Ana de Armas & Tom Cruise Relationship in Trouble, Claims ‘Source'
Ana de Armas allegedly does not want the same level of immense fame and spotlight as Tom Cruise. Dating rumors between the two actors have been swirling around the internet for quite some time now. However, per RadarOnline, a 'source' told them that the 'Deep Water' actor wants to 'wriggle out of' any kind of romantic involvement with the 'Top Gun' actor.
The 'source' claimed, 'Ana likes Tom, and she's thrilled to do movie work with him.' The person continued, 'She doesn't want to live in the spotlight being his partner brings as she is just not interested in fame at his level.' The insider further said, 'She's already looking for the exit from anything romantic.' They added, 'But on the upside, at least it's not Tom's Scientology obsession that has killed another romance for him.'
As reported by the news outlet, in a recent interview, Ana de Armas went on to open up about her opinions on fame. She said, 'You can't let the negative side of fame upset you.' The actor further explained, 'Because then you won't enjoy the beautiful aspects, but it's essential to separate.' She then emphasized, 'We're all people and we need that privacy, consideration, and space.' The actor continued, 'It seems incredible to have to say it, but we've forgotten that minimum of respect for others.'
Ana de Armas stars in the upcoming movie, 'From the World of John Wick: Ballerina.' The film is all set to make its debut on June 6.
Originally reported by Nikita Nath on Reality Tea.
The post Ana de Armas & Tom Cruise Relationship in Trouble, Claims 'Source' appeared first on Mandatory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Movie Review: In ‘The Old Guard 2,' Charlize Theron and Uma Thurman get half a movie
About 80 minutes into 'The Old Guard 2,' I found myself wondering how the filmmakers were going to wrap things up. There were a lot of threads dangling with Charlize Theron'sgang of immortal warriors, split up and facing extinction, and she still had yet to face off with the new villain, Discord (apparently the first immortal), played by Uma Thurman. The promise of a showdown between The Bride and Furiosa may not justify the existence of this sequel, now streaming on Netflix , but it was something to look forward to nonetheless. And while they do fight, for a little, something even crazier happens not too long after: The movie ends or, rather, stops mid-climax. An ending was never part of the plan. This might be an attempt at a cheeky nod to the life of an immortal — what is an ending after all, I guess? But unlike the first film, which merely left the door open for the possibility of a sequel, 'The Old Guard 2' cuts off mid-movie. Not only is there no option to 'continue watching,' there's no promise we'll even get an 'Old Guard 3.' Moviegoers endure a lot of partial stories in these days of franchise filmmaking, ever desperate for a built-in audience. With some, you know a resolution is coming at a later date, as with 'Mission: Impossible' or 'Wicked.' With others, like 'Dune,' a part two or three might have been a question mark, but the intention was unambiguously there. There's nothing fun or enjoyable about being surprised that you've been watching a 'part one' the whole time, especially on a service that has helped train us to click next episode. Perhaps that also has to do with the quality of 'The Old Guard 2,' which feels like a step down from the first movie, which provided much-needed escapism in the summer of 2020 as we met Theron's Andromache the Scythian (Andy, for short) and welcomed KiKi Layne's new immortal Nile. It ended with Booker (Matthias Schoenaerts) being exiled for a betrayal and the tease that Andy's old companion Quynh (Vân Veronica Ngô), was still alive. Quynh is, understandably, not thrilled that she was left at the bottom of the ocean for centuries. She wants to punish Andy the most — the movie heavily implies that they were more than sisters in arms, but never quite goes so far as to confirm that their love was romantic, which is especially strange given that it doesn't shy away from letting Nicky (Luca Marinelli) and Joe (Marwan Kenzari) be an out gay couple. One of the most significant behind-the-scenes changes is that Gina Prince-Bythewood ( 'The Woman King,' 'Love & Basketball') ceded directing duties to Victoria Mahoney, who has directed episodes of 'Queen Sugar' and 'You' and served as second unit director on 'Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker.' Working off Greg Rucka and Sarah L. Walker's screenplay, the movies opens with a lively action sequence in which the immortals attempt to nab an arms dealer. Nicky and Joe are the distractors, getting their own James Bond-esque car chase, while Nile, Andy and Copley (Chiwetel Ejiofor) get more hand-to-hand combat on the property. It sets a fun tone and allows for some (mostly) welcome exposition — 'remember, you're not immortal anymore' — for those who might not have the best memory of something they watched at the height of the pandemic. But the film never recaptures that energy