Who really took the Napalm Girl photo? Iconic image credit 'suspended'
World Press Photo, which awarded the image its 1973 Photo of the Year, recently announced that it has suspended its attribution to Ut, following the release of a new documentary, The Stringer, that challenges the long-accepted account of the photo's origins.
The organisation said its independent investigation raised questions regarding Ut's role and suggested that two Vietnamese photographers, Nguyen Thanh Nghe - highlighted in The Stringer - and Huynh Cong Phuc, may have been better positioned to take the image.
The Stringer, which premiered at Sundance in January earlier this year, claims Nghe sold the photo to AP's Saigon bureau chief for $20 and a print, and forensic experts from the French NGO Index also weighed in, concluding it's 'highly unlikely' that Nick Ut took the photo based on comparisons with other images credited to him that day.
'We conclude that the level of doubt is too significant to maintain the existing attribution,' said Joumana El Zein Khoury, executive director of World Press Photo. 'At the same time, lacking conclusive evidence pointing definitively to another photographer, we cannot reassign authorship, either.'
Ut will not be asked to return his cash prize from the World Press Photo 1973 Photo of the Year.
The Associated Press, where Ut worked at the time, have said that after conducting two internal investigations it couldn't find any definitive proof to strip Ut's credit and no compelling evidence anyone else took the photo.
'We understand World Press Photo has taken different action based on the same available information, and that is their prerogative,' the statement said. 'There is no question over AP's ownership of the photo.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Initial probe into South Korea's Jeju Air crash hints at pilot error
The initial results of an investigation into December's devastating Jeju Air crash in South Korea showed that while both of the plane's engines sustained bird strikes, the pilots turned off the less-damaged one just before its crash-landing. The findings on Tuesday, which implied human error, quickly sparked vehement protests from bereaved families and fellow pilots who accused authorities of trying to shift responsibility for the disaster to the deceased pilots. South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board initially planned to publicise the results of the investigation of the plane's engines on Saturday. But it was forced to cancel its press briefing in the face of strong protests by relatives of crash victims who were informed of the findings earlier in the day, according to government officials. "If they want to say their investigation was done in a reliable, independent manner, they should have come up with evidence that backs up their explanation," said Kim Yu-jin, head of an association of bereaved families. "None of us resent the pilots." According to a copy of an unpublished briefing report obtained by the AP news agency, a South Korean-led multilateral investigation team said it found no defects in the plane's engines built by France's Safran and GE. The report said thorough examinations of the engines found the plane's right engine suffered more serious internal damage following bird strikes as it was engulfed by fire. But the pilots switched off the plane's left engine, the report said citing probes on the cockpit voice recorder, the flight data recorder and examinations of both engines. Officials earlier said the black boxes of the Boeing jetliner stopped recording about four minutes before the accident, complicating investigations into the cause of the disaster. The cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder cited in the briefing report refers to data stored before the recording stopped. The report didn't say why the pilots shut off the less-damaged engine and stopped short of saying whether it was an error by the pilots. Bereaved families slam the probe Bereaved families and pilots at Jeju Air and other airlines blasted the investigation findings, saying authorities must disclose the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder. "We, the 6,500 pilots at civilian airlines, can't contain our seething anger against the preposterous argument by the Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board that lost neutrality," the Korean Pilot Unions Alliance said in a statement Tuesday. Unionised pilots at Jeju Air also issued a statement urging authorities to present scientific evidence to show the plane should have landed normally if it flew with the less-damaged engine. The latest report focused only on engine issues and didn't mention other factors that could also be blamed for the crash. Among them is the concrete structure the plane crashed into. It housed a set of antennas called localisers designed to guide aircraft safely during landings and many analysts say it should have been made with more easily breakable materials. Some pilots say they suspect the government wouldn't want to mainly blame the localisers or bird strikes for mass deaths as Muan Airport is under direct management of the Transport Ministry. The Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board and the Transport Ministry have offered no public response to the criticism. They said they also won't publicly discuss the engine investigations to respect demands by bereaved families. Authorities aim to publish the investigation's final results by next June, a person familiar with the investigation said. The Boeing 737-800 operated by Jeju Air landed on its belly without its landing gear deployed at South Korea's southern Muan International Airport on 29 December. It overshot the runaway, slammed into a concrete structure and burst into flames. It was the deadliest disaster in South Korea's aviation history in decades, killing all but two of the 181 people on board.
