Delay of law proposal adds to uncertainty around redress for clerical abuse survivors
abuse
by their members will not be considered by the Government until 2027 at the earliest.
Many religious organisations are unincorporated bodies. This means they as entities cannot be sued and their assets may be beyond the reach of the courts if and when one of their members are found liable for damages against child sex abuse survivors.
Individual members of such religious bodies can face legal action, but case law shows it can be difficult to legally pursue the organisation itself for redress.
There are concerns about how the State will recoup redress funds from religious bodies for a scheme being considered for survivors of sexual abuse in schools.
READ MORE
If set up, it would likely be the largest and most expensive redress scheme in the history of the State.
Since 2022, the
Law Reform Commission
(LRC) has been considering whether the Government should legislate to give unincorporated associations, such as voluntary religious orders, their own legal personality or set out another way by which they may be held liable.
Minister for Education
Helen McEntee
has said: 'The Government will review any recommendations made by the commission in its final report, with a view to introducing any necessary legislative or administrative changes in due course.'
However, a spokesman for the LRC said its report on changing the legal status of bodies such as religious organisations will not be ready before the end of next year.
'The report about the liability of unincorporated associations is being scoped at present. We do not yet have a completion date but we do not expect it to be published before the end of 2026,' the spokesman said.
Labour Party
leader
Ivana Bacik
has expressed concern about whether a delay in progressing such a law would stymie the ability of the Government to access religious organisations' assets, or the lay-run trusts that their assets may have been transferred to.
Ms Bacik said her party is trying to bring forward a Bill that would allow civil proceedings to be taken against unincorporated bodies like religious orders. It would allow any damages awarded in such cases to be recovered from a religious organisation or from 'associated' trusts.
The same law, if passed, would also add a one-year extension to the normal limitation period provided for in the statutes of limitations.
The Labour Party leader said this was to allow any proceedings that the Bill would cover to be brought within 12 months of it being enacted. She recently personally handed a copy of the Bill to the Attorney General.
Given the upcoming Commission of Investigation into historic abuse in schools, the Government cannot afford to 'sit back and wait' for the LRC report to finish, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
32 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Small Irish businesses say tariffs will hurt US consumers most
Many smaller Irish exporters have mixed feelings about the trade agreement between the European Union and the United States. Last week, they understood there was still an outside chance that discussions could go off the rails with the possibility of a trade war. At the same time, they are less than impressed with the outline deal being presented in the media. Sarah Furno, of Cashel Blue, greeted the news from Scotland yesterday with a 'degree of relief' and the sense that the Tipperary cheese company can now make more definite plans for the US market. Sarah and Sergio Furno of Cashel Blue cheesemakers 'Uncertainty is impossible and disabling especially in a prolonged manner,' she says. 'Overall we feel it could have been worse. It's a relatively even playing field for imports and there is enough light to keep doors open. READ MORE 'Of course it will hurt the average American most'. Ms Furno said the 30 per cent rate threatened by US President Donald Trump would have pushed Cashel products off US shelves. Leo Cummins, of Hazelbrook Confectionery in Co Kildare, decided earlier this year to shun the US market due to the uncertainty. On hearing the news of the agreement, he said he was even more convinced that ignoring the US market in the short term was 'the right thing to do'. 'Obviously one has a concern that the deal as it stands looks quite lopsided in favour of the US,' he says. Leo Cummins of Hazelbrook Confectionary in Newbridge, Co. Kildare. Photograph Nick Bradshaw 'I personally think that American candy sales will decline in Ireland, the UK and Europe over the next three years as consumer sentiment towards America becomes more negative. 'Whilst it appears that there will be no tariffs on US candy imports into Europe, American candy manufacturers will have to pay extra for their cocoa and other ingredients that are not produced in America and that will push their costs higher and hence their prices to European customers.' Mr Cummins says more expensive US confectionery will open doors for Hazelbrook in the UK and Europe as importers there will look to find cheaper alternatives. Whiskey manufacturers were particularly concerned at the possibility of trade talks failing. Brendan Carty, of Killowen Distillery in Co Down, will now have to contend with two different trade deals – the EU deal at 15 per cent and the UK one at 10 per cent. As Irish whiskey is bottled and bonded on both sides of the Border, it presents new headaches for the likes of Killowen. 