again and devolves into an increasingly tedious meditation on time, death and the science of why Andy lost her immortality power (which is approaching 'Face/Off' levels of insanity). Thurman has a mighty good scowl as the 'bad immortal' who long ago decided she didn't have any desire to help the humans who persecuted her kind, but the movie seems to be saving her big moment for later. Overall 'The Old Guard 2' is fine, a bit of a background movie that's probably easy enough to tune in and out of (though Schoenaerts, a standout, gives it some real pathos). Its greatest sin is the non-ending, which might have moviegoers engaging in their own rants about wasted time. Cliffhangers are a gamble — when the movie is satisfying on its own, it can leave them wanting more. In this case, it might just leave them angry. Audiences in 2025 deserve better. 'The Old Guard 2,' a Netflix release now streaming, is rated R by the Motion Picture Association for 'sequences of graphic violence and some language.' Running time: 105 minutes. Two stars out of four.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Death of the Movie Star Has Been Greatly Exaggerated
Do movie stars still exist? Film journalists, cinephiles, and producers have been debating this point for over a decade, declaring the movie star extinct. But throughout the 2010s, Hollywood leaned into intellectual properties and the Marvel Cinematic Universe, while original films starring A-list talents like Jennifer Lawrence ('Passengers'), Johnny Depp ('The Lone Ranger'), and Will Smith ('Gemini Man') flopped, and gradually everybody seemed to be lining up to pay their respects at the grave of the movie star. More from IndieWire '28 Years Later' Review: A Tender, Thoughtful, and Strangely Moving Sequel to One of the Scariest Zombie Movies Ever How 'Materialists' Finds True Love in New York City They've blamed the death on Hollywood's hunger for IP, the erasure of the mid-budget movie, and the rise of television. But many of these arguments miss the forest for the trees: We not only still have movie stars today, but stardom today is very similar to what it was in the Golden Age of Hollywood. The film industry is not post-movie stars, and big-name actors still influence audiences' viewing habits and films' financial success. Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt, whose films 'Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning' and 'F1' are in theaters this summer, are widely considered the last 'true' movie stars, the few aged movie veterans still capable of reliably opening a film. But contrary to popular belief, stardom is not dependent on watertight box office potential — Katharine Hepburn, for instance, was considered box office poison for years. From 1935's 'Break of Hearts' until at least 'The Philadelphia Story' in 1940, her films consistently earned great reviews but poor attendance. Cary Grant also made many commercial failures while still a leading man, including George Cukor's 'Holiday' and 'Bringing Up Baby' (in which he co-starred with Hepburn). Cruise and Pitt might be movie stars, but they still have off days, like 'Rock of Ages' or 'Wolfs,' respectively. These actors certainly elevate the profile of their films and increase the likelihood that they'll make money, but financial security doesn't automatically determine who's a movie star. What makes an actor a movie star is their persona. When you watch Cruise hug the door of an airplane as it takes off in 'Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation,' you forget you're watching the character of Ethan Hunt. Instead, you're watching the carefully crafted screen persona of Tom Cruise, action hero, who will risk certain death if it means delivering cinema to his adoring fans. In 2019, the Wall Street Journal reported that Jason Statham, Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson, and Vin Diesel had unique contracts for their collaborations in the 'Fast and Furious' franchise that basically meant they couldn't lose fights. Statham's contract reportedly protected him from getting beaten up too much on screen, while Johnson and Diesel had people on set to monitor how many licks they got. Such contracts are nothing new in Hollywood, and many scholars of classic Hollywood will likely recollect the strict contracts studios had for their stars in that era. In the old days, stars — especially female stars — were put on strict diets, their names often changed, and they were usually given voice lessons to learn that classic Transatlantic diction. Control over a star's image went even further than that, though. Jean Harlow was forbidden by studio mandate from marrying, since producers at MGM didn't want to complicate her image as a sex symbol. Actors like Ava Gardner, Judy Garland, Jean Harlow, Marilyn Monroe, and Fay Wray were all contractually prevented from having children — some, according to lore, were forced to have abortions. Now, Hollywood studios no longer own their stars' images; they haven't since the early 1960s. Instead, actors control their own images, and they have teams