Latest news with #DeepWater
India.com
6 days ago
- Entertainment
- India.com
This 1 hour 55 minute romantic thriller will force you to bite your nails, husband kills his wife's…, has chilling climax, movie is.., lead actor is…
Every other week, OTT platforms are flooded with new series, movies, and more across different genres. While you may have heard about thrillers, rom-coms, and horror, not many people are aware of psychological thriller films. Mixed with love, suspense, and thrill, these films have the potential to hold the interest of the audience till the very end. Today, we will discuss one such film that kept the audience hooked till the last moment. The 1 hour 55 minutes film is directed by famous director Adrian Lyne and features Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas in lead roles. Let us tell you, we are talking about Deep Water. Deep Water Plot The movie revolves around two characters, Vic and Melinda, who face highs and lows in their lives. The matter goes out of hand when Melinda gets involved in an extramarital affair. The movie gets really interesting when Vic finds out about his wife's extramarital affair and still remains silent. However, what happens next leave eveyrone stunned. Vic gives a rash threat to the man with whom his wife had an extra marital affair with and tell him that how he has killed everyone who was his wife's lover, making him aware of what the consiquense could be. What happens next will leave you shocked. Will the man back off or get involved in a serious crime? This question keeps the audience hooked till the end. Where to Watch Deep Water Initially, the movie's release was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Later, the makers decided to release it on OTT platforms. Hence, Deep Water premiered on Hulu OTT on March 18, 2022. Following this, the makers also released the film on Amazon Prime Video, making it accessible to everyone.
The Age
7 days ago
- Politics
- The Age
Suburban Rail Loop will help only the few
Credit when it's due I am not a fan of President Trump, I have been known to make the comment 'America, land of opportunity where even a fool can be elected president'. He has obviously been misguided on the question of tariffs, but I believe he should be congratulated on recognising that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. The world is indebted to Trump and Israel for the action they have taken. The world is further indebted to Trump for now enabling the peace process to begin. No doubt, Trump exceeded his authority in not going to Congress to obtain approval for the B2 bombing raid on Iran's nuclear facilities, but I believe the venture would certainly have failed had he done so. I can't think of a previous president who would have been prepared to take this necessary action. We are now seeing politics in action by his opponents in belittling what he has achieved. Give him credit when it is due. On this occasion, he has been given expert advice and has followed through on it. Alan Davidson, Altona Feeling less safe Early last week, Benjamin Netanyahu claimed to have bombed Iran in order to make us 'all feel safer'. However, his actions made me, and no doubt many others, feel less safe. Now with Netanyahu having drawn Donald Trump into the 'military action', I feel significantly less safe than last week. Is it because Netanyahu's and Trump's actions were based upon 'intelligence' that is contrary to that of both the International Atomic Energy Agency's and the US State Department? Intelligence that came from the same Israeli people and agency that ignored the warnings of Israeli borders watchers of heightened activity leading up to incursion of Hamas on the October 7, 2023, resulting in the deaths of over 1200 Israelis and now perhaps 50,000 Palestinians in Gaza? Why was that intelligence ignored? Perhaps then US secretary of state, Henry Kissinger's words from the 1970s still ring true: 'There are only 90,000 people out there. Who gives a damn?' ('Deep Water', Good Weekend, 21/6). In the greater scheme of things, ordinary people don't matter to the powerful. We have long known that the first causality of war is truth, and Trump has his own concept of 'truth'. Combine this with having complete disregard for rights, agreements, rules or law, and a preparedness to exert what is basically coercive control on all in his orbit makes for a dangerous combination. At a time when we need greater global cooperation, not competition, I'd feel much safer if Trump insisted countries spent 5per cent of their budgets on addressing global warming and humanitarian aid rather than weapons of war. Trump could then show himself to be a real leader. Rod Eldridge, Derrinallum Israel didn't start conflict Emma Shortis' claim (' Australia needs to find its courage ', 25/6) that Israel 'waged war on Iran' and breached international law is simply incorrect. Israel