'If a distillery sells 50 per cent distilled in Killowen and 50 per cent distilled in the Republic, I suppose our tariffs will be complicated and will fall between the two,' says Mr Carty. 'That's the nature of navigating a global market. It's always changing and very complex. It's the consumers who will take the hurt in the end. 'It's always a navigation exercise working things out with overseas partners, part and parcel of the business, so we won't get too upset about it'. The Irish Whiskey Association still hasn't ruled out the chance that the agreement could yet see the return of 'zero-for-zero' trade in spirits. Director Eoin Ó Catháin says the 10 per cent rate currently being applied, along with a weakened US dollar, has forced some operators to shut their doors. 'We are hopeful that, as we learn more about this deal and discussions on its implementation continue, a mutually beneficial arrangement and the removal of tariffs can be secured,' he says. The overriding sentiment from many exporters is that the deal represents an unwanted regression. With no upsides for Irish businesses – other than avoiding even worse terms – it is the new price of doing business with the US.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
EU-US trade deal: Ireland ‘no doubt' in challenging position over tariffs, says Minister
There is 'no doubt' that Ireland is in a challenging position in relation to tariffs but the recently announced agreement does bring 'some clarity', the Minister for Enterprise has said. Peter Burke said the deal reached on Sunday, which will lock in tariffs of 15 per cent on most EU imports to the US , had avoided a 'direct trade war'. Speaking on RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland on Monday, Mr Burke said the EU was four days away from 30 per cent tariffs, which would have been 'significant', while the Government is awaiting more details to emerge. The final terms of the deal were worked out during a meeting between European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland on Sunday. READ MORE The accord effectively sees the EU accepting import taxes of 15 per cent on most of its huge volume of trade with the US. The two sides agreed that no tariffs would be charged on imports of aircraft, certain chemicals and some agri-food goods, though the finer details of what agricultural products will benefit from these exemptions are still to be worked out. [ EU-US trade deal analysis: Tariffs have a price for both sides. Trump was willing to pay it Opens in new window ] Mr Burke said there would be a number of 'carveouts' for particular sectors such as aviation, agri-foods and spirits. He said the Government was concerned about the 'stacking mechanism', which refers to the cumulative effect of multiple tariffs applied to the same imported product. 'All of those areas have been called out for separate carveouts, so we have to see what that will look like and what will that amount to on paper, and that's where the devil is going to be in the detail,' he said. 'But the critical thing is that at all costs we have to avoid escalation because it would be devastating in terms of the impact because the scale of the market is so huge.' The Fine Gael TD said the Government had been 'very clear that tariffs are bad'. 'They constrain supply, they drive prices up. They're not good for the US economy, or indeed for the Irish economy,' he said. 'Ireland's position is very clear – we always favour an open, rules-based fair trade at every hand's turn. When you have the talk of tariffs and a deal like this, it is going to be challenging, and I think we have to be very honest about that.' [ EU-US trade deal represents 'substantial burden' for Irish businesses Opens in new window ] The deal includes EU commitments to purchase set amounts of US oil, nuclear power and liquefied natural gas annually. In terms of Ireland buying US oil or gas, Mr Burke said he was not aware of it at this point in time but could not 'give a definitive answer'. Mr Burke added that a deal between China and the US had yet to happen, which would affect Irish exports and they would also have to see what separate carveouts will emerge. 'Until we get flesh on the bones in all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what the budgetary parameters will end up with.' He also said he and the Government remained committed to cutting the hospitality VAT rate to 9 per cent and that it was in the programme for government, which had been agreed by all parties.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
EU-US trade deal criticised by German business leaders and French minister