of agents, publicists, and, sometimes, personal stylists on hand to do it. When Emily Blunt and Penélope Cruz became pregnant while making 'Into the Woods' and 'Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides,' respectively, they weren't dropped from the films — instead, the costume departments, stunt teams, and directors accommodated the actors and their pregnancies, reimagining complex sequences and altering costumes as needed. Actors today still rely on contracts, creative control over their productions, and agreements with producers to build and maintain consistent images. The 21st-century definition of brand image means that some movie stars get typecast — unless, like Emma Stone, Kristen Stewart, Anna Kendrick, and Jennifer Lawrence, an actor leverages their mainstream success to break the mold and make independent films. Some naysayers allege that the decline of film stars is due to social media, that having the increased exposure of celebrities' personal lives has made them seem less alluring. But these stars still have agents and publicists, and as such, major actors like Jennifer Lawrence, Zendaya, Tom Hanks, and Ryan Reynolds still have carefully cultivated images, the same way that Jimmy Stewart, Charlie Chaplin, Veronica Lake, and Rita Hayworth did. Some actors preserve the illusion (and their own privacy) by not being on social media at all, including Lawrence, Pitt, and Johansson, but they still engage with viral marketing, which includes everything from GQ and Vanity Fair's career breakdowns to eating spicy wings on 'Hot Ones.' The stars might be on TikTok now, but they're still stars. At Comic-Con 2017, 'Captain America: Brave New World' star Anthony Mackie famously said that there are no movie stars anymore. 'Anthony Mackie isn't a movie star,' he said. 'The Falcon is a movie star.' And Mackie is right that, increasingly, Hollywood has hitched its wagon to intellectual property over original ideas — and the stars have, too. Quentin Tarantino echoed these words in 2022, saying, 'It's these franchise characters that become a star,' rather than the actors playing them. In 2024, out of the 50 highest-grossing domestic films in the U.S. according to BoxOfficeMojo, 32 were IP-driven movies (i.e., remakes, reboots, or sequels) with huge stars in them, like 'Bad Boys: Ride or Die' starring Will Smith. Six films, like 'Wicked' and 'The Fall Guy,' adapted successful IP for the screen. Only 13 films in the top 50 were star-driven projects that didn't rely on IP, and even among that group, you can identify some, like 'Red One' or 'Argylle,' that seem like they're trying to astroturf a franchise. Others, like 'Anyone But You' and 'Bob Marley: One Love,' adapt material many are familiar with — William Shakespeare and the life of Bob Marley, respectively — which helps with brand recognition but means they're not wholly original works. Simply headlining a film these days does not make someone a movie star. But it's always been that way. Chris Evans, Brie Larson, and Chadwick Boseman all headlined movies that grossed a billion dollars worldwide, but those films were built around the brands, characters, and stories rather than the actors. It's telling that Marvel has recast both Captain America and Black Panther (passing the mantle onto Letitia Wright's Shuri) and still found box office success, but rather than recast a new Iron Man and replace its biggest star, Robert Downey Jr., the studio invited him back in a completely different role for 'Avengers: Doomsday.' Marvel didn't kill the movie star; they know the value of one as much as anyone else. The difference between a movie star and an A-list actor is a fine line. Timothée Chalamet, for example, straddles the line between movie star and character actor, choosing complex roles that require him to inhabit radically different characters and show off his range and acting chops. Yet when you watch 'A Complete Unknown,' you're not seeing Chalamet disappear into Bob Dylan. You're seeing Chalamet pretending to be Bob Dylan — the performance is as much about the actor as it is about the character. His character actor contemporaries like Tilda Swinton, Gary Oldman, Lakeith Stanfield, Paul Giamatti, and Toni Collette become whatever their roles require them to be. But Chalamet is still Chalamet, regardless of what costume or affectation he's wearing. He has a brand and an identity that shows through in all of his roles and that he carries with him to every single film, just like Meryl Streep or Tom Cruise. His films might not always make their money back, and he might not be hanging on the wing of a biplane, but his persona is what makes him a star. Best of IndieWire The Best Thrillers Streaming on Netflix in June, from 'Vertigo' and 'Rear Window' to 'Emily the Criminal' All 12 Wes Anderson Movies, Ranked, from 'Bottle Rocket' to 'The Phoenician Scheme' Nightmare Film Shoots: The 38 Most Grueling Films Ever Made, from 'Deliverance' to 'The Wages of Fear'
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Charlize Theron is turning 50 soon. The 'Old Guard 2' star can't wait.