did not start a war with Iran—rather, Iran has long waged war on Israel through its proxies, including Hamas, whose October 7 attacks were funded, armed, and likely coordinated by Iran. Twice last year, Iran directly attacked Israel with missiles and drones. Israel responded in self-defence to prevent further escalation. Iran openly calls for Israel's destruction, funds groups dedicated to that goal, and even has a countdown clock in Tehran marking Israel's supposed demise. Is that not an act of war? In this context, Israel's actions were lawful self-defence. Likewise, the US acted to protect an ally and deter a regime that repeatedly calls for 'Death to America.' How is any of that illegal—or undesirable? Stephen Lazar, Elwood ABC charter needs attention As Karl Quinn writes, the ramifications of the Antoinette Lattouf case are 'potentially profound' (' Lattouf case has cost much more than just the money ', 26/6). The outcome of the case does little to resolve whether ABC broadcasters are free to express their political views. In deciding that the ABC breached the Fair Work Act by dismissing Lattouf for holding or expressing a particular political opinion, the Federal Court casts doubt over whether the ABC can continue to claim that its broadcasters are impartial, fair and balanced. It might be time to change the ABC Charter, abandon the pretence of impartiality, and allow ABC broadcasters to express their views openly. That would be a refreshing change from the current situation in which most ABC broadcasters play at impartiality while clearly holding progressive, left-leaning worldviews. Rod Wise, Surrey Hills Keep opinion to yourselves I'm amazed and disappointed that the Federal Court has said that journalist Antoinette Lattouf could post information on her social media site that showed a view on the Israel Gaza war. According to the journalists' union the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), journalists 'Do not allow personal interest, or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit, to undermine your accuracy, fairness or independence'. The MEAA also informs that journalists 'Disclose conflicts of interest that affect, or could be seen to affect, the accuracy, fairness or independence of your journalism'. Journalists' views, such as on politics, should be private, and they should not interfere in any way in their reporting. Marguerite Marshall, Eltham $8 million in super. Really? I could hardly suppress my crocodile tears after reading the first question and answer in the latest 'Ask an expert' financial advice column (2 5/6). The questioners – a retired couple with a combined balance of $8 million in their SMSF – clearly consider the proposed new super tax to be a burden they want to avoid. Noel's answer, assuming the SMSF's earnings in 2025/26 to be $400,000, shows that the extra tax payable would amount to just over $7000. Given that the couple expect to draw from their fund a combined pension of $333,000 in the coming financial year, I suggest they won't struggle to pay this additional amount. And assuming a typical proportion of the funds are invested in shares, it's likely the extra tax would be more than offset by the tax refund associated with franking credits. Kevin Bailey, Croydon Tax helps The headline ' We have $8 million in SMSF. How do we avoid paying the new super tax? ' makes my blood boil. It encapsulates the way superannuation has been hijacked by selfish and greedy members of our society who have no concept of the greater good. If you have that much money in super, you should be appreciative of your good fortune and be happy that your tax is helping to fund services that benefit all. Ann Maginness, Beaumaris Eroding trust The exponential increase in misinformation and disinformation is not a new phenomenon, but, as mentioned in the article by Liam Mannix ″ Brett Sutton made it through a pandemic. Now he's fighting a new war ″, 25/6, has become more concerning with increasingly sophisticated AI technology. The problem has been enabled primarily through the ubiquitous electronic media, and in particular social media which propagates beliefs and opinions often expressed by those with hidden agendas or inexperienced and unqualified ″influencers″, that are often mistakenly confused with truth and verifiable facts. Consequently, trust in trained and experienced experts, including medical specialists, has been significantly eroded to the detriment of community health. Anything that can be done to reverse or mitigate this trend should be supported. I wish Brett Sutton every success in his endeavour to do this. Furthermore, education should from primary school on, emphasise the importance of deep, critical thinking and analysis, thereby empowering populations to differentiate between fact and fiction. Leslie Chester, Brighton 'Red notice' red flag I write as a concerned and angry consumer. I