Up to 1,000 people partake in Raise the Roof rally in Cork
Up to 1,000 people took to the streets of Cork this afternoon calling for urgent Government action to end homelessness and the housing crisis.
The rally, under the umbrella of the Raise the Roof campaign, followed last Tuesday's protest outside the Dáil in Dublin.
The national campaign is organised by a coalition of trade unions and Opposition political parties.
Among the unions present were SIPTU, Fórsa, the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation and the Community Action Tenants Union.
Joe Kelly of the Cork Council of Trade Unions said it was great to see people coming out in force to demand that there is a change to the housing policy of the Government.
"People are very angry. We have workers on all sides of the economy and they are just priced out of housing. People have good jobs and they still can't a roof over their head," he said.
TDs and councillors from Sinn Féín, the Green Party, the Labour Party and the Social Democtrats marched as did members of People Before Profit, the Socialist Party, the Irish Traveller Movement and Derelict Ireland.
Jude Sherry and Frank O'Connor of Derelict Ireland carried a banner showing dozens of photographs of derelict homes from across the country.
Ms Sherry said: "The whole of the country is crumbling. Every town, village and city has vacant and derelict properties in it.
"So we have enough homes in Ireland to meet the emergency of getting everyone a home, even just the amount of council homes in the country is enough to ensure there is no child in emergency accommodation or going without a home."
Labour Senator Laura Harmon said the State has to step in to build houses.
"Something absolutely has to be done, we are losing teachers, gardaí, nurses, key workers from this country because of the housing crisis. I believe the housing crisis is the biggest threat to our economy here in Ireland, we need to treat it like an emergency," she said.
Social Demoncrats TD Pádraig Rice said their message is that the Government's housing policy have failed and they need to change, while Sinn Féin's Thomas Gould said the clear message from today's rally is that "we need homes, and we need them now".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
18 minutes ago
- Extra.ie
Minister lashed for plans to raise personal injury claims by 17%
Government TDs and business lobby groups have slammed plans to allow a 17% personal injury claims hike by the judiciary, warning it would 'wipe out' any progress in reducing insurance premiums. In a statement, the Irish Small and Medium Enterprises Association (ISME) strongly criticised Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan, who is set to bring a memo to Cabinet next week to legislate for the increase. ISME claimed that Fianna Fáil TD Mr O'Callaghan's support for the increase is 'a capitulation to vested legal interests and undermines years of work to bring down insurance costs for SMEs and consumers'. Minister Jim O'Callaghan. Pic: Leah Farrell/ Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael backbenchers also expressed concern over the proposal. One TD in Fine Gael, which currently holds the Enterprise brief at Cabinet, said the move 'is not at all in line with the Government's focus on reducing the cost of business'. Last week, it emerged that the Minister for Justice will seek Cabinet approval to begin drafting legislation to increase personal injury awards by 16.7%. The proposed hike, which will reportedly be brought before ministers on July 8, is based on a recommendation from the Judicial Council. The board of the council, an independent body representing judges across Ireland, is required by law to review personal injury guidelines every three years. The group proposed in December that payouts should increase by 16.7%, citing 'significant global and national inflation' in the period since the last review. Pic: Gareth Chaney/Collins Photos The recommendation was adopted by the council at large in late January and passed over to Mr O'Callaghan, who must put the amendments before the Houses of the Oireachtas for approval. The memo from the minister will come following sustained pressure on the Government to bring down the cost of premiums, with officials in the Department of Finance currently working on an updated Action Plan for Insurance Reform. ISME said the hike 'would lead to increases in insurance premiums for both businesses and consumers' and 'further reward a legal industry already profiting from vexatious litigation and huge personal injury payouts'. Neil McDonnell. Pic: Sasko Lazarov / The association said: 'Ireland also has 14 times more personal injury cases than England and Wales, with a population 12 times smaller.' The group's chief executive, Neil McDonnell, called the proposed rise 'indefensible' and said: 'Insurance costs have not fallen following previous reforms, and now the Government wants to undo the little progress that has been made. SMEs and voluntary groups will bear the cost while legal firms walk away with bigger fees. 'Minister O'Callaghan will have to make a decision based on social good, not on the desire to maintain legal earning power.' He also called for the Justice Minister to remove the judiciary from the job of setting the amount of awards and delegate it to an independent expert body such as the Injuries Resolution Board or the Workplace Relations Commission. Discontent is also brewing in the Oireachtas, particularly among members of Fine Gael, which is endeavouring to be seen as the 'pro-enterprise' party in the Dáil. Numerous Fianna Fáil sources also indicated discontent in the Justice Minister's own ranks and questioned whether the legislation to give way to the 16.7% hike needed to be brought forward in the coming weeks. Cork TD Séamus McGrath said the Government must do everything in its power to 'put a downward pressure' on insurance costs. 'The proposal to increase personal injury awards needs to be considered very carefully, and I will be raising my own concerns about the reported proposals,' the Fianna Fáil deputy said.
