logo
Trump says US economy is in a 'transition period'

Trump says US economy is in a 'transition period'

The National04-05-2025
President Donald Trump downplayed fears of a recession in the US in response to his tariffs policies and said the US economy is in a "transition period".
He defended the escalating tariff feud with China, and said US-imposed levies would be lowered eventually.
"At some point I'm going to lower them, because otherwise you can never do business with them, and they want to do business very much," Mr Trump said in an interview with NBC news that aired on Sunday.
He pushed back against rising costs of imports, particularly from China, saying that girls don't need 30 dolls, they could have three or four.
"I don't think a beautiful baby girl that's 11 years old, needs to have 30 dolls, I think they can have 3 or four dolls, because what we were doing with China was just unbelievable, we had a trade deficit of hundreds of billions of dollars with China."
The wide-ranging interview, that at times was combative, was taped on Friday from the President's Mar a Lago estate, where he spent the weekend.
The interview comes after Mr Trump marks 100 days of his second term in office.
Mr Trump won the US election in 2024 on a platform to improve the economy, including reducing the cost of living, and impose stricter immigration policies.
He has imposed tariffs on trade partners and allies, upsetting the global economy. He put a 145 per cent tariff rate on goods coming from China.
Beijing responded with a 84 per cent tariff rate in retaliation.
The President has explained away the levies as measures aimed at ending economic imbalances. He said the policy would enrich the US.
"I think the tariffs are going to be great for us, because it's going to make us rich," he said.
Mr Trump had also campaigned on a promise to quickly end the war in Ukraine.
Last week, his administration signed a minerals deal with Kyiv that will see the US profiting from the extraction of resources in the country, and invested in its reconstruction after the war with Russia ends.
Mr Trump, who has dispatched his envoy Steve Witkoff to speak with Russia's President Vladimir Putin, said "maybe it's not possible" to reach a peace deal that would end the three-year-old war.
In recent weeks, he has publicly expressed frustration with Mr Putin, amid continued strikes on Ukraine, even as talks were ongoing.
"I think we have a very good chance of doing it very quickly," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence minister denies India bowed to pressure to end fighting with Pakistan
Defence minister denies India bowed to pressure to end fighting with Pakistan

Dubai Eye

timean hour ago

  • Dubai Eye

Defence minister denies India bowed to pressure to end fighting with Pakistan

India's defence minister said on Monday that New Delhi had ended its military conflict with Pakistan in May as it had met all its objectives and had not responded to pressure, rejecting US President Donald Trump's claim that he brokered the truce. Rajnath Singh was speaking at the opening of a discussion in parliament on the April 22 attack in India's Jammu & Kashmir, in which 26 men were killed. The attack led to a fierce, four-day military conflict with Pakistan in May, the worst between the nuclear-armed neighbours in nearly three decades. "India halted its operation because all the political and military objectives studied before and during the conflict had been fully achieved," Singh said. "To suggest that the operation was called off under pressure is baseless and entirely incorrect," he said. Singh's comments came as the Indian Army said that it had killed "three terrorists" in an intense gun battle in Indian Kashmir on Monday. Indian TV channels said the three were suspected to be behind the April attack. Pakistan thanked Trump for brokering the agreement but India said Washington had no hand in it and that New Delhi and Islamabad had agreed between themselves to end the fighting. "At no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there any linkage with trade and what was going on," Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said, referring to Trump's repeated remarks that he had used the prospect of trade deals between Washington and the two countries as leverage to broker peace. There was also no conversation between Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi between the day of the Kashmir attack when Trump called to convey his sympathy and June 17 when Modi was in Canada for the G-7 summit, Jaishankar told parliament. Indian opposition groups have questioned what they say is the intelligence failure behind the Kashmir attack and the government's inability to capture the assailants - issues they are expected to raise during the parliament discussion. They have also criticised Modi for coming under pressure from Trump and agreeing to end the fighting, along with reports that Indian jets were shot down during the fighting. Pakistan claimed it downed five Indian planes in combat, and India's highest ranking general told Reuters that India suffered initial losses in the air, but declined to give details. The Himalayan region of Kashmir has been at the heart of the hostility between India and Pakistan, both of whom claim the region in full but rule it in part, and have fought two of their three wars over it. India accuses Pakistan of helping separatists in its part of Kashmir, but Pakistan denies this and says it only provides diplomatic and moral support to Kashmiris seeking self-determination.

