US and Japan agree trade deal to circumvent worst of tariffs
Under the terms of the agreement, rather than all Japanese goods being hit with a 24% tax on entry to the US, they will instead be subject to a 15% tariff.
Significantly, and unlike the US-UK deal, there is no cap on the number of Japanese cars subject to the agreed lower tariff. The levy on cars and car parts has been brought down from 25% to 15%, making it the first country to secure a reduction in the blanket 25% rate on vehicles.
Cars make up more than a quarter of all Japan's exports to the US.
Japanese steel and aluminium are still subject to a 25% tariff.
Money blog: Rival set to overtake Morrisons
It's just over a week until the 1 August pause on tariffs is due to end, itself a six-week extension to the 9 July 90-day freeze US President Trump announced in April.
It's seen a win for all parties as Japan is a major trading partner of the world's largest economy.
To make the deal happen, Japan agreed to a $550bn (£406bn) investment package of loans and guarantees from Japanese government-affiliated institutions in key sectors like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.
Japan will also increase purchases of US agricultural products such as rice.
Market reaction
Markets welcomed the news.
In the US, the value of a dollar ticked up, and in Japan, the benchmark stock exchange, the Nikkei, gained sizably, and closed up more than 3.5%.
The index is comprised of many major carmakers, including Nissan, Honda, Mazda, Toyota, and Mitsubishi, which all rallied following the news.
Other Asian stock indexes closed up, including Korea's Kospi, which rose nearly 0.44%, Hong Kong's Hang Seng, which increased more than 1.6%, and Thailand's SET index, which was up more than 2.3%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Benchmark Co. Maintains Buy Rating on ACM Research (ACMR) Stock
ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) is one of the Most Undervalued Semiconductor Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. On June 11, Benchmark Co. analyst Mark Miller maintained a 'Buy' rating on the company's stock and set a price objective of $38.00. The analyst's rating is backed by a combination of factors, which include significant market opportunities and strategic geographic expansion. ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR)'s commitment to expanding presence in the US and Korea, together with established operations in Europe, places it for growth. Close-up of a worker wearing protective gear inspecting a silicon wafer in a laboratory. Furthermore, it also tends to benefit from the majority ownership in ACM Shanghai, which happens to be financially rewarding via dividends. The analyst believes that, with a healthy outlook for shipment growth in 2025 as well as a long-term sales model, ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) exhibits robust potential for success. ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) posted revenues of $172.3 million in Q1 2025, up 13.2%, showcasing increased sales of single wafer cleaning, Tahoe and semi-critical cleaning equipment and ECP (front-end and packaging), furnace, and other technologies. While we acknowledge the potential of ACMR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Cheap AI Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 11 Unstoppable Growth Stocks to Invest in Now Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says JPMorgan, Bank of America Refused His Business
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump accused two of the nation's largest banks of rejecting his business, following as his administration was preparing an executive order threatening financial institutions who refused to work with certain customers on ideological grounds. PATH Train Service Resumes After Fire at Jersey City Station Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole All Hail the Humble Speed Hump 'The banks discriminated against me very badly,' Trump said in an interview Tuesday with CNBC. Trump said he had been 'informed by my people' that JPMorgan Chase & Co. had asked him to close accounts he held for decades within 20 days, and that Bank of America Corp. declined his attempt to deposit more than $1 billion with their company. 'I ended up going to small banks all over the place,' Trump said. The president added that he believed banking regulators during the Biden administration had been ordered to 'do everything you can to destroy Trump, and that's what they did.' 'Banks are not afraid of anything but a regulator — their regulators and their wives,' Trump said. He didn't offer exact dates for his dealings with JPMorgan and Bank of America, though he suggested the latter occurred between his two presidential terms. The defeat in New York's civil fraud suit against Trump and his real estate company last year put restrictions on his ability to do business in the state. That included a three-year ban on the Trump Organization getting loans from New York-chartered banks. Trump has asked a Manhattan appeals court to overturn the civil fraud verdict. Trump was asked on Tuesday about a Wall Street Journal report that his administration was drafting an order that would direct bank regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions might have violated federal laws in closing certain accounts. Any direction from the White House would require both banks and regulators to review and submit their findings of how they engage with their customers. In the draft of the executive order