Ludhiana: Power staff begin ‘work-to-rule' protest over unmet demands
Amid mounting frustration over unfulfilled promises and unresolved grievances, electricity department employees across Punjab have launched a statewide 'work-to-rule' protest. Under the protest, employees will work only for 8 hours and respond to any work-related calls between 5 pm and 9 am. The protesting employees allege that repeated assurances from the government and PSPCL have failed to materialise. (HT File)
The agitation is being led jointly by the PSEB Employees Joint Forum, Bijli Mulazam Ekta Manch Punjab, Association of Junior Engineers, and Grid Sub-Station Employees Union, under the leadership of Rattan Singh Majari and Gurpreet Singh Gandiwind.
The protesting employees allege that repeated assurances from the government and PSPCL have failed to materialise. 'We were assured that our concerns would be addressed within a set timeframe, but even after several extensions, no steps have been taken,' said a junior engineer.
Their key demands include regular recruitment to fill thousands of vacant posts, rollback of privatization efforts, better safety infrastructure, and compensation for workers injured or killed during duty. They have also opposed the implementation of the 7th Pay Commission without proper consultation.
'When a worker gives 24x7 service, he deserves equal pay and humane conditions. This protest is our last resort,' the JE added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Take steps to fast-track and streamline forest clearances, says FAC
In a bid to streamline the forest clearance process, the forest advisory committee (FAC) has recommended curbing multiple enquiries for essential details, not insisting on hard copies of project details, and reviewing pendency of forest clearance applications every fortnight. FAC also decided that some proposals need not be referred to it or regional empowered committees. (HT Photo) Prior forest and environmental clearance are mandatory for any major industry or infrastructure project which is coming up in or near forest land. FAC, a statutory body under the ministry of environment, forest and climate change (MoEFCC) has also decided that some proposals need not be referred to it or regional empowered committees (RECs). These include proposals involving: a change in the name of the user due to inheritance by legal heir; change in name of company, etc; transfer of approval from one user to another such as transfer of mining leases; change in some of the patches of compensatory afforestation (CA) sites due to unforeseen reasons; delay in submission of compliance of in-principle approval conditions after the stipulated period when this is done with valid and cogent reasons for the delay. In an FAC meeting on June 12, the deputy director general of forests (central), various regional officers, and nodal officers of states discussed how forest clearances can be granted in a time bound manner. FAC has stressed that the authorities, while processing proposals, need to adhere to the timelines as provided in the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Rules, 2023. The nodal officer, along with the concerned divisional forest officers in the state/UTs may review the pendency of proposals on a fortnightly basis to process and dispose of the case within the prescribed time lines, it said. HT reported on Feb 27 that the Union environment ministry has developed new features on Parivesh (Pro-active and responsive facilitation by interactive and virtuous environmental single-window hub) 2.0 –– an integrated environmental management system for environment, forests, wildlife, coastal zone clearances –– for quicker processing of forest clearances. One of the changes is to auto-forward a proposal to the next processing authority if 'essential details sought (EDS)' by the central government or regional officials is not provided within three days by state authorities. As per Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2022, projects covering 5 to 40 ha land should be disposed in 120 days, and those above 40 ha should be disposed within 160 days. Fast tracking of forest clearances has been a priority for the government. Union environment minister Bhupender Yadav in an interview to HT on June 5 said the Centre is trying to make the environment and forest clearance system efficient and fast in recent years. Dredging of rivers FAC has also decided that dredging of rivers with the objective of removing debris that accumulated during and after natural disasters, or after extreme weather events, intended to safeguard the natural course of the river, and with the objective of ecological restoration, with a specified plan and for a specified period, prepared for the purpose, cannot be considered as a commercial mining activity. The Himachal Pradesh government had requested the environment ministry to incorporate 'dredging of riverbeds' as a distinct category in the online Parivesh portal to facilitate prompt approvals, ensuring effective disaster mitigation while restoring river flow and preventing flood-like situations. To mitigate such risks, the district disaster management authority, Kullu, initiated dredging under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. Earlier guidelines said that in case the dredged out material is to be used as minor mineral, prior forest approval is needed.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC tell school to re-admit autistic Class 1 girl student
