More clarity needed on plans for HPV catch-up scheme for under-25s, says Roderic O'Gorman
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
9 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Food price cuts should be on the table in Budget 2026
Normally, a second-place finish is a cause for celebration, bringing with it a silver medal, perhaps. Ireland being the second-most-expensive country in Europe for food is no such situation. Citizens have long complained about prices here, usually with some justification. But having the black-and-white statistics to prove it is, strangely, validating and disheartening at the same time. Some 40% of parents in a recent Barnardos cost-of-living survey reported reducing or cutting their own meals so their children could eat, with slightly more than 40% of families cutting back on things like food, energy, and heating just to keep pace with bills. Food price increases have been double the rate of inflation, which itself is no small obstacle to families struggling to stay afloat. It's not as if the money is necessarily going to the producers, because Irish farmers are seeing, for instance, the lowest grain prices in 40 years. Either way, the sort of disparity found by Barnardos should not exist in a developed nation. And yet the Government has, to date, ruled out any one-off measures to address the cost of living, with the electricity rebate of the last few years (welcomed by many struggling families) not due to be repeated in this October's budget. Does this make the Government tone deaf, or does it have some other initiative up the Cabinet sleeves that will tackle the cost of living on a more durable basis? As things stand, there is a €1bn plan to reduce the cost of Vat for the hospitality sector, which, in turn, takes any real scope for tax adjustments elsewhere in the economy. The Irish Congress of Trade Unions has described it as economic vandalism, given that the sector is growing and not stagnating. This may or may not be hyperbole, because a great many businesses are under pressure due to soaring costs, but it does emphasise that the Government seems to have taken its eye off the ball when it comes to the most pressing issues affecting the electorate. With pre-budget submissions already being made and with more to come, it remains to be seen if the Government will change course to give the people not just what they want, but what they need. Nature reclaims land lost in war The destruction of the Nova Kakhovka dam in Ukraine in 2023 not only obliterated a vast area of land but deprived 1m people of drinking water. Russia, as one might expect, denies being behind the explosion, which just happened to occur during its illegal invasion of the country. Russia still denies being behind the explosion at the Nova Kakhovka dam in Ukraine in 2023, obliterating a vast area of land and depriving 1m people of drinking water. File picture: AP/Maxar Technologies Yet from that ruin and weaponisation of natural resources, an unexpected ecological fairytale has emerged. As the report in today's edition notes: 'The drained reservoir is now home to dense growths of willow and poplar and enormous wetlands; endangered sturgeon have returned to waterways; wild boar and mammals to the forests; and there are signs of spontaneous regeneration across a huge stretch of floodplain.' To attempt to visualise it, imagine an area just a little bigger than Co Kilkenny was under water, then became forest and marsh within just a couple of years. No human effort has gone in to this — by all accounts it is a natural regeneration, even if the area is contaminated by heavy metals and other pollutants that could well leach into the soil. Ultimately, nature cares not whether humanity thrives or dies. What the reservoir shows is how quickly nature can reclaim what we relinquish, and how it will go on in some form. The difference to, say, how the jungle retook and buried Mayan cities is that this one has happened in our own lifetime. If more of our species could comprehend the scale, perhaps we might make it out of the climate disaster in better shape. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Ireland and the nuclear option One would not normally think of 'Michael O'Leary' and 'nuclear power' in the same mental breath, but his comments this week have brought them together. Commenting on the National Development Plan, in among his jabs at the Government's capabilities to spend the money wisely and his lack of faith that the Dublin Airport metro would be used, he suggested that some of the money should be used to build a nuclear power plant. Sound reasons have been advanced for not having nuclear power in Ireland but Michael O'Leary's comments are grounded in sensible notion of achieving energy independence. File picture: PA While O'Leary has form for eye-grabbing, pithy statements, sometimes seemingly said without forethought, in this case there was logic: Energy independence. Ireland imports electricity from the UK, which is building a series of nuclear plants, and will soon import power from France, which has several. Much of our development capacity depends on this imported power, and data centres already make up some 20% of the country's usage. Ireland stopped using coal for power just last month, and we no longer have any peat-fuelled plants, though gas and oil are widely used. Still, while renewables make an increasingly welcome proportion of energy generated here, we will always need contingencies. Mr O'Leary said: We are at the end of the line and will be the first to be switched off if there is a crisis. Many sound reasons have been advanced for not having nuclear power in this country, not least on the back of our relationship with the victims of the Chernobyl disaster. The price shock that came with Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the associated restrictions put on imports of Russian gas show that we can never take anything for granted. Has the time, then, come for a formal commission to consider a nuclear power plant in Ireland as part of a long-term overall energy strategy?