being circulated among industry participants, banks would undergo a 120-day review process of their rationale for closing customer accounts, the people familiar with the matter said. Financial regulators would also undergo their own review process, between 120 and 180 days, to examine how they regulate and impose restrictions on banks that could lead to account closures, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing nonpublic information. The order also would call for any criminal findings that come from the review process to be submitted directly to the Department of Justice, said the people. A final executive order is expected to be submitted at some point this week, though timing and the material itself could change, they added. A representative for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both JPMorgan and Bank of America have previously denied rejecting business on ideological grounds. 'Desperately Needed' 'We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed,' Trish Wexler, a JPMorgan spokesperson, said in a statement. 'We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right.' 'We welcome the Trump administration's efforts to provide regulatory clarity to banks,' Bank of America spokesperson William Halldin said in a statement. 'We've provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework.' The Bank Policy Institute also said rules need to be reworked. 'The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion,' Austin Anton, a Bank Policy Institute spokesperson, said Tuesday. 'The banking agencies have already taken steps to address issues like reputational risk, and we're hopeful that any forthcoming executive order will reinforce this progress by directing regulators to confront the flawed regulatory framework that gave rise to these concerns in the first place.' Federal banking regulators have said they'll remove reputation risk from their bank exams, aiming to eliminate a factor that lenders have blamed for forcing them to exit some client relationships. Conservatives have complained that major Wall Street firms have debanked gunmakers, fossil-fuel companies, religious groups and cryptocurrency firms. Trump aired that complaint to Bank of America Chief Executive Officer Brian Moynihan directly during a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier this year. 'We serve more than 70 million clients and we welcome conservatives. We are required to follow extensive government rules and regulations that sometimes result in decisions to exit client relationships,' a representative for Bank of America said in an emailed statement at the time. 'We never close accounts for political reasons and don't have a political litmus test.' Bank of America, the second-largest US bank, had restricted lending to companies that make assault-style guns used for non-military purposes, following shootings at a high school in Florida early in 2018. Citigroup Inc. also announced its own set of restrictions for clients selling guns that year. In June, Citigroup ended a seven-year policy that placed restrictions on firearms sales by its retail sector clients, citing recent legislative developments and concerns over access to banking services. The Trump Organization sued Capital One Financial Corp. in March, accusing it of closing hundreds of the real estate company's accounts in 2021 for political reasons. The president's company claims the bank ended the decades-old relationship 'simply because Capital One believed that the political views at the time favored doing so.' In a setback for Trump's company, a federal judge in July granted Capital One's request to delay the exchange of evidence in the case until after the bank's motion to dismiss is resolved. Capital One argues its agreements with the Trump Organization allowed it to close its accounts for any reason and that it gave the business plenty of advanced notice. The bank also says Trump's company has failed to provide any evidence that the accounts were closed for political purposes. Earlier this year JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s Jamie Dimon on Capitol Hill offered his support to a restructuring of US financial regulators. Bank of America went on to loosen its gun restrictions and made similar changes to its energy-lending policies, including dropping a blanket ban on financing for Arctic drilling, according to an environmental and social risk policy from late 2023. The issue of debanking customers has come up outside of the US as well. In the UK, it prompted an outcry a few years ago, when right-wing politician Nigel Farage — who now leads the Reform UK party — revealed NatWest Group Plc's upmarket Coutts unit had closed his account, saying his political views were a factor in that decision. The subsequent row led to the resignation of the bosses of NatWest and Coutts, while Farage had vowed to campaign for others who were been 'debanked' on questionable grounds. A preliminary review by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority found no evidence that banks were dropping customers for their political opinion. --With assistance from Hannah Levitt, Erik Larson and Hadriana Lowenkron. (Updates with details on draft executive order in paragraphs 10-13) Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay Government Steps Up Campaign Against Business School Diversity What Happens to AI Startups When Their Founders Jump Ship for Big Tech How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Want to buy a house with crypto? What to expect.