The EU-US trade deal, clinched in a ballroom at Donald Trump's golf resort in Scotland on Sunday, has been criticised by France's prime minister and business leaders across Germany. The deal, which will impose 15% tariffs on almost all European exports to the US including cars, ends the threat of a punitive 30% import duties being imposed on Mr Trump's August 1 deadline for a deal, but it is a world apart from the zero-zero import and export tariff the EU offered initially. It also means European exporters to the US will face more then triple the average 4.8% tariff now in force, with negotiations to continue on steel, which is still facing a 50% tariff, aviation, and a question mark over future barriers to pharmaceutical exports. The deal has been cautiously welcomed on the Irish side, with Government sources saying it provides certainty to businesses. One senior source said 'nobody was jumping with joy' over the deal due to baseline tariffs, but that it did provide certainty to businesses. Reacting to the deal, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said it brought 'clarity and predictability to the trading relationship between the EU and the US'. 'That is good for businesses, investors and consumers. It will help protect many jobs in Ireland,' Mr Martin said. 'We will now study the detail of what has been agreed, including its implications for businesses exporting from Ireland to the US, and for different sectors operating here. However, Mr Martin said the baseline tariff would make trade between the EU and US 'more expensive and more challenging'. France's prime minister, François Bayrou, said Europe had submitted to the US, on a 'dark day' for the union. 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, gathered to affirm their values and defend their interests, resolves to submission,' Bayrou posted on X. The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, rapidly hailed the deal, saying it avoided 'needless escalation in transatlantic trade relations' and averted a potentially damaging trade war. German exporters were less enthusiastic. The powerful BDI federation of industrial groups said the accord would have 'considerable negative repercussions', while the country's VCI chemical trade association said the accord left rates 'too high'. It is also clear that the US tariff of 15% on automotive products will place a burden on German automotive companies in the midst of their transformation, hitting sales and profits. The president of the car industry federation VDA, Hildegard Müller, said it was 'fundamentally positive' that a framework deal was agreed but warned of huge costs to come. European stock markets hit a four-month high at the start of trading on Monday, amid relief that a deal had been reached. Germany's Dax jumped by 0.86%, and France's Cac 40 index rose by 1.1%. France's minister for Europe, Benjamin Haddad, said on Monday that the agreement would provide 'temporary stability … but it is unbalanced'. Victory for Trump The German bank Berenberg said the deal brought to an end the 'crippling uncertainty' but said it was a victory for Mr Trump. 'It is great to have a deal. In two major respects, however, the outcome remains much worse than the situation before Trump started his new round of trade wars early this year,' said Holger Schmieding, Berenberg's chief economist. 'The extra US tariffs will hurt both the US and the EU. For Europe, the damage is mostly frontloaded,' Mr Schmieding said in a note to clients on Monday morning. 'The deal is asymmetric. The US gets away with a substantial increase in its tariffs on imports from the EU and has secured further EU concessions to boot. In his apparent zero-sum mentality, Trump can claim that as a 'win' for him,' he added. The Italian bank UniCredit also said Mr Trump had got the better out of the EU. 'Is this a good deal for the EU? Probably not. The outcome is heavily asymmetrical, and it leaves US tariffs on imported EU goods at much higher levels than EU tariffs on imports from the US,' UniCredit said in a note to clients. '15% is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get,' the European Commision president Ursula von der Leyen acknowledged. Initially the EU had tried to hardball the US by threatening but pausing €21bn worth of retaliatory measures in April, and adding another list of €73bn-worth of US imports that would be taxed earlier this month. But it pivoted to a quick UK-style deal after the Nato summit in June, swapping a comprehensive trade deal for security and defence promises from Mr Trump. By contrast, China, which threatened the US with a cascade of punitive tariffs, is still negotiating with Mr Trump, who over the weekend froze technology transfer restrictions to create space for a deal with Beijing. Berenberg said the deal would affect the German economy, but the decline in growth would be offset by the Bundestag's recent growth stimulus package, it added. The EU had pushed for a compromise on steel that could allow a certain quota into the US before tariffs would apply. Mr Trump appeared to rule that out, saying steel was 'staying the way it is', but Ms von der Leyen insisted later that 'tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place' for steel. He also ruled out a carve-out for pharmaceuticals but later Ms von der Leyen said the 15% tariff would apply to EU medicine exports and that any other tariffs were up to the US president. The EU is now subject to a 25% levy on cars, 50% on steel and aluminium, and an across-the-board tariff of 10%, which Washington had threatened to increase to 30% in a no-deal scenario. The bloc had been pushing hard for tariff carve-outs for critical industries from aircraft to spirits, and its car industry, crucial for France and Germany, is already reeling from the levies imposed so far. The Guardian