Democrats ask US State Department to stop funding GHF and return to UN-led aid delivery
Democrats ask US State Department to stop funding GHF and return to UN-led aid delivery

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Democrats ask US State Department to stop funding GHF and return to UN-led aid delivery

More than 20 Democratic senators are urging President Donald Trump 's administration to end its support for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in the wake of the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians at or near aid sites under its control. Since May 27, the GHF has been solely in charge of aid distribution in Gaza, where in recent weeks dozens of Palestinians have starved to death. Several reports have alleged that the GHF's private guards or the Israeli military have shot desperate Palestinians as they have sought food at aid sites. 'We urge you to immediately cease all US funding for GHF and resume support for the existing UN-led aid co-ordination mechanisms with enhanced oversight to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches civilians in need,' the senators, led by Chris Van Hollen, said in a letter addressed to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly denied starvation is occurring in Gaza, but President Donald Trump on Monday conceded that what is happening in the enclave is ' real starvation '. 'I see it, and you can't fake that,' Mr Trump said while on a visit to Scotland. 'We have to get the kids fed.' He said the UK and other European countries would join in providing aid to Gaza 'so we're going to set up food centres where people can walk in with no boundaries', he said. Shocking images of malnourished children have emerged in recent days, prompting accusations that Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war. Since May, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed while waiting for food near GHF centres, according to the UN. That number prompted the senators to ask whether the State Department had its own assessment of the number of Palestinians killed since GHF took over aid distribution in the enclave. 'Does the State Department assess that civilians have been killed in or around the GHF distribution sites?' the senators wrote. 'If so, how many have been killed and who was responsible for their deaths? Has the State Department requested information from the Israeli government or from GHF and contractors on the ground concerning any incidents of civilian harm?'

Tulsi Gabbard became a ‘weapon of mass distraction'
Tulsi Gabbard became a ‘weapon of mass distraction'

Gulf Today

time2 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

Tulsi Gabbard became a ‘weapon of mass distraction'

Josh Marcus, The Independent Critics have accused Tulsi Gabbard of trying to shield Donald Trump's administration from scrutiny through her recent claims that top Obama administration officials should be prosecuted for leading a "coup" against the president in 2016 by investigating Russian efforts to help his campaign. The allegations and conspiracy theories "would be sad if they weren't so dangerous," Democratic Rep. Jason Crow told Fox News on Sunday. "She has turned herself into a weapon of mass distraction, is what I've been calling it." Crow accused Trump's national intelligence director of "trying to curry and get back into favor with Donald Trump and has concocted these theories to do so," an apparent reference to Gabbard and Trump's public disagreement over the state of Iran's nuclear programme. This month, Gabbard spearheaded the release of materials regarding the then-outgoing Obama administration's attempts to probe Russian influence operations during the 2016 election. Critics saw the release as an attempt to distract from continued criticism of the Trump administration for its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and the president's ties to the late financier, who died in prison while awaiting a federal sex trafficking trial. "Nothing in this partisan, previously scuttled document changes that," Senator Mark Warner, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told The Hill after the disclosures. "Releasing this so-called report is just another reckless act by a Director of National Intelligence so desperate to please Donald Trump that she is willing to risk classified sources, betray our allies, and politicise the very intelligence she has been entrusted to protect," he said. Gabbard claims the Obama materials, including a declassified 2020 Republican report from the House intelligence committee, reveal his "years long coup" against Trump. She claims that top Obama officials pushed to override past intelligence findings to allege that Russians specifically wanted to boost the Trump campaign, rather than undermine faith in the US election system more generally, and has called for Obama and others to face criminal charges. Trump has echoed such claims, sharing a fake, AI- generated video of Obama being arrested and thrown in jail on his Truth Social account. As evidence of the alleged coup, Gabbard honed in on past conclusions that Russian actors did not successfully hack digital voting infrastructure or change vote counts, suggesting these findings clashed with intelligence officials' later assessments that Russia sought to help Trump. Susan Miller, a former CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment, said Gabbard was "lying." "We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected," Miller told NBC News, adding that intelligence officials had briefed Trump on their findings and he had thanked them. "At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time," she said. Obama's office issued a rare public statement denouncing Gabbard's allegations. "These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," a spokesperson said. The White House has pushed back against the argument that Gabbard's investigation is a partisan play. "The only people who are suggesting that the director of national intelligence would release evidence to try to boost her standing with the president are the people in this room who constantly try to sow distrust and chaos among the president's Cabinet," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a Wednesday briefing. "And it's not working," she said. Multiple assessments have backed up the intelligence community's original findings of a general, one-way Russian influence operation that sought to boost Trump through tactics like hacking Democratic party materials and spreading disinformation online, even though the Trump campaign itself wasn't shown to have collaborated on the effort. Special counsels have investigated both the underlying "Russiagate" claims and the origins of the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign without uncovering any intentional "coup" by the Obama administration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store