The Delhi High Court has directed GD Goenka School to re-admit an eight-year-old autistic girl in Class 1, ruling that educational institutions are duty-bound to accommodate children with special needs under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The court said that inclusive education under the Act is not a symbolic ideal, but a legally enforceable right. (HT Archive) Justice Vikas Mahajan in a ruling delivered on Tuesday, criticised the school's failure to provide adequate support, observing that its actions amounted to a denial of the child's statutory right to inclusive education. The court said that inclusive education under the Act is not a symbolic ideal, but a legally enforceable right. 'No child can be deprived merely due to the institutional unwillingness to adapt. It needs no emphasis that 'inclusive education' is not merely about access to education; it is about belongingness. It is also about recognising that every child has a place in the classroom not because they are the same, but because they are different, and that difference enriches the learning environment for all,' the judge ruled. The girl was initially admitted to GD Goenka School in 2021. After being diagnosed with mild autism in 2022, her mother requested a shadow teacher or special educator to assist her. The school, however, failed to provide the necessary support, pressuring the family until they withdrew her in January 2023. In the 2024-25 session, she was again allotted a seat at GD Goenka under the children with special needs (CWSN) category, but the school refused admission. A subsequent allotment at Maxfort School, Pitampura, was also denied. Her parents then approached the Delhi High Court, seeking enforcement of her right to education. The school, represented by advocate Kamal Gupta, opposed the petition, arguing there were no vacancies in the general or CWSN categories and that right to education must be weighed against seat limitations and institutional readiness. He further argued that right to education in a neighbourhood or special school was contingent upon availability and suitability, and cannot override seat limitations or institutional readiness. Rejecting the school's defence, the court held in its 28-page verdict that its conduct reflected a regressive approach. 'Her behaviour, flagged by the school, should have triggered support. Instead, the school's response was one of distancing,' the order noted. 'The actions of the school reveal an institutional approach that failed to evolve in consonance with the needs of the petitioner as a person with disabilities.' Welcoming the decision, the girl's lawyer, Ashok Agarwal, called it a landmark judgment. 'This verdict fulfils the constitutional promise of inclusive education. Disabled children have been sidelined for far too long—this ruling is a vital corrective,' he said.
Hindustan Times
13 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Family placed under house arrest, alleges SAD's Grewal
Jul 02, 2025 10:56 PM IST Ahead of Shiromani Akali Dal's (SAD) scheduled protest in Mohali against the arrest of former cabinet minister Bikram Singh Majithia, police action across Punjab has stirred political controversy. In Ludhiana, police visited the residence of senior SAD leader and former cabinet minister Maheshinder Singh Grewal in Model Town early Wednesday morning along with other SAD leaders. SAD leader Maheshinder Singh Grewal's son, Hitesh Singh Grewal talking to a police official at their house in Ludhiana on Wednesday. (HT Photo) While Grewal was not at home, his son Hitesh was reportedly detained at the house. Grewal later alleged that police effectively placed his family members under house arrest, calling it a clear attempt by the state government to stifle dissent and suppress a peaceful democratic protest. The incident comes amid rising political temperatures in Punjab, with SAD accusing the AAP-led state government of launching a political vendetta against its leadership. 'This is nothing but political intimidation,' said Grewal. 'The government is misusing the police to muzzle voices opposing its actions and silence criticism over the arrest of our leader.' However, the police offered a different account. Inspector Balwinder Singh, SHO of Model Town police station, confirmed that officers had visited the homes of SAD leaders in accordance with directives from senior officials. He denied that any formal detentions or house arrests took place, claiming the police merely inquired about the family's travel plans to maintain law and order.