Extra.ie
33 minutes ago
- Extra.ie
Lack of accountability means artist supports are 'a slush fund'
The lack of accountability when it comes to artists' basic income means the scheme has turned into a Government slush fund, a TD has claimed. Carol Nolan was commenting on the response by Arts Minister Patrick O'Donovan to queries about the initiative. Mr Donovan said: 'The current pilot scheme costs approximately €35million per year, based on 2,000 recipients receiving €325 weekly. ' The lack of accountability when it comes to artists' basic income means the scheme has turned into a Government slush fund, a TD has claimed. Pic: Gareth Chaney/Collins Photos The net cost is likely to be less, given the high number of BIA [Basic Income for the Arts] recipients who were previously on social welfare supports prior to the BIA.' Mr O'Donovan also said 'evaluation of the pilot is continuous, as participants complete a survey every six months'. He said: 'My department is currently preparing a report examining the first 24 months of the scheme. A further interview research paper, written by an independent researcher, was published recently. Carol Nolan was commenting on the response by Arts Minister Patrick O'Donovan to queries about the initiative. Pic: Collins 'This paper collects the experiences of 50 BIA recipients, who have been interviewed by a sociologist.' Ms Nolan called the response 'almost absurdly laughable'. She said: 'It is clearly stated in the reply provided to me that the evaluation of the pilot is continuous because participants complete a survey every six months.' The Independent TD asked: 'Does the department really think this is what robust evaluation looks like [and] does it believe that a slush fund that has cost €100million to date is going to be criticised by the very same people on the receiving end of that cash?' Ms Nolan accused Fine Gael TD Mr O'Donovan of implementing outdated Green Party ideology, as it was imple – mented by former arts minister Catherine Martin, adding: 'The entire scheme just reeks of that particular form of cultural entitlement to vast sums of public monies that is particularly pervasive in the likes of RTÉ where control of publicly financed spending is way down the list of priorities.'
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
EU-US trade deal: Cabinet expects 10% baseline tariffs to remain even if agreement is reached
The Government is expected to make a renewed push for certain key sectors to be exempted from the impact of new US trade policies amid growing expectations within Cabinet that a baseline 10 per cent tariffs could remain even if a deal is reached between the European Union and the Trump administration in Washington. US president Donald Trump has threatened to impose 50 per cent tariffs on all EU goods from July 9th unless the two sides reach a deal. Most EU goods already face a 10 per cent tariff, with levies of 25 per cent on cars and car parts and 50 per cent on steel and aluminium. Talks between the EU and US are continuing, but senior figures in Dublin are increasingly concerned that even if an agreement is reached, Washington will insist that a baseline of 10 per cent tariffs remain in place. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris told an Oireachtas committee last week that such a development would 'not be without very significant challenges for certain sectors of the Irish economy'. READ MORE He said that looking at framework agreements put in place between Washington and other countries, '10 per cent is the new norm in terms of tariffs from a US perspective'. Mr Harris told The Irish Times on Sunday night that 'Ireland's position remained 'focused on the negotiations and on pursuing positive dialogue and a mutually beneficial outcome with certainty for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic'. [ 'Trump always chickens out' is starting to look more like 'the man always gets his way' Opens in new window ] 'This position has been continually communicated to both the EU, the US and to other international and business partners. 'As the prospect of a deal comes into view, it will have to be assessed against what exclusions from a baseline 10 per cent tariff can be secured, including scope for 'zero for zero' arrangements for key sectors, as well as clarity on the outcome of the section 232 investigations (which assess the impact of imports on US national security), including on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and aviation.' The Tánaiste will travel to Berlin on Friday, July 4th, to meet his German counterpart. Mr Harris will also provide an update to the Government's trade forum which is to meet on Wednesday – a week before the Trump deadline for a deal. The forum will be given a new analysis on the potential impact of tariffs on the Irish economy and will also hear details on a new national strategy for the semiconductor sector. The Government is, in particular, concerned at the potential impact of tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry, in which about 90 companies employ almost 50,000 staff. About 30,000 of those workers are employed by US companies. However, within Government there are also worries at the impact of non-tariff initiatives by the Trump administration aimed at driving the domestic production of pharmaceuticals in the United States. Internal briefing notes drawn up for Mr Harris show that officials believe an executive order signed by the US president last month represents a 'clear policy shift' from Washington to favour US manufacturing facilities. [ Trump's on-off tariff announcements now the main threat to global growth Opens in new window ] The executive order – Regulatory Relief to Promote Domestic Production of Critical Medicines – was signed by Mr Trump on May 5th. It raises concerns about the length of time it takes to build pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities in the US – something that Irish sources have outlined may limit the effectiveness of the US administration's moves to reduce its pharmaceutical imports from drug-producing nations such as Ireland. The order seeks to cut red tape for US drugmakers and enhance inspection of foreign manufacturing facilities, which would be funded by increased fees levied on them. The analysis for the Tánaiste outlines that the move is a 'clear policy shift towards prioritising US manufacturing facilities over foreign ones'. 'The direction to increase fees for and inspections of foreign manufacturing plants is likely to increase costs and potentially create delays or hurdles for non-US based producers,' the officials wrote.