Sunday World
3 hours ago
- Sunday World
Michael O'Leary criticised for ‘insulting' comments on Dublin metro
Various metro projects for the capital have been proposed in recent decades but none have proceeded to build stage Michael O'Leary said the plan had not been properly costed (Brian Lawless/PA) Ryanair chief executive Michael O'Leary has been criticised for his "insulting" comments on a metro for Dublin, which he called a "waste" of taxpayer money. The 18.8km rail line, most of which will be underground, is to run from north of Swords to Charlemont in the south of Dublin city centre. Various metro projects for the capital have been proposed in recent decades but none have proceeded to build stage. On Tuesday, the Government announced that the MetroLink project would get a €2bn boost in funding as part of the national development plan, in what Taoiseach Micheal Martin said was "a very definitive commitment to the metro". While Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe indicated the latest estimated cost for the MetroLink was 11 billion euro, Mr O'Leary claimed it would cost 20 billion euro, "so about a billion a kilometre". "Dublin Airport doesn't need it, Dublin Airport passengers won't use it - they're already well-served by buses," he told RTÉ Radio on Wednesday, while claiming that less than a third of the airport's passengers use buses. He said that while the tube in London runs from Heathrow and through "all of London", the Metro will only serve a section of Dublin city's residents - around 100,000 people, he claimed. "Here's the madness of this. This thing is going to start at Stephen's Green in the morning. If you want to get to our first wave of departures, which leave at about 6.30 in the morning, you need to be at the airport at 5.30am. "Are you seriously going to drive into the centre of Stephen's Green, where there's no car parking, to get this metro to get to Dublin Airport for 5.30 in the morning? No, you're not. "Let me give you the alternative scenario: for €100m, this year we could buy 400 buses, and 400 buses would provide exactly the same capacity as this metro from Dublin Airport, in through Ballymun, in through Drumcondra, on bus lanes that already exist." He claimed the plan had not been properly costed and hit out at the Government's handling of public finances. "This Government wasted €330,000 on a bike shed, imagine what they do with an 18-kilometre underground train from an airport?" He also criticised comments by Mr Martin, who said the Irish capital will not be sustainable without a metro. "Does he not understand that the buses actually will all be electrified by the end of this decade, which will actually be greener than light rail?" Labour TD Duncan Smith said Mr O'Leary's criticisms of public infrastructure were as sure "as night follows day". "Dubliners are stuck in daily gridlock. MetroLink is their best chance at affordable, reliable transport that serves communities, not corporate profits. "As a consistent advocate for MetroLink in Swords, I find it insulting to hear this kind of drive-by commentary from someone who clearly doesn't rely on public transport to get to work. "Dublin deserves better than a transport plan from a billionaire whose only experience with buses is when he is pretending to be one." When asked about his endorsement of Enterprise Minister Peter Burke and junior minister Robert Troy during the general election campaign, Mr O'Leary claimed "they're not in government" and criticised Mr Martin again. "I endorsed Peter Burke, who actually topped the poll despite the criticism. I also endorsed Robert Troy - and they're not the government." Michael O'Leary said the plan had not been properly costed (Brian Lawless/PA) News in 90 Seconds - July 23rd
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Michael O'Leary criticised for ‘insulting' comments on Dublin metro
The 18.8km rail line, most of which will be underground, is to run from north of Swords to Charlemont in the south of Dublin city centre. Various metro projects for the capital have been proposed in recent decades but none have proceeded to build stage. On Tuesday, the Government announced that the MetroLink project would get a €2bn boost in funding as part of the national development plan, in what Taoiseach Micheal Martin said was "a very definitive commitment to the metro". While Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe indicated the latest estimated cost for the MetroLink was 11 billion euro, Mr O'Leary claimed it would cost 20 billion euro, "so about a billion a kilometre". "Dublin Airport doesn't need it, Dublin Airport passengers won't use it - they're already well-served by buses," he told RTÉ Radio on Wednesday, while claiming that less than a third of the airport's passengers use buses. He said that while the tube in London runs from Heathrow and through "all of London", the Metro will only serve a section of Dublin city's residents - around 100,000 people, he claimed. "Here's the madness of this. This thing is going to start at Stephen's Green in the morning. If you want to get to our first wave of departures, which leave at about 6.30 in the morning, you need to be at the airport at 5.30am. "Are you seriously going to drive into the centre of Stephen's Green, where there's no car parking, to get this metro to get to Dublin Airport for 5.30 in the morning? No, you're not. "Let me give you the alternative scenario: for €100m, this year we could buy 400 buses, and 400 buses would provide exactly the same capacity as this metro from Dublin Airport, in through Ballymun, in through Drumcondra, on bus lanes that already exist." He claimed the plan had not been properly costed and hit out at the Government's handling of public finances. "This Government wasted €330,000 on a bike shed, imagine what they do with an 18-kilometre underground train from an airport?" He also criticised comments by Mr Martin, who said the Irish capital will not be sustainable without a metro. "Does he not understand that the buses actually will all be electrified by the end of this decade, which will actually be greener than light rail?" Labour TD Duncan Smith said Mr O'Leary's criticisms of public infrastructure were as sure "as night follows day". "Dubliners are stuck in daily gridlock. MetroLink is their best chance at affordable, reliable transport that serves communities, not corporate profits. "As a consistent advocate for MetroLink in Swords, I find it insulting to hear this kind of drive-by commentary from someone who clearly doesn't rely on public transport to get to work. "Dublin deserves better than a transport plan from a billionaire whose only experience with buses is when he is pretending to be one." When asked about his endorsement of Enterprise Minister Peter Burke and junior minister Robert Troy during the general election campaign, Mr O'Leary claimed "they're not in government" and criticised Mr Martin again. "I endorsed Peter Burke, who actually topped the poll despite the criticism. I also endorsed Robert Troy - and they're not the government."