needed a plumber to address a toilet malfunction in my home. I selected a plumbing service from the internet that had thousands of five-star reviews. First hard learned mistake. I am an older woman at home by myself at the time of my call to them. I was quoted more than $30,000 to address the problem. I was absolutely floored by this, and told the attending plumber I would need to speak to my husband before any decision could be made. I was then transferred via phone to his supervisor and was told, effectively, that if I did not accept their quote without delay I would find myself with sewerage leaking everywhere and would be issued with a 'red notice' from the council that would order me to vacate my home. This man was so persistent that I felt bullied and threatened. I refused to succumb to his attempted coercion. I was advised by another plumber that no such work was necessary and the problem could be easily fixed and for far less an amount. I know my problem is not unique. I was stunned to learn that there is very little avenue for me to address this behaviour with an appropriate governing tradesmen's body that would result in this particular plumbing service being sanctioned. Surely, it is wrong that such scams can occur so blatantly without consequence, and that the reputation of honest tradesmen is unfairly sullied by association. Christine Harris, Mordialloc AND ANOTHER THING Trump world Trump's desire for a Nobel Peace Prize by blitz bombing Iran is a classic case of the ends justify the means – which they don't. Greg Curtin, Nunawading How long until Trump launches his own awards system? Joan Segrave, Healesville Let's hope this time Donald Trump has said something true when he says Iran's nuclear capability has been destroyed. Tony O'Brien, South Melbourne NATO secretary general Mark Rutte has given the concept of ″brownie points″ a complete new meaning. Ruth Davis, Carrum Don't upset Donald! It is plaintive to watch the NATO leaders in The Hague to kowtowing to Donald Trump to keep the alliance together. For Trump the solipsist it was all that mattered - he was the centre of attention. Helena Kilingerova, Vermont Can the world's focus please be put back on the situation in Gaza? Israel is committing murder and mayhem. Rhonda Cox, Diamond Creek Re Megan Herbert's cartoon, 26/6: It was Hamas. It did house strategic targets. There never was a negotiating table. Sam Bando, Malvern Bezos' wedding Foam party? (' Protesting locals force Bezos to move Venice wedding spectacular ', 26/6). A foam party for 50 to 60-year-olds? And here's me thinking the US president was childish Pam Cupper, Dimboola Furthermore Twice this week the majority of the sport section has been devoted to the trials and tribulations of just one AFL football club. Enough! Apart from Carlton supporters – who cares! There are 17 other AFL clubs. Brian Kidd, Mt Waverley
Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Ana de Armas Wants to Exit Anything Romantic With Tom Cruise, Says ‘Source'
Ana de Armas reportedly doesn't want to stay in anything romantic involving Tom Cruise. As reported by RadarOnline, the 'Mission: Impossible' star has allegedly been putting a lot of energy into impressing the 'Blonde' actor. However, the worldwide fame and scrutiny that come with being involved with the global star are reportedly driving Armas away. Ana de Armas allegedly does not want the same level of immense fame and spotlight as Tom Cruise. Dating rumors between the two actors have been swirling around the internet for quite some time now. However, per RadarOnline, a 'source' told them that the 'Deep Water' actor wants to 'wriggle out of' any kind of romantic involvement with the 'Top Gun' actor. The 'source' claimed, 'Ana likes Tom, and she's thrilled to do movie work with him.' The person continued, 'She doesn't want to live in the spotlight being his partner brings as she is just not interested in fame at his level.' The insider further said, 'She's already looking for the exit from anything romantic.' They added, 'But on the upside, at least it's not Tom's Scientology obsession that has killed another romance for him.' As reported by the news outlet, in a recent interview, Ana de Armas went on to open up about her opinions on fame. She said, 'You can't let the negative side of fame upset you.' The actor further explained, 'Because then you won't enjoy the beautiful aspects, but it's essential to separate.' She then emphasized, 'We're all people and we need that privacy, consideration, and space.' The actor continued, 'It seems incredible to have to say it, but we've forgotten that minimum of respect for others.' Ana de Armas stars in the upcoming movie, 'From the World of John Wick: Ballerina.' The film is all set to make its debut on June 6. The post Ana de Armas Wants to Exit Anything Romantic With Tom Cruise, Says 'Source' appeared first on Reality Tea.
Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Ana de Armas & Tom Cruise Relationship in Trouble, Claims ‘Source'
Ana de Armas reportedly doesn't want to stay in anything romantic involving Tom Cruise. As reported by RadarOnline, the 'Mission: Impossible' star has allegedly been putting a lot of energy into impressing the 'Blonde' actor. However, the worldwide fame and scrutiny that come with being involved with the global star are reportedly driving Armas away. Ana de Armas allegedly does not want the same level of immense fame and spotlight as Tom Cruise. Dating rumors between the two actors have been swirling around the internet for quite some time now. However, per RadarOnline, a 'source' told them that the 'Deep Water' actor wants to 'wriggle out of' any kind of romantic involvement with the 'Top Gun' actor. The 'source' claimed, 'Ana likes Tom, and she's thrilled to do movie work with him.' The person continued, 'She doesn't want to live in the spotlight being his partner brings as she is just not interested in fame at his level.' The insider further said, 'She's already looking for the exit from anything romantic.' They added, 'But on the upside, at least it's not Tom's Scientology obsession that has killed another romance for him.' As reported by the news outlet, in a recent interview, Ana de Armas went on to open up about her opinions on fame. She said, 'You can't let the negative side of fame upset you.' The actor further explained, 'Because then you won't enjoy the beautiful aspects, but it's essential to separate.' She then emphasized, 'We're all people and we need that privacy, consideration, and space.' The actor continued, 'It seems incredible to have to say it, but we've forgotten that minimum of respect for others.' Ana de Armas stars in the upcoming movie, 'From the World of John Wick: Ballerina.' The film is all set to make its debut on June 6. Originally reported by Nikita Nath on Reality Tea. The post Ana de Armas & Tom Cruise Relationship in Trouble, Claims 'Source' appeared first on Mandatory.
Daily Mail
12-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Daily Mail
'Annoyed' Ben Affleck goes shopping with son Samuel as pal Tom Cruise 'dates' his ex Ana de Armas
Ben Affleck keeps busy with his children amid the new romance between his ex-girlfriend Ana de Armas and his friend Tom Cruise, 62. Affleck, 52, previously dated De Armas, 37, from March 2020 to January 2021, who he met on the set of Deep Water, which was released the following year. Over the weekend, Affleck put his 'annoyance' over the new couple behind him when he was spotted on an outing with his 13-year-old son Samuel in Beverly Hills as they shopped for Mother's Day gifts for his ex-wife Jennifer Garner. Put on a happy face: Ben Affleck's spotted enjoying an outing with his son Samuel In addition to Samuel, Affleck and his ex-wife co-parent Violet, 19, and Fin, 16. It's believed that the actor expressed his 'annoyance' over the romance with Cruise. Affleck put that behind him to enjoy a shopping day and picked up juices with his son. The star was casual in a salmon-pink polo shirt paired with cream-colored pants and white high-top sneakers. At one point, he also threw on reflective aviator-style sunglasses, and Samuel also wore a similar set of shades at the Beverly Hills outdoor shopping area. A source said of Cruise and De Armas: 'Ben is a kind of [a] jealous [type], yup. 'He really liked Ana a lot and then she walked away and left him sad. So to see her happy with his friend is kind of weird for him.' Affleck's friends have also reportedly joked that the star 'should get revenge on Cruise by dating his ex-wife Katie Holmes'. The insider also revealed that Affleck's always been 'a little bit' jealous of Cruise's action film career. Sunny day: The two threw on aviator-style sunglasses The insider added: 'I think every working actor in Hollywood is jealous of Tom's success and Ben is not any different. 'But Ben is also happy for Tom. I mean, he admires that a colleague in his sixties is still going hard on the big screen. Ben hopes to be so lucky one day.' Cruise and de Armas had been romantically linked since Valentine's Day this year. Most recently, they were spotted enjoying a romantic stroll in a park in London. Garner enjoyed a visit from ex-husband Affleck on Mother's Day who headed towards her Brentwood home with what looked like a small gift. He looked relaxed in a white T-shirt printed with ANIMALS Film Crew, with jeans and sneakers. Meanwhile, Garner was seen out with their kids Fin and Sam earlier in the day. Affleck and Garner were married from 2005 to 2018. She's since been in an on-off relationship with businessman John Miller. Garner wore a green T-shirt with black leggings and sneakers as she carried snacks, and added a gray sweater and brown cap with sunglasses to her look. Fin looked relaxed in a vintage black and red Beatles T-shirt over khaki shorts and sneakers. Sam rocked a white polo shirt and tan pants with kicks.