Euronews
5 days ago
- Euronews
Brazil's former leader Bolsonaro ordered to wear ankle monitor
Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro has been ordered to wear an ankle monitor, his press office said on Friday. The development came as federal police conducted searches at his home and his party's headquarters in Brasília, according to people familiar with the court order. Local media reported that Bolsonaro is also barred from using social media or contacting other individuals under investigation by the Supreme Federal Court, including his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian lawmaker who currently lives in the United States and is known for his close ties to US President Donald Trump. A police statement said that officers in Brasília carried out "two search and seizure warrants, in addition to precautionary measures other than arrest, in compliance with a decision by the Supreme Court." The statement did not name Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro is currently on trial at the Supreme Court accused of leading an alleged attempt to stage a coup to overturn the 2022 election in which he was defeated by left-wing president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Live aerial footage from local broadcasters showed federal police vehicles outside Bolsonaro's residence in Brasília. Congressman Sóstenes Cavalcante, the leader of Bolsonaro's party in the lower house, told the AP news agency that officers also searched Bolsonaro's office at the party's headquarters. He described the operation as "another chapter in the persecution of conservatives and right-wing figures" in Brazil. A lawyer for Bolsonaro did not immediately respond to a request for comment. On Tuesday, Brazil's Prosecutor General Paulo Gonet said in a report to the Supreme Court that the "evidence is clear: the defendant acted systematically, throughout his mandate and after his defeat at the polls, to incite insurrection and the destabilization of the democratic rule of law." Bolsonaro has described the trial on X as a "witch hunt," echoing a term used by Trump when he came to his South American ally's defence last week. Last week, Trump imposed a 50% import tax on Brazil, directly tying the tariffs to Bolsonaro's trial. The US president hosted Bolsonaro at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida when both were in power in 2020. Trump has compared Bolsonaro's situation with his own legal battles and speaking to reporters at the White House on Tuesday, repeated the claim that the trial is a "witch hunt."
AFP
6 days ago
- AFP
Baseless posts about India embassy attack misuse old photos
"Shocking news from Kabul: Attack on the Indian Embassy; several officials martyred while serving the nation," reads a Hindi-language X post shared July 7, 2025. "This shameful act violates international diplomatic principles," adds the caption to two pictures that each depict a damaged building. Image Screenshot of the false X post taken July 7, 2025, with a red X added by AFP Similar claims also surfaced on Facebook on the anniversary of the 2008 attack on India's embassy in Afghanistan that killed here). But there have been no official reports of an assault targeting the Indian diplomatic headquarters in Kabul. A combination of reverse image and keyword searches on Google found the first photo on the archives of The Associated Press (AP) news agency (archived link) "Afghan security forces watch a house burn at the site of a clash between insurgents and security forces at the Indian Consulate in Herat, Afghanistan, Friday, May 23, 2014," reads part of its caption. Image Screenshot comparison of the false post (L) and the photo from AP The picture was also published in a report from Indian media NDTV about the incident (archived link). The second same image was published in a Reuters report with a caption that says, "Afghan officials inspect outside the German embassy after a blast in Kabul, Afghanistan May 31, 2017" (archived link). The report said a bomb hidden in a sewage tanker exploded in the centre of Kabul, killing at least 80 people and damaging embassy buildings. Image Screenshot comparison of the false post (L) and the photo from Reuters Al Jazeera featured the image in a report about the blast (archived link). Other false posts include a third picture also from AP depicting former Indian diplomats inspecting the embassy in Kabul following a car bomb attack in October 2009 (archived here and here) Image Screenshot comparison of the false post (L) and the photo from AP