So, you put a little mad money into bitcoin a few years ago. Now, your crypto-fueled profit means you have a sweet nest egg to put toward a house. But can you buy a house with crypto rather than using cash or a traditional mortgage loan? What are the roadblocks? And what about taxes? Read more: What is a mortgage, and how does it work? The Trump effect President Trump wants the United States to be "the crypto capital of the world." In that spirit, in late June, Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) William J. Pulte ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to "prepare their businesses to count cryptocurrency as an asset for a mortgage." The FHFA supervises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that fund a major portion of the mortgage industry. Pulte said the housing system "needs a massive upgrade," adding, 'I want people who own cryptocurrency to be able to buy homes like everyone else. I believe cryptocurrency is an asset. I believe Americans should be able to use their crypto if they want to. It's time the housing system caught up.' This signals what could be a fundamental change to how cryptocurrency may be used to qualify for a mortgage. Until now, crypto owners have been commonly advised to cash out digital currency holdings and convert them into dollars to use as assets that can be considered on a financial statement or as reserves for an applicant's home loan. Fervent crypto collectors are not likely to do that, believing there is too much future upside to sell now. Learn more: Trump has called for a strategic bitcoin reserve. Here's how it would work. How crypto volatility could affect buying a home Most crypto assets continue to have one strength, which can also be their crucial weakness: volatility. Investors thrive on "buying the dips" when crypto prices dive, but a similar sudden drop in value when crypto is used as part of a net worth statement could be troubling — even worse if crypto becomes a financial foundation for a mortgage. Imagine you deposit some crypto for your down payment and sign the buy-sell agreement. Days later, the crypto value crashes. As a result, you'll need a sizable additional deposit to keep the purchase valid. That's a call that's going to be hard to answer. Keep reading: The average down payment on a house Up Next Up Next Using cryptocurrency as loan collateral While the FHFA aims to introduce crypto into mortgage transactions as a legitimate asset, the reality may be something less. The point made above regarding volatility is an example. However, the crypto solution may be stablecoins. Designed to maintain a steady value, stablecoins weren't created to be an appreciating asset. That folds neatly into the mortgage loan process. However, this means buying a house with crypto may still require converting a volatile cryptocurrency into stablecoins — which would not appeal to most crypto investors' long-term hold mortgages There has been some movement on crypto mortgages, yet they're still scarce. The idea is to allow a home loan to be issued using digital currencies such as bitcoin or ethereum as collateral without liquidating the position. Players in the space include lenders named Milo, Arch Lending, Figure, and Ledn, though loan availability varies by location. Buyers would deposit an amount of crypto equal to the property's sales price — or sometimes twice the value, or more — for an interest-only mortgage loan. Again, crypto volatility plays an important role in the viability of such a loan. This embedded content is not available in your region. Dig deeper: How to invest in real estate Smart contracts Beyond the transfer of cryptocurrency assets, blockchain-based legal agreements called "smart contracts" might speed up the real estate purchase process. The blockchain is a digital record of transactions accessible anywhere, so embedding such smart contracts on the "distributed ledger" can track when contingencies are completed, funds are transferred, and contracts are signed. While that has nothing to do with buying a house with crypto, it may be the first hurdle to clear in adopting the framework of all crypto, the blockchain, into the real estate transaction space. The IRS is calling Capital gains taxes may be another reason "hodlers" (a colloquial term based on a typo for long-term holders of bitcoin) may not be quick to sell their crypto to buy a house. The Internal Revenue Service will take a big chunk of the profits of any crypto sale in capital gains taxes. Can you buy a house with cryptocurrency? FAQs Has anyone bought a house with crypto? We haven't been able to confirm the published claims of any homes bought with cryptocurrencies. However, if current listings are any clue, it's likely that they weren't ranch-style 3/2s with a carport and a fenced backyard in modest neighborhoods. Crypto Emporium recently listed homes for bitcoin sale that included a modern estate in Mexico and an eight-bedroom manor in Norway. Both are offered for around 290 bitcoin, which is currently worth a little more than $33 million. Do you pay taxes if you buy a house with crypto? Oh, yes. If you sell the bitcoin to buy the house, the IRS says you'll owe capital gains taxes. However, if you were to put bitcoin up as collateral for an interest-only crypto mortgage, you wouldn't have to sell your holdings, so no tax would be due. Can you actually buy anything with crypto? You can use bitcoin, ethereum, litecoin, dogecoin, and other cryptocurrencies to buy real estate, merchandise, gift cards, travel packages, and hundreds of other items. Third-party providers such as BitPay enable the transactions, though some companies accept crypto payments directly. Laura Grace Tarpley edited this article.