Charlize Theron is staring down 50 in just about a month. And 50 should be scared. The Oscar-winning actress ("Monster"), who reprises her butt-kicking, comic-book inspired role of Andromache of Scythia, or Andy, in "The Old Guard 2" (streaming July 2 on Netflix), simply has no time for society's judgmental ageist critiques. As long as Charlize thinks Charlize is hot, all is well. "Listen," she says with a smile as she peppers her comments with expletives. "I wore fishnets last night because I felt awesome in them, and that's where I'm heading right now, it's like, I don't give a ..." well, you know what. "I have limited time left, and I'm going to do it up the way I want to do it up, and that's it," she says, contrasting her feelings today with half a lifetime ago when she felt her on-screen sexuality was her stock-in-trade. "I have no more time to pretend to live my life for other people." Join our Watch Party! Sign up to receive USA TODAY's movie and TV recommendations right in your inbox Not that Theron doesn't sizzle in "Old Guard 2," where she and a bevy of other seductive and powerful women − including Uma Thurman as Discord and KiKi Layne as Nile Freeman − battle immortal figures who are bent on humanity's destruction. A highlight and hallmark of the sequel is bringing together talented female actors under the direction of Victoria Mahoney, who made a name for herself as second-unit director on 2018's "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker," a first for a woman on that series. "When I started my career, I never saw a woman in such positions," Theron says of Mahoney, adding that many of the producers and crew on "Old Guard 2" were women. "Early on as an actor, if I heard that Gwyneth (Paltrow) or Cameron (Diaz) or any of my generation got cast, I didn't even bother to look at the script again because I figured the one role was taken," she says. "We still have a long way to go. There are so many talented women, but so few opportunities. But that said, it feels better these days, more inclusive. It feels like you're not alone out there, that's the best way I can put it." Theron is a doting mom to daughters Jackson, 12, and August, 9. The girls, however, are not impressed by Theron's on-screen exploits; the actress told Jimmy Kimmel her kids were far more dazzled by Tom Cruise's "Mission: Impossible" stunts than her own in "Old Guard 2." Theron adopted the girls from South Africa, a country in which she continues to invest time and money. Just a few days ago, she hosted another block party to raise money for the Charlize Theron Africa Outreach Project, which helps community-based organizations that provide health, education and other support for young people in need. "Women in South Africa are facing femicide at a high rate and it's something nobody is talking about," Theron says. "So we do our small part, partnering with organizations in the trenches, coming up with answers and not waiting around for policy changes. And that's not a Black or white thing, we don't look at people's needs in that way. But it just so happens, though, that minorities of color are the others that usually fall between the cracks." Theron has a lot of irons in the fire. Her production companies, Denver and Delilah Productions (named after her dogs) and Secret Menu, are busy pursuing a range of projects with a particular focus on her favorite genre, documentaries. Secret Menu announced it would produce a new film on the Alexander brothers, real estate moguls who have been accused of serial sexual abuse. But she's also just wrapped filming another movie for Netflix that will find her buff and taking no guff. In "Apex," Theron plays a rock climber who loses her husband (played by Eric Bana) and goes to Australia to deal with her loss. "She heads into nature to let it beat her up a bit," Theron says. "She meets a man who looks like someone who can help her, but he turns out to be a serial killer (Taron Egerton) and he hunts her through the outback wilderness." Let's just say in Hollywood's not-so-distant past, 50-year-old women were not cast doing battle with serial killers. If Theron has her way, she will be entertaining us with such gritty turns well into her Social Security years. And it seems she's got her mother, Gerda, to thank for that. "My mom is − well, we're not 100% sure how old she is, she's from a small town in South Africa and the records were written in pencil, I think − but she's maybe 74 or 72," she says with a big laugh. "I told my mom that I was looking forward to 50, and she said, 'Oh, honey, it gets so much better when you hit your 70s.' So, yeah, I feel like I got lucky with good genes. I think life's going to be OK for me from here on out." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Charlize Theron, 'Old Guard 2' star, can't wait to turn 50
