, once they return to power, may face a similar temptation to use the tariff revenue to fund a new social program, especially if raising taxes in Congress proves as challenging as it has in the past. As it is, Democrats have been divided over tariffs. Maintaining the status quo may be an easier political option than changing trade policy. Advertisement 'That's a hefty chunk of change,' Tyson Brody, a Democratic strategist, said of the tariffs. 'The way that Democrats are starting to think about it is not that 'these will be impossible to withdraw.' It's: 'Oh, look, there's now going to be a large pot of money to use and reprogram.'' Of course, the tariffs could prove unpopular, and future elected officials may want to take steps that could lower consumer prices. At the same time, the amount of revenue the tariffs generate could decline over time if companies do, in fact, end up bringing back more of their operations to the United States, reducing the number of goods that face the import tax. 'This is clearly not an efficient way to gather revenue,' said Alex Jacquez, a former Biden official and the chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal group. 'And I don't think it would be a long-term progressive priority as a way to simply collect revenue.' This article originally appeared in
